Search

Allgemeinmedizin zeichnet sich als generalistische medizinische Disziplin auch durch seinen holistischen Zugang aus. In den letzten Jahren ist der Begriff Coaching ein vielfaltig verwendeter und zunehmend prasenter, der zunehmend auch im Gesundheitsbereich verwendet wird. Ziel des Beitrags war es, der Frage nachzugehen, wie Coaching aus der Perspektive der Allgemeinmedizin zu definieren ist und welche Konsequenzen daraus fur die Versorgung abzuleiten sind. Es wurde ein systematisches Review mit den Schlusselwortern „coaching“, „health coaching“, „resilience coaching“, „primary care“, „family medicine“ and „family physician“ in PubMed, Web of Science und EMBASE sowie eine Handrecherche durchgefuhrt. Insgesamt wurden 2370 Publikationen gesichtet, von denen drei zur Beantwortung der Fragestellung herangezogen werden konnten. Eine einheitliche Definition zu Coaching existiert nicht. Ublicherweise wird damit ein klientenbezogener Prozess bezeichnet, der darauf abzielt, vom Klienten definierte Ziele zu erreichen. Coaching soll dazu befahigen, sich aktiver fur die Verbesserung der eigenen Gesundheit einzusetzen. Hierzu wird eine Vielzahl von Methoden verwendet, die teilweise bereits von Allgemeinarzten verwendet werden. Ohne es so zu benennen werden Coaching Methoden in der Allgemeinmedizin schon angewendet. Es gibt Hinweise darauf, dass es weitere Methoden gibt, die erfolgreich in der hausarztlichen Patientenversorgung eingesetzt werden konnen. Eine weitere wissenschaftliche Evaluation dieser Methoden erscheint vielversprechend.

Introduction. Equity in health is an essential issue and it would appear that it is not guaranteed for all human beings, especially refugee groups. The aim of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore the experiences of refugees, health care professionals, and administrators of refugee health care in a host country. Methods. The study used qualitative methods which consisted of a convenience sample of stakeholders directly and indirectly involved in care for refugees and refugees themselves. The study participants were located in a rural area in the federal state of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with 25 participants. A semistructured interview guideline was used for the focus groups and interviews. The data were evaluated using qualitative content analysis. Results. Four main categories were identified which are important for equity in health care: legal aspects, sociocultural aspects, environmental aspects, and communication aspects. Legal frameworks and language barriers were perceived as strong barriers for accessing health care. Conclusions. The findings suggest that the host countries should address the specific needs of this population group at a systemic and individual level. Based on the views of the participants interviewed it can be concluded that the refugee population group is particularly affected by limited access to health care services. Bureaucratic barriers, unfamiliarity with a new health system, and language issues all contribute to limiting access to health care services.

Katja Goetz,* Karolin Hahn,* Jost Steinhäuser Institute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany *These authors contributed equally to this work Background: The evaluation of quality of primary health care from the perspective of refugees is very underdeveloped. It depends mainly on the availability of instruments in the language of the refugees. The aim of this study was to translate, culturally adapt, and examine the psychometric properties especially the internal consistency and convergent construct validity of the Arabic version of the European Project on Patient Evaluation of General Practice Care (EUROPEP) questionnaire. Methods: The German version of the EUROPEP questionnaire was translated into Arabic language. In total, 619 Arabic-speaking people were invited to participate in this study. Refugees who lived in collective living quarters in the German federal state of Schleswig-Holstein were recruited. The EUROPEP questionnaire is a multidimensional instrument that comprises 23 items, each with a 5-point Likert-type response. Cronbach’s alpha, descriptive statistics, and principal component analysis were used to assess a part of psychometric properties. Convergent construct validity was assessed with the validated questionnaire on satisfaction with ambulatory care – quality from the patient perspective (ZAP questionnaire) by using Spearman rank-order correlation test. Results: A total of 136 questionnaires of refugees were returned (response rate 22%). Of these respondents, 95 participants who had visited a general practitioner were included in the validation study. The exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors, namely, “medical care,” “physician–patient relationship,” “coordination of care,” and “accessibility to care.” The internal consistency ranged between α=0.942 for “medical care” and α=0.869 for “coordination of care.” The convergent construct validity is supported by a significant positive correlation between the overall score of the EUROPEP questionnaire and the overall score of the ZAP questionnaire (rrho=0.820; p

BACKGROUND: Job satisfaction of physicians is an important issue for performance of a health care system. The aim of the study was to evaluate the job satisfaction of primary care physicians in Switzerland and to explore associations between overall job satisfaction, individual characteristics and satisfaction with aspects of work within the practice separated by gender. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was based on a job satisfaction survey. Data were collected from 176 primary care physicians working in 91 primary care practices. Job satisfaction was measured with the 10-item Warr-Cook-Wall job satisfaction scale. Stepwise linear regression analysis was performed for physicians separated by gender. RESULTS: The response rate was 92.6%. Primary care physicians reported the highest level of satisfaction with 'freedom of working method' (mean = 6.45) and the lowest satisfaction for 'hours of work' (mean = 5.38) and 'income' (mean = 5.49). Moreover, some aspects of job satisfaction were rated higher by female physicians than male physicians. Within the stepwise regression analysis, the aspect 'opportunity to use abilities' (β = 0.644) showed the highest association to overall job satisfaction for male physicians while for female physicians it was income (β = 0.733). CONCLUSIONS: The presented results contribute to an understanding of factors that influence levels of satisfaction of female and male physicians. Therefore, research and intervention about job satisfaction should consider gender as well as the stereotypes that come along with these social roles.

Objectives The purpose of the study was to assess the level of job satisfaction of dental nurses in ambulatory care and to explore the impact of aspects of working atmosphere on and their association with job satisfaction. Methods This cross-sectional study was based on a job satisfaction survey. Data were collected from 612 dental nurses working in 106 dental care practices. Job satisfaction was measured with the 10-item Warr–Cook–Wall job satisfaction scale. Working atmosphere was measured with five items. Linear regression analyses were performed in which each item of the job satisfaction scale was handled as dependent variables. A stepwise linear regression analysis was performed with overall job satisfaction and the five items of working atmosphere, job satisfaction, and individual characteristics. Results The response rate was 88.3%. Dental nurses were satisfied with ‘colleagues’ and least satisfied with ‘income.’ Different aspects of job satisfaction were mostly associated with the following working atmosphere issues: ‘responsibilities within the practice team are clear,’ ‘suggestions for improvement are taken seriously,’ ‘working atmosphere in the practice team is good,’ and ‘made easier to admit own mistakes.’ Within the stepwise linear regression analysis, the aspect ‘physical working condition’ (β = 0.304) showed the highest association with overall job satisfaction. The total explained variance of the 14 associated variables was 0.722 with overall job satisfaction. Conclusions Working atmosphere within this discrete sample of dental care practice seemed to be an important influence on reported working condition and job satisfaction for dental nurses. Because of the high association of job satisfaction with physical working condition, the importance of paying more attention to an ergonomic working position for dental nurses to ensure optimal quality of care is highlighted.