Search

Your search keyword '"Kasberg, Azize"' showing total 12 results
Start Over Author "Kasberg, Azize"
12 results on '"Kasberg, Azize"'

5. PartNet-Dikussionspapier: Beteiligte an Partizipativer Gesundheitsforschung

Author

Wahl, Anna, Kasberg, Azize, Netzelmann, Tzvetina Arsova, Kr��mer, Ute, and Berlin, Alice Salomon Hochschule

Abstract

Das PartNet-Diskussionspapier: Beteiligte an Partizipativer Gesundheitsforschung (PGF) hat das Ziel einer eindeutigeren Bezeichnung und Darstellung von Beteiligten in der PGF und entstand im Rahmen eines breiten Diskussionsprozesses im PartNet. Am 20.09.2019 begann innerhalb von PartNet eine kritisch-konstruktive Auseinandersetzung unter dem Motto: ���Praxispartner*innen - Konkretisierung eines ���naiven��� Begriffs���. Die Ergebnisse wurden dokumentiert und im Zuge von weiteren Workshops sowie R��ckmeldungs��schleifen innerhalb von PartNet zu diesem Diskussionspapier weiterentwickelt. Im Diskussionspapier werden ���Beteiligte��� in der PGF genauer bestimmt. F��r die Konkretisierung verschiedener ���Beteiligter��� werden Begriffe (Wissenschaftler:innen, Fachkr��fte, Expert:innen aus Erfahrung) angeboten, definiert, anhand eines grafischen Modells zueinander in Beziehung gesetzt, durch Projektbeispiele verdeutlicht und damit zur Diskussion gestellt. Am Ende des Papieres finden sich Begriffe, die im Laufe des Prozesses diskutiert wurden, aber aus bestimmten Gr��nden nicht f��r die weitere Verwendung im Kontext PGF empfohlen werden. Das Wording in deutscher Sprache kann f��r Publikationen oder der Definition von Beteiligtengruppen im Rahmen von Projekten genutzt werden. Die Begriffsbestimmungen und Visualisierungen stellen ein Angebot f��r eine kompakte Projektdarstellung dar. Dar��ber hinaus soll es die Reflexion von Beziehungen und Machtverh��ltnissen der Beteiligten in partizipativen Projekten unterst��tzen. Erste R��ckmeldungen zur Nutzung des Diskussionspapier zeigten, dass das Diskussionspapier die passende Bezeichnung von Beteiligten in Forschungsprojekten unterst��tzte oder als konzeptuelle Grundlage f��r die inhaltliche Rahmensetzung eines Diskussionsformates herangezogen wurde. Der Austausch zum Diskussionspapier wird weitergef��hrt., The PartNet Discussion Paper: Participants in Participatory Health Research (PHR) aims to provide a clearer and precise definition and illustration of the various groups involved in PHR and has been developed in the frame of a broad discussion process in the Network for Participatory Health Research (PartNet). On 20.09.2019 a critical-constructive debate was set off within PartNet under the motto: ���Practice partners ��� towards a concretisation of a ���na��ve��� notion.��� The results were documented, developed further during several workshops and iterative feedback loops and was systematised in the current discussion paper. The discussion paper specifies more precisely the term ���participants��� in PHR. Undertaking an attempt for a more accurate and clear definition the paper outlines terms for main participants in PHR (scientists, professionals from practice and experts from experience), determines and showcases their mutual relations through visual models, provides project-based examples and puts these up for discussion. Terms that have been intensively discussed in the definition���s development process, but for certain reasons are not recommended for further use in PHR context are described in the last section of the paper. The suggested German wording can be used in publications or definitions of participants��� groups in the frame of participatory projects. The definitions and visualisations can be understood as an offer for a compact presentation of a project and all involved groups in PHR. Furthermore, it can support the reflection on relations and power distribution among the participants in participatory projects. Initial feedbacks from users of the discussion paper confirmed that it was helpful when defining the various groups of participants in research projects with suitable terms. Once the paper was also applied as a conceptual framework when planning and conducting a workshop on various groups in participatory research projects. The debate on the discussion paper will be continued., PartNet Perspektiven. Beitr��ge zur partizipativen Forschung; 1

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. Das Ende der Sonderwelten - ab morgen alle inklusiv!?

Author

KASBERG, AZIZE and KÖSER, PETRA

Abstract

Copyright of Ergotherapie & Rehabilitation is the property of Schulz-Kirchner Verlag Gmbh and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Published
2014

11. [Categorizing methods used in participatory research].

Author

Kasberg A, Müller P, Markert C, and Bär G

Subjects
Data Collection, Germany, Community-Based Participatory Research, Research Design
Abstract

Background: Participatory research methods are gaining interest. In applying these methods, there is often a lack of consideration for methodological issues. Furthermore, a unifying system for categorizing the various approaches does not exist., Objectives: Based on a scoping review, a categorization of participatory research methods to promote health equity was undertaken., Material and Methods: Included in the review are 44 publications in German and English retrieved from various databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, SocIndex, Livivo, Cochrane, Fachportal Pädagogik). Additional publications were identified by hand searching and using the snowball method., Results: The methods are categorized by research phase and type of format used. The principles of multidimensionality and phase integration are central to the proposed system of categorization, resulting in a primary distinction between the methods used to facilitate the participatory research process versus methods used for participatory data collection and analysis. The majority of methods identified are used for data collection or reflexive processes. There are gaps in the German literature regarding methods for cooperative decision making, participatory data analysis, and the application of research results., Conclusion: The classification system provides an overview of available methods and the degree of participation they promote. The system draws attention to the spectrum of methods available, being useful for both teaching and research purposes.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. [Participatory research in Germany - quo vadis?]

Author

von Peter S, Bär G, Behrisch B, Bethmann A, Hartung S, Kasberg A, Wulff I, and Wright M

Subjects
Germany, Community-Based Participatory Research
Abstract

Goal: Participatory Health Research (PHR) approaches are becoming more common in Germany. In this paper, appropriate support strategies for the funding and implementation of PHR projects in Germany are described., Method: Nine strategies are discussed, based on the research experience of the German Network for Participatory Health Research (PartNet) and other international networks., Results: In order to foster PHR in Germany, 1) funds have to be available for those participating in the research process, and 2) for the participatory processes themselves; 3) the requirement to promote participation should be incorporated routinely in tender notices, as well as 4) in special funding programs as a funding requirement; 5) participation in research projects should be part of a formative evaluation; 6) methodology development in this field needs specific funding; 7) review processes for research bids need to be adapted to take into account the specifics of PHR; 8) coordination needs to be established across participatory research projects; 9) and successful models and examples of participation in research should be disseminated., Conclusion: It is necessary to adapt research funding programs in Germany to the specific requirements of PHR so as to promote meaningful participation on the part of non-academic partners and to avoid tokenism., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results