Search

The article discusses the interpretation and coordination of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) with non-UCC law, focusing on two key provisions of section 1-103. Topics include the challenges of statutory interpretation, conflicting viewpoints on coordination with non-UCC law, and recommendations for future actions by relevant bodies.

The authors analyze specific variations between state laws adopting Uniform Commercial Code Revised Article 9 and the official text of the article.

General variations between Uniform Commercial Code Revised Article 9 and the states' adoption of the article are examined.

The article discusses a report on the amendments to Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Codes (UCC), which governs secured transactions. It informs that these amendments were recommended for adoption jointly by the American Law Institute (ALI) and the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) on July 16, 2010. It mentions that changes related to the financing statement forms, debtor names, and electronic transactions were included in Article 9 of the UCC.

The article presents information on the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) for fraudulent transfers and its statutes in the U.S. It discusses the need of uniform law based on fraudulent transfers either as a stand alone statute or as the part of Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA) of the U.S. It further discusses the background, jurisdiction and significance of choice of law. It also discusses the bankruptcy code and a memorandum for the Uniform Law Commission (ULC).

The article explores the choice of law rules in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Revised Article 9 in the U.S. It highlights the potential changes that can be applied to the revised code through referring to the Receivables Convention, the Hague Securities Convention, and the Cape Town convention. It also notes the importance of the said conventions on the selection of law rules.