Search

Objectives:Worldwide, there has been renewed emphasis on reducing neonatal mortality in low-resource countries. The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) programme has been shown to reduce newborn deaths. The aim of this study is to present provider-level perceptions and experiences of the HBB programme implemented at-scale in Tanzania and identify key lessons learned for scalability in similar and other settings. Methods:Focus group discussions with HBB-trained providers were conducted using a prospective longitudinal study design between October 2013 and May 2015. A semi-structured discussion guide was used to facilitate the focus groups which were held 4–6 weeks and 4–6 months post-HBB training. Data were managed using NVivo software and analysed thematically. Results:A total of 222 focus group discussions were conducted in 252 trained facilities and involved 599 providers across 15 regions of Tanzania. Birth attendants reported that the training programme helped increase knowledge, skills and confidence, and that the provided equipment simplified resuscitation. Supportive supervision and regular follow-up visits were considered critical for skills retention. On the other hand, the brief 1-day training in Tanzania, small financal incentives, intra-facility rotations of trained attendants, staff shortages, limited rescucitation spaces and mastery of the bag-and-mask were considered challenges to the HBB programme in Tanzania. Discussion:The HBB programme was largely very well received during its first at-scale implementation in Tanzania. Addressing the main challenges cited by participants, particularly the training duration, may increase provider satisfaction with the HBB training programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To validate a novel objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) tool for assessing neonatal care skills among delivery attendants trained as part of the Essential Care for Every Baby (ECEB) program and to assess ECEB training effectiveness.Methods: Between August 1 and September 30, 2015, a cross-sectional study enrolled ECEB-trained healthcare providers who attended deliveries from the Brong Ahafo and Eastern regions of Ghana. Participants completed a previously developed 21-item OSCE tool that assessed neonatal-care competency. Participant performance was scored independently by regional trainers and national master trainers. The inter-rater scoring reliability was assessed using the Cohen kappa coefficient and performance was compared across participant characteristics.Results: The study enrolled 57 trained delivery attendants from 12 district hospitals. Inter-rater agreement was perfect (kappa 1.00) or almost perfect (kappa 0.81-0.99) for nine OSCE items, substantial (kappa 0.61-0.80) or moderate (kappa 0.41-0.60) for 11 items, and fair (kappa 0.21-0.40) for one item. Differences in OSCE-item performance were recorded based on participants' regions, facility type, age, and education level (P<0.05).Conclusions: In a resource-limited setting, the OSCE tool demonstrated substantial reliability and ECEB-trained healthcare practitioners exhibited satisfactory performance. The OSCE tool could be useful in similar settings and could have potential for up-scaled use in assessing neonatal-management skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]