Search

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy enables adaptive treatment plans based on daily anatomical changes and accurate organ visualization. However, the bias field artifact can compromise image quality, affecting diagnostic accuracy and quantitative analyses. This study aims to assess the impact of bias field correction on 0.35 T pelvis MRIs by evaluating clinical anatomy visualization and generative adversarial network (GAN) auto-segmentation performance., Materials and Methods: 3D simulation MRIs from 60 prostate cancer patients treated on MR-Linac (0.35 T) were collected and preprocessed with the N4ITK algorithm for bias field correction. A 3D GAN architecture was trained, validated, and tested on 40, 10, and 10 patients, respectively, to auto-segment the organs at risk (OARs) rectum and bladder. The GAN was trained and evaluated either with the original or the bias-corrected MRIs. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95 th ) were computed for the segmented volumes of each patient. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test assessed the statistical difference of the metrics within OARs, both with and without bias field correction. Five radiation oncologists blindly scored 22 randomly chosen patients in terms of overall image quality and visibility of boundaries (prostate, rectum, bladder, seminal vesicles) of the original and bias-corrected MRIs. Bennett's S score and Fleiss' kappa were used to assess the pairwise interrater agreement and the interrater agreement among all the observers, respectively., Results: In the test set, the GAN trained and evaluated on original and bias-corrected MRIs showed DSC/HD95 th of 0.92/5.63 mm and 0.92/5.91 mm for the bladder and 0.84/10.61 mm and 0.83/9.71 mm for the rectum. No statistical differences in the distribution of the evaluation metrics were found neither for the bladder (DSC: p = 0.07; HD95 th : p = 0.35) nor for the rectum (DSC: p = 0.32; HD95 th : p = 0.63). From the clinical visual grading assessment, the bias-corrected MRI resulted mostly in either no change or an improvement of the image quality and visualization of the organs' boundaries compared with the original MRI., Conclusion: The bias field correction did not improve the anatomy visualization from a clinical point of view and the OARs' auto-segmentation outputs generated by the GAN., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The Department of Radiation Oncology of the University Hospital of LMU Munich and the Department of Radiation Oncology of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS in Rome have a research agreement with ViewRay. ViewRay had no influence on the study design, the collection or analysis of data, or on the writing of the manuscript. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Vagni, Tran, Catucci, Chiloiro, D’Aviero, Re, Romano, Boldrini, Kawula, Lombardo, Kurz, Landry, Belka, Indovina, Gambacorta, Cusumano and Placidi.)

Purpose: Manual recontouring of targets and Organs At Risk (OARs) is a time-consuming and operator-dependent task. We explored the potential of Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) to auto-segment the rectum, bladder and femoral heads on 0.35T MRIs to accelerate the online MRI-guided-Radiotherapy (MRIgRT) workflow., Methods: 3D planning MRIs from 60 prostate cancer patients treated with 0.35T MR-Linac were collected. A 3D GAN architecture and its equivalent 2D version were trained, validated and tested on 40, 10 and 10 patients respectively. The volumetric Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95 th ) were computed against expert drawn ground-truth delineations. The networks were also validated on an independent external dataset of 16 patients., Results: In the internal test set, the 3D and 2D GANs showed DSC/HD95 th of 0.83/9.72 mm and 0.81/10.65 mm for the rectum, 0.92/5.91 mm and 0.85/15.72 mm for the bladder, and 0.94/3.62 mm and 0.90/9.49 mm for the femoral heads. In the external test set, the performance was 0.74/31.13 mm and 0.72/25.07 mm for the rectum, 0.92/9.46 mm and 0.88/11.28 mm for the bladder, and 0.89/7.00 mm and 0.88/10.06 mm for the femoral heads. The 3D and 2D GANs required on average 1.44 s and 6.59 s respectively to generate the OARs' volumetric segmentation for a single patient., Conclusions: The proposed 3D GAN auto-segments pelvic OARs with high accuracy on 0.35T, in both the internal and the external test sets, outperforming its 2D equivalent in both segmentation robustness and volume generation time., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Ultra-hypofractionated online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is promising for prostate cancer. However, the impact of online adaptation on target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing at the level of accumulated dose has not yet been reported. Using deformable image registration (DIR)-based accumulation, we compared the delivered adapted dose with the simulated non-adapted dose., Materials and Methods: Twenty-three prostate cancer patients treated at two clinics with 0.35 T magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator (MR-linac) following the same treatment protocol (5  ×  7.5 Gy with urethral sparing and daily adaptation) were included. The fraction MR images were deformably registered to the planning MR image. Both non-adapted and adapted fraction doses were accumulated with the corresponding vector fields. Two DIR approaches were implemented. PTV* (planning target volume minus urethra +2mm ) D 95%, CTV* (clinical target volume minus urethra) D 98%, and OARs (urethra +2mm , bladder, and rectum) D 0.2cc, were evaluated. Statistical significance was inferred from a two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( p  < 0.05)., Results: Normalized to the baseline, the accumulated PTV* D 95% increased significantly by 2.7 % ([1.5, 4.3]%) through adaptation, and the CTV* D 98% by 1.2 % ([0.1, 1.7]%). For the OARs after adaptation, accumulated bladder D 0.2cc decreased by 0.4 % ([-1.2, 0.4]%), urethra +2mm D 0.2cc by 0.8 % ([-1.6, -0.1]%), while rectum D 0.2cc increased by 2.6 % ([1.2, 4.9]%). For all patients, rectum D 0.2cc was still below the clinical constraint. Results of both DIR approaches differed on average by less than 0.2 %., Conclusions: Online adaptation in MRgRT improved target coverage and OARs sparing at the level of accumulated dose., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society of Radiotherapy & Oncology.)

Introduction: This study evaluated the performance of magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) during deep-regional hyperthermia (HT) in pelvic and lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas., Materials and Methods: 17 pelvic (45 treatments) and 16 lower-extremity (42 treatments) patients underwent standard regional HT and chemotherapy. Pairs of double-echo gradient-echo scans were acquired during the MR protocol 1.4 s apart. For each pair, precision was quantified using phase data from both echoes ('dual-echo') or only one ('single-echo') in- or excluding body fat pixels in the field drift correction region of interest. The precision of each method was compared to that of the MRT approach using a built-in clinical software tool (SigmaVision). Accuracy was assessed in three lower-extremity patients (six treatments) using interstitial temperature probes. The Jaccard coefficient quantified pretreatment motion; receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed its predictability for acceptable precision (<1 °C) during HT., Results: Compared to the built-in dual-echo approach, single-echo thermometry improved the mean temporal precision from 1.32 ± 0.40 °C to 1.07 ± 0.34 °C (pelvis) and from 0.99 ± 0.28 °C to 0.76 ± 0.23 °C (lower extremities). With body fat-based field drift correction, single-echo mean accuracy improved from 1.4 °C to 1.0 °C. Pretreatment bulk motion provided excellent precision prediction with an area under the curve of 0.80-0.86 (pelvis) and 0.81-0.83 (lower extremities), compared to gastrointestinal air motion (0.52-0.58)., Conclusion: Single-echo MRT exhibited better precision than dual-echo MRT. Body fat-based field-drift correction significantly improved MRT accuracy. Pretreatment bulk motion showed improved prediction of acceptable MRT temporal precision over gastrointestinal air motion.

Background and Purpose: Automation is desirable for organ segmentation in radiotherapy. This study compared deep learning methods for auto-segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) and clinical target volume (CTV) in prostate cancer patients undergoing fractionated magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy. Models predicting dense displacement fields (DDFMs) between planning and fraction images were compared to patient-specific (PSM) and baseline (BM) segmentation models., Materials and Methods: A dataset of 92 patients with planning and fraction MR images (MRIs) from two institutions were used. DDFMs were trained to predict dense displacement fields (DDFs) between the planning and fraction images, which were subsequently used to propagate the planning contours of the bladder, rectum, and CTV to the daily MRI. The training was performed either with true planning-fraction image pairs or with planning images and their counterparts deformed by known DDFs. The BMs were trained on 53 planning images, while to generate PSMs, the BMs were fine-tuned using the planning image of a given single patient. The evaluation included Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the average (HD avg ) and the 95th percentile (HD 95 ) Hausdorff distance (HD)., Results: The DDFMs with DSCs for bladder/rectum of 0.76/0.76 performed worse than PSMs (0.91/0.90) and BMs (0.89/0.88). The same trend was observed for HDs. For CTV, DDFM and PSM performed similarly yielding DSCs of 0.87 and 0.84, respectively., Conclusions: DDFMs were found suitable for CTV delineation after rigid alignment. However, for OARs they were outperformed by PSMs, as they predicted only limited deformations even in the presence of substantial anatomical changes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The Department of Radiation Oncology of the University Hospital of LMU Munich has a research agreement with ViewRay. ViewRay did not fund this study and was not involved and had no influence on the study design, the collection or analysis of data, or on the writing of the manuscript., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background and purpose: In radiotherapy, dose calculations based on 4D cone beam CTs (4DCBCTs) require image intensity corrections. This retrospective study compared the dose calculation accuracy of a deep learning, projection-based scatter correction workflow (ScatterNet), to slower workflows: conventional 4D projection-based scatter correction (CBCT cor ) and a deformable image registration (DIR)-based method (4DvCT). Materials and methods: For 26 lung cancer patients, planning CTs (pCTs), 4DCTs and CBCT projections were available. ScatterNet was trained with pairs of raw and corrected CBCT projections. Corrected projections from ScatterNet and the conventional workflow were reconstructed using MA-ROOSTER, yielding 4DCBCT SN and 4DCBCT cor . The 4DvCT was generated by 4DCT to 4DCBCT DIR, as part of the 4DCBCT cor workflow. Robust intensity modulated proton therapy treatment plans were created on free-breathing pCTs. 4DCBCT SN was compared to 4DCBCT cor and the 4DvCT in terms of image quality and dose calculation accuracy (dose-volume-histogram parameters and 3 % / 3 mm gamma analysis). Results: 4DCBCT SN resulted in an average mean absolute error of 87 HU and 102 HU when compared to 4DCBCT cor and 4DvCT respectively. High agreement was observed in targets with median dose differences of 0.4 Gy (4DCBCT SN -4DCBCT cor ) and 0.3 Gy (4DCBCT SN -4DvCT). The gamma analysis showed high average 3 % / 3 mm pass rates of 96 % for both 4DCBCT SN vs. 4DCBCT cor and 4DCBCT SN vs. 4DvCT. Conclusions: Accurate 4D dose calculations are feasible for lung cancer patients using ScatterNet for 4DCBCT correction. Average scatter correction times could be reduced from 10 min (4DCBCT cor ) to 3.9 s , showing the clinical suitability of the proposed deep learning-based method., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) offers treatment plan adaptation to the anatomy of the day. In the current MRgRT workflow, this requires the time consuming and repetitive task of manual delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs), which is also prone to inter- and intra-observer variability. Therefore, deep learning autosegmentation (DLAS) is becoming increasingly attractive. No investigation of its application to OARs in thoracic magnetic resonance images (MRIs) from MRgRT has been done so far. This study aimed to fill this gap., Materials and Methods: 122 planning MRIs from patients treated at a 0.35 T MR-Linac were retrospectively collected. Using an 80/19/23 (training/validation/test) split, individual 3D U-Nets for segmentation of the left lung, right lung, heart, aorta, spinal canal and esophagus were trained. These were compared to the clinically used contours based on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). They were also graded on their clinical usability by a radiation oncologist., Results: Median DSC was 0.96, 0.96, 0.94, 0.90, 0.88 and 0.78 for left lung, right lung, heart, aorta, spinal canal and esophagus, respectively. Median 95th percentile values of the HD were 3.9, 5.3, 5.8, 3.0, 2.6 and 3.5 mm, respectively. The physician preferred the network generated contours over the clinical contours, deeming 85 out of 129 to not require any correction, 25 immediately usable for treatment planning, 15 requiring minor and 4 requiring major corrections., Conclusions: We trained 3D U-Nets on clinical MRI planning data which produced accurate delineations in the thoracic region. DLAS contours were preferred over the clinical contours., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the intrafractional prostate motion captured during gated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer and analyze its impact on the delivered dose as well as the effect of gating., Methods: Sagittal 2D cine-MRI scans were acquired at 4 Hz during treatment at a ViewRay MRIdian (ViewRay Inc., Oakwood Village, OH, USA) MR linac. Prostate shifts in anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) directions were extracted separately. Using the static dose cloud approximation, the planned fractional dose was shifted according to the 2D gated motion (residual motion in gating window) to estimate the delivered dose by superimposing and averaging the shifted dose volumes. The dose of a hypothetical non-gated delivery was reconstructed similarly using the non-gated motion. For the clinical target volume (CTV), rectum, and bladder, dose-volume histogram parameters of the planned and reconstructed doses were compared., Results: In total, 174 fractions (15.7 h of cine-MRI) from 10 patients were evaluated. The average (±1 σ) non-gated prostate motion was 0.6 ± 1.0 mm in the AP and 0.0 ± 0.6 mm in the SI direction with respect to the centroid position of the gating boundary. 95% of the shifts were within [-3.5, 2.7] mm in the AP and [-2.9, 3.2] mm in the SI direction. For the gated treatment and averaged over all fractions, CTV D 98% decreased by less than 2% for all patients. The rectum and the bladder D 2% increased by less than 3% and 0.5%, respectively. Doses reconstructed for gated and non-gated delivery were similar for most fractions., Conclusion: A pipeline for extraction of prostate motion during gated MRI-guided radiotherapy based on 2D cine-MRI was implemented. The 2D motion data enabled an approximate estimation of the delivered dose. For the majority of fractions, the benefit of gating was negligible, and clinical dosimetric constraints were met, indicating safety of the currently adopted gated MRI-guided treatment workflow., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Online adaptive radiation therapy (RT) using hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerators (MR-Linacs) can administer a tailored radiation dose at each treatment fraction. Daily MR imaging followed by organ and target segmentation adjustments allow to capture anatomical changes, improve target volume coverage, and reduce the risk of side effects. The introduction of automatic segmentation techniques could help to further improve the online adaptive workflow by shortening the re-contouring time and reducing intra- and inter-observer variability. In fractionated RT, prior knowledge, such as planning images and manual expert contours, is usually available before irradiation, but not used by current artificial intelligence-based autocontouring approaches., Purpose: The goal of this study was to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for automatic segmentation of bladder, rectum (organs at risk, OARs), and clinical target volume (CTV) for prostate cancer patients treated at 0.35 T MR-Linacs. Furthermore, we tested the CNNs generalization on data from independent facilities and compared them with the MR-Linac treatment planning system (TPS) propagated structures currently used in clinics. Finally, expert planning delineations were utilized for patient- (PS) and facility-specific (FS) transfer learning to improve auto-segmentation of CTV and OARs on fraction images., Methods: In this study, data from fractionated treatments at 0.35 T MR-Linacs were leveraged to develop a 3D U-Net-based automatic segmentation. Cohort C1 had 73 planning images and cohort C2 had 19 planning and 240 fraction images. The baseline models (BMs) were trained solely on C1 planning data using 53 MRIs for training and 10 for validation. To assess their accuracy, the models were tested on three data subsets: (i) 10 C1 planning images not used for training, (ii) 19 C2 planning, and (iii) 240 C2 fraction images. BMs also served as a starting point for FS and PS transfer learning, where the planning images from C2 were used for network parameter fine tuning. The segmentation output of the different trained models was compared against expert ground truth by means of geometric metrics. Moreover, a trained physician graded the network segmentations as well as the segmentations propagated by the clinical TPS., Results: The BMs showed dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.88(4) and 0.93(3) for the rectum and the bladder, respectively, independent of the facility. CTV segmentation with the BM was the best for intermediate- and high-risk cancer patients from C1 with DSC=0.84(5) and worst for C2 with DSC=0.74(7). The PS transfer learning brought a significant improvement in the CTV segmentation, yielding DSC=0.72(4) for post-prostatectomy and low-risk patients and DSC=0.88(5) for intermediate- and high-risk patients. The FS training did not improve the segmentation accuracy considerably. The physician's assessment of the TPS-propagated versus network-generated structures showed a clear advantage of the latter., Conclusions: The obtained results showed that the presented segmentation technique has potential to improve automatic segmentation for MR-guided RT., (© 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: To investigate the static magnetic field generated by a proton pencil beam as a candidate for range verification by means of Monte Carlo simulations, thereby improving upon existing analytical calculations. We focus on the impact of statistical current fluctuations and secondary protons and electrons., Methods: We considered a pulsed beam (10 μ ${\umu}$ s pulse duration) during the duty cycle with a peak beam current of 0.2 μ $\umu$ A and an initial energy of 100 MeV. We ran Geant4-DNA Monte Carlo simulations of a proton pencil beam in water and extracted independent particle phase spaces. We calculated longitudinal and radial current density of protons and electrons, serving as an input for a magnetic field estimation based on a finite element analysis in a cylindrical geometry. We made sure to allow for non-solenoidal current densities as is the case of a stopping proton beam., Results: The rising proton charge density toward the range is not perturbed by energy straggling and only lowered through nuclear reactions by up to 15%, leading to an approximately constant longitudinal current. Their relative low density however (at most 0.37 protons/mm 3 for the 0.2  μ ${\umu}$ A current and a beam cross-section of 2.5 mm), gives rise to considerable current density fluctuations. The radial proton current resulting from lateral scattering and being two orders of magnitude weaker than the longitudinal current is subject to even stronger fluctuations. Secondary electrons with energies above 10 eV, that far outnumber the primary protons, reduce the primary proton current by only 10% due to their largely isotropic flow. A small fraction of electrons (<1%), undergoing head-on collisions, constitutes the relevant electron current. In the far-field, both contributions to the magnetic field strength (longitudinal and lateral) are independent of the beam spot size. We also find that the nuclear reaction-related losses cause a shift of 1.3 mm to the magnetic field profile relative to the actual range, which is further enlarged to 2.4 mm by the electron current (at a distance of ρ = 50 $\rho =50$  mm away from the central beam axis). For ρ > 45 $\rho &gt;45$  mm, the shift increases linearly. While the current density variations cause significant magnetic field uncertainty close to the central beam axis with a relative standard deviation (RSD) close to 100%, they average out at a distance of 10 cm, where the RSD of the total magnetic field drops below 2%., Conclusions: With the small influence of the secondary electrons together with the low RSD, our analysis encourages an experimental detection of the magnetic field through sensitive instrumentation, such as optical magnetometry or SQUIDs., (© 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: The evaluation of automatic segmentation algorithms is commonly performed using geometric metrics. An analysis based on dosimetric parameters might be more relevant in clinical practice but is often lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of state-of-the-art 3D U-Net-generated organ delineations on dose optimization in radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer patients., Methods: A database of 69 computed tomography images with prostate, bladder, and rectum delineations was used for single-label 3D U-Net training with dice similarity coefficient (DSC)-based loss. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans have been generated for both manual and automatic segmentations with the same optimization settings. These were chosen to give consistent plans when applying perturbations to the manual segmentations. Contours were evaluated in terms of DSC, average and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD). Dose distributions were evaluated with the manual segmentation as reference using dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters and a 3%/3 mm gamma-criterion with 10% dose cut-off. A Pearson correlation coefficient between DSC and dosimetric metrics, i.e. gamma index and DVH parameters, has been calculated., Results: 3D U-Net-based segmentation achieved a DSC of 0.87 (0.03) for prostate, 0.97 (0.01) for bladder and 0.89 (0.04) for rectum. The mean and 95% HD were below 1.6 (0.4) and below 5 (4) mm, respectively. The DVH parameters, V[Formula: see text] for the bladder and V[Formula: see text] for the rectum, showed agreement between dose distributions within [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. The D[Formula: see text] and V[Formula: see text], for prostate and its 3 mm expansion (surrogate clinical target volume) showed agreement with the reference dose distribution within 2% and 3 Gy with the exception of one case. The average gamma pass-rate was 85%. The comparison between geometric and dosimetric metrics showed no strong statistically significant correlation., Conclusions: The 3D U-Net developed for this work achieved state-of-the-art geometrical performance. Analysis based on clinically relevant DVH parameters of VMAT plans demonstrated neither excessive dose increase to OARs nor substantial under/over-dosage of the target in all but one case. Yet the gamma analysis indicated several cases with low pass rates. The study highlighted the importance of adding dosimetric analysis to the standard geometric evaluation., (© 2022. The Author(s).)