Search

This article discusses the inclusion of high functioning individuals in the learning disability category. It argues that extending services to individuals without significant academic impairments may deplete resources for others in greater need, distort the normal processes by which individuals select careers, and diminish the credibility of the diagnosis itself. (Author/CR)

An increasing number of individuals are requesting disability accommodations on high-stakes licensing examinations, and neuropsychological evaluation reports are a frequent component of disability documentation. This study reviewed 103 requests for accommodations based on a learning disability (LD), submitted to the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners between 2013 and 2016 for accommodation on the licensure exams for osteopathic physicians. Depending on criteria employed, anywhere from 84 to 97% of applicants failed to meet recognized criteria for a LD diagnosis, with the vast majority demonstrating academic functioning that was average or better relative to most other individuals in the general population. Thus, although given a disability diagnosis, the majority lacked evidence of substantial impairment that would require accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Additionally, no significant differences were found between the academic achievement or fluency scores of those requesting 50% as compared to 100% extra time. Finally, many evaluators employed grade-based assessment measures to demonstrate academic impairment, even when candidates' functioning using age-based comparisons was unimpaired. Recommendations for future research and practice based on these and other findings are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]