1. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-36 in untreated patients with symptoms of intermittent claudication.
- Author
-
Vaidya A, Kleinegris MC, Severens JL, Ramaekers BL, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Ten Cate H, and Joore MA
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Reproducibility of Results, Intermittent Claudication psychology, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires standards
- Abstract
Aim: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) descriptions and utility scores in newly diagnosed peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients, using two most widely used instruments, EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) and Medical Outcome Study 36-item Short-Form Health Status Survey (SF-36)., Methods: Patients' self-assessment of HRQoL was measured by the Dutch versions of the EQ-5D and SF-36 in the 204 patients., Results: Mean utility scores ranged from 0.675 for Short-Form Six-Dimension, 0.648 for the EQ-5D UK tariff and 0.715 for the Dutch EQ-5D tariff. A moderate correlation between the utility scores was found due to different valuation techniques of these instruments., Conclusion: Both instruments have clinical validity for use in the PAD and can be used alongside each other to provide a holistic assessment of the HRQoL. Before using these two instruments interchangeably for utility score calculations and healthcare resource allocation, a thorough sensitivity analysis is necessary to explore the robustness of the value argument based on these utility scores.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF