Search

A top priority for the Veteran’s Healthcare Administration is improving access to high-quality mental healthcare. Mobile and telemental healthcare are a vital component of increasing access for veterans. The Veteran’s Healthcare Administration is making efforts to further broaden how veterans receive their care through VA Video Connect, which allows veterans to connect with their provider from their residence or workplace. In this mixed-methods study, successes and challenges associated with the rapid implementation of VA Video Connect telemental health appointments are examined through (1) administrative data and (2) qualitative interviews at one medical center. Within 1 year of the telehealth initiative, the number of providers experienced with telemental health increased from 15% to 85%, and telehealth appointments increased from 5376 to 14,210. Provider reported barriers included administrative challenges and concerns regarding care. Having an implementation model of telehealth champions and a team of experienced mental health providers allowed for rapid adoption of telehealth. Utilizing a similar model in other settings will further enable more veterans with depression and anxiety to have access to evidence-based psychotherapy, regardless of location or national crisis. With the dramatic increase in both training for providers as well as veteran use of telemental healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic response, future research should aim to better understand which teams were able to switch to telehealth easily versus those which struggled, along with examining system-wide and provider-level factors that facilitated continued use of telehealth after social distancing requirements related to COVID-19 were relaxed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s41347-020-00161-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Three methods for estimation of the equilibrium tissue-to-plasma partition ratios (Kp values) in the presence of tissue concentration time data have been investigated. These are the area method, the open loop (tissue specific) method and the whole body model(closed loop) method, each with different model assumptions. Additionally, multiple imputations, a technique for dealing with deficiencies in data sets (i.e., missing tissues) is used. The estimated Kp values by the three methods have been compared and the limitations and advantages of each approach drawn. The area method, which is essentially model free, gives only a crude estimate of Kp without making any statement of its uncertainty; whereas both the open and closed loop methods provide an estimate of this. The closed loop method, where the most assumptions are made, is the approach that gives the best overall estimates of Kp, which was confirmed by comparing the predicted concentration–time profiles with experimental data. Although the estimates from the closed loop method, as well as the other two methods, are conditioned on the data, they are the most reliable for both propagating parameter variability and uncertainty through a whole body physiologically based model, as well as for extrapolation to human. A series of benzodiazepines, namely alprazolam, chlordiazepoxide, clobazam, diazepam, flunitrazepam, midazolam and triazolam in rat is used as a case study in the current investigation.