Search

Although it has been known for at least a century that alcohol abuse is a risk factor for pneumonia, it has only recently been shown to be an independent risk factor for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In fact, alcohol abuse more than doubles the risk of ARDS in critically ill patients. Moreover, there is strong evidence that alcohol abuse increases the risk of pneumonia and ARDS even in persons who are otherwise healthy. A number of factors contribute to this increased risk; in addition to the well-known role of aspiration in an intoxicated person, research has shed more light on how alcohol abuse results in impaired host defenses. When managing pneumonia in an alcoholic patient, keep in mind that the pathogen is more likely to be a Gram-negative bacillus or multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. The treatment of ARDS is the same for alcoholics as it is for nonalcoholics; however, early identification of high-risk patients could help prevent the development of ARDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is an essential component of the diagnosis and assessment of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). In some cases, a diagnosis of ILD can be made solely based on a multidisciplinary discussion of HRCT findings and clinical evaluation. HRCT findings also inform prognosis and may influence treatment decisions. It is essential that high-quality HRCT images are obtained using parameters for optimum spatial resolution. Key terms used to describe HRCT findings should be used consistently among clinicians. Radiologic information should be included as part of the multidisciplinary discussion of patients with ILDs during follow-up., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Early prognostication of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who may require mechanical ventilation and have worse outcomes within 30 days of admission is useful for delivering appropriate clinical care and optimizing resource allocation., Objective: To develop machine learning models to predict COVID-19 severity at the time of the hospital admission based on a single institution data., Design, Setting, and Participants: We established a retrospective cohort of patients with COVID-19 from University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center from May 2020 to March 2022. Easily accessible objective markers including basic laboratory variables and initial respiratory status were assessed using Random Forest's feature importance score to create a predictive risk score. Twenty-five significant variables were identified to be used in classification models. The best predictive models were selected with repeated tenfold cross-validation methods., Main Outcomes and Measures: Among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital, severity was defined by 30-day mortality (30DM) rates and need for mechanical ventilation., Results: This was a large, single institution COVID-19 cohort including total of 1795 patients. The average age was 59.7 years old with diverse heterogeneity. 236 (13%) required mechanical ventilation and 156 patients (8.6%) died within 30 days of hospitalization. Predictive accuracy of each predictive model was validated with the 10-CV method. Random Forest classifier for 30DM model had 192 sub-trees, and obtained 0.72 sensitivity and 0.78 specificity, and 0.82 AUC. The model used to predict MV has 64 sub-trees and returned obtained 0.75 sensitivity and 0.75 specificity, and 0.81 AUC. Our scoring tool can be accessed at https://faculty.tamuc.edu/mmete/covid-risk.html ., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, we developed a risk score based on objective variables of COVID-19 patients within six hours of admission to the hospital, therefore helping predict a patient's risk of developing critical illness secondary to COVID-19., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: This review aims to summarize the available literature to identify the incidence and risk factors for persistent interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) following hospitalization for COVID-19. The current and prospective treatment options are reviewed in an effort to help pulmonary practitioners care for this burgeoning patient population., Recent Findings: Statistical modeling suggests that 11.7% of all patients hospitalized with COVID-19 have irreversible fibrotic features on long-term follow-up imaging., Summary: The available evidence suggests that up to 30% of patients have ILAs following COVID-19 hospitalization. The radiographic abnormalities improve or resolve in a majority of these patients. However, estimates suggest that up to one-third of these patients have irreversible fibrotic features. Clinical trials of the impact of anti-fibrotic agents are ongoing. As there continue to be thousands of COVID-19 hospitalizations in the USA each week, the management of post-COVID ILAs will become a common problem for the pulmonary practitioner., Competing Interests: Conflict of InterestDr. Robertshaw has no relevant conflicts of interest to report. Dr. Kershaw reports advisory board work for Boehringer Ingelheim., (© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.)

A lung transplant (LT) patient developed 2 distinct episodes of COVID-19, confirmed by whole-genome sequencing, which was caused by the Delta, and then followed 6 weeks later, by the Omicron variant. The clinical course with Omicron was more severe, leading us to speculate that Omicron may not be any milder among LT patients. We discuss the potential mechanisms behind the Omicron not being any milder among LT patients and emphasize the need for outcomes data among these patients. Until such data become available, it may be prudent to maintain clinical equipoise as regards the relative virulence of the newer variants among LT patients., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are limited data regarding the clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines among lung transplant (LT) patients., Methods: We included all LT patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and December 10, 2021 (n = 84; median age 55, range, 20-73 years; males 65.5%). The study group was divided into 3 groups based on the vaccination status (patients who did not complete the primary series for any of the vaccines: n = 58; those with 2 doses of messenger RNA (mRNA) or 1 dose of the adenoviral vector vaccine, vaccinated group: n = 16; those with at least 1 additional dose beyond the primary series, boosted group: n = 10)., Results: Pulmonary parenchymal involvement on chest computed tomography scan was less common among the boosted group (P = .009). The proportion of patients with new or worsening respiratory failure was significantly lower among the vaccinated and boosted groups and these patients were significantly more likely to achieve the composite endpoint of oxygen-dependence free survival (P = .02). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher body mass index, restrictive lung disease as the transplant indication, and preinfection chronic lung allograft dysfunction were independently associated with acute or acute on chronic respiratory failure while being on therapeutic dose anticoagulation and having received the booster dose had a protective effect., Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines appear to have several favorable effects among LT patients with breakthrough infections including lower likelihood of allograft involvement on imaging (among boosted patients), need of hospitalization, and complications such as new or worsening respiratory failure., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite multiple studies evaluating the immunological responsiveness to vaccines, the clinical effectiveness of the two-dose mRNA vaccine schedule among lung transplant (LT) patients has not been evaluated., Methods: We included LT patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on a nasopharyngeal swab between March 1, 2020, and August 25, 2021 (n = 70). The study group was divided based on their vaccination status., Results: During the study period, 14 fully vaccinated LT patients with one of the mRNA vaccines tested positive for COVID-19 (median age 54, range 30-62 years, M:F 9:5). The vaccinated cohort was younger with bilateral LT, have suppurative conditions as the transplant indication, and present with milder symptoms. However, pulmonary parenchymal involvement was seen among all 12 patients where computed tomography (CT) of chest was available. The laboratory profile indicated a more subdued inflammatory response among the vaccinated group. A lower proportion of vaccinated patients developed respiratory failure, needed ICU admission or ventilator support, although none of the differences achieved statistical significance. None of the vaccinated patients succumbed to COVID-19 during the study period, while the 4-week mortality among unvaccinated patients was nearly 15% (8/56)., Conclusions: In this cohort of vaccinated LT patients who developed breakthrough COVID-19, the clinical course, risk of complications, and outcomes trended better than unvaccinated patients. However, universal involvement of the allograft demonstrates the continued vulnerability of these patients to significant sequelae from COVID-19. Future studies may evaluate the incremental protection of vaccination after the completion of the third dose of mRNA vaccines among LT patients., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Studies indicate that the recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome may be slower than other viral pneumonia. There are limited data to guide decisions among patients who need extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, especially the expected time of recovery and considering lung transplantation (LT)., Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome placed on ECMO between March 1, 2020, and September 15, 2021 (n = 20; median age, 44 y; range, 22-62 y; male:female, 15:5). We contrasted the baseline variables and clinical course of patients with and without the need for ECMO support >30 d (ECMO long haulers, n = 10)., Results: Ten patients met the criteria for ECMO long haulers (median duration of ECMO, 86 d; range, 42-201 d). The long haulers were healthier at baseline with fewer comorbidities but had worse pulmonary compliance and higher partial pressure of CO2. They had a significantly higher number of membrane oxygenator failures, changes to their cannulation sites, and suffer more complications on ECMO. One of the long hauler was bridged to LT while another 6 patients recovered and were discharged. Overall survival was better among the ECMO long haulers (70% versus 20%; 9.3, 1.2-73; P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Despite worse pulmonary physiology, frequent complications, and a tortuous hospital course that may appear to portend a poor prognosis, ECMO long haulers have the potential to recover and be weaned off ECMO without the need for LT. A customized approach comprising a more conservative timeline for the consideration of LT may be prudent among these patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is limited data on the predictors and outcomes of new or worsening respiratory failure among lung transplant (LT) patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)., Methods: We included all the LT patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during a 1-year period (March 2020 to February 2021; n = 54; median age: 60, 20-73 years; M:F 37:17). Development of new or worsening respiratory failure (ARF) was the primary outcome variable., Results: The overall incidence of ARF was 48.1% (n = 26). More than 20% of patients (n = 11) needed intubation and mechanical ventilation. Body mass index > 25 Kg/m 2 (adjusted OR: 5.7, .99-32.93; P = .05) and peak D-dimer levels > .95 mcg/ml (adjusted OR: 24.99, 1.77-353.8; P = .017) were independently associated with ARF while anticoagulation use prior to COVID-19 was protective (adjusted OR: .024, .001-.55; P = .02). Majority patients survived the acute illness (85.2%). Pre-infection chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted HR: 5.03, 1.14-22.25; P = .033)., Conclusions: COVID-19 is associated with significant morbidity and mortality among LT patients. Patients on chronic anticoagulation seem to enjoy favorable outcomes, while higher BMI and peak D-dimer levels are associated with development of ARF. Pre-infection CLAD is associated with an increased risk of death from COVID-19., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Rationale: The impact of palliative care consultation on end-of-life care has not previously been evaluated in a multi-center study., Objectives: To evaluate the impact of palliative care consultation on the incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed and comfort care received at the end-of-life in hospitalized patients with COVID-19., Methods: We used the Society of Critical Care Medicine's COVID-19 registry to extract clinical data on patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between March 31st, 2020 to March 17th, 2021 and died during their hospitalization. The proportion of patients who received palliative care consultation was assessed in patients who did and did not receive CPR (primary outcome) and comfort care (secondary outcome). Propensity matching was used to account for potential confounding variables., Measurements and Main Results: 3,227 patients were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of palliative care consultation between the CPR and no-CPR groups (19.9% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.8334). Patients who received comfort care at the end-of-life were significantly more likely to have received palliative care consultation (43.3% vs. 7.7%, p < 0.0001). After propensity matching for comfort care on demographic characteristics and comorbidities, this relationship was still significant (43.2% vs. 8.5%; p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Palliative care consultation was not associated with CPR performed at the end-of-life but was associated with increased incidence of comfort care being utilized. These results suggest that utilizing palliative care consultation at the end-of-life may better align the needs and values of patients with the care they receive., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Kumar is currently funded by funding the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation through the University of Washington, and Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Dr. Kashyap receives funding from the NIH/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: R01HL 130881, UG3/UH3HL 141722; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and Janssen Research & Development, LLC; and royalties from Ambient Clinical Analytics. Inc. Dr. Gajic receives funding from the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality R18HS 26609-2, NIH/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: R01HL 130881, UG3/UH3HL 141722; Department of Defense DOD W81XWH; American Heart Association Rapid Response Grant—COVID-19; and royalties from Ambient Clinical Analytics. Inc. Dr. Walkey currently receives funding from the NIH/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute grants R01HL151607, R01HL139751, R01HL136660, Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality, R01HS026485, Boston Biomedical Innovation Center/NIH/NHLBI 5U54HL119145-07, and royalties from UpToDate., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is limited data on outcomes among lung transplant (LT) patients who survive Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)., Methods: Any single or bilateral LT patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 1, 2020, to February 15, 2021 (n = 54) and survived the acute illness were included (final n = 44). Each patient completed at least 3 months of follow-up (median: 4.5; range 3-12 months) after their index hospitalization for COVID-19. The primary endpoint was a significant loss of lung functions (defined as > 10% decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) or forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) on two spirometries, at least 3 weeks apart compared to the pre-infection baseline)., Results: A majority of the COVID-19 survivors had persistent parenchymal opacities (n = 29, 65.9%) on post-infection CT chest. Patients had significantly impaired functional status, with the majority reporting residual disabilities (Karnofsky performance scale score of 70% or worse; n = 32, 72.7%). A significant loss of lung function was observed among 18 patients (40.9%). Three patients met the criteria for new chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) following COVID-19 (5.6%), with all three demonstrating restrictive allograft syndrome phenotype. An absolute lymphocyte count < 0.6 × 10 3 /dl and ferritin > 150 ng/ml at the time of hospital discharge was independently associated with significant lung function loss., Conclusions: A significant proportion of COVID-19 survivors suffer persistent allograft injury. Low absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) and elevated ferritin levels at the conclusion of the hospital course may provide useful prognostic information and form the basis of a customized strategy for ongoing monitoring and management of allograft dysfunction., Tweet: Twitter handle: @AmitBangaMD Lung transplant patients who survive COVID-19 suffer significant morbidity with persistent pulmonary opacities, loss of lung functions, and functional deficits. Residual elevation of the inflammatory markers is predictive., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: There are limited data on management strategies and outcomes among lung transplant (LT) patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We implemented management protocols based on the best available evidence and consensus among multidisciplinary teams. The current study reports our experience and outcomes using this protocol-based management strategy., Methods: We included single or bilateral LT patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab between March 1, 2020, to December 15, 2020 (n = 25; median age: 60, range 20-73 years; M: F 17:8). A group of patients with Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infection during 2016-18 were included to serve as a comparator group (n = 36)., Results: As compared to RSV, patients with COVID-19 were more likely to present with constitutional symptoms, spirometric decline, pulmonary opacities, new or worsening respiratory failure, and need for ventilator support. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were less likely to receive a multimodality treatment strategy, and they experienced worse post-infection lung function loss, functional decline, and three-month survival. A significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 needed readmission for worsening allograft function (36.4%), and chronic kidney disease at initial presentation was associated with this complication. Lower pre-morbid FEV 1 appeared to increase the risk of new or worsening respiratory failure, which was associated with worse outcomes. Overall hospital survival was 88% (n = 22). Follow-up data was available for all discharged patients (median: 43.5 days, range 15-287 days). A majority had persistent radiological opacities (19/22, 86.4%), with nearly half of the patients with available post-COVID-19 spirometry showing > 10% loss in lung function (6/13, median loss: 14.5%, range 10%-31%)., Conclusions: Despite similar demographic characteristics and predispositions, LT patients with COVID-19 are sicker and experience worse outcomes as compared to RSV. Despite the availability of newer therapeutic agents, COVID-19 continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality., (Copyright © 2021 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Acute exacerbations of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) occur in both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) as well as non-IPF ILDs. An expert consensus definition has allowed for more frequent reporting of IPF exacerbations. The same is lacking for non-IPF ILD exacerbations. The incidence of non-IPF ILD exacerbations is likely less than in IPF, but the two entities share similar risk factors, such as increased frequency as physiologic derangements advance. The radiologic and histopathologic spectrum of acute ILD exacerbations extends from organizing pneumonia (OP) to the more treatment-refractory diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) pattern. Indeed, responsiveness to various therapies may depend on the relative components of these entities, favoring OP over DAD. There are no proven therapies for acute ILD exacerbations. Corticosteroids are a mainstay in any regimen although clear evidence of benefit does not exist. A variety of immunosuppressant agents have purported success in historical cohort studies - cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, and tacrolimus most commonly. Only one randomized controlled trial has been published, studying recombinant thrombomodulin for IPF exacerbation, but the primary outcome of survivor proportion at 90 days was not met. Other novel therapies for ILD exacerbations are still under investigation. The short and long-term prognosis of acute exacerbations of ILD is poor, especially in patients with IPF. Transplant referral should be considered early for both IPF as well as fibrosing non-IPF ILDs, given the unpredictability of the exacerbation event., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Alcohol abuse independently increases the risk of developing the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a disease characterized by diffuse alveolar epithelial damage, lung edema, and consequent severe hypoxemia. Chronic alcohol abuse increases alveolar epithelial permeability both in vitro and in vivo, in part due to altered tight junction formation. However, both alcohol-fed animals and otherwise healthy alcoholic humans do not have pulmonary edema at baseline, even though their lungs are highly susceptible to acute edematous injury in response to inflammatory stresses. This suggests that active fluid transport by the alveolar epithelium is preserved or even augmented in the alcoholic lung. Chronic alcohol ingestion increases expression of apical sodium channels in the alveolar epithelium; however, its effects on the Na,K-ATPase complex that drives sodium and fluid transport out of the alveolar space have not been examined., Methods: Age- and gender-matched Sprague-Dawley rats were fed the Lieber-DeCarli liquid diet containing either alcohol or an isocaloric substitution (control diet) for 6 weeks. Gene and protein expression of lung Na,K-ATPase alpha1, alpha2, and beta1 subunits were quantified via real-time PCR and immunobiological analyses, respectively. Alcohol-induced, Na,K-ATPase-dependent epithelial barrier dysfunction was determined by calculating lung tissue wet:dry ratios following an ex vivo buffer-perfused challenge for 2 hours in the presence of ouabain (10(-4) M), a Na,K-ATPase inhibitor., Results: Chronic alcohol ingestion significantly increased gene and protein expression of each Na,K-ATPase subunit in rat lungs. Immunohistochemical analyses of the alcoholic lung also revealed that protein expression of the Na,K-ATPase alpha1 subunit was increased throughout the alveolar epithelium. Additionally, lungs isolated from alcohol-fed rats developed more edema than comparably treated lungs from control-fed rats, as reflected by increased lung tissue wet:dry ratios., Conclusions: These findings indicate that chronic alcohol ingestion, which is known to increase alveolar epithelial paracellular permeability, actually increases the expression of Na,K-ATPase in the lung as a compensatory mechanism. This provides a potential explanation as to why the otherwise healthy alcoholic does not have evidence of pulmonary edema at baseline.

Background: Patients with alcohol abuse have a two- to three-fold increased risk of acute lung injury and respiratory failure after sepsis or trauma but are also at increased risk of nosocomial pneumonia. Mechanical ventilation exacerbates lung injury during critical illnesses. In this study we tested whether mechanical ventilation of the alcoholic lung promotes on balance a proinflammatory phenotype favoring ventilator-induced lung injury or an immunosuppressive phenotype favoring ventilator-associated pneumonia., Methods: Lungs from rats fed an isocaloric diet with or without ethanol (six weeks) were isolated and ventilated ex vivo with a low-volume (protective) or high-volume (injurious) strategy for two hours with or without prior endotoxemia (two hours). In other experiments, rats were subjected to high-volume ventilation in vivo. Airway levels of the proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and interleukin-1beta were determined after mechanical ventilation ex vivo and compared with edematous lung injury after high-volume ventilation in vivo. In parallel, alveolar macrophage phagocytosis of bacteria and secretion of interleukin-12 during ventilation ex vivo and endotoxin-stimulated alveolar macrophage phagocytosis and tumor necrosis factor-alpha secretion in vitro were determined., Results: Ethanol ingestion suppressed the proinflammatory response to injurious mechanical ventilation and did not increase experimental ventilator-induced lung injury. In parallel, ethanol ingestion blunted the innate immune response of alveolar macrophages during injurious ventilation ex vivo and after endotoxin stimulation in vitro., Conclusions: Ethanol ingestion dampens ventilator-induced inflammation but exacerbates macrophage immune dysfunction. These findings could explain at least in part why alcoholic patients are at increased risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia.