Search

Treatment of metastatic melanoma has changed dramatically in the past 5 years with the approval of six new agents (vemurafenib, dabrafenib, trametinib, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This review will compare the immunotherapies recently approved by the FDA (ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab) with the long-approved immunotherapy, interleukin-2. Additional consideration will be given to the evolving landscape, including the opportunities for combination regimens. Immunotherapies have distinct mechanisms of action and unique response kinetics that differ from conventional cytotoxic and targeted therapies, and have a range of adverse events that can be safely managed by experienced health-care providers. Data suggest immunotherapies can result in long-term survival in a proportion of patients. This dynamic and evolving field of immunotherapy for melanoma will continue to offer challenges in terms of optimal patient management for the foreseeable future.

The literature contains few reports of patients with four more or more synchronous primary malignancies. We report the case of a 74-year-old woman who presented with synchronous primary malignant neoplasms of the breast (metaplastic carcinoma), lung (squamous cell carcinoma), esophagus (adenocarcinoma), and colon (adenocarcinoma). She was treated with multimodality therapy and demonstrated a favorable response at early follow-up. To our knowledge, this combination of synchronous primary malignancies has not been previously reported. The management of patients with multiple synchronous primary malignancies introduces a number of unique challenges which necessitate highly individualized treatment plans that may not strictly adhere to standard practices in the setting of a single malignancy., (Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Introduction: To date, no study has compared laparoscopy (LB) to percutaneous (PB) biopsy for the diagnosis of abdominal lymphoma. The objective of this study is to compare the success rate and safety profile of laparoscopic lymph node biopsy to the percutaneous approach in patients with intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy concerning for lymphoma., Materials and Methods: We performed a multi-institution, retrospective review of patients undergoing lymph node biopsy for suspected intra-abdominal lymphoma between 2005 and 2013. Our primary outcome was adequate tissue yield between the two techniques, both for histologic diagnosis and for ancillary studies such as flow cytometry. Secondary outcomes included 30-day morbidity, 30-day readmission rates, the need for additional lymph node biopsy procedures, and length of stay., Results: All 34 of the LB patients had adequate specimen for histologic diagnosis compared to 92.3% of patients with a PB (p = 0.18). Significantly more patients in the LB group had sufficient tissue for ancillary studies when needed than in the PB group, 95.5 and 68.2%, respectively (p = 0.04). A second biopsy was pursued in 23.1% of failed PB patients, 0% with success on second attempt., Discussion: When index of suspicion is high or when biopsy is performed for patient previously diagnosed with lymphoma and recurrence/transformation is suspected, LB safely and consistently provides adequate tissue for initial diagnosis and for ancillary studies. In contrast, image-guided PB may be more appropriate for patients for whom ancillary studies are unlikely to add to planned treatments or when there is a high risk of complications from either general anesthesia or patient comorbidities.

High-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) is an approved immunotherapy agent for metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma resulting in objective responses in 15-20 % of patients. An additional subset of patients achieves stable disease, and the natural history of these patients has not been well documented. We hypothesized that stable disease following HD IL-2 is associated with a survival advantage. To explore this hypothesis, a retrospective chart review of 305 patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma or renal cell carcinoma treated with HD IL-2 was conducted. Patient characteristics, response based on standard RECIST criteria and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and associations with clinical response were compared using a log-rank test. Two hundred and forty-five patients had melanoma and 60 had renal cell carcinoma. Of these, 217 had complete data available for analysis. Fifty-nine percentage had progressive disease (PD), 26 % had stable disease (SD) and 15 % had an objective complete (CR) or partial response (PR). Median overall survival was 16.8 months for all patients with available survival data; patients with PD had a median survival of 7.9 months compared to 38.2 months for stable disease, while the median has not been reached for those with objective responses. This retrospective data support an association between overall survival and stable disease, suggesting that clinical benefit may be underestimated for patients treated with HD IL-2. The data further support the use of disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) as a more meaningful endpoint for future clinical studies of tumor immunotherapy, including future studies of HD IL-2.