Search

After the European Union ban of antibiotic growth promoters, works on different methods of improving gut health have intensified. The poultry industry is struggling with problems that were previously controlled by antibiotic growth promoters, therefore the search for optimal solutions continues. Simultaneously, there is also increasing social pressure to minimize the use of antibiotics and replace them with alternative feed additives. A variety of available alternatives is considered safe by consumers, among which phytogenics play a significant role. However, there are still some limitations that need to be considered. The most questionable are the issues related to bioavailability, metabolism of plant derivatives in birds, and the difficulty of standardizing commercial products. There is still a need for more evidence-based recommendations for the use of phytogenics in livestock. On the other hand, a positive influence of phytogenic compounds on the health of poultry has been previously described by many researchers and practical application of these compounds has auspicious perspectives in poultry production. Supplementation with phytogenic feed additives has been shown to protect birds from various environmental threats leading to impaired intestinal barrier function. Phytogenic feed additives have the potential to improve the overall structure of intestinal mucosa as well as gut barrier function on a molecular level. Recognition of the phytogenicsʼ effect on the components of the intestinal barrier may enable the selection of the most suitable ones to alleviate negative effects of different agents. This review aims to summarize current knowledge of the influence of various phytogenic constituents on the intestinal barrier and health of poultry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Polyphenol quercetin induced apoptosis in proliferating murine L1210 lymphocytic cells. DNA damage, as well as apoptosis and withdrawal from the cell cycle were transient. The above mentioned death promoting activity of quercetin was enhanced by physiological concentrations of TNF-$\alpha$. At the same time, indices of cell viability dropped. However, the extent and tendency of the initially enhanced cell mortality steadily diminished throughout the experiment. After 12 h the G2/M phase reappeared. After 24 h all indices almost returned to control levels indicating either the selection of subpopulation of unaffected leukaemic cells or cells developing resistance to the treatment. A DNA ladder of oligonucleosomes was observed for apoptogenic treatments. We conclude that quercetin unmasked cell death, promoting the activity of TNF-$\alpha$. However, after 12 and 24 h of exposure, surviving cells could complete the cell cycle and finally recover. At the same time, increased NF-$\kappa$B activation was demonstrated by immunoblotting of the immunoreactive RelA/p65 subunit in nuclear extracts. Exposure to TNF-$\alpha$ or quercetin was crucial for increased activity of NF-$\kappa$B, which may implicate an increasing resistance to their cytotoxicity.