Search

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common type of hereditary anaemia and genetic disorder worldwide. Cerebrovascular disease is one of its most devastating complications, with consequent increased morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines suggest that children and adults with SCD who develop acute ischaemic stroke should be transfused without delay. Those with acute ischaemic stroke aged over 18 years who present within 4.5 hours of symptom onset should be considered for intravenous thrombolysis; older patients with conventional vascular risk factors are the most likely to benefit. Endovascular thrombectomy should be considered carefully in adults with SCD as there are few data to guide how the prevalence of cerebral vasculopathy may confound the expected benefits or risks of intervention. We present a practical approach to cerebrovascular disease in sickle cell patients based on the available evidence and our experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current national guidelines advocate intravenous thrombolysis to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke presenting within 4.5 hours from symptom onset, and thrombectomy for patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke from large vessel occlusion presenting within 6 hours from onset. However, a substantial group of patients presents with acute ischaemic stroke beyond these time windows or has an unknown time of onset. Recent studies are set to revolutionise treatment for these patients. Using MRI diffusion/FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) mismatch, it is possible to identify patients within 4.5 hours from onset and safely deliver thrombolysis. Using CT perfusion imaging, it is possible to identify subjects with a middle cerebral artery syndrome who have an extensive area of ischaemic brain but as yet have only a small area of infarction who may benefit from urgent thrombectomy in up to 24 hours. Here, we highlight the recent advances in late window stroke treatment and their potential contribution to clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. Pineal tumours continue to present considerable clinical dilemmas and challenges. We were, therefore, interested to review our cumulative experience with a view to formulating a potential treatment strategy. Methods. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated with Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pineal tumours in one centre between 1987 and 2009. Forty-four patients (66% male) were treated radiosurgically with a mean age(± 1sd) of 33.6 (16.4) years. Eleven had biopsy-proven pineal parenchymal tumours (PPT), six astrocytomas, three ependymomas, two papillary epithelial tumours and two germ cell tumours. Twenty (45%) patients had no definitive histology despite attempted surgical biopsy in 11. Prior to radiosurgery, 17 had undergone craniotomy, 10 radiotherapy and four chemotherapy. Nine patients were referred for primary SRS. Results. Fifty Gamma knife treatments were performed on 44 patients prescribing 18.1 (4.2) Gy with a treatment volume of 3.8 (3.8) cm3. Routine clinical and MRI assessments were reviewed to calculate control rates. Mean follow up was 62.5 (52.9) months. Five patients (two ependymomas and three PPT) died at 36.2 (36.7) months after initial radiosurgical treatment. Overall progression-free survival (PFS) results were 93% at 1 year, 77% at 5 years, 67% at 10 and 20 years. Log-rank analysis revealed that higher initial tumour grade ( P = 0.04), previous radiotherapy ( P = 0.002) and radiological evidence of necrosis (P = 0.03) were associated with worse outcomes. The 5-year PFS for patients who possessed these 'aggressive' features was 47.1% compared with 91% for those patients who did not have these features. No persistent complications were attributed to SRS. Conclusions. These results further demonstrate the increasingly significant role played by STRS in the treatment of pineal tumours. Based on our findings, we believe a re-examination of the role of more established therapies for this patient group may be warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]