Search

Patients with hematologic malignancies are at increased risk of influenza and its complications. Despite current health recommendations and evidence favoring influenza vaccination, vaccination rates remain low in cancer patients.The purpose of this study was to determine which factors influenced vaccination rates.During the 2009-2010 pandemic H1N1 and seasonal influenza season, we surveyed patients with hematologic malignancies in a Canadian cancer center. Of the patients participating in our study (n = 129), 66% and 57% received the H1N1 pandemic influenza and seasonal influenza vaccines, respectively.A number of reasons for vaccination refusal were reported, most relating to general skepticism about the safety and efficacy of vaccination. Physician advice was also a factor influencing vaccination rates in patients. The vaccination rate for seasonal influenza was 39% in patients65 years old, significantly lower than the rate of 73% reported for patients agedor = 65 years (P0.0001).Future education programs should target younger patient populations and health-care workers, focusing on vaccine safety and efficacy in the high-risk cancer population.

Patients with hematological malignancies are at increased risk of influenza and its complications, but evidence for the efficacy of influenza vaccination in this population is limited. We sought to determine whether patients being treated for hematological malignancies were able to mount protective antibodies to the H1N1 influenza vaccine. Pre- and post-vaccination plasma samples were collected from patients with hematological malignancies during the 2009-2010 influenza season. Seroconversion was defined as a four-fold increase in antibody titer, as measured by the hemagglutinin inhibition test. Sixty-two patients received the H1N1 vaccine and 41 patients were unvaccinated controls. The rate of seroconversion among vaccinated patients was 21%, which was significantly higher than that in unvaccinated patients (0%), but significantly lower than that previously reported for healthy adults. Physicians should be aware that influenza vaccination may not generate an immune response in patients with hematological malignancies. Larger studies are required to confirm these results.

Although patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated with adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy frequently develop neutropenia, febrile neutropenia is uncommon. Three retrospective trials reported that ABVD could be safely administered without dose delays or granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 89 patients treated with ABVD and found that the incidence of febrile neutropenia was 0.5% (five of 927 treatments). This prompted a change to our institutional policy so that patients receiving ABVD no longer receive routine G-CSF for uncomplicated neutropenia. We then prospectively assessed the safety of this policy change. Thirty-three patients received a total of 327 ABVD treatments, 185 (57%) of which were administered with a neutrophil count

Summary. Background: Polymorphisms in the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genes influence warfarin requirements. It has been suggested that dosing algorithms incorporating them might outperform usual care. Standardized warfarin initiation nomograms are safe and effective and patients’ responses to them could be used to predict warfarin requirements without the need for genetic testing. Objectives: To develop a model to predict warfarin dose requirements based on the response to a standard nomogram without using genetic testing. Patients/methods: We included 363 outpatients with acute venous thromboembolism who were started on treatment using a standardized warfarin nomogram and achieved a stable maintenance warfarin dose defined as a dose prescribed twice consecutively after two consecutive INR measurements between 2.0 and 3.0. Linear regression was used to derive equations predicting the maintenance dose and models were validated using non-parametric bootstrapping and tested in an independent cohort. Results: Three models were constructed for patients completing the nomogram until day 3 (warfarin dose (mg week−1) = Exp [2.737 + 1.896(INR3−1)−0.008(Age)]; R2adj = 0.462), day 5 (warfarin dose (mg week−1) = Exp[2.261 + 2.412(INR3−1) −0.285(ΔINR5−3)]; R2adj = 0.603) and day 8 (warfarin dose (mg week−1) = Exp[1.574 + 1.788(INR8−1) + 0.024(cumulated warfarin dose until nomogram day 7)]; R2adj = 0.643), where Exp is the exponential function; INR3 and INR8 are the INR on days 3 or 8 of the nomogram, and ΔINR5−3 is the difference in the INR on days 5 and 3. All models were internally and externally validated and were accurate to within 25% of the actual dose in >60% of patients. Conclusion: Maintenance warfarin dose can be accurately predicted using individual response to a standard warfarin initiation nomogram without the need for costly genetic testing.

The optimal means of initiating warfarin therapy for acute venous thromboembolism in the outpatient setting remains controversial. We have previously demonstrated the efficacy of a 10 mg initiation nomogram in a randomized controlled trial; however, some clinicians remain reluctant to use this nomogram due to a fear of potential increased bleeding. To review the safety and efficacy of a 10 mg warfarin nomogram we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients prospectively treated for venous thromboembolism according to a 10 mg nomogram in an outpatient thrombosis clinic. All patients received standard treatment with low molecular weight heparin for 5 to 7 days and warfarin for at least 3 months. Four-hundred and fourteen patients were included in the analysis, of whom 295 (71%) fully adhered to the nomogram. In the whole cohort, 8 patients (1.9%) experienced recurrent thrombosis, 4 (0.97%) suffered a major bleeding event, and 3 (0.72%) suffered a minor bleeding event. There were no deaths related to thrombosis or bleeding. Four patients (0.97%) died from unrelated causes. Twenty-two (5.3%) patients experienced an INR ≥ 5.0 in the first 8 days of therapy, and none of these patients experienced a bleeding event. Eighty-four percent of patients achieved a therapeutic INR by day 5. In outpatients, a 10 mg nomogram results in timely achievement of a therapeutic INR with an acceptable incidence of bleeding and recurrent thromboembolism.