Search

Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in women after menopause is associated with prevention of clinical coronary artery disease. However, few studies have investigated possible benefits from ERT in postmenopausal women undergoing treatment for established coronary disease. We therefore retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 428 postmenopausal women undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA) to test the hypothesis that ERT has a beneficial effect in this setting. The women were divided into 2 groups based on ERT status at the time of the procedure. Estrogen users were younger (60 +/- 10 vs 68 +/- 9 years, p <0.001), more commonly had family histories of coronary heart disease (54% vs 41%, p = 0.04), had less incidence of hypertension (63% vs 76%, p = 0.02), and had slightly fewer diseased vessels per patient (1.3 +/- 0.5 vs 1.5 +/- 0.7, p = 0.03) compared with nonusers. No in-hospital deaths occurred in estrogen users compared with 5% hospital mortality in nonusers (p = 0.01). The combined outcome of death or myocardial infarction (MI) also was lower in estrogen users (4% vs 12%, p = 0.04). Of 348 women discharged after successful PTCA, 336 (97%) were able to be contacted at an average follow-up interval of 22 +/- 17 months (range 5 to 82). Estrogen users had superior event-free survival both for death as well as for death or nonfatal MI. Repeat revascularizations were similar in both groups (32% vs 24%, p = 0.15). In a Cox proportional-hazards model, nonusers had 4 times the likelihood of death after angioplasty compared with estrogen users (OR = 4.025, 95% CI = 1.3 to 13.4, p = 0.02). We conclude that estrogen replacement may offer protection against clinical coronary events in postmenopausal women who already have established coronary disease and are undergoing balloon angioplasty. The benefit was independent of age, smoking, presence of diabetes mellitus, or the number of diseased coronary vessels. However, it did not include a reduction in repeat revascularization procedures, suggesting no reduction in restenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/purpose: Matching phasic pressure tracings between a fluid-filled catheter and high-fidelity pressure wire has received limited attention, although each part contributes half of the information to clinical decisions. We aimed to study the impact of a novel and automated method for improving the phasic calibration of a fluid-filled catheter by accounting for its oscillatory behavior., Methods/materials: Retrospective analysis of drift check tracings was performed using our algorithm that corrects for mean difference (offset), temporal delays (timing), differential sensitivity of the manifold transducer and pressure wire sensor (gain), and the oscillatory behavior of the fluid-filled catheter described by its resonant frequency and damping factor (how quickly oscillations disappear after a change in pressure)., Results: Among 2886 cases, correcting for oscillations showed a large improvement in 28 % and a medium improvement in 41 % (decrease in root mean square error >0.5 mmHg to <1 or 1-2 mmHg, respectively). 96 % of oscillators were underdamped with median damping factor 0.27 and frequency 10.6 Hz. Fractional flow reserve or baseline Pd/Pa demonstrated no clinically important bias when ignoring oscillations. However, uncorrected subcycle non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPR) displayed both bias and scatter., Conclusions: By automatically accounting for the oscillatory behavior of a fluid-filled catheter system, phasic matching against a high-fidelity pressure wire can be improved compared to standard equalization methods. The majority of tracings contain artifacts, mainly due to underdamped oscillations, and neglecting them leads to biased estimates of equalization parameters. No clinically important bias exists for whole-cycle metrics, in contrast to significant effects on subcycle NHPR., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) and its relationship with hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR) index and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in stable coronary artery disease., Methods: This is a substudy of the DEFINE-FLOW cohort (NCT02328820), which evaluated the prognosis of lesions (n=456) after combined FFR and coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessment in a prospective, non-blinded, non-randomised, multicentre study in 12 centres in Europe and Japan. Participants (n=430) were evaluated by wire-based measurement of coronary pressure, flow and vascular resistance (ComboWire XT, Phillips Volcano, San Diego, California, USA)., Results: Mean FFR and CFR were 0.82±0.10 and 2.2±0.6, respectively. When divided according to FFR and CFR thresholds (above and below 0.80 and 2.0, respectively), HMR was highest in lesions with FFR>0.80 and CFR<2.0 (n=99) compared with lesions with FFR≤0.80 and CFR≥2.0 (n=68) (2.92±1.2 vs 1.91±0.64 mm Hg/cm/s, p<0.001). The FFR value was proportional to the ratio between HMR and the HMR+HSR (total resistance), 95% limits of agreement (-0.032; 0.019), bias (-0.003±0.02) and correlation (r 2 =0.98, p<0.0001). Cox regression model using HMR as continuous parameter for target vessel failure showed an HR of 1.51, 95% CI (0.9 to 2.4), p=0.10., Conclusions: Increased HMR was not associated with a higher rate of adverse clinical events, in this population of mainly stable patients. FFR can be equally well expressed as HMR/HMR+HSR, thereby providing an alternative conceptual formulation linking epicardial severity with microvascular resistance., Trial Registration Number: NCT02328820., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JJP has been consultant for Philips. RLK and NJ and KLG received internal funding from the Weatherhead PET center for Preventing and reversing Atherosclerosis. NJ has an institutional licensing and consulting agreement with Boston Scientific for the smart minimum FFR algorithm; and received significant institutional research support from St. Jude Medical (CONTRAST, NCT02184117) for a different study using intracoronary pressure sensors. NJ received significant institutional research support from Philips/Volcano Corporation for this study. EHC received institutional research support from Philips/Volcano Corporation for this study., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes after combined pressure and flow assessment of coronary lesions., Background: Although fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains the invasive reference standard for revascularization, approximately 40% of stenoses have discordant coronary flow reserve (CFR). Optimal treatment for these disagreements remains unclear., Methods: A total of 455 subjects with 668 lesions were enrolled from 12 sites in 6 countries. Only lesions with reduced FFR and CFR underwent revascularization; all other combinations received initial medical therapy., Results: Fourteen percent of lesions had FFR ≤0.8 but CFR ≥2.0 while 23% of lesions had FFR >0.8 but CFR <2.0. During 2-year follow-up, the primary endpoint of composite all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization in lesions with FFR ≤0.8 but CFR ≥2.0 (10.8% event rate) compared with lesions with FFR >0.8 and CFR ≥2.0 (6.2% event rate) exceeded the prespecified +10% noninferiority margin (P = 0.090). Target vessel failure models using both continuous FFR and continuous CFR found that only higher FFR was associated with reduced target vessel failure (Cox P = 0.007) after initial medical treatment. Central core laboratory review accepted 69.8% of all tracings with mean differences of <0.01 for FFR and <0.02 for CFR, indicating no material impact on clinical measurements or outcomes., Conclusions: All-cause death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization after 2 years was not noninferior between lesions with FFR ≤0.8 but CFR ≥2.0 and lesions with FFR >0.8 and CFR ≥2.0. These results do not support using invasive CFR ≥2.0 to defer revascularization for lesions with reduced FFR if the patient would otherwise be a candidate on the basis of the entire clinical scenario and treatment preference., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Johnson has received significant institutional research support from Philips Volcano for this study; has received significant institutional research support from St. Jude Medical (CONTRAST [Can Contrast Injection Better Approximate FFR Compared to Pure Resting Physiology?]; NCT02184117) for a different study using intracoronary pressure sensors; and has an institutional licensing agreement with Boston Scientific for the smart minimum FFR algorithm, commercially available as 510(k) K191008. Dr Matsuo serves as advisory board member for Zeon Medical; and receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan, Boston Scientific Japan, and Phillips Japan. Drs Johnson, Kirkeeide, and Gould have received internal funding from the Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis; and have patents pending on diagnostic methods for quantifying aortic stenosis and transcatheter aortic valve replacement physiology, as well as algorithms to correct pressure tracings from fluid-filled catheters. Dr Gould is the 510(k) applicant for CFR Quant (K113754) and HeartSee (K143664, K171303, K202679), software packages for cardiac positron emission tomographic image processing, analysis, and absolute flow quantification. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We sought to develop an automatic method for correcting common errors in phasic pressure tracings for physiology-guided interventions on coronary and valvular stenosis., Background: Effective coronary and valvular interventions rely on accurate hemodynamic assessment. Phasic (subcycle) indexes remain intrinsic to valvular stenosis and are emerging for coronary stenosis. Errors, corrections, and clinical implications of fluid-filled catheter phasic pressure assessments have not been assessed in the current era of ubiquitous, high-fidelity pressure wire sensors., Methods: We recruited patients undergoing invasive coronary physiology assessment. Phasic aortic pressure signals were recorded simultaneously using a fluid-filled guide catheter and 0.014″ pressure wire before and after standard calibration as well as after pullback. We included additional subjects undergoing hemodynamic assessment before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Using the pressure wire as reference standard, we developed an automatic algorithm to match phasic pressures., Results: Removing pressure offset and temporal shift produced the largest improvements in root mean square (RMS) error between catheter and pressure wire signals. However, further optimization <1 mmHg RMS error was possible by accounting for differential gain and the oscillatory behavior of the fluid-filled guide. The impact of correction was larger for subcycle (like systole or diastole) versus whole-cycle metrics, indicating a key role for valvular stenosis and emerging coronary pressure ratios., Conclusions: When calibrating phasic aortic pressure signals using a pressure wire, correction requires these parameters: offset, timing, gain, and oscillations (frequency and damping factor). Automatically eliminating common errors may improve some clinical decisions regarding physiology-based intervention., (© 2020 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

With the increasing prevalence of aortic stenosis (AS) due to a growing elderly population, a proper understanding of its physiology is paramount to guide therapy and define severity. A better understanding of the microvasculature in AS could improve clinical care by predicting left ventricular remodeling or anticipate the interplay between epicardial stenosis and myocardial dysfunction. In this review, we combine five decades of literature regarding microvascular, coronary, and aortic valve physiology with emerging insights from newly developed invasive tools for quantifying microcirculatory function. Furthermore, we describe the coupling between microcirculation and epicardial stenosis, which is currently under investigation in several randomized trials enrolling subjects with concomitant AS and coronary disease. To clarify the physiology explained previously, we present two instructive cases with invasive pressure measurements quantifying coexisting valve and coronary stenoses. Finally, we pose open clinical and research questions whose answers would further expand our knowledge of microvascular dysfunction in AS. These trials were registered with NCT03042104, NCT03094143, and NCT02436655., Competing Interests: JMZ reports no support or industry relationships. PALT, NHJP, RLK, KLG, and NPJ have a patent pending on diagnostic methods for quantifying aortic stenosis and TAVI physiology. PALT reports no additional support or industry relationships. NHPJ receives institutional grant support from Abbott, serves as a consultant for Abbott and Opsens, and possesses equity in Philips, GE, ASML, and Heartflow. BDB has received institutional research grants and consulting fees from Abbott Vascular (formerly St. Jude Medical), Boston Scientific, and Opsens. BDB, RLK, KLG, and NPJ have a patent pending on correcting pressure signals from fluid-filled catheters. RLK reports no additional support or industry relationships. KLG is the 510(k) applicant for CFR Quant (K113754) and HeartSee (K143664 and K171303), software packages for cardiac positron emission tomography image processing, analysis, and absolute flow quantification. NPJ receives internal funding from the Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis, has an institutional licensing and consulting agreement with Boston Scientific for the smart minimum FFR algorithm (commercialized under 510(k) K191008), and has received significant institutional research support from St. Jude Medical (CONTRAST, NCT02184117) and Philips Volcano Corporation (DEFINE-FLOW, NCT02328820), studies using intracoronary pressure and flow sensors., (Copyright © 2020 Jo M. Zelis et al.)

Background Coronary flow capacity (CFC), which is a categorical assessment based on the combination of hyperemic coronary flow and coronary flow reserve (CFR), has been introduced as a comprehensive assessment of the coronary circulation to overcome the limitations of CFR alone. The aim of this study was to quantify coronary flow changes after percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to the classification of CFC and the current physiological cutoff values of fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and CFR. Methods and Results Using the combined data set from DEFINE FLOW (Distal Evaluation of Functional Performance With Intravascular Sensors to Assess the Narrowing Effect -Combined Pressure and Doppler FLOW Velocity Measurements) and IDEAL (Iberian-Dutch-English), a total of 133 vessels that underwent intracoronary Doppler flow measurement before and after percutaneous coronary intervention were analyzed. CFC classified prerevascularization lesions as normal (14), mildly reduced (40), moderately reduced (31), and severely reduced (48). Lesions with larger impairment of CFC showed greater increase in coronary flow and vice versa (median percent increase in coronary flow by revascularization: 4.2%, 25.9%, 50.1%, and 145.5%, respectively; P <0.001). Compared with the conventional cutoff values of fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and CFR, an ischemic CFC defined as moderately to severely reduced CFC showed higher diagnostic accuracy with higher specificity to predict a >50% increase in coronary flow after percutaneous coronary intervention. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that only CFC has a superior predictive efficacy to CFR ( P <0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed lesions with ischemic CFC to be the independent predictor of a significant coronary flow increase after percutaneous coronary intervention (odds ratio, 10.7; 95% CI, 4.6-24.8; P <0.001). Conclusions CFC showed significant improvement of identification of lesions that benefit from revascularization compared with CFR with respect to coronary flow increase. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02328820.

Background: It remains uncertain if invasive coronary physiology beyond fractional flow reserve (FFR) can refine lesion selection for revascularization or provide additional prognostic value. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) equals the ratio of hyperemic to baseline flow velocity and has a wealth of invasive and noninvasive data supporting its validity. Because of fundamental physiologic relationships, binary classification of FFR and CFR disagrees in approximately 30%-40% of cases. Optimal management of these discordant cases requires further study., Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic value of combined FFR and CFR measurements to predict the 24-month rate of major adverse cardiac events. Secondary end points include repeatability of FFR and CFR, angina burden, and the percentage of successful FFR/CFR measurements which will not be excluded by the core laboratory., Methods: This prospective, nonblinded, nonrandomized, and multicenter study enrolled 455 subjects from 12 sites in Europe and Japan. Patients underwent physiologic lesion assessment using the 0.014" Philips Volcano ComboWire XT that provides simultaneous pressure and Doppler velocity sensors. Intermediate coronary lesions received only medical treatment unless both FFR (≤0.8) and CFR (<2.0) were below thresholds. The primary outcome is a 24-month composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, and revascularization., Conclusion: The DEFINE-FLOW study will determine the prognostic value of invasive CFR assessment when measured simultaneously with FFR, with a special emphasis on discordant classifications. Our hypothesis is that lesions with an intact CFR ≥ 2.0 but reduced FFR ≤ 0.8 will have a 2-year outcome with medical treatment similar to lesions with FFR> 0.80 and CFR ≥ 2.0. Enrollment has been completed, and final follow-up will occur in November 2019., Competing Interests: Disclosures, (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Aims: Echocardiography and tomographic imaging have documented dynamic changes in aortic stenosis (AS) geometry and severity during both the cardiac cycle and stress-induced increases in cardiac output. However, corresponding pressure gradient vs. flow relationships have not been described., Methods and Results: We recruited 16 routine transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI's) for graded dobutamine infusions both before and after implantation; 0.014″ pressure wires in the aorta and left ventricle (LV) continuously measured the transvalvular pressure gradient (ΔP) while a pulmonary artery catheter regularly assessed cardiac output by thermodilution. Before TAVI, ΔP did not display a consistent relationship with transvalvular flow (Q). Neither linear resistor (median R2 0.16) nor quadratic orifice (median R2 < 0.01) models at rest predicted stress observations; the severely stenotic valve behaved like a combination. The unitless ratio of aortic to left ventricular pressures during systolic ejection under stress conditions correlated best with post-TAVI flow improvement. After TAVI, a highly linear relationship (median R2 0.96) indicated a valid valve resistance., Conclusion: Pressure loss vs. flow curves offer a fundamental fluid dynamic synthesis for describing aortic valve pathophysiology. Severe AS does not consistently behave like an orifice (as suggested by Gorlin) or a resistor, whereas TAVI devices behave like a pure resistor. During peak dobutamine, the ratio of aortic to left ventricular pressures during systolic ejection provides a 'fractional flow reserve' of the aortic valve that closely approximates the complex, changing fluid dynamics. Because resting assessment cannot reliably predict stress haemodynamics, 'valvular fractional flow' warrants study to explain exertional symptoms in patients with only moderate AS at rest.

Objective: We propose a novel technique called pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve (pb-CFR) and demonstrate its application to the randomized DEFER trial., Background: Intracoronary flow reserve assessment remains underutilized relative to pressure measurements partly due to less robust tools., Methods: While rest and hyperemic intracoronary pressure measurements cannot quantify CFR exactly, they do provide upper and lower bounds. We validated pb-CFR invasively against traditional CFR, then applied it to high fractional flow reserve (FFR ≥ 0.75) lesions in DEFER randomized to revascularization or medical therapy., Results: pb-CFR showed an 84.4% accuracy to predict invasive CFR < 2 or CFR ≥ 2 in 107 lesions. In its proof of concept application to DEFER lesions with FFR ≥ 0.75, the 28 with pb-CFR < 2 compared to 28 with pb-CFR ≥ 2 had a non-significant reduction in freedom from angina (61% vs. 71% at 5 years, P = 0.57) and a non-significantly higher rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, 25% vs. 15%, P = 0.34). Lesions with FFR ≥ 0.75 but pb-CFR < 2 showed no difference in freedom from angina (61% vs. 50%, P = 0.54) or MACE (25% vs. 38%, P = 0.27) between the 28 randomized to medical therapy and the 16 randomized to revascularization., Conclusions: pb-CFR offers a new method for studying FFR/CFR discordances using regular pressure wire measurements. As an example application, DEFER suggested that low pb-CFR with high FFR may be a risk marker for more angina and worse outcomes, but that this risk cannot be modified by revascularization. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: This study compared the diagnostic performance with adenosine-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.8 of contrast-based FFR (cFFR), resting distal pressure (Pd)/aortic pressure (Pa), and the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)., Background: FFR objectively identifies lesions that benefit from medical therapy versus revascularization. However, FFR requires maximal vasodilation, usually achieved with adenosine. Radiographic contrast injection causes submaximal coronary hyperemia. Therefore, intracoronary contrast could provide an easy and inexpensive tool for predicting FFR., Methods: We recruited patients undergoing routine FFR assessment and made paired, repeated measurements of all physiology metrics (Pd/Pa, iFR, cFFR, and FFR). Contrast medium and dose were per local practice, as was the dose of intracoronary adenosine. Operators were encouraged to perform both intracoronary and intravenous adenosine assessments and a final drift check to assess wire calibration. A central core lab analyzed blinded pressure tracings in a standardized fashion., Results: A total of 763 subjects were enrolled from 12 international centers. Contrast volume was 8 ± 2 ml per measurement, and 8 different contrast media were used. Repeated measurements of each metric showed a bias <0.005, but a lower SD (less variability) for cFFR than resting indexes. Although Pd/Pa and iFR demonstrated equivalent performance against FFR ≤0.8 (78.5% vs. 79.9% accuracy; p = 0.78; area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.875 vs. 0.881; p = 0.35), cFFR improved both metrics (85.8% accuracy and 0.930 area; p < 0.001 for each) with an optimal binary threshold of 0.83. A hybrid decision-making strategy using cFFR required adenosine less often than when based on either Pd/Pa or iFR., Conclusions: cFFR provides diagnostic performance superior to that of Pd/Pa or iFR for predicting FFR. For clinical scenarios or health care systems in which adenosine is contraindicated or prohibitively expensive, cFFR offers a universal technique to simplify invasive coronary physiological assessments. Yet FFR remains the reference standard for diagnostic certainty as even cFFR reached only ∼85% agreement., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Microvascular dysfunction or disease is most commonly associated with diffuse epicardial coronary atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction, whereas it is less common as a distinct, separate, isolated pathophysiology. The different manifestations of coronary artery disease in women relate in part to their smaller coronary arteries, higher coronary blood flow, and higher endothelial shear stress, which have profound effects on endothelial function and development or resistance to atherosclerosis, its symptomatic presentation, outcomes, and treatment. The complex interactions of focal stenosis, diffuse epicardial atherosclerotic coronary narrowing, and microvascular dysfunction make definitive diagnosis and management difficult by use of standard noninvasive and invasive physiological and anatomic technologies. However, quantitative rest-stress myocardial perfusion, best documented by positron emission tomography, combined with clinical circumstances usually provides a definitive diagnosis to guide management, including vigorous risk factor management and revascularization for patients with physiologically severe epicardial stenosis by quantitative positron emission tomography., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We discuss the historical development of clinical coronary physiology, emphasizing coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR). Our analysis focuses on the clinical motivations and technologic advances that prompted and enabled the application of physiology for patient diagnosis. CFR grew from the general concepts of physiologic and coronary reserve, linking the anatomic severity of a lesion to its impact on hyperemic flow. FFR developed from existing models relating pressure measurements to the potential for flow to increase after removing a stenosis. Because pressure measurements have proved easier and more robust than flow measurements, FFR has become the dominant metric., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study classified and quantified the variation in fractional flow reserve (FFR) due to fluctuations in systemic and coronary hemodynamics during intravenous adenosine infusion., Background: Although FFR has become a key invasive tool to guide treatment, questions remain regarding its repeatability and stability during intravenous adenosine infusion because of systemic effects that can alter driving pressure and heart rate., Methods: We reanalyzed data from the VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice) study, which enrolled consecutive patients who were infused with intravenous adenosine at 140 μg/kg/min and measured FFR twice. Raw phasic pressure tracings from the aorta (Pa) and distal coronary artery (Pd) were transformed into moving averages of Pd/Pa. Visual analysis grouped Pd/Pa curves into patterns of similar response. Quantitative analysis of the Pd/Pa curves identified the "smart minimum" FFR using a novel algorithm, which was compared with human core laboratory analysis., Results: A total of 190 complete pairs came from 206 patients after exclusions. Visual analysis revealed 3 Pd/Pa patterns: "classic" (sigmoid) in 57%, "humped" (sigmoid with superimposed bumps of varying height) in 39%, and "unusual" (no pattern) in 4%. The Pd/Pa pattern repeated itself in 67% of patient pairs. Despite variability of Pd/Pa during the hyperemic period, the "smart minimum" FFR demonstrated excellent repeatability (bias -0.001, SD 0.018, paired p = 0.93, r(2) = 98.2%, coefficient of variation = 2.5%). Our algorithm produced FFR values not significantly different from human core laboratory analysis (paired p = 0.43 vs. VERIFY; p = 0.34 vs. RESOLVE)., Conclusions: Intravenous adenosine produced 3 general patterns of Pd/Pa response, with associated variability in aortic and coronary pressure and heart rate during the hyperemic period. Nevertheless, FFR - when chosen appropriately - proved to be a highly reproducible value. Therefore, operators can confidently select the "smart minimum" FFR for patient care. Our results suggest that this selection process can be automated, yet comparable to human core laboratory analysis., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to examine the clinical performance of and theoretical basis for the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) approximation to the fractional flow reserve (FFR)., Background: Recent work has proposed iFR as a vasodilation-free alternative to FFR for making mechanical revascularization decisions. Its fundamental basis is the assumption that diastolic resting myocardial resistance equals mean hyperemic resistance., Methods: Pressure-only and combined pressure-flow clinical data from several centers were studied both empirically and by using pressure-flow physiology. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed by repeatedly selecting random parameters as if drawing from a cohort of hypothetical patients, using the reported ranges of these physiologic variables., Results: We aggregated observations of 1,129 patients, including 120 with combined pressure-flow data. Separately, we performed 1,000 Monte Carlo simulations. Clinical data showed that iFR was +0.09 higher than FFR on average, with ±0.17 limits of agreement. Diastolic resting resistance was 2.5 ± 1.0 times higher than mean hyperemic resistance in patients. Without invoking wave mechanics, classic pressure-flow physiology explained clinical observations well, with a coefficient of determination of >0.9. Nearly identical scatter of iFR versus FFR was seen between simulation and patient observations, thereby supporting our model., Conclusions: iFR provides both a biased estimate of FFR, on average, and an uncertain estimate of FFR in individual cases. Diastolic resting myocardial resistance does not equal mean hyperemic resistance, thereby contravening the most basic condition on which iFR depends. Fundamental relationships of coronary pressure and flow explain the iFR approximation without invoking wave mechanics., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether observed discordance between coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) is due to methodology or reflects basic coronary pathophysiology., Background: Despite the clinical importance of coronary physiological assessment, relationships between its 2 most common tools, CFR and FFR, remain poorly defined., Methods: The worst CFR and stress relative uptake were recorded from 1,500 sequential cardiac positron emission tomography cases from our center. From the literature, we assembled all combined, invasive CFR-FFR measurements, including a subset before and after angioplasty. Both datasets were compared with a fluid dynamic model of the coronary circulation predicting relationships between CFR and FFR for variable diffuse and focal narrowing., Results: A modest but significant linear relationship exists between CFR and FFR both invasively (r = 0.34, p < 0.001) and using positron emission tomography (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). Most clinical patients undergoing CFR or FFR measurements have diffusely reduced CFR consistent with diffuse atherosclerosis or small-vessel disease. The theoretical model predicts linear relationships between CFR and FFR for progressive stenosis with slopes dependent on diffuse narrowing, matching observed data. Reported changes in CFR and FFR with angioplasty agree with model predictions of removing focal stenosis but leaving diffuse disease. Although CFR-FFR concordance is common, discordance is due to dominant or absent diffuse versus focal disease, reflecting basic pathophysiology., Conclusions: CFR is linearly related to FFR for progressive stenosis superimposed on diffuse narrowing. The relative contributions of focal and diffuse disease define the slope and values along the linear CFR and FFR relationship. Discordant CFR and FFR values reflect divergent extremes of focal and diffuse disease, not failure of either tool. With such discordance observed by invasive and noninvasive techniques and also fitting fluid dynamic predictions, it reflects clinically relevant basic coronary pathophysiology, not methodology., (Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We sought to quantify ranges of normal myocardial perfusion and flow reserve in young, asymptomatic volunteers after systematic historical and laboratory screening for unexpected factors affecting coronary flow., Background: Noninvasive cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) quantifies absolute flow and coronary flow reserve (CFR), thereby defining physiological severity of coronary artery disease for clinical studies or management. Defining "normal" coronary flow is a necessary prerequisite to its broad clinical application., Methods: Volunteers aged 20 to 40 years of age without cardiac disease or other conditions underwent rest-dipyridamole stress cardiac PET with absolute quantitative flow measurements using Rb-82 in paired studies at least 7 days apart for reproducibility. The presence of coronary calcium, detectable blood nicotine or caffeine, dyslipidemia, and an extended family history of early clinical atherosclerosis were objectively and systematically examined for grouping subjects as true normal or not normal., Results: We enrolled 125 volunteers, 107 (86%) underwent 2 PET scans. Fifty-six (45%) were classified as true normal, whereas 69 (55%) were classified as not normal. True normals had higher high-density lipoprotein and less PET scan heterogeneity. Hemodynamic responses to dipyridamole stress were similar. Rest flow was the same in both groups (0.72 ± 0.17 ml/min/g vs. 0.69 ± 0.14 ml/min/g, p = 0.164). However, stress flow (2.89 ± 0.50 ml/min/g vs. 2.63 ± 0.61 ml/min/g, p = 0.005) and CFR (4.17 ± 0.80 vs. 3.91 ± 0.86, p = 0.047) were higher in true normals. Paired studies were performed a median of 22 days (interquartile range: 15 to 39) apart. Reproducibility was improved in the true normal group., Conclusions: One-half of young, asymptomatic volunteers from the community harbor unexpected factors that mildly but systematically reduce stress flow, CFR, and reproducibility. This study establishes normal ranges and reproducibility for flow and CFR as the basis for clinical applications., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the association of alcohol intake with progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Although moderate drinkers have a lower risk of coronary heart disease than abstainers, the relation of alcohol use and coronary atherosclerosis has not been well studied., Methods and Results: In the Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Angiographic Study, we evaluated 103 women, aged 65 years or younger, hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris who underwent serial quantitative coronary angiography 3-6 months following their index event and repeated an average of 3 years and 3 months (range 2-5 years) later. Individual alcoholic beverage consumption was assessed by a standardized questionnaire. We used mixed model analysis to estimate the effect of alcohol consumption on progression of coronary atherosclerosis, as measured by mean luminal diameter change, controlling for age, smoking, body-mass index, education, physical activity, index cardiac event, menopausal status, diabetes, and history of dyslipidemia. Of the 93 women with complete information on alcohol intake, 14 consumed no alcohol (abstainers), 55 consumed up to 5 g of alcohol per day (light drinkers), and 24 consumed more than 5 g of alcohol per day (moderate drinkers). Coronary atherosclerosis progressed by a multivariate-adjusted average of 0.138 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.027-0.249) among abstainers, 0.137 mm (95% CI: 0.057-0.217) among light drinkers, and -0.054 mm (95% CI: -0.154 to 0.047) among moderate drinkers (P < 0.001). The inverse association persisted in analyses stratified by index event. No beverage type appeared to confer particular benefit., Conclusions: Among middle-aged women with coronary heart disease, moderate alcohol consumption (over 5 g/day) was protective of coronary atherosclerosis progression.

Background: Angiographic predictors of plaque progression are weak and few: length, irregular surface, turbulence, low shear, and (in some studies) eccentricity and calcification. Having noted plaques that briefly retained dye after angiography, we interpreted these as plaques with a fissured surface or neovascularization and hypothesized that progression would be predicted by "plaque blush.", Methods: Plaques (<50% diameter stenosis) in 68 pairs of angiograms, 5.6 +/- 4.8 months apart, were reviewed by 2 blinded observers. The presence of plaque blush, calcification, clot (mobile defect), eccentricity, and a branch point location were compared between progressing (> or =20% stenosis increase) and nonprogressing plaques., Results: Sixteen lesions in 15 patients progressed from 29% +/- 13% to 68% +/- 14% over a period of 8.1 +/- 7.9 months. Patients with and without progression were similar in sex, age, congestive heart disease risk factors, medications, interval between angiograms, clinical presentation, and initial stenosis severity. By logistic regression, plaque blush (BL) (P =.002), calcification (CA) (P =.024), and a branch (BR) point location (P =.001) predicted plaque progression. The odds ratio for plaque progression (ORp) was calculated as ORp = e(2.5 x BL + 1.8 x CA + 2.6 x BR). Using an ORp of 1/3, the model has 81% sensitivity and 77% specificity. A second analysis in which each progressive lesion was compared with proximal and distal lesions and with one in a different coronary artery yielded similar results., Conclusions: In mild to moderate coronary stenoses, studied retrospectively, plaque blush (a new sign) and a branch point location were strong predictors of plaque progression, whereas calcification was a weak predictor of progression.

Background: Coronary flow velocity varies widely between individuals, even at rest. Because of this variation, indices with less apparent deviation, such as the ratio of hyperemic to resting velocity (coronary flow reserve), have been more commonly studied. We tested the hypothesis that the flow continuity principle could be used to model resting coronary flow, and we examined the resulting velocity relationship., Methods and Results: We studied coronary velocity in 59 patients using a Doppler wire to measure resting and hyperemic average peak velocities in the left anterior descending artery. Quantitative techniques were used to calculate lumen cross-sectional area and the lengths of all distal coronary branches. Branch lengths were used to estimate regional left ventricular mass. We then calculated the ratio of lumen area to regional mass (A/m). Regional perfusion was estimated from the double product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure. Resting velocity (V) varied inversely with A/m ratio [V=46.5/(A/m); r=0.68, P<0.001]. Disease in the left anterior descending artery was categorized as none or luminal irregularities only (n=22), mild (n=15), or moderate (n=22). The A/m ratio declined across these groups (8.7+/-4.0, 8.5+/-6.2, and 5. 6+/-3.0 mm(2)/100 g, respectively; P<0.04), and the resting average peak velocity increased (27+/-16, 33+/-11, and 37+/-20 cm/s, respectively; P=0.06)., Conclusions: Resting coronary artery flow velocity is inversely related to the ratio of lumen area to regional left ventricular mass. Higher resting velocities are found when insufficient lumen size exists for the distal myocardial bed, as occurs with diffuse mild or moderate coronary atherosclerosis.

Context: The Lifestyle Heart Trial demonstrated that intensive lifestyle changes may lead to regression of coronary atherosclerosis after 1 year., Objectives: To determine the feasibility of patients to sustain intensive lifestyle changes for a total of 5 years and the effects of these lifestyle changes (without lipid-lowering drugs) on coronary heart disease., Design: Randomized controlled trial conducted from 1986 to 1992 using a randomized invitational design., Patients: Forty-eight patients with moderate to severe coronary heart disease were randomized to an intensive lifestyle change group or to a usual-care control group, and 35 completed the 5-year follow-up quantitative coronary arteriography., Setting: Two tertiary care university medical centers., Intervention: Intensive lifestyle changes (10% fat whole foods vegetarian diet, aerobic exercise, stress management training, smoking cessation, group psychosocial support) for 5 years., Main Outcome Measures: Adherence to intensive lifestyle changes, changes in coronary artery percent diameter stenosis, and cardiac events., Results: Experimental group patients (20 [71%] of 28 patients completed 5-year follow-up) made and maintained comprehensive lifestyle changes for 5 years, whereas control group patients (15 [75%] of 20 patients completed 5-year follow-up) made more moderate changes. In the experimental group, the average percent diameter stenosis at baseline decreased 1.75 absolute percentage points after 1 year (a 4.5% relative improvement) and by 3.1 absolute percentage points after 5 years (a 7.9% relative improvement). In contrast, the average percent diameter stenosis in the control group increased by 2.3 percentage points after 1 year (a 5.4% relative worsening) and by 11.8 percentage points after 5 years (a 27.7% relative worsening) (P=.001 between groups. Twenty-five cardiac events occurred in 28 experimental group patients vs 45 events in 20 control group patients during the 5-year follow-up (risk ratio for any event for the control group, 2.47 [95% confidence interval, 1.48-4.20])., Conclusions: More regression of coronary atherosclerosis occurred after 5 years than after 1 year in the experimental group. In contrast, in the control group, coronary atherosclerosis continued to progress and more than twice as many cardiac events occurred.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify qualitative or quantitative variables present on angioscopy, intravascular ultrasound imaging or quantitative coronary arteriography that were associated with adverse clinical outcome after coronary intervention in high risk patients., Background: Patients with acute coronary syndromes and complex lesion morphology on angiography are at increased risk for acute complications after coronary angioplasty. Newer devices that primarily remove atheroma have not improved outcome over that of balloon angioplasty. Intravascular imaging can accurately identify intraluminal and intramural histopathologic features not adequately visualized during coronary arteriography and may provide mechanistic insight into the pathogenesis of abrupt closure and restenosis., Methods: Sixty high risk patients with unstable coronary syndromes and complex lesions on angiography underwent angioscopy (n = 40) and intravascular ultrasound imaging (n = 46) during interventional procedures. In 26 patients, both angioscopy and intravascular ultrasound were performed in the same lesion. All patients underwent off-line quantitative coronary arteriography. Coronary interventions included balloon (n = 21) and excimer laser (n = 4) angioplasty, directional (n = 19) and rotational (n = 6) atherectomy and stent implantation (n = 11). Patients were followed up for 1 year for objective evidence for recurrent ischemia., Results: Patients whose clinical presentation included rest angina or acute myocardial infarction or who received thrombolytic therapy within 24 h of procedure were significantly more likely to experience recurrent ischemia after intervention. Plaque rupture or thrombus on preprocedure angioscopy or angioscopic thrombus after intervention were also significantly associated with adverse outcome. Qualitative or quantitative variables on angiography, intravascular ultrasound or off-line quantitative arteriography were not associated with recurrent ischemia on univariate analysis. Multivariate predictors of recurrent ischemia were plaque rupture on preprocedure angioscopy (p < 0.05, odds ratio [OR] 10.15) and angioscopic thrombus after intervention (p < 0.05, OR 7.26)., Conclusions: Angioscopic plaque rupture and thrombus were independently associated with adverse outcome in patients with complex lesions after interventional procedures. These features were not identified by either angiography or intravascular ultrasound.

The Bard Atherectomy Catheter is a new rotational atherectomy device that consists of a flexible, hollow, thin-walled cutting catheter that, while rotated at 1,500 revolutions per minute, is advanced across the lesion over a special spiral guidewire system. We report the initial clinical experience with this device in 20 peripheral lesions in ten patients. The majority of patients were treated for limb salvage. All lesions were successfully intervened on by atherectomy followed by adjunctive balloon angioplasty. A reduction to less than 50% stenosis was achieved in 13 of the 20 lesions (65%) after atherectomy but in all 20 lesions (100%) after adjunctive angioplasty for all lesions and stenting for dissections in two. Baseline minimal lesion lumen diameter was 0.8 +/- 0.7 mm with a reference vessel diameter of 4.2 +/- 1.7 mm (75 +/- 21% stenosis). The lumen improved to 2.0 +/- 0.8 mm (45 +/- 19% stenosis) (P < 0.001) following atherectomy and to 3.9 +/- 1.9 mm (13 +/- 16% stenosis) (P < 0.001) after adjunctive angioplasty. The average weight of removed atheroma was 45 +/- 58 mg. All ten patients had initial improvement in symptoms. At 6 months follow-up there was persistent improvement in eight patients and two subjects had undergone amputations. Our early clinical experience with this low profile, flexible atherectomy device, that enables extraction of a large amount of atheroma, suggests that it will become a valuable addition to current atherectomy technologies in small- and medium-sized vessels. The value of this device in coronary vessels is under investigation.

Ultrasound transducer-tipped guidewires can be used for coronary interventions, and they permit the monitoring of coronary flow before, during, and after the interventions. The flow signal contains valuable information regarding the quality and stability of the final result. Restoration of typical phasic flow patterns with diastolic predominance is one guide to final result. Monitoring the trend in average velocity over several minutes after completion of the procedure can detect subtle alterations in flow that may presage abrupt closure. These flow alterations might also help predict active plaques with heavy thrombus involvement that may undergo recurrence in the weeks and months after successful procedures.

Coronary guidewires with ultrasound transducer tips are commercially available and are appropriately sized for use in coronary interventions. These guidewires permit monitoring of coronary flow before, during and after the interventions. The measured flow signal contains valuable information regarding the quality and the stability of the final result. After completion of the procedure, monitoring the trend in average velocity over several minutes can reveal subtle alterations in flow that may presage abrupt closure. Abnormal or unstable flow patterns also may help predict lesions that might develop recurrences in the weeks and months after successful procedures.

Background: The present study was designed to evaluate the role of tachycardia-induced dynamic coronary artery diameter changes in the development of myocardial ischemia., Methods: Coronary angiography at rest and during atrial pacing-induced myocardial ischemia was performed in 22 patients. The diameter of the proximal and the corresponding distal coronary artery segments at rest and during pacing was measured using quantitative coronary angiography. Plasma levels of noradrenaline, adrenaline, dopamine and endothelin were determined in a subset of 14 patients in blood drawn from aorta and coronary sinus at rest and during pacing., Results: Luminal diameter in normal proximal and distal segments increased, respectively, from 2.93 +/- 0.34 and 1.40 +/- 0.04 mm at rest to 3.03 +/- 0.25 and 1.58 +/- 0.07 mm during atrial pacing. The diameter of the proximal coronary artery segments with significant concentric stenosis decreased from 1.28 +/- 0.4 mm at rest to 0.95 +/- 0.34 mm during pacing, whereas segments with either significant eccentric or non-significant stenosis did not change significantly. A correlation was found between the noradrenaline level in the coronary sinus and the distal coronary artery diameter., Conclusions: A decrease in diameter of coronary artery segments with concentric stenosis during tachycardia might contribute to the development of myocardial ischemia. Some of the dynamic coronary artery changes may be influenced by the plasma level of noradrenaline. No evidence was found to suggest that dynamic changes in the diameter of proximal segments are related to the changes in diameter of the corresponding distal segments.

Isocenter calibration transforms cardiac structures in digitized biplane angiograms to absolute dimensions, calculating their radiological magnification and video transformation. Since a scaling device is not required, isocenter calibration yields to more accurate measurements than the widely used reference object calibration. Both isocenter methods reported so far, regarding geometrically inaccurate x-ray gantries, yield to different and complex computational formulas. Since these formulas are hard to understand, isocenter calibration is less widely used. To facilitate the implementation of the isocenter calibration, the basic formulas for accurate x-ray gantries are derived. Shifting virtually one x-ray system onto the other, basic isocenter calibration is derived geometrically in three simple steps. The radiological magnification of an object is illustrated as a ratio of planes. The calculation of all parameters entering the computations is demonstrated geometrically, by use of the isocenter of the x-ray gantry. The derivation gives a clear idea of isocenter calibration. It is simple to derive and facilitates the understanding of the error regarding developments. When geometrical inaccuracies vanish, all formulas become equivalent. However, even if the inaccuracies increase, all methods provide nearly identical results, indicating the robustness of isocenter calibration.

Objectives: We tested the hypothesis that cyclic alterations in coronary artery blood flow that occurred after coronary angioplasty could be attenuated or abolished by a monoclonal antibody to the platelet surface membrane GP IIb/IIIa receptor., Background: Coronary artery cyclic flow variations may occur after coronary angioplasty in experimental animal models and humans. In animal models of coronary thrombosis, cyclic alterations in flow often have preceded thrombotic occlusion or reocclusion. Several agents that inhibit platelet function have been shown to attenuate or eliminate cyclic flow variations in these models., Methods: We monitored coronary artery flow in 27 patients for 30 min after coronary angioplasty, using 0.018-in. (0.046 cm) coronary guide wires with pulsed wave Doppler ultrasound transducers on the distal tips. Clinical data were collected and quantitative analyses performed on coronary arteriograms made before and after the angioplasty procedures. We compared findings in patients with and without cyclic flow variations detected., Results: There were 20 men and 7 women. Mean age was 58 years, and 63% had unstable angina. They received standard doses of nitrates, aspirin, heparin, calcium channel antagonists and other medications clinically indicated. Nevertheless, we detected cyclic flow variations in five patients (19%). Four of these patients had stable flow restored with intravenous injection of 0.25 mg/kg normal body weight of monoclonal antibody c7E3 Fab to the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor. In one patient, stable flow was restored by repeat dilation when an immediate angiogram revealed renarrowing. Patients developing cyclic alterations in flow had longer lesions (18.7 +/- 7.5 mm vs. 13.1 +/- 5.7 mm, p < 0.05) that had responded less well to angioplasty (stenosis postangioplasty 47 +/- 13% vs. 33 +/- 15%, p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Cyclic alterations in coronary artery blood flow may occur in some patients after coronary angioplasty, despite the use of standard antiplatelet, antithrombotic and antivasospastic medications. We found that they could be eliminated by this monoclonal antibody that blocks the final common event of platelet aggregation.

Technologic innovations have made it possible to measure coronary artery blood flow in awake patients. Both flow velocity as well as flow reserve can be assessed. In particular, the period of time immediately following coronary interventions offers a unique opportunity to study important features of coronary flow behavior. In 22 patients, coronary flow reserve was measured before and after an intervention, either angioplasty or atherectomy, using a 0.018-in Doppler guidewire (Flowire). The minimum lumen diameter (MLD) was increased from 1.0 +/- 0.4 to 1.7 +/- 0.4 mm, while coronary flow velocity increased significantly, rising from 29 +/- 13 to 39 +/- 14 cm/sec (p < 0.025). The maximum hyperemic velocity also increased, from 44 +/- 16 to 69 +/- 21 cm/sec. Using only the preintervention or postintervention values, the flow reserve ratio was 1.53 +/- 0.4 prior to intervention and 1.84 +/- 0.5 after intervention (p = nonsignificant). However, the post-intervention value may have been artifactually reduced by the fact that both resting as well as hyperemic velocities increased. When the post-intervention flow reserve ratio was recalculated, using the preintervention resting value, flow reserve ratio was seen in increase from 1.53 +/- 0.4 to 2.73 +/- 1.2 (p < 0.001). Measurements of coronary flow in the postintervention period also revealed several interesting phenomena. Spasm of a coronary artery was documented, and its resolution in response to intracoronary nitroglycerin was observed. Elastic recoil following angioplasty was documented by gradual decline in coronary flow over 30 minutes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Background: Severity of coronary artery stenosis has been defined in terms of geometric dimensions, pressure gradient-flow relations, resistance to flow and coronary flow reserve, or maximum flow capacity after maximum arteriolar vasodilation. A direct relation between coronary pressure and flow, however, may only be presumed if the resistances in the coronary circulation are constant (and minimal) as theoretically is the case during maximum arteriolar vasodilation. In that case, pressure measurements theoretically can be used to predict maximum flow and assess functional stenosis severity., Methods and Results: A theoretical model was developed for the different components of the coronary circulation, and a set of equations was derived by which the relative maximum flow or fractional flow reserve in both the stenotic epicardial artery and the myocardial vascular bed and the proportional contribution of coronary arterial and collateral flow to myocardial blood flow are calculated from measurements of arterial, distal coronary, and central venous pressures during maximum arteriolar vasodilation. To test this model, five dogs were acutely instrumented with an epicardial, coronary Doppler flow velocity transducer. Distal coronary pressures were measured by an ultrathin pressure-monitoring guide wire (0.015 in.) with minimal influence on transstenotic pressure gradient. Fractional flow reserve was calculated from the pressure measurements and compared with relative maximum coronary artery flow measured directly by the Doppler flowmeter at three different levels of arterial pressure for each of 12 different severities of stenosis at each pressure level. Relative maximum blood flow through the stenotic artery (Qs) measured directly by the Doppler flowmeter showed an excellent correlation with the pressure-derived values of Qs (r = 0.98 +/- 0.01, intercept = 0.02 +/- 0.03, slope = 0.98 +/- 0.04), of the relative maximum myocardial flow (r = 0.98 +/- 0.02, intercept = 0.26 +/- 0.07, slope = 0.73 +/- 0.08), and of the collateral blood flow (r = 0.96 +/- 0.04, intercept = 0.24 +/- 0.07, slope = -0.24 +/- 0.06). Moreover, the theoretically predicted constant relation between mean arterial pressure and coronary wedge pressure, both corrected for venous pressure, was confirmed experimentally (r = 0.97 +/- 0.03, intercept = 9.5 +/- 13.3, slope = 4.4 +/- 1.2)., Conclusions: These results provide the experimental basis for determining relative maximum flow or fractional flow reserve of both the epicardial coronary artery and the myocardium, including collateral flow, from pressure measurements during maximum arteriolar vasodilation. With a suitable guide wire for reliably measuring distal coronary pressure clinically, this method may have potential applications during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for assessing changes in the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses and for estimating collateral flow achievable during occlusion of the coronary artery.

Objectives: To obtain the size of regional myocardial mass for individual coronary arteries in vivo., Background: The anatomic site of occlusion in a coronary artery does not predict the size of the risk area because location of the occlusion does not account for the size of the artery or of its dependent myocardial bed., Methods: Intracoronary radiolabeled microspheres were injected and coronary arteriograms were quantitatively analyzed by semiautomated methods. The coronary artery lumen areas and the sum of epicardial coronary artery branch lengths distal to the points where radiomicrospheres had been injected were determined from both in vivo and postmortem coronary arteriograms. Regional myocardial mass distal to the point of each microsphere injection was correlated with corresponding distal summed coronary branch lengths and with coronary artery lumen areas., Results: 1) Regional myocardial mass was closely and linearly related to sum of coronary artery branch lengths distal to any point in the coronary artery tree and therefore could be determined for any location on a coronary arteriogram. 2) The fraction of total left ventricular mass at risk distal to a stenosis could be determined from the corresponding fraction of total coronary artery tree length independently of the scale or X-ray magnification used to measure absolute branch lengths. 3) Cross-sectional lumen area at any point in the left coronary artery tree was closely related to the size of the dependent vascular bed with a curvilinear relation similar to that observed in humans with normal coronary arteriograms., Conclusions: On coronary arteriograms, the anatomic area at risk for myocardial infarction distal to any point in the coronary artery tree can be determined from the sum of distal coronary artery branch lengths. There is a curvilinear relation between coronary artery lumen area and dependent regional myocardial mass comparable to that in humans, reflecting fundamental physical principles underlying the structure of the coronary vascular tree.

Background: Quantitative coronary arteriography has been validated for stenotic segments of coronary arteries. However, it does not currently account for diffuse coronary artery disease, because the normal size of the coronary artery for its distal myocardial bed size is not known and cannot be measured directly with diffuse involvement of the artery., Methods and Results: From clinical coronary arteriograms of 12 patients without coronary artery disease (group 1) and in 17 patients with coronary artery disease (group 2), we determined by quantitative coronary arteriography 1) the relations among measured coronary artery cross-sectional lumen area, summed distal branch lengths, and regional myocardial mass distal to each point in each coronary artery; 2) the ratio of coronary artery lumen area between parent and daughter vessels at 50 bifurcations; and 3) which of three different theoretical physical principles could underlie the tree structure of the human coronary artery system, by comparing the coronary artery size, branch lengths, regional mass, and relations between parent-to-daughter lumen area ratios with those for the different theoretical physical principles to test which principle best fit the observed data and therefore which principle most probably characterizes the human coronary artery tree structure. The results showed that 1) there is a close correlation between the lumen area of a coronary artery at each point along its length and the corresponding summed distal branch lengths and regional myocardial mass in patients without and with coronary artery disease; 2) measured coronary artery lumen area in patients with coronary artery disease is diffusely 30-50% too small for distal myocardial bed size compared with normal subjects; and 3) the observed relations among coronary artery size, distal summed lengths, myocardial bed size, and parent-to-daughter size ratios are not consistent with the theoretical principle of constant mean blood flow velocity in the coronary circulation but are consistent with the principles of minimum viscous energy loss and of limited/adaptive vascular wall shear stress characterized by a 2/3 power law relating coronary artery lumen area to distal summed branch lengths and regional mass or parent-to-daughter branching ratios., Conclusions: These observations provide a basis for quantifying diffuse coronary artery disease on clinical arteriograms.

To test the hypothesis that tortuous, diseased vessels could be successfully treated with a flexible rotational atherectomy device we evaluated the BARD atherectomy device with quantitative angiography and histology in normal canine coronary arteries and diseased human below-knee amputation specimens. The mid left anterior descending and the circumflex vessels were treated in 4 dogs serially with 1 wk separating treatments. The acute and follow-up anterior descending artery size was unchanged (1.41 mm before, 1.39 mm after, and 1.59 mm at 1 week). Similar findings were obtained in the circumflex vessels. In 4 adult human amputated legs, diseased peroneal or tibial arteries were treated with a significant reduction in the percent luminal diameter stenosis from 62.75 prior to intervention to 36.5 following intervention (p = 0.021). The luminal diameter increased from 0.81 to 1.54 mm (p = 0.06). In 2 canine arteries there was histologic evidence of localized perforation of the arterial wall, but there was no angiographic evidence of perforation or dissection and no significant myocardial necrosis in the distribution of the treated vessels at 1 wk. The majority of the diseased human vessels demonstrated smoothly cut atheromas with sparing of the media. The rotational atherectomy catheter system holds promise for removal of plaque in relatively small, diffusely diseased, tortuous vessels.

In part 1 of a three-part study, 14 novice readers and 6 experienced cardiologists interpreted phantom images of known stenosis severity. No difference between the interpretations of experienced and novice readers was detectable. Visual estimates of "moderately" severe stenosis were 30% higher than actual percent diameter stenosis. In part 2 of the study, visual interpretation of percent diameter stenosis from 212 stenoses on 241 arteriograms was compared with quantitative coronary arteriographic assessment. The visual analysis overestimated disease severity in arteries with greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis (except for right coronary lesions) and underestimated severity in all arteries with less than 50% diameter stenosis. Of the 241 arteriograms, 40 had quantitative and visual analysis of all three coronary arteries for assessment of significant disease. In only 62% of the cases did visual and quantitative methods agree on the presence of severe disease; visual estimates diagnosed significantly (p less than 0.05) more three-vessel disease. In part 3 of the study, comparison of percent diameter stenosis by visual estimate with quantitative coronary arteriographic assessment before and after balloon angioplasty of 38 stenoses showed that visual interpretation significantly (p less than 0.001) overestimated initial lesion severity and underestimated stenosis severity after angioplasty.

Technetium-99m (Tc-99m) teboroxime is a new perfusion tracer that is highly extracted and rapidly cleared by the myocardium. To determine the feasibility of Tc-99m teboroxime imaging in the diagnosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease, 30 patients underwent single photon emission computed tomography imaging with Tc-99m teboroxime (25.2 +/- 1 mCi) at peak exercise and again 60 min later at rest. All patients underwent either a thallium stress test (n = 26) or automated quantitative coronary arteriography (n = 25), or both, without intervening revascularization or infarction. Images were reviewed by two investigators who had no knowledge of clinical data. Coronary lesions with greater than or equal to 50% diameter narrowing by quantitative coronary arteriography were considered significant. Both thallium and Tc-99m teboroxime detected disease in all patients with two or three vessel disease. One vessel disease was detected with Tc-99m teboroxime in 9 of 10 patients and with thallium in 8 of 10 (p = NS). In patients without angiographically significant disease. Tc-99m teboroxime demonstrated normal perfusion in six of eight patients and thallium in three of five (p = NS). Overall, when presence or absence of disease detected by Tc-99m teboroxime or thallium was compared with quantitative coronary arteriography, there was no difference between Tc-99m teboroxime and thallium. These results suggest that Tc-99m teboroxime is comparable to thallium as an imaging agent. The rapid biologic half-life, 5.3 min, allows studies to be completed in 60 to 90 min.

In a prospective, randomised, controlled trial to determine whether comprehensive lifestyle changes affect coronary atherosclerosis after 1 year, 28 patients were assigned to an experimental group (low-fat vegetarian diet, stopping smoking, stress management training, and moderate exercise) and 20 to a usual-care control group. 195 coronary artery lesions were analysed by quantitative coronary angiography. The average percentage diameter stenosis regressed from 40.0 (SD 16.9)% to 37.8 (16.5)% in the experimental group yet progressed from 42.7 (15.5)% to 46.1 (18.5)% in the control group. When only lesions greater than 50% stenosed were analysed, the average percentage diameter stenosis regressed from 61.1 (8.8)% to 55.8 (11.0)% in the experimental group and progressed from 61.7 (9.5)% to 64.4 (16.3)% in the control group. Overall, 82% of experimental-group patients had an average change towards regression. Comprehensive lifestyle changes may be able to bring about regression of even severe coronary atherosclerosis after only 1 year, without use of lipid-lowering drugs.