Search

Background: Despite the immunogenic nature of many ovarian tumors, treatment with immune checkpoint therapies has not led to substantial improvements in ovarian cancer survival. To advance population-level research on the ovarian tumor immune microenvironment, it is critical to understand methodologic issues related to measurement of immune cells on tissue microarrays (TMA) using multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) assays. Methods: In two prospective cohorts, we collected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovarian tumors from 486 cases and created seven TMAs. We measured T cells, including several sub-populations, and immune checkpoint markers on the TMAs using two mIF panels. We used Spearman correlations, Fisher exact tests, and multivariable-adjusted beta-binomial models to evaluate factors related to immune cell measurements in TMA tumor cores. Results: Between-core correlations of intratumoral immune markers ranged from 0.52 to 0.72, with more common markers (e.g., CD3+, CD3+CD8+) having higher correlations. Correlations of immune cell markers between the whole core, tumor area, and stromal area were high (range 0.69–0.97). In multivariable-adjusted models, odds of T-cell positivity were lower in clear cell and mucinous versus type II tumors (ORs, 0.13–0.48) and, for several sub-populations, were lower in older tissue (sample age > 30 versus ≤ 10 years; OR, 0.11–0.32). Conclusions: Overall, high correlations between cores for immune markers measured via mIF support the use of TMAs in studying ovarian tumor immune infiltration, although very old samples may have reduced antigenicity. Impact: Future epidemiologic studies should evaluate differences in the tumor immune response by histotype and identify modifiable factors that may alter the tumor immune microenvironment.

BACKGROUND: Cyclin E1 (CCNE1) is a potential predictive marker and therapeutic target in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Smaller studies have revealed unfavorable associations for CCNE1 amplification and CCNE1 overexpression with survival, but to date no large-scale, histotype-specific validation has been performed. The hypothesis was that high-level amplification of CCNE1 and CCNE1 overexpression, as well as a combination of the two, are linked to shorter overall survival in HGSC. METHODS: Within the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium, amplification status and protein level in 3029 HGSC cases and mRNA expression in 2419 samples were investigated. RESULTS: High-level amplification (>8 copies by chromogenic in situ hybridization) was found in 8.6% of HGSC and overexpression (>60% with at least 5% demonstrating strong intensity by immunohistochemistry) was found in 22.4%. CCNE1 high-level amplification and overexpression both were linked to shorter overall survival in multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and stage, with hazard stratification by study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47, p = .034, and HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32, p = .015, respectively). This was also true for cases with combined high-level amplification/overexpression (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47, p = .033). CCNE1 mRNA expression was not associated with overall survival (HR, 1.00 per 1-SD increase; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06; p = .58). CCNE1 high-level amplification is mutually exclusive with the presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and shows an inverse association to RB1 loss. CONCLUSION: This study provides large-scale validation that CCNE1 high-level amplification is associated with shorter survival, supporting its utility as a prognostic biomarker in HGSC. ispartof: CANCER vol:129 issue:5 pages:697-713 ispartof: location:United States status: published

The presence of macroscopic residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) is an important factor influencing survival for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). More research is needed to identify factors associated with having macroscopic residual disease. We analyzed 12 lifestyle and personal exposures known to be related to ovarian cancer risk or inflammation to identify those associated with having residual disease after surgery.This analysis used data on 2054 patients with advanced stage HGSC from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The exposures were body mass index, breastfeeding, oral contraceptive use, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use, endometriosis, first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, incomplete pregnancy, menopausal hormone therapy use, menopausal status, parity, smoking, and tubal ligation. Logistic regression models were fit to assess the association between these exposures and having residual disease following PCS.Menopausal estrogen-only therapy (ET) use was associated with 33% lower odds of having macroscopic residual disease compared to never use (OR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.46-0.97, p = 0.033). Compared to nulliparous women, parous women who did not breastfeed had 36% lower odds of having residual disease (OR = 0.64, 95%CI 0.43-0.94, p = 0.022), while there was no association among parous women who breastfed (OR = 0.90, 95%CI 0.65-1.25, p = 0.53).The association between ET and having no macroscopic residual disease is plausible given a strong underlying biologic hypothesis between this exposure and diagnosis with HGSC. If this or the parity finding is replicated, these factors could be included in risk stratification models to determine whether HGSC patients should receive PCS or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Few studies have assessed the association between endogenous steroid hormone levels and a subsequent diagnosis of endometriosis. We prospectively evaluated premenopausal plasma sex hormone levels and the risk of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis in a nested case-control study within Nurses’ Health Study II. Between blood collection (1996–1999) and 2009, we ascertained 446 women with incident endometriosis and matched them to 878 controls through risk-set sampling. We conducted multivariable conditional logistic regression accounting for matching and confounders to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Women with greater early follicular-phase total or free estradiol levels had a nonlinear increased risk of endometriosis (early follicular total estradiol: second quartile vs. first, RR = 2.23 (95% CI: 1.44, 3.47); third quartile, RR = 1.83 (95% CI: 1.16, 2.88); fourth quartile, RR = 1.68 (95% CI: 1.05, 2.68); early follicular free estradiol: second quartile vs. first, RR = 1.63 (95% CI: 1.05, 2.54); third quartile, RR = 2.02 (95% CI: 1.31, 3.12); fourth quartile, RR = 1.04 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.65)). Free testosterone assessed in quartile categories was not associated with endometriosis, although a threshold effect was observed, with a positive association among women in the top 2% of free testosterone levels. Levels of mid–luteal-phase total and free estradiol, follicular and luteal estrone, total testosterone, progesterone, and sex hormone binding globulin were not associated with endometriosis risk. These results support the role of sex steroids in endometriosis etiology, although the relationships suggest complex threshold effects.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of endometriosis is not well understood. Limited evidence suggests that dietary factors influence risk, but prospective data related to carbohydrate, fiber, and gluten consumption are scarce. Despite this, recommendations concerning fiber, gluten intake, and endometriosis are pervasive in the lay literature. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the associations of carbohydrate quality [glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL)], fiber intake (total, legume, vegetable, cruciferous vegetable, fruit, cereal), and gluten intake with incident laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study using data collected from 81,961 premenopausal women in the Nurses’ Health Study II (mean age = 36 y in 1991). Diet was assessed with a validated FFQ every 4 y. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 3810 incident cases of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis were reported over 24 y of follow-up. Women in the highest quintile of GI had 12% (95% CI: 1.01, 1.23; P(trend) = 0.03) higher risk of endometriosis diagnosis than those in the lowest quintile. Total vegetable and cruciferous vegetable fiber intakes were also associated with higher risk (highest compared with lowest quintile RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.24; P(trend) = 0.004 and RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.29; P(trend) = 0.02, respectively). Higher intake of fruit fiber was associated with lower risk of endometriosis but the association was not significant after adjusting for the Alternative Healthy Eating Index. Gluten intake was also associated with lower risk (highest compared with lowest quintile RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.02; P(trend) = 0.01), but these results were not consistent in direction nor statistical significance across sensitivity analyses. No association was observed for GL or total, legume, or cereal fiber intake. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that carbohydrate quality and specific types of fiber—total vegetable and cruciferous vegetable fiber—are associated with endometriosis diagnosis in premenopausal women. These results also indicate it is unlikely that gluten intake is a strong factor in the etiology or symptomatology of endometriosis.

We described trends in pelvic pain characteristics over 2 years of follow-up among adolescents and adults with and without endometriosis participating in the longitudinal observational cohort of the Women's Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood, using data reported at baseline and at years 1 and 2 of follow-up. Participants completed a questionnaire at baseline (between November 2012 and May 2019) and annually thereafter that included validated measures of severity, frequency, and life interference of dysmenorrhea, acyclic pelvic pain, and dyspareunia. Our study population included 620 participants with surgically confirmed endometriosis (rASRM stage I/II = 95%) and 671 community-based and hospital-based controls, with median age = 19 and 24 years, respectively. The proportion reporting hormone use varied across the 3 years ranging from 88% to 92% for cases and 56% to 58% for controls. At baseline, endometriosis cases were more likely to report severe, frequent, and life-interfering dysmenorrhea, acyclic pelvic pain, and dyspareunia compared with controls. Among cases, frequency and severity of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia were relatively static across 2 years. However, acyclic pelvic pain improved. Severe acyclic pain decreased from 69% at baseline to 46% at year 2. Daily pain decreased from 28% to 14%, and life interference from 68% to 38%. Trends among controls remained fairly stable across 2 years. Among endometriosis cases who completed the questionnaire at all 3 time points, 18% reported persistent, severe acyclic pelvic pain at all 3 time points. Over time, different trends were observed by pelvic pain type among endometriosis cases and controls, supporting the importance of assessing multidimensional features of pelvic pain.

Background While folate intake has not been associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer overall, studies of other cancer types have suggested that high folate intake may promote carcinogenesis in pre-cancerous lesions. Women with endometriosis (a potential pre-cancerous lesion) have an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer; however, whether high folate intake increases risk in this group is unknown. Methods We conducted a pooled analysis of six case-control studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium to investigate the association between folate intake and risk of ovarian cancer among women with and without self-reported endometriosis. We included 570 cases/558 controls with and 5,171/7,559 without endometriosis. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for the association between folate intake (dietary, supplemental, total) and ovarian cancer risk. Finally, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate our results using genetic markers as a proxy for folate status. Results Higher dietary folate intake was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer for women with endometriosis (OR 1.37[1.01-1.86]) but not for women without endometriosis. There was no association between supplemental folate intake and ovarian cancer risk for women with or without endometriosis. A similar pattern was seen using MR. Conclusions High dietary folate intake may be associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer among women with endometriosis. Impact Women with endometriosis with high folate diets may be at increased risk of ovarian cancer. Further research is needed on the potential cancer-promoting effects of folate in this group.

Supplemental Table 1 shows the correlations of percentages of the markers in the tumor.

Supplemental Figure 1 provides representative images from the T cell panel for high-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous tumors.

Supplemental Figure 2 provides representative images from the immune checkpoint panel for high-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous tumors.

Supplemental Table 2 shows the distribution of presence/absence of percentage of the marker in the tumor, by age of sample for type I and type II tumors

Supplemental Table 3 shows case characteristics included on tissue microarrays in NHS and NHSII

Supplemental Table 4 shows beta binomial models, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for marker positivity in the tumor, by tumor and participant characteristics

Background:Despite the immunogenic nature of many ovarian tumors, treatment with immune checkpoint therapies has not led to substantial improvements in ovarian cancer survival. To advance population-level research on the ovarian tumor immune microenvironment, it is critical to understand methodologic issues related to measurement of immune cells on tissue microarrays (TMA) using multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) assays.Methods:In two prospective cohorts, we collected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovarian tumors from 486 cases and created seven TMAs. We measured T cells, including several sub-populations, and immune checkpoint markers on the TMAs using two mIF panels. We used Spearman correlations, Fisher exact tests, and multivariable-adjusted beta-binomial models to evaluate factors related to immune cell measurements in TMA tumor cores.Results:Between-core correlations of intratumoral immune markers ranged from 0.52 to 0.72, with more common markers (e.g., CD3+, CD3+CD8+) having higher correlations. Correlations of immune cell markers between the whole core, tumor area, and stromal area were high (range 0.69–0.97). In multivariable-adjusted models, odds of T-cell positivity were lower in clear cell and mucinous versus type II tumors (ORs, 0.13–0.48) and, for several sub-populations, were lower in older tissue (sample age > 30 versus ≤ 10 years; OR, 0.11–0.32).Conclusions:Overall, high correlations between cores for immune markers measured via mIF support the use of TMAs in studying ovarian tumor immune infiltration, although very old samples may have reduced antigenicity.Impact:Future epidemiologic studies should evaluate differences in the tumor immune response by histotype and identify modifiable factors that may alter the tumor immune microenvironment.

Supplemental Table 5 shows beta binomial models, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for marker positivity in the tumor, by population characteristics

PDF file - 157K, Supplemental Table 1. Regulatory T cell genes included in this study (N=25). Supplemental Table 2. Regulatory T cell SNPs included in this study. Supplemental Table 3. Participating invasive epithelial ovarian cancer studies. Supplemental Table 4. Association between clinical variables and overall survival.

The presence of regulatory T cells (Treg) in solid tumors is known to play a role in patient survival in ovarian cancer and other malignancies. We assessed inherited genetic variations via 749 tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 25 Treg-associated genes (CD28, CTLA4, FOXP3, IDO1, IL10, IL10RA, IL15, 1L17RA, IL23A, IL23R, IL2RA, IL6, IL6R, IL8, LGALS1, LGALS9, MAP3K8, STAT5A, STAT5B, TGFB1, TGFB2, TGFB3, TGFBR1, TGRBR2, and TGFBR3) in relation to ovarian cancer survival. We analyzed genotype and overall survival in 10,084 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, including 5,248 high-grade serous, 1,452 endometrioid, 795 clear cell, and 661 mucinous carcinoma cases of European descent across 28 studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). The strongest associations were found for endometrioid carcinoma and IL2RA SNPs rs11256497 [HR, 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22–1.64; P = 5.7 × 10−6], rs791587 (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.17–1.57; P = 6.2 × 10−5), rs2476491 (HR, = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.19–1.64; P = 5.6 × 10−5), and rs10795763 (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.17–1.57; P = 7.9 × 10−5), and for clear cell carcinoma and CTLA4 SNP rs231775 (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54–0.82; P = 9.3 × 10−5) after adjustment for age, study site, population stratification, stage, grade, and oral contraceptive use. The rs231775 allele associated with improved survival in our study also results in an amino acid change in CTLA4 and previously has been reported to be associated with autoimmune conditions. Thus, we found evidence that SNPs in genes related to Tregs seem to play a role in ovarian cancer survival, particularly in patients with clear cell and endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol Res; 2(4); 332–40. ©2014 AACR.

Supplementary Table S1 shows characteristics among ovarian cancer cases, Supplementary Table S2 shows the association between duration of analgesic use and ovarian cancer risk, Supplementary Table S3 shows the association between frequency of analgesic use and ovarian cancer risk, Supplementary Table S4 shows the association between age at first use of analgesics and ovarian cancer risk, Supplementary Table S5 shows the associations between analgesic use and ovarian cancer risk stratified by oral contraceptive use and history of endometriosis

Menstrual pain has been associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, presumably through increased inflammation, which is known to play a critical role in ovarian carcinogenesis. Analgesic medications are frequently used to treat menstrual pain, some of which lower ovarian cancer risk. In this study, we examined the association between analgesic use for menstrual pain during the premenopausal period and ovarian cancer risk among women with history of menstrual pain. We used data from the New England Case-Control Study, including 1,187 epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,225 population-based controls enrolled between 1998 and 2008 with detailed information on analgesic use for their menstrual pain. We used unconditional logistic regression to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between analgesic use (i.e., aspirin, ibuprofen, acetaminophen) for menstrual pain and ovarian cancer risk. We further conducted a stratified analysis by intensity of menstrual pain (mild/moderate, severe). Among women with menstrual pain during their 20s and 30s, ever use of analgesics for menstrual pain was not significantly associated with ovarian cancer risk. However, among women with severe menstrual pain, ever use of aspirin or acetaminophen for menstrual pain was inversely associated with risk (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18–0.94 and OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21–0.88 compared with never users, respectively). No significant association was observed between analgesic use and ovarian cancer risk among women with mild/moderate menstrual pain (Pinteraction ≤ 0.03). Our results suggest that use of aspirin or acetaminophen for severe menstrual pain may be associated with lower risk of ovarian cancer.Prevention Relevance:This study investigates whether analgesic use specifically for menstrual pain during the premenopausal period influences ovarian cancer risk. Our results suggest use of aspirin or acetaminophen for severe menstrual pain may be associated with lower risk of ovarian cancer among women with severe menstrual pain.

STUDY QUESTION What are the systemic molecular profiles of endometriosis diagnosed in adolescents and young adults? SUMMARY ANSWER Significant enrichment and increased activation of proteins related to angiogenesis and cell migration pathways were observed in endometriosis cases compared to controls (P-value WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Little is known about the pathophysiology of adolescent endometriosis despite the fact that over 50% of adults with endometriosis report onset of severe pelvic pain during adolescence. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A cross-sectional analysis using data on 142 laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis cases and 74 controls from the observational longitudinal cohort of Women’s Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood (A2A). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We measured 1305 plasma protein levels using the validated, multiplex aptamer-based proteomics discovery platform, SOMAscan. We calculated odds ratios and 95% CIs using logistic regression adjusting for age, BMI, fasting status and hormone use at blood draw for differentially expressed proteins (P MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Average age at blood draw was 18 years for endometriosis cases and 22 years for controls. We identified 63 proteins associated with endometriosis with type-I error set at 0.05, and absolute fold change >1.2, revealing significant enrichment of dysregulated proteins in biological pathways associated with endometriosis. Increased activation of pathways related to angiogenesis and cell migration was observed in plasma from endometriosis cases compared to controls (P-value LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Validation of our results in independent datasets and mechanistic studies are warranted to further our understanding of the pathophysiological characteristics of this common but understudied patient population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS To our knowledge, this was the first study to comprehensively examine circulating proteins in predominantly adolescents and young adult women with and without endometriosis. Results from this study provide novel biological insight that will build toward further research to elucidate endometriosis pathophysiology during the earlier course of the disease trajectory. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was supported by the Department of Defense (W81XWH1910318) and the 2017 Boston Center for Endometriosis Trainee Award. Financial support for establishment of and data collection within the A2A cohort were provided by the J. Willard and Alice S. Marriott Foundation. N.S., A.F.V., S.A.M., K.L.T. have received funding from Marriott Family Foundation. S.A.M. and K.L.T. are supported by NICHD (R01 HD94842). S.A.M. serves as an advisory board member for AbbVie and Roche; neither are related to this study. The authors report no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

To determine if women with endometriosis experience lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) more often than those without.Cross-sectional analysis at enrollment in a longitudinal cohort.Enrollment at 2 academic hospitals and from the local community.This analysis included 1,161 women with (n = 520) and without (n = 641) surgically confirmed endometriosis who were enrolled in the Women's Health Study: from Adolescence to Adulthood between 2012 and 2018.Not applicable.Prevalence of LUTSs, including stress incontinence, urgency and frequency, straining with urination, incomplete bladder emptying, hematuria, dysuria, and bladder pain using standardized questionnaires.The primary outcomes were that women with endometriosis reported the following more often than those without: difficulty passing urine (7.9% vs. 2%; crude odds ratio [OR], 4.14 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.19-7.80]; adjusted OR [aOR], 4.31 [95% CI, 2.07-8.95]); still feeling full after urination (18.8% vs. 4.7%; crude OR, 4.73 [95% CI, 3.08-7.25]; aOR, 4.67 [95% CI, 2.88-7.56]); having to urinate again within minutes of urinating (33.1% vs. 17.0%; crude OR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.83-3.18]; aOR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.81-3.43]), dysuria (11.7% vs. 4.9%; crude OR, 2.55 [95% CI, 1.62-4.01]; aOR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.40-4.02]); and pain when the bladder is full (23.0% vs. 4.9%; crude OR, 5.79 [95% CI, 3.82-8.78]; aOR, 6.04 [95% CI, 3.74-9.76]). For the secondary outcomes, among female participants with endometriosis, we observed that the odds of LUTS did not differ by the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage (I/II vs. III/IV) or duration of endometriosis-associated symptoms.Women with surgically confirmed endometriosis were more likely to report LUTS than those without.

Background: There is suggestive evidence that inflammation is related to ovarian cancer survival. However, more research is needed to identify inflammation-related factors that are associated with ovarian cancer survival and to determine their combined effects. Methods: This analysis used pooled data on 8,147 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The prediagnosis inflammation-related exposures of interest included alcohol use; aspirin use; other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use; body mass index; environmental tobacco smoke exposure; history of pelvic inflammatory disease, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and endometriosis; menopausal hormone therapy use; physical inactivity; smoking status; and talc use. Using Cox proportional hazards models, the relationship between each exposure and survival was assessed in 50% of the data. A weighted inflammation-related risk score (IRRS) was developed, and its association with survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models in the remaining 50% of the data. Results: There was a statistically significant trend of increasing risk of death per quartile of the IRRS [HR = 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03–1.14]. Women in the upper quartile of the IRRS had a 31% higher death rate compared with the lowest quartile (95% CI, 1.11–1.54). Conclusions: A higher prediagnosis IRRS was associated with an increased mortality risk after an ovarian cancer diagnosis. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate whether postdiagnosis exposures are also associated with survival. Impact: Given that pre- and postdiagnosis exposures are often correlated and many are modifiable, our study results can ultimately motivate the development of behavioral recommendations to enhance survival among patients with ovarian cancer.

Objective To evaluate the association between hysterectomy and ovarian cancer, and to understand how hormone therapy (HT) use and endometriosis affect this association. Methods We conducted a pooled analysis of self-reported data from 11 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Women with (n = 5350) and without ovarian cancer (n = 7544) who never used HT or exclusively used either estrogen-only therapy (ET) or estrogen+progestin therapy (EPT) were included. Risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer adjusted for duration of ET and EPT use and stratified on history of endometriosis was determined using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Overall and among women without endometriosis, there was a positive association between ovarian cancer risk and hysterectomy (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.31 and OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, respectively), but no association upon adjusting for duration of ET and EPT use (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.16 and OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.95-1.18, respectively). Among women with a history of endometriosis, there was a slight inverse association between hysterectomy and ovarian cancer risk (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.69-1.26), but this association became stronger and statistically significant after adjusting for duration of ET and EPT use (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.99). Conclusions The hysterectomy-ovarian cancer association is complex and cannot be understood without considering duration of ET and EPT use and history of endometriosis. Failure to take these exposures into account in prior studies casts doubt on their conclusions. Overall, hysterectomy is not risk-reducing for ovarian cancer, however the inverse association among women with endometriosis warrants further investigation.

Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have so far reported 12 loci associated with serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. We hypothesized that some of these loci function through nearby transcription factor (TF) genes and that putative target genes of these TFs as identified by coexpression may also be enriched for additional EOC risk associations.Methods: We selected TF genes within 1 Mb of the top signal at the 12 genome-wide significant risk loci. Mutual information, a form of correlation, was used to build networks of genes strongly coexpressed with each selected TF gene in the unified microarray dataset of 489 serous EOC tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Genes represented in this dataset were subsequently ranked using a gene-level test based on results for germline SNPs from a serous EOC GWAS meta-analysis (2,196 cases/4,396 controls).Results: Gene set enrichment analysis identified six networks centered on TF genes (HOXB2, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7 at 17q21.32 and HOXD1, HOXD3 at 2q31) that were significantly enriched for genes from the risk-associated end of the ranked list (P < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05). These results were replicated (P < 0.05) using an independent association study (7,035 cases/21,693 controls). Genes underlying enrichment in the six networks were pooled into a combined network.Conclusion: We identified a HOX-centric network associated with serous EOC risk containing several genes with known or emerging roles in serous EOC development.Impact: Network analysis integrating large, context-specific datasets has the potential to offer mechanistic insights into cancer susceptibility and prioritize genes for experimental characterization. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(10); 1574–84. ©2015 AACR.

Supplemental Figure S 3

C-statistics by tumor histology for variable lag-times since blood donation

Characteristics of HGSOC cases with platinum relapse data included in the BWH TMA

Purpose: About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best source of information to evaluate early detection biomarkers. Here we evaluate the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarkers in prospectively collected samples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study.Experimental Design: We measured CA125, HE4, CA72.4, and CA15.3 in 810 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,939 controls. We calculated the sensitivity at 95% and 98% specificity as well as area under the receiver operator curve (C-statistic) for each marker individually and in combination. In addition, we evaluated marker performance by stage at diagnosis and time between blood draw and diagnosis.Results: We observed the best discrimination between cases and controls within 6 months of diagnosis for CA125 (C-statistic = 0.92), then HE4 (0.84), CA72.4 (0.77), and CA15.3 (0.73). Marker performance declined with longer time between blood draw and diagnosis and for earlier staged disease. However, assessment of discriminatory ability at early stage was limited by small numbers. Combinations of markers performed modestly, but significantly better than any single marker.Conclusions: CA125 remains the single best marker for the early detection of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be slightly improved by combining with other markers. Identifying novel markers for ovarian cancer will require studies including larger numbers of early-stage cases. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4664–75. ©2016 AACR.See related commentary by Skates, p. 4542

Case characteristics (median (min-max) or n (%)) by histologic subtypes in the EPIC cohort

Supplementary Figures 1-5, Tables 1-8. Supplementary Figure 1: Overview of the analytic approach. Supplementary Figure 2: QQ plots of SNPs with MAF ≥0.02 and imputation r2 ≥0.9 associated with Overall Survival in A. Supplementary Figure 3: ‘All OCAC’ histology-adjusted analysis. Supplementary Figure 4: Forest plots of promising SNPs. Supplementary Figure 5: KM-Plotter graphs of significant associations with outcome. Supplementary Table 1: All studies (OCAC & TCGA) eligible for analyses according to first-line chemotherapy. Supplementary Table 2: Description of individual OCAC studies included in the secondary 'all OCAC' analysis. Supplementary Table 3a: Overall Survival estimates for selected SNPs (MAF ≥0.02) comparing iCOGS imputed (r2 ≥0.3) and iPLEX genotyped samples. Supplementary Table 3b: Progression-free Survival estimates for selected SNPs (MAF ≥0.02) comparing iCOGS imputed (r2 ≥0.3) and iPLEX genotyped samples. Supplementary Table 4: SNPs with imputation r2 ≥0.9, EAF ≥0.02 and p ≤ 1E-05 for at least one of four outcomes analyzed in cases selected according to first-line chemotherapy. Supplementary Table 5: Meta-analysis of largest possible sample (TCGA, non-overlapping iCOGS and iplex genotyped) for selected promising SNPs analyzed in cases selected according to first-line chemotherapy. Supplementary Table 6: Significant association between protein-coding genes within 1Mb of promising SNPs and ovarian cancer outcomes. Supplementary Table 7: SNPs with imputation r-sq≥0.9 and p ≤ 1E-05 for Overall Survival in histology-adj 'all OCAC' analysis. Supplementary Table 8: iCOGS estimates for SNPs previously identified to be associated with response to chemotherapy as reported in the aNHGRI GWAS catalog.

Background: While numerous susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have been identified, few associations have been reported with overall survival. In the absence of common prognostic genetic markers, we hypothesize that rare coding variants may be associated with overall EOC survival and assessed their contribution in two exome-based genotyping projects of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC).Methods: The primary patient set (Set 1) included 14 independent EOC studies (4,293 patients) and 227,892 variants, and a secondary patient set (Set 2) included six additional EOC studies (1,744 patients) and 114,620 variants. Because power to detect rare variants individually is reduced, gene-level tests were conducted. Sets were analyzed separately at individual variants and by gene, and then combined with meta-analyses (73,203 variants and 13,163 genes overlapped).Results: No individual variant reached genome-wide statistical significance. A SNP previously implicated to be associated with EOC risk and, to a lesser extent, survival, rs8170, showed the strongest evidence of association with survival and similar effect size estimates across sets (Pmeta = 1.1E−6, HRSet1 = 1.17, HRSet2 = 1.14). Rare variants in ATG2B, an autophagy gene important for apoptosis, were significantly associated with survival after multiple testing correction (Pmeta = 1.1E−6; Pcorrected = 0.01).Conclusions: Common variant rs8170 and rare variants in ATG2B may be associated with EOC overall survival, although further study is needed.Impact: This study represents the first exome-wide association study of EOC survival to include rare variant analyses, and suggests that complementary single variant and gene-level analyses in large studies are needed to identify rare variants that warrant follow-up study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(3); 446–54. ©2016 AACR.

Background: Despite a large body of literature evaluating the association between recreational physical activity and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk, the extant evidence is inconclusive, and little is known about the independent association between recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk. We conducted a pooled analysis of nine studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium to investigate the association between chronic recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk.Methods: In accordance with the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, women reporting no regular, weekly recreational physical activity were classified as inactive. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to estimate the ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between inactivity and EOC risk overall and by subgroups based upon histotype, menopausal status, race, and body mass index.Results: The current analysis included data from 8,309 EOC patients and 12,612 controls. We observed a significant positive association between inactivity and EOC risk (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14–1.57), and similar associations were observed for each histotype.Conclusions: In this large pooled analysis examining the association between recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk, we observed consistent evidence of an association between chronic inactivity and all EOC histotypes.Impact: These data add to the growing body of evidence suggesting that inactivity is an independent risk factor for cancer. If the apparent association between inactivity and EOC risk is substantiated, additional work via targeted interventions should be pursued to characterize the dose of activity required to mitigate the risk of this highly fatal disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(7); 1114–24. ©2016 AACR.

Purpose: Chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We hypothesize that germline polymorphisms might be associated with clinical outcome.Experimental Design: We analyzed approximately 2.8 million genotyped and imputed SNPs from the iCOGS experiment for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2,901 European epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients who underwent first-line treatment of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy regardless of regimen, and in a subset of 1,098 patients treated with ≥4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin at standard doses. We evaluated the top SNPs in 4,434 EOC patients, including patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. In addition, we conducted pathway analysis of all intragenic SNPs and tested their association with PFS and OS using gene set enrichment analysis.Results: Five SNPs were significantly associated (P ≤ 1.0 × 10−5) with poorer outcomes in at least one of the four analyses, three of which, rs4910232 (11p15.3), rs2549714 (16q23), and rs6674079 (1q22), were located in long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) RP11-179A10.1, RP11-314O13.1, and RP11-284F21.8, respectively (P ≤ 7.1 × 10−6). ENCODE ChIP-seq data at 1q22 for normal ovary show evidence of histone modification around RP11-284F21.8, and rs6674079 is perfectly correlated with another SNP within the super-enhancer MEF2D, expression levels of which were reportedly associated with prognosis in another solid tumor. YAP1- and WWTR1 (TAZ)-stimulated gene expression and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated lipid transport pathways were associated with PFS and OS, respectively, in the cohort who had standard chemotherapy (pGSEA ≤6 × 10−3).Conclusions: We have identified SNPs in three lncRNAs that might be important targets for novel EOC therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 21(23); 5264–76. ©2015 AACR.

Survival in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is influenced by the host immune response, yet the key genetic determinants of inflammation and immunity that affect prognosis are not known. The nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) transcription factor family plays an important role in many immune and inflammatory responses, including the response to cancer. We studied common inherited variation in 210 genes in the NF-κB family in 10,084 patients with invasive EOC (5,248 high-grade serous, 1,452 endometrioid, 795 clear cell, and 661 mucinous) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Associations between genotype and overall survival were assessed using Cox regression for all patients and by major histology, adjusting for known prognostic factors and correcting for multiple testing (threshold for statistical significance, P < 2.5 × 10−5). Results were statistically significant when assessed for patients of a single histology. Key associations were with caspase recruitment domain family, member 11 (CARD11) rs41324349 in patients with mucinous EOC [HR, 1.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41–2.35; P = 4.13 × 10−6] and tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 13B (TNFRSF13B) rs7501462 in patients with endometrioid EOC (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56–0.82; P = 2.33 × 10−5). Other associations of note included TNF receptor–associated factor 2 (TRAF2) rs17250239 in patients with high-grade serous EOC (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77–0.92; P = 6.49 × 10−5) and phospholipase C, gamma 1 (PLCG1) rs11696662 in patients with clear cell EOC (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26–0.73; P = 4.56 × 10−4). These associations highlight the potential importance of genes associated with host inflammation and immunity in modulating clinical outcomes in distinct EOC histologies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(7); 1421–7. ©2014 AACR.

Background: Comorbidities can affect survival of ovarian cancer patients by influencing treatment efficacy. However, little evidence exists on the association between individual concurrent comorbidities and prognosis in ovarian cancer patients.Methods: Among patients diagnosed with invasive ovarian carcinoma who participated in 23 studies included in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, we explored associations between histories of endometriosis; asthma; depression; osteoporosis; and autoimmune, gallbladder, kidney, liver, and neurological diseases and overall and progression-free survival. Using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age at diagnosis, stage of disease, histology, and study site, we estimated pooled HRs and 95% confidence intervals to assess associations between each comorbidity and ovarian cancer outcomes.Results: None of the comorbidities were associated with ovarian cancer outcome in the overall sample nor in strata defined by histologic subtype, weight status, age at diagnosis, or stage of disease (local/regional vs. advanced).Conclusions: Histories of endometriosis; asthma; depression; osteoporosis; and autoimmune, gallbladder, kidney, liver, or neurologic diseases were not associated with ovarian cancer overall or progression-free survival.Impact: These previously diagnosed chronic diseases do not appear to affect ovarian cancer prognosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(9); 1470–3. ©2017 AACR.

Additional Materials and Methods

Western blot analysis of A2780, IF quantification, immunoblot quantification in human and murine cell lines

Immunofluorescence studies on patient tumor ascites, quantification of 5-hmC from patient ascites by dot blot, 5-hmC measured with mass spectrometry

A2780 immunoblot and IC50 one week after 5-aza treatments, additional cell line IC50's

Supplemental Table S1: Number of invasive EOC patients by study site. Supplemental Table S2: Results of Set 1 single variant analysis, for variants with P

Supplemental Figure Legends