Search

Objectives PsA is a heterogeneous disease that impacts many aspects of social and mental life, including quality of life. Risankizumab, an antagonist specific for IL-23, is currently under investigation for the treatment of adults with active PsA. This study evaluated the impact of risankizumab vs placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with active PsA and inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD-IR) in the KEEPsAKE 1 trial. Methods Adult patients with active PsA (n = 964) were randomized (1:1) to receive risankizumab 150 mg or placebo. PROs assessed included the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36, v2), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), Patient’s Assessment of Pain, Patient’s Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment–PsA (WPAI-PsA) questionnaire. Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline at week 24 was compared between risankizumab and placebo. Results At week 24, differences between groups were observed using LS mean changes from baseline in SF-36 physical component summary and mental component summary; FACIT-Fatigue; EQ-5D-5L; Patient’s Assessment of Pain; PtGA; all eight SF-36 domains (all nominal P Conclusion Risankizumab treatment resulted in greater improvements in HRQoL, fatigue, pain and work productivity in patients with active PsA who have csDMARD-IR, when compared with placebo. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03675308

Abdullah Alakeel,1 Afaf Al Sheikh,2,3 Ali A Alraddadi,4– 6 Khalid Mohammed Alattas,7 Maha Aldayel,8 Mohammed Abdulaziz Alajlan,9 Mohammed Al-Haddab,1 Mohammad Almohideb,3,10 Mohamed Fatani,11 Issam R Hamadah,12 Ruaa Alharithy,13,14 Yousef Binamer,15,16 Kim Papp,17 Ahmed Elaraby18 1Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 3Department of Dermatology, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4Department of Dermatology, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 5King Abdullah International Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 6King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 7King Fahad Central Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia; 8Dammam Medical Complex, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; 9Dermatology Section MSD, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 10King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 11Hera General Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 12King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 13Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 14Princess Nourah University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 15Department of Dermatology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 16Department of Dermatology, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 17Probity Medical Research Inc. and K. Papp Clinical Research Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada; 18Bachelor of pharmacy, Cairo University, Giza, EgyptCorrespondence: Issam R Hamadah, Email ihamadah@kfshrc.edu.sa; issamhamadah@gmail.comBackground: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a long-term, pruritic, recurrent, systemic, inflammatory skin disorder. In the Middle East region, the burden of AD is understudied, and there is a dearth of AD guideline documents for practitioners.Methods: An expert panel meeting, encompassing 12 dermatologists from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), was congregated to develop evidence- and experience-based consensus recommendations for AD management, especially in adults in KSA. They completed a questionnaire with seven clinical statements, and a consensus was defined when the responses of ≥ 75% of participants coincided.Results: The expert recommendations were as follows: American Association of Dermatology guidelines are to be followed for defining AD; Eczema Area and Severity Index or SCORing atopic dermatitis index may be used to quantify the disease severity; Dermatology Life Quality Index may be used to determine the impact of AD on patients’ quality of life; Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool may be used to assess long-term disease control in AD patients; and the European guidelines are to be followed for the management of AD. In AD patients who are inadequately controlled with topical or systemic therapies, the preferred systemic agent for use either alone or in combination with topical treatments is dupilumab, cyclosporine, methotrexate, phototherapy, or other available systemic treatments that may include mycophenolate mofetil or oral corticosteroids.Conclusion: These expert recommendations assist physicians by providing a reference framework for optimal care of adult AD patients.Keywords: atopic dermatitis, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Eczema Area and Severity Index, SCORing atopic dermatitis

Background/Aims Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and prior inadequate response or intolerance to ≥ 1 biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) at week (wk) 56 in the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UPA at wk 104 from the ongoing long-term extension of SELECT-PsA 2. Methods Pts were randomized to UPA 15 mg (UPA15), UPA 30 mg (UPA30), or placebo (PBO) for 24 wks; PBO pts were then switched to UPA15 or UPA30. For continuous UPA treatment groups, efficacy endpoints at wk 104 were analyzed using non-responder imputation (NRI) and as observed (AO) (binary endpoints) or mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) and AO (continuous endpoints). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized for pts who received ≥1 dose of study drug using visit-based cut-off at wk 104. Results A total of 641 pts received ≥1 dose of study drug. At wk 104, 38.4% of all patients had discontinued study drug, with the highest discontinuation observed in patients randomized to PBO at baseline (all PBO: 46.7%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (UPA15: 12.3%, UPA30: 8.7%, all PBO: 21.7%) and adverse event (UPA15: 10.9%, UPA30: 13.3%, all PBO: 12.7%). The proportion of UPA pts that achieved ACR20/50/70, MDA, PASI75/90/100, and resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis were generally similar, or further improved, with 104 wks of treatment vs 56 wks. Similarly, mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI, patient’s assessment of pain, BASDAI, and ASDAS was improved with UPA treatment. At 104 wks of therapy, clinical responses were largely similar with UPA15 and UPA30. Generally, safety data at wk 104 were consistent with that reported at wk 56. Rates of serious infection, herpes zoster, hepatic disorder, anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and CPK elevation remained numerically higher with UPA30 vs UPA15, while rates of malignancies, MACE, and VTE were similar for both UPA groups. One death was reported with UPA15 (unexplained due to lack of information; however, the patient had recently been diagnosed with ovarian cancer) and two with UPA30 (pancytopenia and COVID-19 pneumonia). Conclusion In PsA pts with prior inadequate response or intolerance to ≥ 1 bDMARD, clinical responses were maintained with UPA15 and UPA30 up to two years of treatment. No new safety signals were identified in this long-term extension. Disclosure P.J. Mease: Consultancies; Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squib, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squib, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB. Grants/research support; Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squib, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB. A. Setty: Shareholder/stock ownership; Financial Disclosures: Employee of AbbVie and may hold stock or options. K. Papp: Consultancies; Consultant of: AbbVie, Akros, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Avillion, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech/Roche. Member of speakers’ bureau; Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Akros, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech/Roche, Janssen, Kyowa. Grants/research support; Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Akros, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Avillion, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, G. F. Van den Bosch: Consultancies; Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. S. Tsuji: Consultancies; Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB. Grants/research support; Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB. M. Keiserman: Consultancies; Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB. Grants/research support; Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB. X. Bu: Shareholder/stock ownership; Financial Disclosures: Employee of AbbVie and may hold stock or options. L. Chen: Shareholder/stock ownership; Financial Disclosures: Employee of AbbVie and may hold stock or options. R. Mccaskill: Shareholder/stock ownership; Financial Disclosures: Employee of AbbVie and may hold stock or options. E. Mcdearmon-Blondell: Shareholder/stock ownership; Financial Disclosures: Employee of AbbVie and may hold stock or options. P. Wung: Shareholder/stock ownership; Financial Disclosures: Employee of AbbVie and may hold stock or options. W. Tillett: Consultancies; Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Grants/research support; Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, and Janssen.

BACKGROUND Risankizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in randomized clinical trials. OBJECTIVES To evaluate safety data from risankizumab psoriasis phase I-III clinical trials. METHODS Short-term safety (through week 16) was analysed using integrated data from five phase II and III clinical trials. Long-term safety was evaluated using integrated data from 17 phase I-III completed and ongoing trials. RESULTS Short-term safety analyses included 1306 patients receiving risankizumab 150 mg and 300 patients receiving placebo [402·2 and 92·0 patient-years (PY) of exposure, respectively]. Long-term analyses included 3072 risankizumab-treated patients (exposure: 7927 PY). The median (excluding four outliers) treatment duration was 2·9 years (range 2 days to 5·9 years). Exposure-adjusted adverse event rates did not increase with long-term treatment (318 vs. 171 events per 100 PY for short- and long-term analyses). With long-term risankizumab treatment, rates of serious adverse events were 7·8 per 100 PY, serious infections 1·2 per 100 PY, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) 0·7 per 100 PY, malignant tumours excluding NMSC 0·5 per 100 PY, and adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events 0·3 per 100 PY, with no important identified risks. Limitations include that the study inclusion and exclusion criteria varied and that three studies enrolled ≤ 50 patients. CONCLUSIONS Risankizumab demonstrated a favourable safety profile over short- and long-term treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Objective PsA is a chronic disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations requiring treatment options with long-term efficacy and safety. In this follow-up analysis, the 52-week efficacy and safety of risankizumab 150 mg in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response/intolerance to one or more conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD-IR) were evaluated. Methods KEEPsAKE 1 is an ongoing, global, phase 3 study with a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period (period 1) and an open-label extension period (period 2). In period 1, eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16. At week 24 (period 2), all continuing patients received open-label risankizumab 150 mg every 12 weeks through week 208. Results At week 24, 57.3% of risankizumab-treated patients (n = 483) achieved ≥20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20) vs 33.5% of placebo-treated patients (n = 481; P Conclusion In patients with active PsA who were csDMARD-IR, continuous risankizumab treatment demonstrated robust long-term efficacy and was well tolerated through 52 weeks of treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, KEEPsAKE1, NCT03675308.

Background Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes the activity of interleukin-13, a key pathogenic driver of atopic dermatitis (AD). Clinical trials including adults with moderate-to-severe AD, of up to 52 weeks’ duration, showed tralokinumab was efficacious and well tolerated. Objectives To characterize the safety profile of tralokinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. Methods Safety and laboratory measures were assessed in pooled analyses of phase II and III placebo-controlled clinical trials of tralokinumab in moderate-to-severe AD (NCT02347176, NCT03562377, NCT03131648, NCT03160885, NCT03363854). Results In total, 2285 patients were randomized in the initial treatment periods up to 16 weeks (1605 tralokinumab, 680 placebo). The frequencies of any adverse event (AE) were 65·7% for tralokinumab and 67·2% for placebo. The respective rates were 640 and 678 events per 100 patient-years of exposure (ep100PYE); rate ratio 1·0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·9–1·1. Serious AEs occurred in 2·1% of patients with tralokinumab and 2·8% with placebo (7·4 and 11·9 ep100PYE; rate ratio 0·7, 95% CI 0·4–1·2). The most common AEs occurring at a higher frequency and rate with tralokinumab vs. placebo were: viral upper respiratory tract infection (15·7% vs. 12·2%; 65·1 vs. 53·5 ep100PYE); upper respiratory tract infection (5·6% vs. 4·8%; 20·8 vs. 18·5 ep100PYE); conjunctivitis (5·4% vs. 1·9%; 21·0 vs. 6·9 ep100PYE); and injection-site reaction (3·5% vs. 0·3%; 22·9 vs. 4·0 ep100PYE). Some events in safety areas of interest occurred at a lower frequency and rate with tralokinumab vs. placebo: skin infections requiring systemic treatment (2·6% vs. 5·5%; 9·7 vs. 22·8 ep100PYE), eczema herpeticum (0·3% vs. 1·5%; 1·2 vs. 5·2 ep100PYE), opportunistic infections (3·4% vs. 4·9%; 13·0 vs. 21·3 ep100PYE) and serious infections (0·4% vs. 1·1%; 1·3 vs. 3·7 ep100PYE). AEs did not increase with continued maintenance and open-label treatment, including rates of common or serious AEs and AEs leading to study drug discontinuation. No clinically meaningful changes in mean laboratory measures were observed with treatment up to 1 year. Conclusions Across the AD population pool from five clinical trials, tralokinumab was well tolerated, with consistent safety findings during treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The safety profile during prolonged tralokinumab treatment was consistent with that during the initial treatment period; the frequency of events did not increase over time. What is already known about this topic? Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, a key cytokine driving skin inflammation and epidermal barrier dysfunction in atopic dermatitis (AD).In clinical trials in moderate-to-severe AD, tralokinumab provided significant and early improvements in the extent and severity of AD and was well tolerated, with an overall safety profile comparable with placebo over 52 weeks. What does this study add? We report the frequency and rate of adverse events (AEs) from pooled observations of over 2000 patients from five phase II and phase III placebo-controlled clinical trials of tralokinumab in moderate-to-severe AD.During initial treatment up to 16 weeks, the frequencies of any AE and of serious AEs were similar for tralokinumab and placebo. AE rates did not increase with continued treatment up to 52 weeks.Common AEs occurring more frequently with tralokinumab vs. placebo were viral and upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis and injection-site reaction. Some events occurred at a lower frequency and rate with tralokinumab vs. placebo, such as skin infections requiring systemic treatment, eczema herpeticum and opportunistic and serious infections.No clinically meaningful changes in mean laboratory measures were observed.

an inadequate response to biologics may reach 30% in psoriasis patients.1,2 In other inflammatory diseases, a positive effect of adding methotrexate (MTX) to adalimumab has been reported.3,4 In this real-world, Canadian multicenter, single-arm, phase IIIb, open-label study, sub-optimal responders who have been receiving adalimumab for ≥16 weeks, who had a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ≥ 3 and Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 5, continued to self-administer adalimumab (40 mg every other week). Oral MTX was added (10 to 25 mg per week as per investigator's decision and could vary throughout the length of study) as well as folic acid (1-mg tablet daily) for 24 weeks.

Objective PsA is a chronic inflammatory disease in which the skin and joints are affected. In this follow-up analysis, the 52-week efficacy and safety of risankizumab 150 mg in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response/intolerance to one or two biologic therapies (Bio-IR) or one or more conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD-IR) were evaluated. Methods In the ongoing, phase 3, KEEPsAKE 2 trial, patients with active PsA were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16 (period 1). At week 24 (period 2), patients who received placebo were switched to risankizumab, and all patients received risankizumab 150 mg every 12 weeks from weeks 28 to 208. Results At week 24, 51.3% of risankizumab-treated patients (n = 224) achieved ≥20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR 20) vs 26.5% of placebo-treated patients (n = 220; P Conclusion Risankizumab was well tolerated and improved symptoms of PsA in Bio-IR/csDMARD-IR patients, with a consistent long-term safety profile from weeks 24 to 52. Trial registration United States National Library of Medicine clinical trials database www.clinicaltrials.gov; KEEPsAKE 2; NCT03671148.

BACKGROUND Brodalumab is efficacious for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis through 52 weeks. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brodalumab through 120 weeks, including following withdrawal and retreatment. METHODS At baseline, patients were randomized to brodalumab (n = 222) or placebo (n = 220). At week 12, patients achieving a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1) with brodalumab were rerandomized to brodalumab (n = 83) or placebo (n = 84; later re-treated with brodalumab if sPGA ≥ 3 occurred), and patients receiving placebo switched to brodalumab (n = 208). Safety was assessed by exposure-adjusted rates of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS Among those who achieved sPGA 0/1 at week 12 and were rerandomized to brodalumab, 96% and 80% using observed data, respectively, and 74% and 61% using nonresponder imputation, respectively, achieved 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and PASI 100 at week 120. Following withdrawal from brodalumab, return of disease occurred after a mean ± SD duration of 74·7 ± 50·5 days. Among those who switched from brodalumab to placebo at week 12, PASI 75 rates using observed data and nonresponder imputation were 55% and 51% at week 20, respectively and 94% and 75% at week 120, respectively; PASI 100 rates at week 120 were 75% and 60%, respectively. Efficacy was maintained through week 120 in those receiving brodalumab after placebo. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that brodalumab is efficacious and safe for continuous long-term treatment of psoriasis, and support the potential for response after discontinuation and retreatment.

Background Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, systemic immune‐mediated inflammatory musculoskeletal disease. The onset of dermatologic symptoms often precedes rheumatic manifestations. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of PsA that has been shown to improve dermatologic symptoms in patients with PsA. Objectives To investigate the efficacy of tofacitinib in improving dermatologic endpoints in adult patients with active PsA. Methods This analysis included data from two placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, phase 3 studies in patients with active PsA and an inadequate response (IR) to ≥1 conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) who were tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)‐naïve (OPAL Broaden; NCT01877668) or an IR to ≥1 TNFi (OPAL Beyond; NCT01882439). Patients had active plaque psoriasis at screening and received a stable dose of one csDMARD during the study. Patients were randomized to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), 10 mg BID, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks (OPAL Broaden only) or placebo (to Month 3). Dermatologic endpoints: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) total score; PASI90 overall; PASI75 and PASI90 by baseline PASI severity; Physician’s Global Assessment of Psoriasis; Nail Psoriasis Severity Index; Dermatology Life Quality Index total and sub‐dimension scores; Itch Severity Item; and Patient’s Global Joint and Skin Assessment‐Visual Analog Scale‐Psoriasis question. Results In patients with active PsA, including those stratified by mild or moderate/severe dermatologic symptoms, greater improvements from baseline and percentage of responders were observed in tofacitinib‐treated patients vs. placebo for the majority of analyzed dermatologic endpoints at Months 1 and 3, and improvements were maintained to Month 12 in OPAL Broaden and Month 6 in OPAL Beyond. Similar effects were observed in adalimumab‐treated patients vs. placebo in OPAL Broaden across dermatologic endpoints. Conclusions Tofacitinib provides a treatment option for patients with active PsA, including the burdensome dermatologic symptoms of PsA.

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, skin condition associated with many comorbidities and often has a substantial impact on patients’ lives. Objectives To evaluate symptom burden and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) at baseline in patients with HS in an observational, real‐world, clinical setting using several tools including a validated HS‐specific instrument. Methods This study evaluated HRQoL data from the international UNITE HS disease registry. Administration of patient‐reported outcome (PRO) instruments and collection of data were executed per local regulations. All data were assessed using descriptive statistical methods. Results PRO data from 529 adults and 65 adolescents were evaluated. Most adults (64.5%) and adolescents (73.8%) were classified as Hurley Stage II with substantial disease burden at baseline. HS had a large effect (mean DLQI = 12.6) and moderate effect (mean CDLQI = 6.9) on the lives of adults and adolescents, respectively. Approximately 58% of adults and 41% of adolescents had anxiety scores beyond the normal range; 30% of adults and 16% of adolescents exhibited symptoms of depression. Based on HSSA and HSIA scores, approximately 30% of adults reported a substantial burden of multiple HS clinical symptoms and more than 45% reported a significant emotional impact of HS that adversely affected their intimate relationships. Only 60% of adults were employed and of those, 64% reported at least some degree of impairment while working because of HS. Conclusions Based on PROs collected from patients enrolled in the UNITE registry, a real‐world, clinical setting, HS has a significant negative impact on the everyday lives of patients affected by this disease.

Ruxolitinib cream demonstrated safety and efficacy over 8 weeks in two double-blind phase 3 atopic dermatitis studies (NCT03745638/NCT03745651).Evaluate long-term safety (LTS) and disease control with ruxolitinib cream.Patients initially randomized to twice-daily 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream maintained their regimen during the 44-week LTS period (as-needed treatment). Patients on vehicle were rerandomized (1:1) at Week 8 to either ruxolitinib cream strength. Safety and disease control (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score 0/1 and affected body surface area [BSA]) were assessed.Over 52 weeks, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 67.4%/62.6%/53.5%/57.6% of patients in 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream/vehicle to 0.75% ruxolitinib cream/vehicle to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream groups (n=426/446/101/99). Most common AEs were upper respiratory tract infection (10.3%/11.4%/5.9%/7.1%) and nasopharyngitis (8.9%/9.9%/7.9%/14.1%). Most AEs were considered unrelated to treatment. Application site reactions were infrequent (3.8%/1.8%/1.0%/1.0%). Disease control was achieved throughout the LTS; 74.1%-77.8% of patients had IGA 0/1 at Week 52, and mean affected BSA was low (1.4%-1.8%).LTS had no control treatment.During 44 weeks of as-needed treatment, ruxolitinib cream demonstrated effective disease control and tolerability; low ruxolitinib plasma concentrations alongside safety findings reflecting known risk factors suggest physiologically meaningful systemic Janus kinase inhibition is highly unlikely.

Background: Roflumilast cream is a potent phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor recently approved in the United States for treatment of plaque psoriasis with no limitations on duration of use. An open-label trial was conducted to evaluate long-term safety (52 weeks) of once-daily roflumilast cream (NCT03764475). This abstract presents data on durability of response as measured by the percentage of patients with an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of Clear or Almost Clear, percentage improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score, and reduction in body surface area (BSA) affected. Methods: Patients who completed a parent, phase 2b, 12-week randomized controlled trial could continue on open-label roflumilast cream 0.3% (Cohort-1, n=230), and patients naïve to roflumilast were also enrolled (Cohort-2, n=102). All psoriasis lesions (except scalp) were treated, including face and intertriginous areas for up to 52 weeks. If affected, palms and soles were treated, but not evaluated towards any efficacy assessments. Median duration of response was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: With cumulative treatment up to 64 weeks in Cohort-1 and 52 weeks in Cohort-2, long-term safety and tolerability were consistent with the 12-week, phase 2b study. Overall, 73.5% of patients completed the study; 3.9% discontinued due to adverse events (AE) and 0.9% discontinued due to lack of efficacy. Treatment-related AEs were reported in 2.7% patients; none were deemed serious. Investigator tolerability assessments at each visit demonstrated 99% of patients rated “no evidence of irritation.” At Week 52, IGA Success (demonstrating Clear/Almost Clear plus 2-grade improvement from baseline) was achieved by 34.8% of patients in Cohort-1 and 39.5% in Cohort-2. Of patients in Cohort-2, 40% of patients achieved IGA success at week 12. IGA Clear/Almost Clear was achieved by 46.8% of patients across both cohorts at week 12 and consistent through week 52 (44.8%). Similarly, a 60.5% mean PASI improvement and 60.1% mean BSA improvement from baseline were observed at week 12 and consistent through week 52 (59.4% and 63.3%, respectively). Of the 185 patients who achieved IGA Clear/Almost Clear during the open-label trial, the median durability of IGA of Clear/Almost Clear was 10 months (40.1 weeks). Among patients who achieved an IGA of Clear or Almost Clear, 50% maintained Clear or Almost Clear status for at least 10 months. Conclusions: In this long-term safety study, roflumilast cream was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with the parent Ph2b trial, and effectively maintained clear/almost clear skin with no tachyphylaxis observed. Sponsored by Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Introduction: Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is a common, chronic, inflammatory dermatosis that affects patients of all ages with a global prevalence ≥5%. Treatments usually consist of topical therapies, including antifungals and low potency corticosteroids; however, current treatments have limitations such as side effects with long-term use and/or vehicles that can be difficult to use on both hair-bearing and non-hair-bearing areas. Roflumilast is a selective, nonsteroidal, highly potent phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor once-daily foam under investigation for the treatment of SD. Efficacy, safety, and local tolerability of roflumilast foam 0.3% in patients with SD were demonstrated in a phase 2a and subsequent open-label trial (NCT04091646 and NCT04445987, respectively). Here, we present efficacy, safety, and local tolerability in a phase 3 trial of roflumilast foam 0.3% in patients with SD (NCT04973228). Methods: This phase 3 randomized, parallel group, double blind, vehicle-controlled trial was conducted in patients ≥9 years old with at least moderate SD affecting scalp and/or non-scalp areas. Patients were randomized 2:1 to apply once-daily roflumilast foam 0.3% (n=304) or vehicle (n=153) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success (IGA of Clear or Almost Clear plus ≥2-grade improvement from baseline) at Week 8. Secondary efficacy endpoints included IGA score of Clear at Week 8, achievement of ≥4-point improvement from baseline in Worst Itch Numeric Rating Score (WI-NRS) among patients with baseline score ≥4 (WI-NRS Success), Overall Assessment of Erythema score of 0, and Overall Assessment of Scaling score of 0. Safety and local tolerability were also evaluated. Results: Overall, significantly more roflumilast-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients achieved the primary efficacy endpoint of IGA Success (79.5% vs. 58.0%; P

N/A

Background Secukinumab has shown sustained efficacy and safety in several manifestations of psoriasis. Objectives GESTURE investigated the long-term (2·5-year) safety and efficacy of 150 mg and 300 mg subcutaneous secukinumab in 205 patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis. Methods GESTURE was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase IIIb trial conducted across 15 countries. The study was 140 weeks long and consisted of four periods: screening (up to 4 weeks), treatment period 1 (16 weeks), treatment period 2 (116 weeks) and post-treatment follow-up (8 weeks). Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis and at least one plaque outside of the palms and soles. Efficacy was assessed via a palmoplantar Investigator's Global Assessment (ppIGA) and the palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Results The primary end point, a ppIGA score of 0 or 1, was met at week 16. The effect was sustained over 2·5 years with 59% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43·5-74·1] and 53% (95% CI 35·1-69·6) of patients in the secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg groups, respectively, achieving clear or almost clear palms and soles (ppIGA 0 or 1). At 2·5 years, the mean palmoplantar PASI percentage was reduced in both the secukinumab 300 mg group (-74·7%) and the secukinumab 150 mg group (-61·6%). A total of 17% (secukinumab 300 mg group) and 18% (secukinumab 150 mg group) of patients experienced no difficulty in hands and feet functionality, as indicated by the palmoplantar quality of life instrument overall scores. The safety profile was favourable. Conclusions GESTURE revealed that secukinumab provides a strong and sustained response over 2·5 years in challenging-to-treat palmoplantar psoriasis.

Background Long-term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab [160 mg at week 0, then 80 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 12 weeks, followed by every 4 weeks (Q4W) thereafter (i.e. Q2W/Q4W), which is the labelled psoriasis dosing where approved, except in Japan] have been established for the treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. However, some patients may benefit from remaining on Q2W dosing beyond 12 weeks. Methods Among patients who had static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) > 1 at week 12, efficacy through week 52 of continuous Q2W dosing in the IXORA-P study was compared indirectly with Q2W/Q4W in the integrated data from the UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 studies. The continuous Q4W dose group, which had comparable results across studies, was used as the common comparator. Results In the IXORA-P study, among patients with sPGA > 1 at week 12, 64% of patients in the continuous Q2W group achieved sPGA ≤ 1 at week 52, which was statistically significantly higher than the 36% of patients with sPGA > 1 in the Q2W/Q4W group based on the integrated data from the UNCOVER studies (P = 0·0007). There were no clinically meaningful differences in frequencies of safety events between patients with sPGA ≤ 1 and patients with sPGA > 1 at week 12 in the IXORA-P study. Conclusions Among patients who did not have clear or almost clear skin at week 12, nearly 30% more patients who were treated continuously with ixekizumab Q2W in IXORA-P had clear or almost clear skin at week 52 when compared indirectly with those who were treated using the labelled psoriasis dosing in integrated UNCOVER studies. What's already known about this topic? Most patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who were given the labelled psoriasis dosing of ixekizumab [160-mg loading dose at week 0, 80 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) through week 12, and 80 mg every 4 weeks (QW4) thereafter] respond quickly with a high percentage of skin clearance. Additionally, patients who achieve static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) ≤ 1 by week 12 tend to maintain this response, even after switching to Q4W. What does this study add? Here, we assessed whether patients with sPGA > 1 at week 12 benefited from receiving more frequent dosing beyond the first 12 weeks. The results showed that Q2W dosing beyond 12 weeks resulted in more patients achieving sPGA ≤ 1 by week 52 than the labelled psoriasis dosing among patients with sPGA > 1 at week 12.

Background: The impact of treatment with interleukin 17 (IL-17) inhibitors on the efficacy of subsequent IL-17 inhibitor therapy is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the impact of previous treatment with IL-17 inhibitors on the 52-week efficacy of ixekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods: In a phase 3, randomized, double-blinded trial (IXORA-P; NCT02513550), patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomized (2:1:1) to ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 weeks (IXE Q2W, n = 611), every 4 weeks (IXE Q4W, n = 310), or IXE Q4W/IXE Q2W dose adjustment (per predefined criteria; n = 306). Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, and 100% response rates (PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100) were assessed. Results: Overall, 288 (23.5%) of 1227 patients were IL-17 inhibitor experienced (brodalumab, 22.6%; secukinumab, 1.1%). The PASI 75, 90, and 100 at week 52 were similar between IL-17 inhibitor-naive and IL-17 inhibitor-experienced patients. The PASI 75 at week 52 for IL-17 inhibitor-naive and -experienced patients was 85% and 89% (IXE Q2W), 79% and 81% (IXE Q4W), and 83% and 85% (IXE Q4W/IXE Q2W), respectively. The PASI 90 at week 52 for IL-17 inhibitor-naive and -experienced patients was 79% and 82% (IXE Q2W), 65% and 67% (IXE Q4W), and 73% and 75% (IXE Q4W/IXE Q2W), respectively. The PASI 100 at week 52 for IL-17 inhibitor-naive and -experienced patients was 60% and 59% (IXE Q2W), 44% and 42% (IXE Q4W), and 49% and 52% (IXE Q4W/IXE Q2W), respectively. Safety findings were generally similar between IL-17 inhibitor-naive and -experienced patients. Conclusion: Ixekizumab was demonstrated to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients previously treated with other IL-17 inhibitors.

Background The relevance of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in the management of psoriasis has not been studied previously. GM-CSF is important in the initiation and maintenance of chronic inflammatory processes. Objectives To investigate the clinical use of GM-CSF neutralization by evaluating the efficacy and safety of namilumab (AMG203), a monoclonal antibody GM-CSF inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Methods A phase II, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding, proof-of-concept study (NEPTUNE) was conducted. Four doses of namilumab (20, 50, 80 and 150 mg, via subcutaneous injection) were compared with placebo. Assessment of the primary end point - the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75 treatment response) - was performed at week 12. Exploratory investigation at the tissue level was conducted in a subset of the overall study population. The trial was registered with the number NCT02129777. Results In total, 122 patients were enrolled and 106 (86·9%) completed the double-blind treatment; 16 (13·1%) prematurely discontinued study medication. Serum concentration-time profiles were as expected for subcutaneous delivery of an IgG1 monoclonal antibody, and exposure increased proportionally with dose elevation. The number of patients showing PASI 75 treatment response at week 12 was low in all groups; no significant difference was recorded in this end point between placebo and any namilumab group. Similar outcomes were recorded for other clinical study end points. Moreover, no significant treatment-related changes from baseline were observed in laboratory investigations of cell types or subpopulations, or cytokines relevant to inflammatory pathways in psoriasis. Conclusions GM-CSF blockade is not critical for suppression of key inflammatory pathways underlying psoriasis.

Background Long-term evaluation is required to confirm the safety profile of newer biologic agents. Objectives To report on pooled safety data from the ongoing VOYAGE 1 (NCT02207231) and VOYAGE 2 (NCT02207244) trials through 100 weeks of follow-up. Methods Patients were randomized to either guselkumab 100 mg at weeks 0 and 4 and every 8 weeks thereafter; placebo at weeks 0, 4, 12 followed by guselkumab 100 mg at weeks 16 and 20 and every 8 weeks thereafter; or adalimumab 80 mg at week 0, 40 mg at week 1, and 40 mg every 2 weeks thereafter. Patients who received adalimumab crossed over to guselkumab at week 52 (VOYAGE 1) and at/after week 28 based on clinical response (VOYAGE 2). Open-label extensions, in which all patients received guselkumab, started at week 52 (VOYAGE 1) and week 76 (VOYAGE 2). Rates of adverse events (AEs) per 100 patient-years (PYs) are presented through 100 weeks of follow-up. Results Through week 52, observed rates for guselkumab- and adalimumab-treated patients, respectively, were 262·45 per 100 PYs and 328·28 per 100 PYs for AEs, 6·20 per 100 PYs and 7·77 per 100 PYs for serious AEs (SAEs), 1·22 per 100 PYs and 1·79 per 100 PYs for serious infections (SIs), 0·28 per 100 PYs and 0·40 per 100 PYs for malignancies other than nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), 0·56 per 100 PYs and 0·40 per 100 PYs for NMSCs, and 0·47 per 100 PYs and 0·40 per 100 PYs for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Rates among patients treated with guselkumab through week 52 and week 100, respectively, were 262·45 per 100 PYs and 210·41 per 100 PYs for AEs, 6·20 and 6·29 per 100 PYs, for SAEs, 1·22 per 100 PYs and 1·06 per 100 PYs for SIs, 0·28 per 100 PYs and 0·38 per 100 PYs for malignancies, 0·56 per 100 PYs and 0·39 per 100 PYs for NMSCs, and 0·47 per 100 PYs and 0·38 per 100 PYs for MACEs. Among patients treated with adalimumab, rates of AEs, SAEs, SIs, malignancies, NMSCs, and MACEs showed some variability before and after crossover to guselkumab, although no new safety signals were noted after crossover. Conclusions The safety profile for guselkumab remains favourable through 100 weeks of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Background Long-term, real-word data are needed to help manage patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) through this recurrent, painful and debilitating disease. Objectives To primarily measure real-world effectiveness of adalimumab in HS and to secondarily observe clinical course of HS in the light of patients' response. Methods In SOLACE, adults with moderate-to-severe HS in need for change in ongoing therapy were treated with adalimumab for up to 52 weeks as per physician's medical practice. Treatment effectiveness was measured by Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR). Inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining fistulas were counted, Hurley stage was assessed, and disease severity was rated using the International HS Severity Scoring System (IHS4). A post hoc analysis further explored the HiSCR response by abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at baseline (low, medium and high) and gender. Spontaneously reported safety events were collected. Results From 23 Canadian centres, 69% of the 138 patients achieved HiSCR at week 24, which increased to 82% and 75% at week 52 in patients with medium and high AN counts, respectively. Gender (4 times the odds for female) and age at HS onset (5% decrease with each additional year) had an effect on achieving HiSCR. Treatment with adalimumab led to an important decrease in number of lesions in responders, with most gains observed in inflammatory nodules, more frequently in the lower body area of patients in the high AN count group. The IHS4 scores of responders were substantially lowered, with a larger decrease in patients of the high AN count group. No new safety signal was detected. Conclusions The effectiveness of adalimumab was maintained during this 1-year period, and an optimal gain was documented for patients with medium and high AN counts. These real-world data support a prompt treatment of HS patients and the use of IHS4 to monitor treatment.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is caused by SARS‐CoV‐2, a novel RNA virus that was declared a global pandemic on 11 March 2020. The efficiency of infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 is reflected by its rapid global spread. The SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic has implications for patients with inflammatory skin diseases on systemic immunotherapy who may be at increased risk of infection or more severe infection. This position paper is a focused examination of current evidence considering the mechanisms of action of immunotherapeutic drugs in relation to immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2. We aim to provide practical guidance for dermatologists managing patients with inflammatory skin conditions on systemic therapies during the current pandemic and beyond. Considering the limited and rapidly evolving evidence, mechanisms of action of therapies, and current knowledge of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, we propose that systemic immunotherapy can be continued, with special considerations for at risk patients or those presenting with symptoms.