Search

Background: Aggressive treatment of peritoneal metastases from colon cancer by surgical cytoreduction and infusional intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy may benefit selected patients. We reviewed our institutional experience to assess patient selection, complications, and outcome., Methods: Patients having surgical debulking and IP 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUDR) plus leucovorin (LV) for peritoneal metastases from 1987 to 1999 were evaluated retrospectively., Results: There were 64 patients with a mean age of 50 years. Primary tumor sites were 47 in the colon and 17 in the appendix. Peritoneal metastases were synchronous in 48 patients and metachronous in 16 patients. Patients received IP FUDR (1000 mg/m2 daily for 3 days) and IP leucovorin (240 mg/m2) with a median cycle number of 4 (range, 1-28). The median number of complications was 1 (range, 0-5), with no treatment related mortality. Only six patients (9%) required termination of IP chemotherapy because of complications. The median follow-up was 17 months (range, 0-132 months). The median survival was 34 months (range, 2-132); 5-year survival was 28%. Lymph node status, tumor grade, and interval to peritoneal metastasis were not statistically significant prognostic factors for survival. Complete tumor resection was significant on multivariate analysis (P = .04), with a 5-year survival of 54% for complete (n = 19) and 16% for incomplete (n = 45) resection., Conclusions: Surgical debulking and IP FUDR for peritoneal metastases from colon cancer can be accomplished safely and has yielded an overall 5-year survival of 28%. Complete resection is associated with improved survival (54% at 5 years) and is the most important prognostic indicator.

The liver is a common site for developing metastatic disease. Although any malignancy can spread to the liver, the direct passage of blood from the gastrointestinal tract to the liver via the portal circulation results in a high rate of liver metastasis from gastrointestinal tract tumours. Various radiographical tests including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can detect the majority of liver metastases. Surgical resection if feasible is the treatment of choice since it produces a 5-year survival rate of about 30%. However, the majority of the patients relapse after hepatic resection, 50% relapsing in the liver. Systemic chemotherapy produces response rates of 15-30% with a median survival of 10-12 months. It is estimated that 30,000 patients each year in the USA are candidates for regional hepatic therapy. Hepatic arterial chemotherapy, hepatic artery embolization, chemoembolization, cryosurgery, ethanol injection of the tumour and radiation therapy are being investigated as potential treatment options for such patients.

Hepatic metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The rationale for hepatic arterial chemotherapy has both an anatomical and pharmacological basis. Several randomized clinical studies of fluoropyrimidine showed higher response rates in all trials when the drug was given as an hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) versus systemic administration. However, the studies did not accurately define survival for the following reasons: (1) some allowed a crossover; (2) some were too small; and (3) some used inadequate systemic chemotherapy. Patients who have failed to respond to previous systemic chemotherapy have an approximately 50% response rate with HAI treatment. Hepatic toxicity, especially biliary sclerosis, is the dose-limiting toxicity, occurring in 6% to 25% of patients. Adding dexamethasone to HAI fluoropyrimidine decreases the hepatobiliary toxicity. The therapeutic benefit of HAI in one study was also demonstrated by an increased time with normal quality of life. To truly define the role of regional therapy in patients with CRC confined to the liver, the current Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study is randomizing patients to HAI versus systemic therapy without a crossover to demonstrate if HAI improves survival and/or quality of life in addition to response rates.

Background: Chest computed tomography (CT) often is used to rule out lung metastases in patients with potentially resectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. In the current study the authors evaluated whether CT of the chest was necessary in patients with a negative chest radiograph., Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 202 patients with negative initial chest X-rays who were undergoing evaluation for potentially resectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Patients with highly suspicious pulmonary lesions on the initial chest CT scan underwent a thoracoscopy and biopsy. All patients were monitored for the development of pulmonary metastases., Results: Sixty patients (30%) had a positive initial chest CT scan. Two patients were found to have metastases by comparison with prior CT scans. Seventeen patients had highly suspicious lesions that were biopsied, but only 2 were found to have pulmonary metastases; the other lesions were benign. An additional 13 of these 60 patients developed lung metastases during follow-up, 6 of whom were diagnosed in retrospect. Of the 142 patients with a negative initial CT scan, 33 (23%) developed pulmonary metastases. The rate of pulmonary metastases in both groups was not significantly different, regardless of whether the CT scans were positive or negative., Conclusions: During routine preoperative workup for liver resection, the majority of lesions appearing on chest CT scans of patients with negative chest radiographs were not malignant. The positive yield of CT-guided workup was only 10 of 202 patients (5%). Based on this review the authors question the use of chest CT scans in this setting.

Background: Hepatic resection is the standard treatment for hepatic colorectal metastases. The lung represents the next most likely site, after the liver, of metastatic disease. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest is more sensitive than is chest x-ray in detecting metastatic lung lesions. However, the usefulness of chest CT in the evaluation of patients before hepatic resection remains uncertain., Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with negative chest x-rays and potentially resectable hepatic colorectal metastases underwent chest CT. Patients with CT findings suggestive of metastatic disease were subjected to thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) before laparotomy and attempted hepatic resection. The operative findings and clinical course were analyzed., Results: Eleven of 100 patients had a positive chest CT. Four of these 11 patients had malignant lesions of the lung (three metastatic colorectal cancers and one primary lung cancer). There was no difference in median total hospital stay (8.5 days [range 7 to 13 days] vs. 8.0 days [range 3 to 49 days]), number of perioperative deaths (0 vs. 2 deaths), or long-term outcome between those patients with a positive chest CT undergoing thoracotomy/VATS and those patients with a negative chest CT. Overall, chest CT provided a positive yield of 4% and a positive predictive value of 36% for the detection of malignant lesions of the lung., Conclusions: Chest CT only minimally improved detection of malignant lesions of the lung over chest x-ray. Thoracotomy/VATS and wedge resection of lung nodules did not adversely affect outcome. The low positive yield and low positive predictive value of chest CT in the setting of a negative chest x-ray places in question the usefulness of routinely performing chest CT as part of the extent-of-disease work-up before hepatic resection.