Search

The N-degron pathways are a set of proteolytic systems that relate the half-life of a protein to its N-terminal (Nt) residue. In Escherchia coli the principal N-degron pathway is known as the Leu/N-degron pathway of which an Nt Leu is a key feature of the degron. Although the physiological role of the Leu/N-degron pathway is currently unclear, many of the components of the pathway are well defined. Proteins degraded by this pathway contain an Nt degradation signal (N-degron) composed of an Nt primary destabilizing (Nd1) residue (Leu, Phe, Trp or Tyr) and an unstructured region which generally contains a hydrophobic element. Most N-degrons are generated from a pro-N-degron, either by endoproteolytic cleavage, or by enzymatic attachment of a Nd1 residue (Leu or Phe) to the N-terminus of a protein (or protein fragment) by the enzyme Leu/Phe tRNA protein transferase (LFTR) in a non-ribosomal manner. Regardless of the mode of generation, all Leu/N-degrons are recognized by ClpS and delivered to the ClpAP protease for degradation. To date, only two physiological Leu/N-degron bearing substrates have been verified, one of which (PATase) is modified by LFTR. In this study, we have examined the substrate proteome of LFTR during stationary phase. From this analysis, we have identified several additional physiological Leu/N-degron ligands, including AldB, which is modified by a previously undescribed activity of LFTR. Importantly, the novel specificity of LFTR was confirmed in vitro, using a range of model proteins. Our data shows that processing of the Nt-Met of AldB generates a novel substrate for LFTR. Importantly, the LFTR-dependent modification of T2-AldB is essential for its turnover by ClpAPS, in vitro. To further examine the acceptor specificity of LFTR, we performed a systematic analysis using a series of peptide arrays. These data reveal that the identity of the second residue modulates substrate conjugation with positively charged residues being favored and negatively charged and aromatic residues being disfavored. Collectively, these findings extend our understanding of LFTR specificity and the Leu/N-degron pathway in E. coli.

Over a decade ago Polymerase δ interacting protein of 38 kDa (PDIP38) was proposed to play a role in DNA repair. Since this time, both the physiological function and subcellular location of PDIP38 has remained ambiguous and our present understanding of PDIP38 function has been hampered by a lack of detailed biochemical and structural studies. Here we show, that human PDIP38 is directed to the mitochondrion in a membrane potential dependent manner, where it resides in the matrix compartment, together with its partner protein CLPX. Our structural analysis revealed that PDIP38 is composed of two conserved domains separated by an α/β linker region. The N-terminal (YccV-like) domain of PDIP38 forms an SH3-like β-barrel, which interacts specifically with CLPX, via the adaptor docking loop within the N-terminal Zinc binding domain of CLPX. In contrast, the C-terminal (DUF525) domain forms an immunoglobin-like β-sandwich fold, which contains a highly conserved putative substrate binding pocket. Importantly, PDIP38 modulates the substrate specificity of CLPX and protects CLPX from LONM-mediated degradation, which stabilises the cellular levels of CLPX. Collectively, our findings shed new light on the mechanism and function of mitochondrial PDIP38, demonstrating that PDIP38 is a bona fide adaptor protein for the mitochondrial protease, CLPXP., Strack et al find that Polymerase δ interacting protein 38 (PDIP38) is targeted to the mitochondrial matrix where it colocalises with the mitochondrial AAA + protein CLPXP. PDIP38 modulates the specificity of CLPXP in vitro and alters the stability of CLPX in vitro and in cells. The PDIP38 structure leads the authors to speculate that PDIP38 is a CLPXP adaptor.

SummaryPolymerase δ interacting protein of 38 kDa (PDIP38) was originally identified in a yeast two hybrid screen as an interacting protein of DNA polymerase delta, more than a decade ago. Since this time several subcellular locations have been reported and hence its function remains controversial. Our current understanding of PDIP38 function has also been hampered by a lack of detailed biochemical or structural analysis of this protein. Here we show, that human PDIP38 is directed to the mitochondrion, where it resides in the matrix compartment, together with its partner protein CLPX. PDIP38 is a bifunctional protein, composed of two conserved domains separated by an α-helical hinge region (or middle domain). The N-terminal (YccV-like) domain of PDIP38 forms an SH3-like β-barrel, which interacts specifically with CLPX, via the adaptor docking loop within the N-terminal Zinc binding domain (ZBD) of CLPX. In contrast, the C-terminal (DUF525) domain forms an Immunoglobin-like β-sandwich fold, which contains a highly conserved hydrophobic groove. Based on the physicochemical properties of this groove, we propose that PDIP38 is required for the recognition (and delivery to CLPXP) of proteins bearing specific hydrophobic degrons, potentially located at the termini of the target protein. Significantly, interaction with PDIP38 stabilizes the steady state levels of CLPX in vivo. Consistent with these data, PDIP38 inhibits the LONM-mediated turnover of CLPX in vitro. Collectively, our findings shed new light on the mechanistic and functional significance of PDIP38, indicating that in contrast to its initial identification as a nuclear protein, PIDP38 is a bona fide mitochondrial adaptor protein for the CLPXP protease.

Succinate:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR) functions in energy metabolism, coupling the tricarboxylic acid cycle and electron transport chain in bacteria and mitochondria. The biogenesis of flavinylated SdhA, the catalytic subunit of SQR, is assisted by a highly conserved assembly factor termed SdhE in bacteria via an unknown mechanism. By using X-ray crystallography, we have solved the structure of Escherichia coli SdhE in complex with SdhA to 2.15-A resolution. Our structure shows that SdhE makes a direct interaction with the flavin adenine dinucleotide-linked residue His45 in SdhA and maintains the capping domain of SdhA in an “open” conformation. This displaces the catalytic residues of the succinate dehydrogenase active site by as much as 9.0 A compared with SdhA in the assembled SQR complex. These data suggest that bacterial SdhE proteins, and their mitochondrial homologs, are assembly chaperones that constrain the conformation of SdhA to facilitate efficient flavinylation while regulating succinate dehydrogenase activity for productive biogenesis of SQR.

The pupylation of cellular proteins plays a crucial role in the degradation cascade via the Pup-Proteasome system (PPS). It is essential for the survival of Mycobacterium smegmatis under nutrient starvation and, as such, the activity of many components of the pathway is tightly regulated. Here, we show that Pup, like ubiquitin, can form polyPup chains primarily through K61 and that this form of Pup inhibits the ATPase-mediated turnover of pupylated substrates by the 20S proteasome. Similarly, the autopupylation of PafA (the sole Pup ligase found in mycobacteria) inhibits its own enzyme activity; hence, pupylation of PafA may act as a negative feedback mechanism to prevent substrate pupylation under specific cellular conditions.

The maintenance of mitochondrial protein homeostasis (proteostasis) is crucial for correct cellular function. Recently, several mutations in the mitochondrial protease CLPP have been identified in patients with Perrault syndrome 3 (PRLTS3). These mutations can be arranged into two groups, those that cluster near the docking site (hydrophobic pocket, Hp) for the cognate unfoldase CLPX (i.e. T145P and C147S) and those that are adjacent to the active site of the peptidase (i.e. Y229D). Here we report the biochemical consequence of mutations in both regions. The Y229D mutant not only inhibited CLPP-peptidase activity, but unexpectedly also prevented CLPX-docking, thereby blocking the turnover of both peptide and protein substrates. In contrast, Hp mutations cause a range of biochemical defects in CLPP, from no observable change to CLPP activity for the C147S mutant, to dramatic disruption of most activities for the “gain-of-function” mutant T145P - including loss of oligomeric assembly and enhanced peptidase activity.

Targeted protein degradation is crucial for the correct function and maintenance of a cell. In bacteria, this process is largely performed by a handful of ATP-dependent machines, which generally consist of two components - an unfoldase and a peptidase. In some cases, however, substrate recognition by the protease may be regulated by specialized delivery factors (known as adaptor proteins). Our detailed understanding of how these machines are regulated to prevent uncontrolled degradation within a cell has permitted the identification of novel antimicrobials that dysregulate these machines, as well as the development of tunable degradation systems that have applications in biotechnology. Here, we focus on the physiological role of the ClpP peptidase in bacteria, its role as a novel antibiotic target and the use of protein degradation as a biotechnological approach to artificially control the expression levels of a protein of interest.

The N-end rule is a conserved protein degradation pathway that relates the metabolic stability of a protein to the identity of its N-terminal residue. Proteins bearing a destabilising N-terminal residue (N-degron) are recognised by specialised components of the pathway (N-recognins) and degraded by cellular proteases. In bacteria, the N-recognin ClpS is responsible for the specific recognition of proteins bearing an N-terminal destabilising residue such as leucine, phenylalanine, tyrosine or tryptophan. In this study, we show that the putative apicoplast N-recognin from Plasmodium falciparum (PfClpS), in contrast to its bacterial homologues, exhibits an expanded substrate specificity that includes recognition of the branched chain amino acid isoleucine.

Intracellular proteolysis is a tightly regulated process responsible for the targeted removal of unwanted or damaged proteins. The non-lysosomal removal of these proteins is performed by processive enzymes, which belong to the AAA + superfamily, such as the 26S proteasome and Clp proteases. One important protein degradation pathway, that is common to both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, is the N-end rule. In this pathway, proteins bearing a destabilizing amino acid residue at their N-terminus are degraded either by the ClpAP protease in bacteria, such as Escherichia coli or by the ubiquitin proteasome system in the eukaryotic cytoplasm. A suite of enzymes and other molecular components are also required for the successful generation, recognition and delivery of N-end rule substrates to their cognate proteases. In this review we examine the similarities and differences in the N-end rule pathway of bacterial and eukaryotic systems, focusing on the molecular determinants of this pathway. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: AAA ATPases: structure and function.

The N-end rule pathway is a highly conserved process that operates in many different organisms. It relates the metabolic stability of a protein to its N-terminal amino acid. Consequently, amino acids are described as either 'stabilizing' or 'destabilizing'. Destabilizing residues are organized into three hierarchical levels: primary, secondary, and in eukaryotes - tertiary. Secondary and tertiary destabilizing residues act as signals for the post-translational modification of the target protein, ultimately resulting in the attachment of a primary destabilizing residue to the N-terminus of the protein. Regardless of their origin, proteins containing N-terminal primary destabilizing residues are recognized by a key component of the pathway. In prokaryotes, the recognition component is a specialized adaptor protein, known as ClpS, which delivers target proteins directly to the ClpAP protease for degradation. In contrast, eukaryotes use a family of E3 ligases, known as UBRs, to recognize and ubiquitylate their substrates resulting in their turnover by the 26S proteasome. While the physiological role of the N-end rule pathway is largely understood in eukaryotes, progress on the bacterial pathway has been slow. However, new interest in this area of research has invigorated several recent advances, unlocking some of the secrets of this unique proteolytic pathway in prokaryotes.

In eukaryotes, mitochondria are required for the proper function of the cell and as such the maintenance of proteins within this organelle is crucial. One class of proteins, collectively known as the AAA+ (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) superfamily, make a number of important contributions to mitochondrial protein homeostasis. In this organelle, they contribute to the maturation and activation of proteins, general protein quality control, respiratory chain complex assembly, and mitochondrial DNA maintenance and integrity. To achieve such diverse functions this group of ATP-dependent unfoldases utilize the energy from ATP hydrolysis to modulate the structure of proteins via unique domains and (or) associated functional components. In this review, we describe the current status of knowledge regarding the known mitochondrial AAA+ proteins and their role in this organelle.

The N-end rule pathway is conserved from bacteria to man and determines the half-life of a protein based on its N-terminal amino acid. In Escherichia coli, model substrates bearing an N-degron are recognised by ClpS and degraded by ClpAP in an ATP-dependent manner. Here, we report the isolation of 23 ClpS-interacting proteins from E. coli. Our data show that at least one of these interacting proteins--putrescine aminotransferase (PATase)--is post-translationally modified to generate a primary N-degron. Remarkably, the N-terminal modification of PATase is generated by a new specificity of leucyl/phenylalanyl-tRNA-protein transferase (LFTR), in which various combinations of primary destabilising residues (Leu and Phe) are attached to the N-terminal Met. This modification (of PATase), by LFTR, is essential not only for its recognition by ClpS, but also determines the stability of the protein in vivo. Thus, the N-end rule pathway, through the ClpAPS-mediated turnover of PATase may have an important function in putrescine homeostasis. In addition, we have identified a new element within the N-degron, which is required for substrate delivery to ClpA.

The mitochondrial inner membrane contains preprotein translocases that mediate insertion of hydrophobic proteins. Little is known about how the individual components of these inner membrane preprotein translocases combine to form multisubunit complexes. We have analyzed the assembly pathway of the three membrane-integral subunits Tim18, Tim22, and Tim54 of the twin-pore carrier translocase. Tim54 displayed the most complex pathway involving four preprotein translocases. The precursor is translocated across the intermembrane space in a supercomplex of outer and inner membrane translocases. The TIM10 complex, which translocates the precursor of Tim22 through the intermembrane space, functions in a new posttranslocational manner: in case of Tim54, it is required for the integration of Tim54 into the carrier translocase. Tim18, the function of which has been unknown so far, stimulates integration of Tim54 into the carrier translocase. We show that the carrier translocase is built via a modular process and that each subunit follows a different assembly route. Membrane insertion and assembly into the oligomeric complex are uncoupled for each precursor protein. We propose that the mitochondrial assembly machinery has adapted to the needs of each membrane-integral subunit and that the uncoupling of translocation and oligomerization is an important principle to ensure continuous import and assembly of protein complexes in a highly active membrane.

Protein degradation in the cytosol of Escherichia coli is carried out by a variety of different proteolytic machines, including ClpAP. The ClpA component is a hexameric AAA+ (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) chaperone that utilizes the energy of ATP to control substrate recognition and unfolding. The precise role of the N-domains of ClpA in this process, however, remains elusive. Here, we have analysed the role of five highly conserved basic residues in the N-domain of ClpA by monitoring the binding, unfolding and degradation of several different substrates, including short unstructured peptides, tagged and untagged proteins. Interestingly, mutation of three of these basic residues within the N-domain of ClpA (H94, R86 and R100) did not alter substrate degradation. In contrast mutation of two conserved arginine residues (R90 and R131), flanking a putative peptide-binding groove within the N-domain of ClpA, specifically compromised the ability of ClpA to unfold and degrade selected substrates but did not prevent substrate recognition, ClpS-mediated substrate delivery or ClpP binding. In contrast, a highly conserved tyrosine residue lining the central pore of the ClpA hexamer was essential for the degradation of all substrate types analysed, including both folded and unstructured proteins. Taken together, these data suggest that ClpA utilizes two structural elements, one in the N-domain and the other in the pore of the hexamer, both of which are required for efficient unfolding of some protein substrates.

Maintenance of mitochondrial protein homeostasis is critical for proper cellular function. Under normal conditions resident molecular chaperones and proteases maintain protein homeostasis within the organelle. Under conditions of stress however, misfolded proteins accumulate leading to the activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt). While molecular chaperone assisted refolding of proteins in mammalian mitochondria has been well documented, the contribution of AAA+ proteases to the maintenance of protein homeostasis in this organelle remains unclear. To address this gap in knowledge we examined the contribution of human mitochondrial matrix proteases, LONM and CLPXP, to the turnover of OTC-∆, a folding incompetent mutant of ornithine transcarbamylase, known to activate UPRmt. Contrary to a model whereby CLPXP is believed to degrade misfolded proteins, we found that LONM and not CLPXP is responsible for the turnover of OTC-∆ in human mitochondria. To analyse the conformational state of proteins that are recognised by LONM, we examined the turnover of unfolded and aggregated forms of malate dehydrogenase (MDH) and OTC. This analysis revealed that LONM specifically recognises and degrades unfolded, but not aggregated proteins. Since LONM is not upregulated by UPRmt, this pathway may preferentially act to promote chaperone mediated refolding of proteins.

In Escherichia coli, σ(S) is the master regulator of the general stress response. The level of σ(S) changes in response to multiple stress conditions and it is regulated at many levels including protein turnover. In the absence of stress, σ(S) is rapidly degraded by the AAA+ protease, ClpXP in a regulated manner that depends on the adaptor protein RssB. This two-component response regulator mediates the recognition of σ(S) and its delivery to ClpXP. The turnover of σ(S) however, can be inhibited in a stress specific manner, by one of three anti-adaptor proteins. Each anti-adaptor binds to RssB and inhibits its activity, but how this is achieved is not fully understood at a molecular level. Here, we describe details of the interaction between each anti-adaptor and RssB that leads to the stabilization of σ(S). By defining the domains of RssB using partial proteolysis we demonstrate that each anti-adaptor uses a distinct mode of binding to inhibit RssB activity. IraD docks specifically to the N-terminal domain of RssB, IraP interacts primarily with the C-terminal domain, while IraM interacts with both domains. Despite these differences in binding, we propose that docking of each anti-adaptor induces a conformational change in RssB, which resembles the inactive dimer of RssB. This dimer-like state of RssB not only prevents substrate binding but also triggers substrate release from a pre-bound complex.

Transport of metabolites across the mitochondrial inner membrane is highly selective, thereby maintaining the electrochemical proton gradient that functions as the main driving force for cellular adenosine triphosphate synthesis. Mitochondria import many preproteins via the presequence translocase of the inner membrane. However, the reconstituted Tim23 protein constitutes a pore remaining mainly in its open form, a state that would be deleterious in organello. We found that the intermembrane space domain of Tim50 induced the Tim23 channel to close. Presequences overcame this effect and activated the channel for translocation. Thus, the hydrophilic cis domain of Tim50 maintains the permeability barrier of mitochondria by closing the translocation pore in a presequence-regulated manner.

Tom40 is the central pore-forming component of the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM complex). Different views exist about the secondary structure and electrophysiological characteristics of Tom40 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Neurospora crassa. We have directly compared expressed and renatured Tom40 from both species and find a high content of beta-structure in circular dichroism measurements in agreement with refined secondary structure predictions. The electrophysiological characterization of renatured Tom40 reveals the same characteristics as the purified TOM complex or mitochondrial outer membrane vesicles, with two exceptions. The total conductance of the TOM complex and outer membrane vesicles is twofold higher than the total conductance of renatured Tom40, consistent with the presence of two TOM pores. TOM complex and outer membrane vesicles possess a strongly enhanced sensitivity to a mitochondrial presequence compared to Tom40 alone, in agreement with the presence of several presequence binding sites in the TOM complex, suggesting a role of the non-channel Tom proteins in regulating channel activity.

The carrier proteins of the mitochondrial inner membrane consist of three structurally related tandem repeats (modules). Several different, and in some cases contradictory, views exist on the role individual modules play in carrier transport across the mitochondrial membranes and how they promote protein insertion into the inner membrane. Thus, by use of specific translocation intermediates, we performed a detailed analysis of carrier biogenesis and assessed the physical association of carrier modules with the inner membrane translocation machinery. Here we have reported that each module of the dicarboxylate carrier contains sufficient targeting information for its transport across the outer mitochondrial membrane. The carboxyl-terminal module possesses major targeting information to facilitate the direct binding of the carrier protein to the inner membrane twin-pore translocase and subsequent insertion into the inner membrane in a membrane potential-dependent manner. We concluded that, in this case, a single structural repeat can drive inner membrane insertion, whereas all three related units contribute targeting information for outer membrane translocation.

Tom40 forms the central channel of the preprotein translocase of the mitochondrial outer membrane (TOM complex). The precursor of Tom40 is encoded in the nucleus, synthesized in the cytosol, and imported into mitochondria via a multi-step assembly pathway that involves the mature TOM complex and the sorting and assembly machinery of the outer membrane (SAM complex). We report that opening of the mitochondrial intermembrane space by swelling blocks the assembly pathway of the β-barrel protein Tom40. Mitochondria with defects in small Tim proteins of the intermembrane space are impaired in the Tom40 assembly pathway. Swelling as well as defects in the small Tim proteins inhibit an early stage of the Tom40 import pathway that is needed for formation of a Tom40-SAM intermediate. We propose that the biogenesis pathway of β-barrel proteins of the outer mitochondrial membrane not only requires TOM and SAM components, but also involves components of the intermembrane space.

Mitochondrial preproteins destined for the matrix are translocated by two channel-forming transport machineries, the translocase of the outer membrane and the presequence translocase of the inner membrane. The presequence translocase-associated protein import motor (PAM) contains four essential subunits: the matrix heat shock protein 70 (mtHsp70) and its three cochaperones Mge1, Tim44 and Pam18. Here we report that the PAM contains a fifth essential subunit, Pam16 (encoded by Saccharomyces cerevisiae YJL104W), which is selectively required for preprotein translocation into the matrix, but not for protein insertion into the inner membrane. Pam16 interacts with Pam18 and is needed for the association of Pam18 with the presequence translocase and for formation of a mtHsp70-Tim44 complex. Thus, Pam16 is a newly identified type of motor subunit and is required to promote a functional PAM reaction cycle, thereby driving preprotein import into the matrix.

Transport of preproteins into the mitochondrial matrix is mediated by the presequence translocase–associated motor (PAM). Three essential subunits of the motor are known: mitochondrial Hsp70 (mtHsp70); the peripheral membrane protein Tim44; and the nucleotide exchange factor Mge1. We have identified the fourth essential subunit of the PAM, an essential inner membrane protein of 18 kD with a J-domain that stimulates the ATPase activity of mtHsp70. The novel J-protein (encoded by PAM18/YLR008c/TIM14) is required for the interaction of mtHsp70 with Tim44 and protein translocation into the matrix. We conclude that the reaction cycle of the PAM of mitochondria involves an essential J-protein.

The mitochondrial intermembrane space contains a protein complex essential for cell viability, the Tim9-Tim10 complex. This complex is required for the import of hydrophobic membrane proteins, such as the ADP/ATP carrier (AAC), into the inner membrane. Different views exist about the role played by the Tim9-Tim10 complex in translocation of the AAC precursor across the outer membrane. For this report we have generated a new tim10 yeast mutant that leads to a strong defect in AAC import into mitochondria. Thereby, for the first time, authentic AAC is stably arrested in the translocase complex of the outer membrane (TOM), as shown by antibody shift blue native electrophoresis. Surprisingly, AAC is still associated with the receptors Tom70 and Tom20 when the function of Tim10 is impaired. The nonessential Tim8-Tim13 complex of the intermembrane space is not involved in the transfer of AAC across the outer membrane. These results define a two-step mechanism for translocation of AAC across the outer membrane. The initial insertion of AAC into the import channel is independent of the function of Tim9-Tim10; however, completion of translocation across the outer membrane, including release from the TOM complex, requires a functional Tim9-Tim10 complex.

Mitochondrial proteins with N-terminal targeting signals are transported across the inner membrane via the presequence translocase, which consists of membrane-integrated channel proteins and the matrix Hsp70 import motor. It has not been known how preproteins are directed to the import channel. We have identified the essential protein Tim50, which exposes its major domain to the intermembrane space. Tim50 interacts with preproteins in transit and directs them to the channel protein Tim23. Inactivation of Tim50 strongly inhibits the import of preproteins with a classical matrix-targeting signal, while preproteins carrying an additional inner membrane-sorting signal do not strictly depend on Tim50. Thus, Tim50 is crucial for guiding the precursors of matrix proteins to their insertion site in the inner membrane.

The protein insertion complex of the mitochondrial inner membrane is crucial for import of the numerous multitopic membrane proteins with internal targeting signals. Little is known about the molecular mechanism of this complex, including whether it forms a real channel or merely acts as scaffold for protein insertion. We report the unexpected observation that Tim22 is the only essential membrane-integrated subunit of the complex. Reconstituted Tim22 forms a hydrophilic, high-conductance channel with distinct opening states and pore diameters. The channel is voltage-activated and specifically responds to an internal targeting signal, but not to presequences. Thus, a protein insertion complex can combine three essential functions, signal recognition, channel formation, and energy transduction, in one central component.

Proteins imported into the mitochondrial matrix are synthesized in the cytosol with an N-terminal presequence and are translocated through hetero-oligomeric translocase complexes of the outer and inner mitochondrial membranes. The channel across the inner membrane is formed by the presequence translocase, which consists of roughly six distinct subunits; however, it is not known which subunits actually form the channel. Here we report that purified Tim23 forms a hydrophilic, approximately 13-24 A wide channel characteristic of the mitochondrial presequence translocase. The Tim23 channel is cation selective and activated by a membrane potential and presequences. The channel is formed by the C-terminal domain of Tim23 alone, whereas the N-terminal domain is required for selectivity and a high-affinity presequence interaction. Thus, Tim23 forms a voltage-sensitive high-conductance channel with specificity for mitochondrial presequences.

Proteins targeted to mitochondria are transported into the organelle through a high molecular weight complex called the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM). At the core of this machinery is a multisubunit general import pore (GIP) of 400 kDa. Here we report the assembly of the yeast GIP that involves two successive intermediates of 250 kDa and 100 kDa. The precursor of the channel-lining Tom40 is first targeted to the membrane via the receptor proteins Tom20 and Tom22; it then assembles with Tom5 to form the 250 kDa intermediate exposed to the intermembrane space. The 250 kDa intermediate is followed by the formation of the 100 kDa intermediate that associates with Tom6. Maturation to the 400 kDa complex occurs by association of Tom7 and Tom22. Tom7 functions by promoting both the dissociation of the 400 kDa complex and the transition from the 100 kDa intermediate to the mature complex. These results indicate that the dynamic conversion between the 400 kDa complex and the 100 kDa late intermediate allows integration of new precursor subunits into pre-existing complexes.

Most mitochondrial proteins are transported from the cytosol into the organelle. Due to the division of mitochondria into an outer and inner membrane, an intermembrane space and a matrix, an elaborated system for recognition and transport of preproteins has evolved. The translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM) and the translocases of the inner mitochondrial membrane (TIM) mediate these processes. Receptor proteins on the cytosolic face of mitochondria recognize the cargo proteins and transfer them to the general import pore (GIP) of the outer membrane. Following the passage of preproteins through the outer membrane they are transported with the aid of the TIM23 complex into either the matrix, inner membrane, or intermembrane space. Some preprotein families utilize the TIM22 complex for their insertion into the inner membrane. The identification of protein components, which are involved in these transport processes, as well as significant insights into the molecular function of some of them, has been achieved in recent years. Moreover, we are now approaching a new era in which elaborated techniques have already allowed and will enable us to gather information about the TOM and TIM complexes on an ultrastructural level.

The groE homologous genes of the anaerobic thermophile Thermoanaerobacter sp. Rt8.G4 (TRt) have been isolated, sequenced and analysed. The TRt groES and groEL encode subunits of chaperonin 10 (Cpn10) and chaperonin 60 (Cpn60) of 94 and 541 amino acids, respectively, and are arranged in that order forming the open reading frames (ORFs) of a bicistronic operon. A controlling inverted repeat of chaperone expression (CIRCE) element lies between the consensus promoter of the operon and TRt groES. At optimum growth temperature (65 degreesC) the chaperonins of TRt are expressed, but production of Cpn60 increases significantly following temperature increases of 3-10 degreesC. Functionally intact recombinant TRt chaperonins were produced in Escherichia coli. However, owing to codon incompatibility, replacement of consecutive AGA codons in the gene encoding TRt Cpn60 was necessary for optimum expression in this heterologous host.

Mitochondria are specialised organelles that are structurally and functionally integrated into cells in the vast majority of eukaryotes. They are the site of numerous enzymatic reactions, some of which are essential for life. The double lipid membrane of the mitochondrion, that spatially defines the organelle and is necessary for some functions, also creates a physical but semi-permeable barrier to the rest of the cell. Thus to ensure the biogenesis, regulation and maintenance of a functional population of proteins, an autonomous protein handling network within mitochondria is required. This includes resident mitochondrial protein translocation machinery, processing peptidases, molecular chaperones and proteases. This review highlights the contribution of proteases of the AAA+ superfamily to protein quality and activity control within the mitochondrion. Here they are responsible for the degradation of unfolded, unassembled and oxidatively damaged proteins as well as the activity control of some enzymes. Since most knowledge about these proteases has been gained from studies in the eukaryotic microorganism Saccharomyces cerevisiae, much of the discussion here centres on their role in this organism. However, reference is made to mitochondrial AAA+ proteases in other organisms, particularly in cases where they play a unique role such as the mitochondrial unfolded protein response. As these proteases influence mitochondrial function in both health and disease in humans, an understanding of their regulation and diverse activities is necessary.

Mitochondria are specialised organelles that are structurally and functionally integrated into cells in the vast majority of eukaryotes. They are the site of numerous enzymatic reactions, some of which are essential for life. The double lipid membrane of the mitochondrion, that spatially defines the organelle and is necessary for some functions, also creates a physical but semi-permeable barrier to the rest of the cell. Thus to ensure the biogenesis, regulation and maintenance of a functional population of proteins, an autonomous protein handling network within mitochondria is required. This includes resident mitochondrial protein translocation machinery, processing peptidases, molecular chaperones and proteases. This review highlights the contribution of proteases of the AAA+ superfamily to protein quality and activity control within the mitochondrion. Here they are responsible for the degradation of unfolded, unassembled and oxidatively damaged proteins as well as the activity control of some enzymes. Since most knowledge about these proteases has been gained from studies in the eukaryotic microorganism Saccharomyces cerevisiae, much of the discussion here centres on their role in this organism. However, reference is made to mitochondrial AAA+ proteases in other organisms, particularly in cases where they play a unique role such as the mitochondrial unfolded protein response. As these proteases influence mitochondrial function in both health and disease in humans, an understanding of their regulation and diverse activities is necessary.

The mechanisms that underlie the oxidative biogenesis of mitochondrial proteins catalyzed by disulfide carrier Mia40 and thiol oxidase Erv1 are not fully understood. This study identifies dynamics of the Mia40–substrate intermediate complex and shows that Erv1 directly participates in Mia40–substrate dynamics by forming a ternary complex., The intermembrane space of mitochondria accommodates the essential mitochondrial intermembrane space assembly (MIA) machinery that catalyzes oxidative folding of proteins. The disulfide bond formation pathway is based on a relay of reactions involving disulfide transfer from the sulfhydryl oxidase Erv1 to Mia40 and from Mia40 to substrate proteins. However, the substrates of the MIA typically contain two disulfide bonds. It was unclear what the mechanisms are that ensure that proteins are released from Mia40 in a fully oxidized form. In this work, we dissect the stage of the oxidative folding relay, in which Mia40 binds to its substrate. We identify dynamics of the Mia40–substrate intermediate complex. Our experiments performed in a native environment, both in organello and in vivo, show that Erv1 directly participates in Mia40–substrate complex dynamics by forming a ternary complex. Thus Mia40 in cooperation with Erv1 promotes the formation of two disulfide bonds in the substrate protein, ensuring the efficiency of oxidative folding in the intermembrane space of mitochondria.

Chaperonin 60 and chaperonin 10 (GroEL and GroES homologues, respectively) have been isolated from extracts of the anaerobic thermophile Thermoanaerobacter brockii. A simple and rapid purification for chaperonin 60 made use of hydrophobic and anion-exchange chromatographies, and could be readily scaled up; approximately 2 mg pure chaperonin 60 was obtained/g cells. In contrast with all other prokaryotic chaperonin 60 proteins that have been studied, which are tetradecamers, including those from Thermus sp., the T. brockii protein is a heptamer, and as isolated was not in association with chaperonin 10. The preparation is readily crystallized using 2-propanol or poly(ethylene glycol) with MgCl2. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of this preparation is similar to other thermophilic chaperonin 60 proteins. Chaperonin 10 was purified from the flow-through of the first hydrophobic column (which bound chaperonin 60) using a more hydrophobic adsorbent to remove contaminating proteins, followed by anion-exchange chromatography. Chaperonin 10 was obtained with a yield of approximately 10% that of chaperonin 60. The subunit molecular mass of chaperonin 10 determined by electrospray mass spectrometry is 10254 +/- 0.4 Da, which is very similar to the molecular mass of Escherichia coli GroES. Similarly, the subunit size of chaperonin 60 determined by mass spectrometry is very similar to that of GroEL, at 57949 +/- 10 Da. T. brockii chaperonin 60 has an ATPase activity that is suppressed by chaperonin 10, and the two proteins together are active in protein-folding assays. Mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase was successfully refolded at 37 degrees C after denaturation in guanidine hydrochloride, using T. brockii chaperonin 60 and chaperonin 10, or chaperonin 60 and E. coli GroES. The denatured enzyme was protected from aggregation by association with chaperonin 60. Guanidine-hydrochloride-denatured preparations of isocitrate dehydrogenase and secondary alcohol dehydrogenase isolated from T. brockii were also refolded at 60-65 degrees C. In each case, refolding required chaperonin 60, chaperonin 10 and ATP, giving up to 80% regeneration of control activity.

Proteins imported into mitochondria must be unfolded in order to pass through translocation pores present in the mitochondrial membranes. An article in this issue suggests that not only the heat shock protein 70 in the matrix, but also the electrical membrane potential across the inner membrane can actively unfold preproteins via a pulling mechanism.

Mitochondrial import of cleavable preproteins occurs at translocation contact sites, where the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) associates with the presequence translocase of the inner membrane (TIM23) in a supercomplex. Different views exist on the mechanism of how TIM23 mediates preprotein sorting to either the matrix or inner membrane. On the one hand, two TIM23 forms were proposed, a matrix transport form containing the presequence translocase-associated motor (PAM; TIM23-PAM) and a sorting form containing Tim21 (TIM23(SORT)). On the other hand, it was reported that TIM23 and PAM are permanently associated in a single-entity translocase. We have accumulated distinct transport intermediates of preproteins to analyze the translocases in their active, preprotein-carrying state. We identified two different forms of active TOM-TIM23 supercomplexes, TOM-TIM23(SORT) and TOM-TIM23-PAM. These two supercomplexes do not represent separate pathways but are in dynamic exchange during preprotein translocation and sorting. Depending on the signals of the preproteins, switches between the different forms of supercomplex and TIM23 are required for the completion of preprotein import.

In Escherichia coli, the ClpAP protease, together with the adaptor protein ClpS, is responsible for the degradation of proteins bearing an amino-terminal destabilizing amino acid (N-degron). Here, we determined the three-dimensional structures of ClpS in complex with three peptides, each having a different destabilizing residue--Leu, Phe or Trp--at its N terminus. All peptides, regardless of the identity of their N-terminal residue, are bound in a surface pocket on ClpS in a stereo-specific manner. Several highly conserved residues in this binding pocket interact directly with the backbone of the N-degron peptide and hence are crucial for the binding of all N-degrons. By contrast, two hydrophobic residues define the volume of the binding pocket and influence the specificity of ClpS. Taken together, our data suggest that ClpS has been optimized for the binding and delivery of N-degrons containing an N-terminal Phe or Leu.

Most mitochondrial proteins are nuclear-encoded and synthesised as preproteins on polysomes in the cytosol. They must be targeted to and translocated into mitochondria. Newly synthesised preproteins interact with cytosolic factors until their recognition by receptors on the surface of mitochondria. Import into or across the outer membrane is mediated by a dynamic protein complex coined the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM). Preproteins that are imported into the matrix or inner membrane of mitochondria require the action of one of two translocation complexes of the inner membrane (TIMs). The import pathway of preproteins is predetermined by their intrinsic targeting and sorting signals. Energy input in the form of ATP and the electrical gradient across the inner membrane is required for protein translocation into mitochondria. Newly imported proteins may require molecular chaperones for their correct folding.

Often preparations of isolated organelles contain other, unwanted, cellular components. For biochemical experiments to determine the localization of newly identified proteins, or to determine the whole set of proteins (or the proteome) from a desired organelle, these unwanted components often confuse the resulting data. For these types of studies, it is crucial to have highly pure fractions of the desired organelle. Here we describe a protocol for purification of mitochondria from Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells devoid of contamination from other cellular compartments.

Tom40 forms the central channel of the preprotein translocase of the mitochondrial outer membrane (TOM complex). The precursor of Tom40 is encoded in the nucleus, synthesized in the cytosol, and imported into mitochondria via a multi-step assembly pathway that involves the mature TOM complex and the sorting and assembly machinery of the outer membrane (SAM complex). We report that opening of the mitochondrial intermembrane space by swelling blocks the assembly pathway of the beta-barrel protein Tom40. Mitochondria with defects in small Tim proteins of the intermembrane space are impaired in the Tom40 assembly pathway. Swelling as well as defects in the small Tim proteins inhibit an early stage of the Tom40 import pathway that is needed for formation of a Tom40-SAM intermediate. We propose that the biogenesis pathway of beta-barrel proteins of the outer mitochondrial membrane not only requires TOM and SAM components, but also involves components of the intermembrane space.

The mitochondrial inner membrane contains numerous multispanning integral proteins. The precursors of these hydrophobic proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and therefore have to cross the mitochondrial outer membrane and intermembrane space to reach the inner membrane. While the import pathways of noncleavable multispanning proteins, such as the metabolite carriers, have been characterized in detail by the generation of translocation intermediates, little is known about the mechanism by which cleavable preproteins of multispanning proteins, such as Oxa1, are transferred from the outer membrane to the inner membrane. We have identified a translocation intermediate of the Oxa1 preprotein in the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) and found that there are differences from the import mechanisms of carrier proteins. The intermembrane space domain of the receptor Tom22 supports the stabilization of the Oxa1 intermediate. Transfer of the Oxa1 preprotein to the inner membrane is not affected by inactivation of the soluble TIM complexes. Both the inner membrane potential and matrix heat shock protein 70 are essential to release the preprotein from the TOM complex, suggesting a close functional cooperation of the TOM complex and the presequence translocase of the inner membrane. We conclude that mitochondria employ different mechanisms for translocation of multispanning proteins across the aqueous intermembrane space.

The mitochondrial inner membrane imports numerous proteins that span it multiple times using the membrane potential Deltapsi as the only external energy source. We purified the protein insertion complex (TIM22 complex), a twin-pore translocase that mediated the insertion of precursor proteins in a three-step process. After the precursor is tethered to the translocase without losing energy from the Deltapsi, two energy-requiring steps were needed. First, Deltapsi acted on the precursor protein and promoted its docking in the translocase complex. Then, Deltapsi and an internal signal peptide together induced rapid gating transitions in one pore and closing of the other pore and drove membrane insertion to completion. Thus, protein insertion was driven by the coordinated action of a twin-pore complex in two voltage-dependent steps.

Mitochondrial proteins with N-terminal targeting signals are transported across the inner membrane via the presequence translocase, which consists of membrane-integrated channel proteins and the matrix Hsp70 import motor. It has not been known how preproteins are directed to the import channel. We have identified the essential protein Tim50, which exposes its major domain to the intermembrane space. Tim50 interacts with preproteins in transit and directs them to the channel protein Tim23. Inactivation of Tim50 strongly inhibits the import of preproteins with a classical matrix-targeting signal, while preproteins carrying an additional inner membrane-sorting signal do not strictly depend on Tim50. Thus, Tim50 is crucial for guiding the precursors of matrix proteins to their insertion site in the inner membrane.

Publisher Summary This chapter outlines the translocation of proteins into mitochondria. Most mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and subsequently imported into the organelle. According to the “conservative sorting” model, the precursor protein is first imported into the matrix, then cleaved by MPP, re-exported as an intermediate form into the inner membrane and finally cleaved to the mature protein by the inner membrane peptidase. Numerous mitochondrial preproteins, however, do not carry cleavable presequences, but contain internal targeting signals in the mature protein part. The signaling information for the specific targeting of preproteins to mitochondria is only contained in the targeting sequences of the preproteins and is decoded by membrane-bound receptors of the mitochondria. The binding chain thus serves as a guiding system to direct preproteins across the mitochondrial outer membrane and to the inner membrane. This chapter also highlights that a pressing issue will be the elucidation of the structural organization of the translocases, of receptors and channels. This is yet to be explored and to know which energy sources drive the translocation of preproteins across the outer membrane and how the import motor of mtHsp70 and Tim44 functions at a molecular level.

Carrier proteins located in the inner membrane of mitochondria are responsible for the exchange of metabolites between the intermembrane space and the matrix of this organelle. All members of this family are nuclear-encoded and depend on translocation machineries for their import into mitochondria. Recently many new translocation components responsible for the import of carrier proteins were identified. It is now possible to describe a detailed import pathway for this class of proteins. This review highlights the contribution made by translocation components to the process of carrier protein import into mitochondria.

A high-abundance NADH-oxidizing enzyme (NADH: acceptor oxidoreductase, EC 1.6.99.3) has been identified and isolated from a range of anaerobic extreme thermophiles, including strains of Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum and Thermoanaerobium brockii. By use of a pseudo-affinity salt-promoted adsorbent, a nearly pure sample was obtained in one step; remaining impurities were separated by ion-exchange. The fully active purified enzyme contains FAD (two molecules per subunit of 75-78 kDa) and iron-sulphur, and is hexameric in its most active form. The reaction with oxygen is a one- or two-electron transfer to produce superoxide radical and H2O2; other acceptors include tetrazolium salts, dichlorophenol-indophenol, menadione and ferricyanide. The role of the enzyme is not clear; it was found not to be NAD:ferredoxin oxidoreductase, which is a major NADH-utilizing enzyme in these organisms.