Search

Objective: To compare compressed sensing (CS) and the Cascades of Independently Recurrent Inference Machines (CIRIM) with respect to image quality and reconstruction times when 12-fold accelerated scans of patients with neurological deficits are reconstructed., Materials and Methods: Twelve-fold accelerated 3D T2-FLAIR images were obtained from a cohort of 62 patients with neurological deficits on 3 T MRI. Images were reconstructed offline via CS and the CIRIM. Image quality was assessed in a blinded and randomized manner by two experienced interventional neuroradiologists and one experienced pediatric neuroradiologist on imaging artifacts, perceived spatial resolution (sharpness), anatomic conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and contrast. The methods were also compared in terms of self-referenced quality metrics, image resolution, patient groups and reconstruction time. In ten scans, the contrast ratio (CR) was determined between lesions and white matter. The effect of acceleration factor was assessed in a publicly available fully sampled dataset, since ground truth data are not available in prospectively accelerated clinical scans. Specifically, 451 FLAIR scans, including scans with white matter lesions, were adopted from the FastMRI database to evaluate structural similarity (SSIM) and the CR of lesions and white matter on ranging acceleration factors from four-fold up to 12-fold., Results: Interventional neuroradiologists significantly preferred the CIRIM for imaging artifacts, anatomic conspicuity, and contrast. One rater significantly preferred the CIRIM in terms of sharpness and diagnostic confidence. The pediatric neuroradiologist preferred CS for imaging artifacts and sharpness. Compared to CS, the CIRIM reconstructions significantly improved in terms of imaging artifacts and anatomic conspicuity (p < 0.01) for higher resolution scans while yielding a 28% higher SNR (p = 0.001) and a 5.8% lower CR (p = 0.04). There were no differences between patient groups. Additionally, CIRIM was five times faster than CS was. An increasing acceleration factor did not lead to changes in CR (p = 0.92), but led to lower SSIM (p = 0.002)., Discussion: Patients with neurological deficits can undergo MRI at a range of moderate to high acceleration. DL reconstruction outperforms CS in terms of image resolution, efficient denoising with a modest reduction in contrast and reduced reconstruction times., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) along the acquisition and processing chain. Advanced AI frameworks have been applied in various successive tasks, such as image reconstruction, quantitative parameter map estimation, and image segmentation. However, existing frameworks are often designed to perform tasks independently of each other or are focused on specific models or single datasets, limiting generalization. This work introduces the Advanced Toolbox for Multitask Medical Imaging Consistency (ATOMMIC), a novel open-source toolbox that streamlines AI applications for accelerated MRI reconstruction and analysis. ATOMMIC implements several tasks using deep learning (DL) models and enables MultiTask Learning (MTL) to perform related tasks in an integrated manner, targeting generalization in the MRI domain., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review and analyzed 12,479 GitHub repositories to assess the current landscape of AI frameworks for MRI. Subsequently, we demonstrate how ATOMMIC standardizes workflows and improves data interoperability, enabling effective benchmarking of various DL models across MRI tasks and datasets. To showcase ATOMMIC's capabilities, we evaluated twenty-five DL models on eight publicly available datasets, focusing on accelerated MRI reconstruction, segmentation, quantitative parameter map estimation, and joint accelerated MRI reconstruction and segmentation using MTL., Results: ATOMMIC's high-performance training and testing capabilities, utilizing multiple GPUs and mixed precision support, enable efficient benchmarking of multiple models across various tasks. The framework's modular architecture implements each task through a collection of data loaders, models, loss functions, evaluation metrics, and pre-processing transformations, facilitating seamless integration of new tasks, datasets, and models. Our findings demonstrate that ATOMMIC supports MTL for multiple MRI tasks with harmonized complex-valued and real-valued data support while maintaining active development and documentation. Task-specific evaluations demonstrate that physics-based models outperform other approaches in reconstructing highly accelerated acquisitions. These high-quality reconstruction models also show superior accuracy in estimating quantitative parameter maps. Furthermore, when combining high-performing reconstruction models with robust segmentation networks through MTL, performance is improved in both tasks., Conclusions: ATOMMIC advances MRI reconstruction and analysis by leveraging MTL and ensuring consistency across tasks, models, and datasets. This comprehensive framework serves as a versatile platform for researchers to use existing AI methods and develop new approaches in medical imaging., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Quantitative MRI (qMRI) acquired at the ultra-high field of 7 Tesla has been used in visualizing and analyzing subcortical structures. qMRI relies on the acquisition of multiple images with different scan settings, leading to extended scanning times. Data redundancy and prior information from the relaxometry model can be exploited by deep learning to accelerate the imaging process. We propose the quantitative Recurrent Inference Machine (qRIM), with a unified forward model for joint reconstruction and R 2 * -mapping from sparse data, embedded in a Recurrent Inference Machine (RIM), an iterative inverse problem-solving network. To study the dependency of the proposed extension of the unified forward model to network architecture, we implemented and compared a quantitative End-to-End Variational Network (qE2EVN). Experiments were performed with high-resolution multi-echo gradient echo data of the brain at 7T of a cohort study covering the entire adult life span. The error in reconstructed R 2 * from undersampled data relative to reference data significantly decreased for the unified model compared to sequential image reconstruction and parameter fitting using the RIM. With increasing acceleration factor, an increasing reduction in the reconstruction error was observed, pointing to a larger benefit for sparser data. Qualitatively, this was following an observed reduction of image blurriness in R 2 * -maps. In contrast, when using the U-Net as network architecture, a negative bias in R 2 * in selected regions of interest was observed. Compressed Sensing rendered accurate, but less precise estimates of R 2 * . The qE2EVN showed slightly inferior reconstruction quality compared to the qRIM but better quality than the U-Net and Compressed Sensing. Subcortical maturation over age measured by a linearly increasing interquartile range of R 2 * in the striatum was preserved up to an acceleration factor of 9. With the integrated prior of the unified forward model, the proposed qRIM can exploit the redundancy among repeated measurements and shared information between tasks, facilitating relaxometry in accelerated MRI., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest M.W.A. Caan is shareholder of Nico-lab International Ltd., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Deep-learning-based brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction methods have the potential to accelerate the MRI acquisition process. Nevertheless, the scientific community lacks appropriate benchmarks to assess the MRI reconstruction quality of high-resolution brain images, and evaluate how these proposed algorithms will behave in the presence of small, but expected data distribution shifts. The multi-coil MRI (MC-MRI) reconstruction challenge provides a benchmark that aims at addressing these issues, using a large dataset of high-resolution, three-dimensional, T1-weighted MRI scans. The challenge has two primary goals: (1) to compare different MRI reconstruction models on this dataset and (2) to assess the generalizability of these models to data acquired with a different number of receiver coils. In this paper, we describe the challenge experimental design and summarize the results of a set of baseline and state-of-the-art brain MRI reconstruction models. We provide relevant comparative information on the current MRI reconstruction state-of-the-art and highlight the challenges of obtaining generalizable models that are required prior to broader clinical adoption. The MC-MRI benchmark data, evaluation code, and current challenge leaderboard are publicly available. They provide an objective performance assessment for future developments in the field of brain MRI reconstruction., Competing Interests: MC is a shareholder of Nico.lab International Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Beauferris, Teuwen, Karkalousos, Moriakov, Caan, Yiasemis, Rodrigues, Lopes, Pedrini, Rittner, Dannecker, Studenyak, Gröger, Vyas, Faghih-Roohi, Kumar Jethi, Chandra Raju, Sivaprakasam, Lasby, Nogovitsyn, Loos, Frayne and Souza.)

Accelerating MRI scans is one of the principal outstanding problems in the MRI research community. Towards this goal, we hosted the second fastMRI competition targeted towards reconstructing MR images with subsampled k-space data. We provided participants with data from 7,299 clinical brain scans (de-identified via a HIPAA-compliant procedure by NYU Langone Health), holding back the fully-sampled data from 894 of these scans for challenge evaluation purposes. In contrast to the 2019 challenge, we focused our radiologist evaluations on pathological assessment in brain images. We also debuted a new Transfer track that required participants to submit models evaluated on MRI scanners from outside the training set. We received 19 submissions from eight different groups. Results showed one team scoring best in both SSIM scores and qualitative radiologist evaluations. We also performed analysis on alternative metrics to mitigate the effects of background noise and collected feedback from the participants to inform future challenges. Lastly, we identify common failure modes across the submissions, highlighting areas of need for future research in the MRI reconstruction community.