Search

Stig Holm Ovesen,1,2 Søren Helbo Skaarup,3 Rasmus Aagaard,4 Hans Kirkegaard,1 Bo Løfgren,1,5 Michael Dan Arvig,6– 8 Bo Martin Bibby,9 Stefan Posth,10 Christian B Laursen,11,12 Jesper Weile1,2 1Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 2Emergency Department, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark; 3Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 4Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark; 6Emergency Department, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark; 7Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 8Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 9Department of Biostatistics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 10Emergency Department, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; 11Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; 12Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DenmarkCorrespondence: Stig Holm Ovesen, Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, J103, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark, Email stigholm@clin.au.dkPurpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) helps emergency department (ED) physicians make prompt and appropriate decisions, but the optimal diagnostic integration and potential clinical benefits remain unclear. We describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial. The objective is to determine the effect of a POCUS-driven diagnostic pathway in adult dyspneic ED patients on the proportion of patients having a hospital stay of less than 24 hours when compared to the standard diagnostic pathway.Patients and Methods: This is a multicenter, random

Background This scoping review was conducted to provide an overview of the evidence of point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) in emergency medicine. By emphasizing clinical topics, time trends, study designs, and the scope of the primary outcomes, a map is provided for physicians and researchers to guide their future initiatives. Research Question Which study designs and primary outcomes are reported in published studies of LUS in emergency medicine? Study Design and Methods We performed a systematic search in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for LUS studies published prior to May 13, 2023. Study characteristics were synthesized quantitatively. The primary outcomes in all papers were categorized into the hierarchical Fryback and Thornbury levels. Results A total of 4,076 papers were screened and, following selection and handsearching, 406 papers were included. The number of publications doubled from January 2020 to May 2023 (204 to 406 papers). The study designs were primarily observational (n = 375 [92%]), followed by randomized (n = 18 [4%]) and case series (n = 13 [3%]). The primary outcome measure concerned diagnostic accuracy in 319 papers (79%), diagnostic thinking in 32 (8%), therapeutic changes in 4 (1%), and patient outcomes in 14 (3%). No increase in the proportions of randomized controlled trials or the scope of primary outcome measures was observed with time. A freely available interactive database was created to enable readers to search for any given interest (https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/blinded/viz/LUSinEM_240216/INFO). Interpretation Observational diagnostic studies have been produced in abundance, leaving a paucity of research exploring clinical utility. Notably, research exploring whether LUS causes changes to clinical decisions is imperative prior to any further research being made into patient benefits. Key Words emergency, Background: This scoping review was conducted to provide an overview of the evidence of point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) in emergency medicine. By emphasizing clinical topics, time trends, study designs, and the scope of the primary outcomes, a map is provided for physicians and researchers to guide their future initiatives. Research Question: Which study designs and primary outcomes are reported in published studies of LUS in emergency medicine? Study Design and Methods: We performed a systematic search in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for LUS studies published prior to May 13, 2023. Study characteristics were synthesized quantitatively. The primary outcomes in all papers were categorized into the hierarchical Fryback and Thornbury levels. Results: A total of 4,076 papers were screened and, following selection and handsearching, 406 papers were included. The number of publications doubled from January 2020 to May 2023 (204 to 406 papers). The study designs were primarily observational (n = 375 [92%]), followed by randomized (n = 18 [4%]) and case series (n = 13 [3%]). The primary outcome measure concerned diagnostic accuracy in 319 papers (79%), diagnostic thinking in 32 (8%), therapeutic changes in 4 (1%), and patient outcomes in 14 (3%). No increase in the proportions of randomized controlled trials or the scope of primary outcome measures was observed with time. A freely available interactive database was created to enable readers to search for any given interest (https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/blinded/viz/LUSinEM_240216/INFO). Interpretation: Observational diagnostic studies have been produced in abundance, leaving a paucity of research exploring clinical utility. Notably, research exploring whether LUS causes changes to clinical decisions is imperative prior to any further research being made into patient benefits.

Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) helps emergency department (ED) physicians make prompt and appropriate decisions, but the optimal diagnostic integration and potential clinical benefits remain unclear. We describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial. The objective is to determine the effect of a POCUS-driven diagnostic pathway in adult dyspneic ED patients on the proportion of patients having a hospital stay of less than 24 hours when compared to the standard diagnostic pathway. Patients and Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated, open-labeled, pragmatic, controlled trial. Adult ED patients with chief complaint dyspnea are eligible. Patients are randomized (1:1) to the POCUS-driven diagnostic pathway or standard diagnostic pathway, with 337 patients in each group. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients having a hospital stay (from ED arrival to hospital discharge) of less than 24 hours. Key secondary outcomes include hospital length-of-stay, 72-hour revisits, and 30-day hospital-free days. Conclusion: Sparse evidence exists for any clinical benefit from a POCUS-integrated diagnostic pathway. The results from this trial will help clarify the promising signals for POCUS to influence patient care among ED patients with dyspnea. Keywords: focused lung ultrasound, focused cardiac ultrasound, shortness-of-breath, diagnostic effectiveness, Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) helps emergency department (ED) physicians make prompt and appropriate decisions, but the optimal diagnostic integration and potential clinical benefits remain unclear. We describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial. The objective is to determine the effect of a POCUS-driven diagnostic pathway in adult dyspneic ED patients on the proportion of patients having a hospital stay of less than 24 hours when compared to the standard diagnostic pathway. Patients and Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated, open-labeled, pragmatic, controlled trial. Adult ED patients with chief complaint dyspnea are eligible. Patients are randomized (1:1) to the POCUS-driven diagnostic pathway or standard diagnostic pathway, with 337 patients in each group. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients having a hospital stay (from ED arrival to hospital discharge) of less than 24 hours. Key secondary outcomes include hospital length-of-stay, 72-hour revisits, and 30-day hospital-free days. Conclusion: Sparse evidence exists for any clinical benefit from a POCUS-integrated diagnostic pathway. The results from this trial will help clarify the promising signals for POCUS to influence patient care among ED patients with dyspnea.

Background Neuroimaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may assist clinicians in evaluating brain injury and optimising care in comatose adults resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, contemporary international data on its use are lacking. Aim The primary aim was to compare the patient characteristics, early postresuscitation care, and neurological outcomes of patients according to MRI use. Methods We performed a posthoc analysis of the Targeted Therapeutic Mild Hypercapnia after Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest (TAME) trial, a multinational randomised trial comparing targeted mild hypercapnia or normocapnia in comatose adults after OHCA. Results After exclusions, 1639 patients enrolled in the TAME trial were analysed. Of these, 149 (9%) had an MRI. Compared to non-MRI patients, MRI patients were younger (58.9 versus 61.7 years, p: 0.02), had a longer median time from OHCA to return of spontaneous circulation (30 versus 25 min, p < 0.0001), and had a higher average arterial lactate level (8.78 versus 6.74 mmol/L, p < 0.0001) on admission to hospital. MRI patients were more likely to receive additional advanced diagnostic assessments during intensive care unit admission (p < 0.0001). At 6 months, 23 of 140 patients (16.4%) in the MRI group had a favourable neurological outcome, compared with 659 of 1399 patients (47.1%) in the no-MRI group (p < 0.001). On multivariable modelling, country of enrolment was the dominating predictor in the likelihood of an MRI being performed. Conclusions In the TAME trial, 9% of patients had an MRI during their intensive care unit admission. Among these patients, only 16% had a favourable neurological outcome at 6 months.

BACKGROUND A main cause of trauma morbidity and mortality is multiple-organ failure, and endotheliopathy has been implicated. Pilot studies indicate that low-dose prostacyclin improves endothelial functionality in critically ill patients, suggesting that this intervention may improve trauma patient outcome. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized, blinded, clinical investigator-initiated trial in 229 trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock who were randomized 1:1 to 72 hours infusion of the prostacyclin analog iloprost (1 ng/kg/min) or placebo. The primary outcome was the number of intensive care unit (ICU)-free days alive within 28 days of admission. Secondary outcomes included 28-day all-cause mortality and hospital length of stay. RESULTS The mean number of ICU-free days alive within 28 days was 15.64 days in the iloprost group versus 13.99 days in the placebo group (adjusted mean difference, -1.63 days [95% confidence interval (CI), -4.64 to 1.38 days]; p = 0.28). The 28-day mortality was 18.8% in the iloprost group versus 19.6% in the placebo group (odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.51-2.0]; p = 0.97). The mean hospital length of stay was 19.96 days in the iloprost group versus 27.32 days in the placebo group (adjusted mean difference, 7.84 days [95% CI, 1.66-14.02 days], p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Iloprost did not result in a statistically significant increase in the number of ICU-free days alive within 28 days of admission, whereas it was safe and a statistically significant reduction in hospital length of stay was observed. Further research on prostacyclin in shocked trauma patients is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.