Search

Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a targeted drug used for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Erlotinib is considered relatively safe and generally well-tolerated, with rarely reported cardiac side effects. Herein, we report a case of cardiomyopathy that developed during erlotinib treatment for NSCLC. Two months after erlotinib initiation, our 70 year-old female patient complained of progressive dyspnea, and a diagnostic endomyocardial biopsy confirmed non-specific cardiomyopathy, indicating erlotinib-induced cardiomyopathy. We believed that continued administration of erlotinib would exacerbate her heart failure, while treatment of the heart failure with intensive monitoring would allow the administration of erlotinib to be continued. This case report highlights the potential cardiotoxic effects of erlotinib and suggests the need for close clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of patients receiving erlotinib.

Objective Onco-cardiology services are expanding rapidly in Japan. To provide a better service, it is important to consider the needs of oncologists. However, little is known regarding specific needs for which oncologists should consult cardiologists to manage cardiovascular problems of their patients. We analysed cardiology consultations sought by oncologists to evaluate the role of cardiologists in cancer treatment. Method We retrospectively investigated consecutive 2064 cardiology consultations of cancer patients in the University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan, between January 2014 and December 2018. Results The most common timing of cardiology consultation was before the commencement of cancer treatment (n = 1355; 65.7%), followed by after the commencement of cancer treatment (n = 686; 33.2%). Among the 361 consultations before the administration of anticancer drugs, 235 (65.1%) were for anthracycline-based regimens. There were 506 (24.5%) consultations for the management of cardiovascular emergencies developing after the commencement of cancer treatment; venous thromboembolism was the most frequent (n = 125; 24.7%), followed by atrial fibrillation (n = 110; 21.7%) and heart failure (n = 74; 14.6%). There were marked differences in the types of cardiovascular emergencies depending on the type of cancer. Conclusions This survey revealed the various cardiovascular problems for which oncologists sought interventions by cardiologists. A multidisciplinary approach in an onco-cardiology service is essential to achieve optimal long-term outcomes.

As the number of cancer survivors increases, cardiac management in anthracycline-treated patients has become more important. We planned to conduct a prospective multicenter registry study for comprehensive echocardiographic and biomarker data collection and an evaluation of the current practice in terms of diagnosis and management of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC registry). To examine the feasibility of this registry study, we analyzed the 1-year follow-up data of 97 patients registered during the first year of this registry. The AIC registry was launched in July 2016. Data on echocardiographic parameters (e.g., two-and three-dimensional [(2- and 3-D) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS)) and biomarkers (e.g., troponin T and brain natriuretic peptide) were collected before anthracycline treatment, every 3 months during the first year after starting anthracycline, and every 6 months during the second year. Eighty-three patients (86%) completed a 1-year follow-up. The measurable rates of 2D LVEF, 3D LVEF, and GLS on each visit were nearly optimal (100%, 86–93%, and 84–94%, respectively). During the 1-year follow-up, 5 patients (6.0%) developed cardiotoxicity (a reduction in LVEF ≥ 10 percentage points from baseline and &lt, 55%). The AIC registry study is feasible and will be the first study to collect sizable echocardiographic and biomarker data on cardiotoxicity in Japanese patients treated with anthracycline in a real-world setting.