Search

Abstract Objective: Statins have been shown to impact international normalized ratio (INR) when coadministered with warfarin. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pitavastatin compared with rosuvastatin on steady-state pharmacodynamics (PD) of warfarin by measuring INR in healthy adult subjects. Methods: Subjects received oral doses of warfarin 5 mg once daily on days 1 through 3. The dose was titrated on days 4 through 9 to reach a steady-state INR of 1.5 to 2.2. Warfarin was continued on days 10 through 21 and pitavastatin 4 mg or rosuvastatin 40 mg was administered once daily on days 14 through 22. After a 14-day washout period, the process was repeated with the alternate statin. Study number: NK-104-4.03US. Results: For pitavastatin, mean INR changed from 1.73 ± 0.18 (n = 42) on day 14 before starting statin dosing, to 1.78 ± 0.29 (n = 42) on day 22 at treatment end; the difference in INR was not significant (p = 0.219). For rosuvastatin, mean INR increased significantly from 1.74 ± 0.20 (n = 43) at baseline to 1.90 ± 0.30 (n = 43) at treatment end (p < 0.001). Rosuvastatin caused a significantly greater increase in INR than pitavastatin (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Steady-state INR during warfarin treatment did not change significantly when pitavastatin 4 mg was added to the regimen, while a significant increase was observed when rosuvastatin 40 mg was added. The effect of rosuvastatin on INR was significantly larger than the effect of pitavastatin. This study is limited because it was done in healthy volunteers. Further studies in patient populations are needed to better understand the clinical significance of the results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Duloxetine, a potent reuptake inhibitor of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine, is effective for the treatment of major depressive disorder, diabetic neuropathic pain, stress urinary incontinence, generalized anxiety disorder and fibromyalgia. Duloxetine achieves a maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of approximately 47 ng/mL (40 mg twice-daily dosing) to 110 ng/mL (80 mg twice-daily dosing) approximately 6 hours after dosing. The elimination half-life of duloxetine is approximately 10-12 hours and the volume of distribution is approximately 1640 L. The goal of this paper is to provide a review of the literature on intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may impact the pharmacokinetics of duloxetine with a focus on concomitant medications and their clinical implications. Patient demographic characteristics found to influence the pharmacokinetics of duloxetine include sex, smoking status, age, ethnicity, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype, hepatic function and renal function. Of these, only impaired hepatic function or severely impaired renal function warrant specific warnings or dose recommendations. Pharmacokinetic results from drug interaction studies show that activated charcoal decreases duloxetine exposure, and that CYP1A2 inhibition increases duloxetine exposure to a clinically significant degree. Specifically, following oral administration in the presence of fluvoxamine, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and C(max) of duloxetine significantly increased by 460% (90% CI 359, 584) and 141% (90% CI 93, 200), respectively. In addition, smoking is associated with a 30% decrease in duloxetine concentration. The exposure of duloxetine with CYP2D6 inhibitors or in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers is increased to a lesser extent than that observed with CYP1A2 inhibition and does not require a dose adjustment. In addition, duloxetine increases the exposure of drugs that are metabolized by CYP2D6, but not CYP1A2. Pharmacodynamic study results indicate that duloxetine may enhance the effects of benzodiazepines, but not alcohol or warfarin. An increase in gastric pH produced by histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists or antacids did not impact the absorption of duloxetine. While duloxetine is generally well tolerated, it is important to be knowledgeable about the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between duloxetine and drugs that inhibit CYP1A2 or drugs that are metabolized by CYP2D6 enzymes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Duloxetine is indicated for patients with a variety of conditions, and some of these patients may have mild to moderate degrees of renal impairment. Renal impairment may affect the pharmacokinetics of a drug by causing changes in absorption, distribution, protein binding, renal excretion or nonrenal clearance. As duloxetine is highly bound to plasma proteins and its metabolites are renally excreted, it is prudent to evaluate the effect of renal insufficiency on exposure to duloxetine and its metabolites in the systemic circulation.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of varying degrees of renal impairment on duloxetine pharmacokinetics in a single-dose phase I study and using pooled steady-state pharmacokinetic data from phase II/III trials.Methods: In the phase I study, a single oral dose of duloxetine 60 mg was given to 12 subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and 12 matched healthy control subjects. In the phase II/III trials (n = 463 patients), duloxetine 20-60 mg was given as once- or twice-daily doses. Duloxetine and metabolite concentrations in plasma were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Noncompartmental methods (phase I: duloxetine and its metabolites) and population modelling methods (phase II/III: duloxetine) were used to analyse the pharmacokinetic data.Results: The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of duloxetine were approximately 2-fold higher in subjects with ESRD than in healthy subjects, which appeared to reflect an increase in oral bioavailability. The C(max) and AUC of two major inactive conjugated metabolites were as much as 2- and 9-fold higher, respectively, reflecting reduced renal clearance of these metabolites. Population pharmacokinetic results indicated that mild or moderate renal impairment, assessed by creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula, did not have a statistically significant effect on pharmacokinetic parameters of duloxetine. Values for the apparent total body clearance of duloxetine from plasma after oral administration (CL/F) in subjects with ESRD were similar to CL/F values in patients with normal renal function or with mild or moderate renal impairment.Conclusion: Dose adjustments for duloxetine are not necessary for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment (CL(CR) > or =30 mL/min). For patients with ESRD or severe renal impairment (CL(CR) <30 mL/min), exposures of duloxetine and its metabolites are expected to increase; therefore, duloxetine is not generally recommended for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluated the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of once-daily dosing of warfarin at steady state when taken concomitantly with once-daily doses of duloxetine. Healthy subjects with a stable international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.5 to 2.0 on an individualized fixed dose of warfarin (2-9 mg) in period 1 received daily warfarin and duloxetine (60 mg for 14 days [n = 15] or 60 mg for 4 days, then 120 mg for 10 days [n = 15]) in period 2. Across the 14-day period when warfarin was coadministered with duloxetine, the least squares mean INR changes from baseline (warfarin alone) ranged from -0.05 to +0.07, and the 90% confidence intervals ranged from -0.12 to +0.14. Following coadministration of warfarin with 60 mg duloxetine, but not with 120 mg duloxetine, there was a statistically significant prolongation in bleeding time compared to warfarin alone. For both R- and S-warfarin, the 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratios of area under the curve (AUC{tau},ss) and maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax,ss) between warfarin administered alone and with 60 or 120 mg duloxetine were contained within the bioequivalence limits of 0.8 to 1.25. In conclusion, duloxetine had no clinically or statistically significant effect on the pharmacodynamics or pharmacokinetics of warfarin at steady state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The objectives of this analysis were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of duloxetine at steady state in patients, estimate the variability, identify significant covariates that may influence duloxetine pharmacokinetics and provide appropriate dosing recommendations for patients on duloxetine treatment.Methods: The pharmacokinetic meta-analysis dataset was created from one open-label clinical study and four double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies. Duloxetine concentrations (N = 2002) were obtained from 594 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (n = 223), diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (n = 112), stress urinary incontinence (n = 128) and fibromyalgia (n = 131). Patients were given 20-60 mg/day of oral duloxetine once or twice daily (the highest dose studied was 120 mg/day). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling method. Covariates including bodyweight, age, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, disease condition, dose, dosing regimen and creatinine clearance were tested for their influence on duloxetine pharmacokinetics. The final model was used to predict steady-state duloxetine concentration-time profiles in various patient subgroups.Results: Duloxetine pharmacokinetics in patients were described by a one-compartmental pharmacokinetic model. The interpatient variability in apparent oral clearance (CL/F) was 59% and the interpatient variability in the apparent volume of distribution after oral administration (V(d)/F) was 97%. The residual error was 31%. Sex, smoking status, age and dose had a statistically significant effect on CL/F, whereas the V(d)/F was influenced by ethnicity. CL/F was 40% lower in females than in males and 30% lower in nonsmokers than in smokers. CL/F decreased with increasing dose and age. The V(d)/F in Hispanic patients was twice that of non-Hispanic patients. Simulations showed a considerable overlap in duloxetine exposure between the identified patient subgroups.Conclusion: Given the clinically insignificant change in the magnitude of duloxetine steady-state exposure and the considerable overlap in duloxetine exposure between the patient subgroups, specific dose recommendations based on sex, smoking status, age, dose and ethnicity are not warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Restoration of the physiologic hepatic-to-peripheral insulin gradient may be achieved by either portal vein administration or altering insulin structure to increase hepatic specificity or restrict peripheral access. Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) is a novel, PEGylated basal insulin with a flat pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic profile and altered hepatic-to-peripheral action gradient. We hypothesized reduced BIL exposure in peripheral tissues explains the latter, and in this study assessed the adipose tissue interstitial fluid (ISF) concentrations of BIL compared with human insulin (HI)., Methods: A euglycemic glucose clamp was performed in patients with type 1 diabetes during continuous intravenous (IV) infusion of BIL or HI, while the adipose ISF insulin concentrations were determined using open-flow microperfusion (OFM). The ratio of adipose ISF-to-serum concentrations and the absolute steady-state adipose ISF concentrations were assessed using a dynamic no-net-flux technique with subsequent regression analysis., Results: Steady-state BIL concentrations in adipose tissue ISF were achieved by ∼16 h after IV infusion. Median time to reach steady-state glucose infusion rate across doses ranged between 8 and 22 h. The average serum concentrations (coefficient of variation %) of BIL and HI were 11,200 pmol/L (23%) and 425 pmol/L (15%), respectively. The ISF-to-serum concentration ratios were 10.2% for BIL and 22.9% for HI., Conclusions: This study indicates feasibility of OFM to measure BIL in ISF. The observed low ISF-to-serum concentration ratio of BIL is consistent with its previously demonstrated reduced peripheral action.

Aims: Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) is a novel PEGylated basal insulin with a flat pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic profile and reduced peripheral effects, which results in a hepato-preferential action. In Phase 3 trials, patients with T1DM treated with BIL had lower prandial insulin requirements, yet improved prandial glucose control, relative to insulin glargine (GL). We hypothesized that this may be because of an enhanced sensitivity to prandial insulin with BIL resulting from lower chronic peripheral insulin action., Materials and Methods: Two open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover clinical studies were conducted in 28 patients with T1DM and 24 patients with T2DM. In each study period, patients received once-daily, individualized, stable, subcutaneous doses of BIL or GL for 5 weeks before a euglycaemic 2-step hyperinsulinemic clamp procedure (with [6,6- 2 H 2 ]-glucose in 12 of the patients with T1DM). M-values were derived from the clamp procedure for all patients, with rate of glucose appearance (Ra) and disappearance (Rd) and insulin sensitivity index (SI) determined from the clamps with [6,6- 2 H 2 ]-glucose., Results: There were no statistically significant differences between BIL and GL in key measures of hepatic (% Ra suppression during the low-dose insulin infusion; 78.7% with BIL, 81.8% with GL) or peripheral (M-value and M/I during the high-dose insulin infusion, Rd and SI) insulin sensitivity in patients with T1DM or T2DM., Conclusions: The need to reduce prandial insulin observed with BIL during phase 3 trials cannot be explained by the differential effects of BIL and GL on sensitivity to prandial insulin in either T1DM or T2DM., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) consists of insulin lispro with a 20-kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety covalently attached to lysine B28. Because chronic parenteral administration of PEGylated proteins to animals has sometimes resulted in PEG vacuolation of tissue macrophages, renal tubular cells, and choroid plexus ependymal cells, we investigated whether chronic subcutaneous (sc) injection of BIL in rats (52 weeks) and dogs (39 weeks) was associated with systemic toxicities or other changes, including vacuolation of tissue macrophages, renal tubular cells, and ependymal cells. Rats and dogs received daily sc injections of BIL (rats: 0.17, 0.45, or 1.15 mg/kg/d and dogs: 0.025, 0.10, or 0.20 mg/kg/d) and the reference compound, HUMULIN N® (neutral protamine Hagedorn [NPH] human insulin; rats: 0.15 mg/kg/d and dogs: 0.02-0.03 mg/kg/d). Animals were evaluated for standard end points including mortality, clinical signs, body weights, toxicokinetics, glucodynamics, clinical pathology, and morphological pathology. Nonadverse injection site lipohypertrophy occurred for all BIL and NPH doses but more frequently with BIL. No BIL-related hyperplasia or neoplasia was observed. There was no vacuolation of tissue macrophages, renal tubular cells, or ependymal cells attributable to PEG. These studies demonstrate BIL is not associated with tissue vacuolation attributable to PEG at 4- to 6-fold multiple of the median clinical exposure in patients with diabetes.

Despite peptide transporter 1 (PEPT1) being responsible for the bioavailability for a variety of drugs, there has been little study of its potential involvement in drug-drug interactions. Pomaglumetad methionil, a metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor agonist prodrug, utilizes PEPT1 to enhance absorption and bioavailability. In vitro studies were conducted to guide the decision to conduct a clinical drug interaction study and to inform the clinical study design. In vitro investigations determined the prodrug (LY2140023 monohydrate) is a substrate of PEPT1 with K m value of approximately 30 µM, whereas the active moiety (LY404039) is not a PEPT1 substrate. In addition, among the eight known PEPT1 substrates evaluated in vitro, valacyclovir was the most potent inhibitor (IC 50 = 0.46 mM) of PEPT1-mediated uptake of the prodrug. Therefore, a clinical drug interaction study was conducted to evaluate the potential interaction between the prodrug and valacyclovir in healthy subjects. No effect of coadministration was observed on the pharmacokinetics of the prodrug, valacyclovir, or either of their active moieties. Although in vitro studies showed potential for the prodrug and valacyclovir interaction via PEPT1, an in vivo study showed no interaction between these two drugs. PEPT1 does not appear to easily saturate because of its high capacity and expression in the intestine. Thus, a clinical interaction at PEPT1 is unlikely even with a compound with high affinity for the transporter., (Copyright © 2017 by The Author(s).)

Purpose: Determine the pharmacokinetics of insulin peglispro (BIL) in 5/6-nephrectomized rats and study the absorption in lymph duct cannulated (LDC) sheep., Methods: BIL is insulin lispro modified with 20-kDa linear PEG at lysine B28 increasing the hydrodynamic size to 4-fold larger than insulin lispro. Pharmacokinetics of BIL and insulin lispro after IV administration were compared in 5/6-nephrectomized and sham rats. BIL was administered IV or SC into the interdigital space of the hind leg, and peripheral lymph and/or serum samples were collected from both LDC and non-LDC sheep to determine pharmacokinetics and absorption route of BIL., Results: The clearance of BIL was similar in 5/6-nephrectomized and sham rats, while the clearance of insulin lispro was 3.3-fold slower in 5/6-nephrectomized rats than in the sham rats. In non-LDC sheep, the terminal half-life after SC was about twice as long vs IV suggesting flip-flop pharmacokinetics. In LDC sheep, bioavailability decreased to <2%; most of the dose was absorbed via the lymphatic system, with 88% ± 19% of the dose collected in the lymph after SC administration., Conclusion: This work demonstrates that increasing the hydrodynamic size of insulin lispro through PEGylation can impact both absorption and clearance to prolong drug action., Competing Interests: Compliance with Ethical Standards Declarations of Interest This work was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Mary Pat Knadler, Kristina Campanale, John M Beals, Shun Li, Ryan Hansen, Angela Siesky, and M. Dodson Michael are fulltime employees at Eli Lilly and Company and own stock. Christopher JH Porter, Tri-Hung Nguyen, and Michael J De Veer have no conflicts to disclose.

Aims: Basal insulin peglispro (BIL), a novel PEGylated basal insulin with a large hydrodynamic size, has a delayed absorption and reduced clearance that prolongs the duration of action. The current study compared the effects of BIL and insulin glargine (GL) on endogenous glucose production (EGP), glucose disposal rate (GDR) and lipolysis in patients with type 1 diabetes., Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, four-period, crossover study. Patients received intravenous infusions of BIL and GL, each at two dose levels selected for partial and maximal suppression of EGP, during an 8 to 10 h euglycemic clamp procedure with d-[3- 3 H] glucose., Results: Following correction for equivalent human insulin concentrations (EHIC), low-dose GL infusion resulted in similar EGP at the end of the clamp compared to low-dose BIL infusion (GL/BIL ratio of 1.03) but a higher GDR (GL/BIL ratio of 2.42), indicating similar hepatic activity but attenuated peripheral activity of BIL. Consistent with this, the EHIC-corrected GDR/EGP at the end of the clamp was 1.72-fold greater for GL than BIL following low-dose administration. At the lower dose of BIL and GL (concentrations in the therapeutic range), BIL produced less suppression of lipolysis compared with GL as indicated by free fatty acid and glycerol levels at the end of the clamp., Conclusions: Compared with GL, BIL restored the hepato-peripheral insulin action gradient seen in normal physiology via its peripherally restricted action on target tissues related to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) comprises insulin lispro covalently bound to a 20-kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) at lysine B28. The biologic fate of BIL and unconjugated PEG were examined in rats given a single 0.5-mg/kg i.v. or 2-mg/kg s.c. dose of BIL with (14)C label in 20-kDa PEG or (125)I label in lispro. Unconjugated (14)C-labeled 20-kDa PEG was dosed at 10 mg/kg i.v. or s.c. Blood, urine, and feces were collected up to 336 hours after dosing. Radioactivity was measured by scintillation spectrometry, and BIL was quantitated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Area under the curve and half-life for immunoreactive BIL were lower than those for both (14)C and (125)I after subcutaneous and intravenous administration. The half-lives of (14)C after BIL and PEG dosing were similar. The clearance of immunoreactive BIL was 2.4-fold faster than that of (14)C and 1.6-fold faster than (125)I. After a subcutaneous dose of BIL, immunoreactive BIL accounted for 31% of the circulating (125)I and 16% of the circulating (14)C, indicating extensive catabolism of BIL. Subcutaneous bioavailability of BIL was 23%-29%; bioavailability for unconjugated PEG was 78%. For unconjugated PEG, most of the (14)C dose was recovered in urine. For BIL, ≥86% of (125)I was eliminated in urine and (14)C was eliminated about equally in urine and feces. The major (14)C-labeled catabolism product of BIL in urine was 20-kDa PEG with lysine attached. The attachment of 20-kDa PEG to lispro in BIL led to a different elimination pathway for PEG compared with unconjugated 20-kDa PEG., (Copyright © 2015 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Objective: This thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study assessed the effects of a supratherapeutic dose of pomaglumetad methionil, a potential treatment for schizophrenia, compared to placebo on the QT interval in subjects with schizophrenia., Methods: This double-blind, 3-period crossover study enrolled 86 subjects aged 22 - 63 years, who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition, Test Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for schizophrenia; 78 subjects completed the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to sequences of 3 treatment periods of single oral doses of pomaglumetad methionil 400 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg, and placebo. Quadruplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) were extracted from 2 hours predose to 12 hours postdose and were overread by a blinded central reader. Time-matched pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were assessed., Results: At all-time points, the upper bound of the 90% 2-sided confidence interval (CI) for the least squares (LS) mean difference in changes from baseline in Fridericia's corrected QT interval (ΔQTcF) between pomaglumetad methionil and placebo was < 10 milliseconds (msec). Sufficient assay sensitivity was not achieved, likely due to food effect; although the maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax) with moxifloxacin (1,410 ng/mL) was lower than expected, the slope of the regression line of moxifloxacin plasma concentrations versus placebo-subtracted ΔQTcF was similar to that reported in the literature., Conclusions: A single supratherapeutic dose of 400 mg pomaglumetad methionil did not prolong QTcF to a clinically significant degree and, importantly, did not result in any absolute QTcF > 450 msec or increase in QTcF from predose > 30 msec.

Pomaglumetad methionil (LY2140023) is the prodrug of a novel metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor agonist (LY404039) being investigated for the treatment of schizophrenia. Using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) and an intravenous (i.v.) radiolabeled tracer approach, the absolute bioavailability of the prodrug and the extent of its conversion to active moiety (LY404039) were estimated at presystemic (intestinal/first pass) and systemic sites after simultaneous oral and i.v. dosing in healthy subjects. The mean absolute bioavailability of prodrug (80 mg oral) was 0.68. On the basis of these data and a previous radiolabeled mass balance study in which no prodrug was recovered in feces, we concluded that 0.32 of the dose is converted to active drug in the intestinal tract. The fraction of prodrug converted to active moiety was approximately 1, indicating complete conversion of the prodrug that reaches the systemic circulation to the active moiety. Prodrug (80 mg oral and 100 μg i.v.) and active moiety (100 μg i.v.) were well tolerated in healthy subjects. Thus, the absolute bioavailability of prodrug LY2140023 and the fraction converted presystemically and systemically to active moiety LY404039 were estimated simultaneously using radiolabeled tracer microdosing and AMS., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.)

Objective: We evaluated the endogenous glucose production (EGP) and glucose disposal rate (GDR) over a range of doses of basal insulin peglispro (BIL) and insulin glargine in healthy subjects., Research Design and Methods: This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, four-period, incomplete-block, crossover study conducted in eight healthy male subjects. Subjects had 8-h euglycemic clamps performed with primed, continuous infusions of BIL (5.1 to 74.1 mU/min) in three dosing periods and insulin glargine (20 or 30 mU/m(2)/min) in a fourth period, targeted to achieve 50-100% suppression of EGP. D-[3-(3)H] glucose was infused to assess rates of glucose appearance and disappearance., Results: Mean BIL and insulin glargine concentrations (targeted to reflect the differences in intrinsic affinities of the two basal insulins) ranged from 824 to 11,400 and 212 to 290 pmol/L, respectively, and increased accordingly with increases in dose. Suppression of EGP and stimulation of GDR were observed with increasing concentrations of both insulins. At insulin concentrations where EGP was significantly suppressed, insulin glargine resulted in increased GDR. In contrast, at comparable suppression of EGP, BIL had minimal effect on GDR at lower doses and had substantially less effect on GDR than insulin glargine at higher doses., Conclusions: The novel basal insulin analog BIL has relative hepatopreferential action and decreased peripheral action, compared with insulin glargine, in healthy subjects., (© 2014 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.)

Duloxetine selectively inhibits the serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters (5-HTT and NET, respectively), as demonstrated in vitro and in preclinical studies; however, transporter inhibition has not been fully assessed in vivo at the approved dose of 60 mg/d. Here, the in vivo effects of dosing with duloxetine 60 mg once daily for 11 days in healthy subjects were assessed in 2 studies: (1) centrally (n = 11), by measuring concentrations of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), and NE in cerebrospinal fluid, and (2) versus escitalopram 20 mg/d (n = 32) in a 2-period crossover study by assessing the ΔDHPG/ΔNE ratio in plasma during orthostatic testing and by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of reuptake inhibition using subjects' serum in cell lines expressing cloned human 5-HTT or NET. At steady state, duloxetine significantly reduced concentrations of DHPG and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (P < 0.05), but not NE, in cerebrospinal fluid; DHPG was also decreased in plasma and urine. The ΔDHPG/ΔNE ratio in plasma decreased significantly more with duloxetine than escitalopram (65% and 21%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Ex vivo reuptake inhibition of 5-HTT was comparable (EC50 = 44.5 nM) for duloxetine and escitalopram, but duloxetine inhibited NET more potently (EC50 = 116 nM and 1044 nM, respectively). Maximal predicted reuptake inhibition for 5-HTT was 84% for duloxetine and 80% for escitalopram, and that for NET was 67% and 14%, respectively. In summary, duloxetine significantly affected 5-HT and NE turnover in the central nervous system and periphery; these effects presumably occurred via inhibition of reuptake by the 5-HTT and NET, as indicated by effects on functional reuptake inhibition ex vivo.

Prasugrel, a thienopyridine ADP receptor antagonist, is an orally administered prodrug requiring in vivo metabolism to form the active metabolite that irreversibly inhibits platelet activation and aggregation mediated by the P2Y12[sub 12] receptor. A comprehensive nonclinical safety assessment including genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies supported the chronic use of prasugrel in patients with atherothrombotic disease. In addition, a special assessment of the potential for prasugrel to enhance tumor growth was undertaken to address regulatory concerns relating to increases in human cancers. Prasugrel demonstrated no evidence of genotoxicity and was not oncogenic in a 2-year rat carcinogenicity study. In the 2-year mouse study, an increase in hepatocellular adenomas was considered secondary to enzyme induction and not relevant to human safety. Further, the absence of any increase in common background tumors at any other organ site in either rodent study indicated a lack of tumor promoting activity (apart from the CYP450 induction-related increase in mouse liver tumors). Cell culture studies with 3 human tumor cell lines (lung, colon, prostate) demonstrated that exposure of serum-starved cells to prasugrel's active and major circulating human metabolites does not increase cell proliferation relative to starved cells stimulated to proliferate by addition of 10% FBS. Prasugrel also did not increase tumor growth relative to vehicle controls in nude mice implanted with 3 human tumor cell lines. Thus, traditional genotoxicity and 2-year bioassays as well as specially designed tumor growth enhancement studies in human tumor cell lines and mouse xenograft models clearly demonstrated prasugrel's lack of tumorigenic potential.

Regulatory guidelines on MIST were initially established in 2005 and finalized in 2008 by the US FDA and this has led to much discussion and debate on how to apply these recommendations in today's resource-constrained pharmaceutical environment. There are four aspects of MIST that impact on the field of bioanalysis: definition of a disproportionate human metabolite, establishment of nonclinical (animal) safety coverage for important human metabolites, degree of rigor in validation of bioanalytical methods to quantify metabolites when synthetic standards are available, and semiquantitation of metabolites when synthetic standards are not available. In this manuscript, each of these points has been addressed from a pharmaceutical industry standpoint, including a perspective on the necessary convergence of the fields of metabolite safety testing and bioanalysis.

The FDA issued a guidance on the safety testing of metabolites in February 2008, in which they stated that metabolites of concern are those that are detected at levels greater than 10% of the systemic exposure of the parent at steady state. This has presented many challenges in determining the circulating human metabolites at an early stage of development. The intention of this perspective is to address the question of how effective in vitro metabolism and early exploratory clinical data are in predicting the circulating metabolites from both a qualitative and a quantitative perspective. To this end, data were reviewed from 17 molecules in the Lilly portfolio for which there were in vitro data and a radiolabeled study in humans. Twelve example cases are presented in detail to demonstrate trends for when in vitro data adequately predicted in vivo (41%), when in vitro data underpredicted the circulating metabolites (35%), and when in vitro data overpredicted the circulating metabolites (24%). In addition, cases that present special challenges due to very low levels of the circulating parent or long half-lives of the parent and/or metabolites are presented. The trends indicate that the more complex the metabolism, the less likely the in vitro data were to predict the circulating metabolites. The in vitro data were also less predictive for N-glucuronidations and non-P450-mediated cleavage reactions. Although the in vitro data were better at predicting clearance pathways, the data set often failed to predict the quantity of metabolites, which is needed in consideration of whether or not a "disproportionate" metabolite may be circulating in human plasma.

Objective: Review nonclinical and clinical trial data for hepatic effects of duloxetine., Methods: Review studies of toxicology, metabolism, mitochondrial effects, and clinical trials., Results: Nonclinical studies revealed no treatment-related transaminase elevations and no effects of duloxetine on mitochondrial beta-oxidation in rat hepatocytes. In patients with a normal baseline alanine transaminase (ALT), duloxetine was associated with elevated transaminases >3X ULN in about 1% of patients. ALT and aspartate transaminase values peaked at 8 weeks, alkaline phosphatase steadily increased to maximum value at Week 52 and mean total bilirubin values were not increased. Hepatic-related treatment-emergent adverse events were uncommon. Seven of 23,000 duloxetine- and 2/6000 placebo-treated patients met criteria for modified Hy's rule (significant elevation of both ALT and total bilirubin) but were complicated by contributing factors such as excessive alcohol consumption (n=3), gall stones, common bile duct calculus, hepatitis C, and liver adenocarcinoma (n=1 each)., Conclusions: Duloxetine has an effect on the liver, manifested by transient, self-limiting transaminase elevations. Rare events characterized as hepatocellular injury, cholestatic injury, or mixed type of hepatic injury have been reported. The pattern of liver effects was different from that in laboratory animals.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize duloxetine pharmacokinetics in the breast milk and plasma of lactating women and to estimate the duloxetine dose that an infant might consume if breastfed., Methods: This open-label study included six healthy women aged 22-35 years who stopped nursing during and after the study. Duloxetine 40 mg was given orally every 12 hours for 3.5 days; seven plasma and milk samples over 12 hours were obtained after the seventh dose. Plasma and milk samples were analysed using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Safety measures included vital signs, ECGs, laboratory tests, adverse event monitoring and depression rating scales., Results: The mean steady-state milk-to-plasma duloxetine exposure ratio was 0.25 (90% CI 0.18, 0.35). The amount of duloxetine in the breast milk was 7 microg/day (range 4-15 microg/day). The estimated infant dose was 2 microg/kg/day (range 0.6-3 microg/kg/day), which is 0.14% of the maternal dose. Dizziness, nausea and fatigue were commonly reported adverse events. No clinically important changes in safety measures occurred., Conclusion: Duloxetine is detected in breast milk, and steady-state concentrations in breast milk are about one-fourth of those in maternal plasma. As the safety of duloxetine in infants is unknown, prescribers should carefully assess, on an individual basis, the potential risks of duloxetine exposure to infants and the benefits of nursing an infant when the mother is on duloxetine therapy.

Objective: To determine whether duloxetine is a substrate, inhibitor or inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 enzyme, using in vitro and in vivo studies in humans., Methods: Human liver microsomes or cells with expressed CYP enzymes and specific CYP inhibitors were used to identify which CYP enzymes catalyse the initial oxidation steps in the metabolism of duloxetine. The potential of duloxetine to inhibit CYP1A2 activity was determined using incubations with human liver microsomes and phenacetin, the CYP1A2 substrate. The potential for duloxetine to induce CYP1A2 activity was determined using human primary hepatocytes treated with duloxetine for 72 hours. Studies in humans were conducted using fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and theophylline, a CYP1A2 substrate, as probes. The subjects were healthy men and women aged 18-65 years. Single-dose duloxetine was administered either intravenously as a 10-mg infusion over 30 minutes or orally as a 60-mg dose in the presence or absence of steady-state fluvoxamine (100 mg orally once daily). Single-dose theophylline was given as 30-minute intravenous infusions of aminophylline 250 mg in the presence or absence of steady-state duloxetine (60 mg orally twice daily). Plasma concentrations of duloxetine, its metabolites and theophylline were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods and evaluated using mixed-effects ANOVA. Safety measurements included vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, a physical examination, ECG readings and adverse event reports., Results: The in vitro results indicated that duloxetine is metabolized by CYP1A2; however, duloxetine was predicted not to be an inhibitor or inducer of CYP1A2 in humans. Following oral administration in the presence of fluvoxamine, the duloxetine area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity)) and the maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)) significantly increased by 460% (90% CI 359, 584) and 141% (90% CI 93, 200), respectively. In the presence of fluvoxamine, the oral bioavailability of duloxetine increased from 42.8% to 81.9%. In the presence of duloxetine, the theophylline AUC(infinity) and C(max) increased by only 13% (90% CI 7, 18) and 7% (90% CI 2, 14), respectively. Coadministration of duloxetine with fluvoxamine or theophylline did not result in any clinically important safety concerns, and these combinations were generally well tolerated., Conclusion: Duloxetine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2; therefore, coadministration of duloxetine with potent CYP1A2 inhibitors should be avoided. Duloxetine does not seem to be a clinically significant inhibitor or inducer of CYP1A2; therefore, dose adjustment of CYP1A2 substrates may not be necessary when they are coadministered with duloxetine.

A sensitive bioanalytical method for the measurement of two major circulating metabolites of duloxetine [4-hydroxy duloxetine glucuronide (LY550408) and 5-hydroxy-6-methoxy duloxetine sulfate (LY581920)] in plasma is reported. This method produced acceptable precision and accuracy over the validation range of 1-1000 ng/mL. Several issues had to be addressed in order to develop an LC/MS/MS assay for these metabolites. First, 4-hydroxy duloxetine glucuronide required chromatographic resolution from the 5-, and 6-hydroxy duloxetine glucuronide isomers. Second, the glucuronide conjugate is readily ionized under positive ESI conditions, while the sulfate conjugate required negative ESI conditions to obtain adequate sensitivity. Finally, the chromatographic conditions needed to separate the glucuronide isomers were not suitable for the analysis of the sulfate conjugate. The present method addressed these challenges, and was successfully applied to multiple human pharmacokinetic studies in which subjects received oral doses of duloxetine hydrochloride.

Aims: To compare single- and multiple-dose duloxetine pharmacokinetics between healthy Japanese and Caucasians., Methods: Twenty-four subjects of each race were given single oral doses of duloxetine (20, 40 and 60 mg) in a randomized, double-blind study. Another 20 subjects of each race received 20, 40 mg or placebo (2 : 2 : 1) twice-daily for 5 days., Results: Following single doses, the mean duloxetine C(max) and AUC were approximately 20% greater in Japanese. This difference could be explained by the 15% lower average body weight in Japanese. Similar results were observed following multiple dosing., Conclusion: Duloxetine pharmacokinetics are not meaningfully different between Japanese and Caucasians.

Background: The electrophysiological effects of duloxetine at supratherapeutic exposures were evaluated to ensure compliance with regulatory criteria and to assess the QT prolongation potential., Methods: Electrocardiograms were collected in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study that enrolled 117 healthy female subjects aged 19 to 74 years. Duloxetine dosages escalated from 60 mg twice daily to 200 mg twice daily; a single moxifloxacin 400 mg dose was used as a positive control. Data were analyzed using 3 QT interval correction methods: mixed-effect analysis of covariance model with RR interval change from baseline as the covariate, the QT Fridericia's correction method, and the individual QT correction method. Concentrations of duloxetine and its 2 major metabolites were measured., Results: Compared with placebo, the mean change from baseline in QTc decreased with duloxetine 200 mg twice daily. The upper limits of the 2-sided 90% confidence intervals for duloxetine vs. placebo were <0 msec at each time point by any correction method. No subject had absolute QT Fridericia's correction values >445 msec with duloxetine, and the change in QT Fridericia's correction from baseline with duloxetine did not exceed 36 msec. No relationship was detected between QTc change and plasma concentrations of duloxetine or its metabolites even though average duloxetine concentrations ranged to more than 5 times those achieved at therapeutic doses. Moxifloxacin significantly prolonged QTc at all time points, regardless of correction method., Conclusions: Duloxetine does not affect ventricular repolarization as assessed by both mean changes and outliers in QT corrected by any method.

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to characterise the pharmacokinetics and assess the tolerability of duloxetine in healthy Chinese subjects after single and multiple oral 60 mg dosing., Methods: This was a single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, single-period study in healthy native Chinese subjects. A total of 32 subjects, 19 men (14 on duloxetine, 5 on placebo) and 13 women (10 on duloxetine, 3 on placebo) between the ages of 20 and 39 years, participated in the study. Duloxetine 60 mg (enteric-coated pellets in a capsule) was given orally once on day 1 and once daily on days 4 to 9. Sequential blood samples were collected over 72 hours after the dose on days 1 and 9, and a predose sample was obtained on days 7 and 8. Duloxetine concentrations in plasma were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The tolerability evaluation included a physical examination, vital signs, adverse event monitoring and clinical laboratory evaluations., Results: Duloxetine disposition on oral administration is characterised by a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Duloxetine is well absorbed, with a median time of maximum plasma concentration at 6 and 4 hours following single and multiple dosing, respectively. At steady state, the mean apparent oral clearance (CL(ss)/F), mean apparent volume of distribution (V(ss)/F) and mean terminal elimination half-life (t((1/2))) were 86.8 L/h, 1570L and 11 hours, respectively. CL/F and V(ss)/F on single dosing were not statistically significantly different (p > 0.05) compared with multiple dosing. The linearity index, calculated as the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) during the dosing interval tau at steady state (AUC(tau)(,ss)) to the AUC from time zero to infinity after single dosing (AUC(infinity,single dose)) was 1.15 (coefficient of variation 35.7%). The accumulation in duloxetine exposure was estimated to be 50% on multiple dosing compared with single dosing, consistent with the t((1/2)) and dosing interval (24 hours). The pharmacokinetic parameters of duloxetine in Chinese subjects were not statistically significantly different from those reported previously in Caucasian and Japanese subjects. There were no clinically significant adverse events, abnormal safety laboratory data or vital sign changes reported., Conclusion: Duloxetine pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese subjects given a 60 mg once-daily dosing regimen were well characterised and consistent with known duloxetine pharmacokinetics in healthy Caucasian and Japanese subjects. Both single dosing and multiple once-daily dosing of duloxetine 60 mg were well tolerated by healthy Chinese subjects in this study.

Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics of single-dose duloxetine in cirrhotic and healthy subjects., Methods: An open-label inpatient study compared duloxetine pharmacokinetics in six subjects with moderate liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class B) to those in six healthy subjects. Subjects received a single 20 mg capsule of duloxetine following overnight fasting. Blood samples were collected up to 120 h post dose for determination of plasma concentrations of duloxetine and its major metabolites using a validated LC/MS/MS method. Plasma concentration-time data for duloxetine and its major metabolites were analyzed by noncompartmental methods. Specific pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed statistically using a mixed-effects model., Results: Duloxetine apparent clearance was significantly lower (24 vs 160 l/h, p < 0.05) and AUC values were substantially higher (775 vs 268 ng x (h/ml) in cirrhotic compared to healthy subjects. The half-life of duloxetine was about three times longer (47.8 vs 13.5 h) in cirrhotic than in healthy subjects (p < 0.05). In contrast, there was no significant difference in Cmax or apparent volume of distribution between the two groups. The metabolites exhibited lower levels and longer half-lives in cirrhotic subjects compared to healthy subjects. The lower clearance and slower elimination of duloxetine in cirrhotic individuals is likely attributable to impaired duloxetine metabolism., Conclusions: The rate of duloxetine elimination is reduced for cirrhotic subjects, making dosage adjustments appropriate. Based on simulations, the duloxetine dose for at least an initial treatment period may need to be reduced and/or less frequently administered for patients with moderate cirrhosis.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) poses a significant health problem and is estimated to be the third most costly and disabling disorder in the United States. Pharmacotherapy of depression has been successful, but improvements in response rates, remission rates, side effects, compliance and faster onset of therapeutic action have become prime objectives in drug development. There is considerable support for the hypothesis that dysfunctional serotonergic or noradrenergic neurotransmission may be etiological in depressed patients. Duloxetine is a balanced and potent reuptake inhibitor of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) being studied as an antidepressant medication. In this review, we highlight the preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic profile, and effects of duloxetine in the pharmacotherapy of depression. Evidence for 5-HT and NE reuptake inhibition by duloxetine comes from in vitro and in vivo transporter binding and functional uptake studies. Taken together with efficacy data from in vivo microdialysis, electrophysiological and behavioral studies, it is evident that duloxetine is balanced as a dual serotonin norepinephrine uptake inhibitor in vivo. The clinical efficacy and safety of duloxetine in the treatment of MDD has been studied in 6 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. In these studies, duloxetine was found to be effective in the treatment of emotional/psychological and painful physical symptoms associated with depression. More importantly, duloxetine appears to have better response rates and remission from depressive symptoms, perhaps due to its ability to treat a wider range of symptoms.

Aim: To investigate the effect of duloxetine on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of tolterodine and its active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite (5-HM)., Methods: Sixteen healthy subjects received two 5-day treatment regimens in a randomized, double-blinded, crossover fashion: tolterodine (2 mg, BID) + duloxetine (40 mg, BID), tolterodine (2 mg, BID) + duloxetine placebo (BID). Plasma concentrations of tolterodine and 5-HM were measured on day 5. Adverse events, clinical safety laboratory data and vital signs were assessed during the study., Results: Duloxetine increased the AUC(tau,ss) of tolterodine by 71%[geometric mean, 95% confidence interval (CI) 31, 123], and its C(max,ss) by 64% (CI 30, 106), and prolonged its t(1/2) by 14% (CI 1, 28). Duloxetine did not affect the plasma concentrations or t(1/2) of 5-HM. Laboratory data and vital signs did not reveal any clinically significant changes or abnormalities., Conclusions: Duloxetine exhibited minor inhibitory effects on the pharmacokinetics of tolterodine but not 5-HM. Coadministration of these drugs was well tolerated and demonstrated no significant safety findings in the studied population. These findings suggest that there should not be a need for routine adjustment of tolterodine dosage in the presence of duloxetine.

Aims: The effect of age on duloxetine pharmacokinetics was evaluated in healthy volunteers and in patients with urinary incontinence., Methods: Twenty-four healthy subjects (12 women 65-77 years, and 12 women 32-50 years) were given a single 40-mg oral dose of duloxetine in Study 1. Plasma concentration-time data were analysed by noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. Sparse plasma samples were obtained from patients with urinary incontinence treated in two phase II studies: 70 women (24-77 years) who received duloxetine 20 mg day(-1), 30 mg day(-1), or 40 mg day(-1) in Study 2A and 128 women (28-64 years) who received duloxetine 20 mg day(-1), 40 mg day(-1), or 80 mg day(-1) in Study 2B. Based upon the combined data, a model was developed to characterize population pharmacokinetics of duloxetine using the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling program (NONMEM)., Results: In Study 1, the elderly (> or = 65 years) exhibited a statistically significant slower elimination rate constant lambdaz compared with younger subjects [elderly-younger difference = -0.022 h(-1)[95% confidence interval (CI) -0.036, -0.008]]. However, no statistically significant differences in either CL/F [elderly-younger difference = -17.4 l h(-1) (95% CI -41.1, 6.23)] or V/F [elderly-younger difference = 115.9 l (95% CI -168.6, 400.4)] were observed. The population pharmacokinetic analysis of Studies 2A and 2B revealed that the CL/F of duloxetine decreased with increasing age. Despite statistical significance, the age effect only accounted for 3% of the interindividual variability in CL/F and unexplained sources of the variation in clearance were still substantial (> 50%). Adverse events were generally mild to moderate, and the incidence of adverse events was generally similar in elderly and non-elderly participants in these studies., Conclusions: Whereas the results suggest that age has an effect on duloxetine pharmacokinetics, primarily reflected as a slower lambdaz in the elderly, the magnitude of mean changes in CL/F, or V/F was small relative to the large interindividual variation in pharmacokinetics. Elderly participants had a safety profile of duloxetine comparable to their younger counterparts. Specific dose recommendations for duloxetine in the elderly are not warranted.

Duloxetine is a potent and balanced dual inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake being investigated for the treatment of depression and urinary incontinence. The disposition of duloxetine was studied in four healthy human subjects after a single 20.2-mg (100.6 microCi) oral dose of [14C]duloxetine in an enteric-coated tablet. The mean total recovery of radioactivity (+/- S.E.M.) after 312 h was 90.5% (+/-0.4%) with 72.0% (+/-1.1%) excreted in the urine. Duloxetine was extensively metabolized to numerous metabolites primarily excreted into the urine in the conjugated form. The major biotransformation pathways for duloxetine involved oxidation of the naphthyl ring at either the 4-, 5-, or 6-positions followed by further oxidation, methylation, and/or conjugation. The major metabolites found in plasma were glucuronide conjugates of the following: 4-hydroxy duloxetine (M6), 6-hydroxy-5-methoxy duloxetine (M10), 4, 6-dihydroxy duloxetine (M9), and a sulfate conjugate of 5-hydroxy-6-methoxy duloxetine (M7). The major metabolites found in plasma were also found in the urine, but the urine contained many additional metabolites. In addition to duloxetine, 4-hydroxy duloxetine (M14) and an unidentified polar metabolite were observed in feces. Following [14C]duloxetine administration, Cmax was reached at a median of 6 h for both duloxetine and total radioactivity. Duloxetine accounted for less than 3% of the circulating radioactivity based on mean area under the curve values. The elimination half-life of total radioactivity (120 h) was substantially longer than that of duloxetine (10.3 h).

Background and Objectives: Duloxetine, a potent dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine currently undergoing clinical investigation for treatment of depression and stress urinary incontinence, has the potential to act as both a substrate and an inhibitor of cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6). Our objectives were to determine the effect of duloxetine on the pharmacokinetics of desipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant metabolized by CYP2D6 (study 1), and the effect of paroxetine, a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor, on duloxetine pharmacokinetics (study 2)., Methods: Subjects were healthy men and women between 21 and 63 years old. All subjects were genotypically CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers. In study 1, 50 mg of desipramine was administered as a single dose alone and in the presence of steady-state duloxetine 60 mg twice daily. In study 2, steady-state pharmacokinetics of duloxetine 40 mg once daily were determined in the presence and absence of steady-state paroxetine 20 mg once daily., Results: Duloxetine increased the maximum plasma concentration of desipramine 1.7-fold and the area under the concentration-time curve 2.9-fold. Paroxetine increased the maximum plasma concentration of duloxetine and the area under the concentration-time curve at steady state 1.6-fold. Reports of adverse events were similar whether duloxetine was administered alone or in combination with desipramine or paroxetine., Conclusion: Duloxetine 60 mg twice daily is a moderately potent CYP2D6 inhibitor, intermediate between paroxetine and sertraline. The potent CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine has a moderate effect on duloxetine concentrations. The results of these 2 studies suggest that caution should be used when CYP2D6 substrates and inhibitors are coadministered with duloxetine.

Purpose: Evista (raloxifene HCl) is a nonsteroidal selective estrogen receptor modulator that displays estrogen agonist effects on bone and lipid metabolism but estrogen antagonist effects on the breast and endometrium. The potential for drug-drug interaction between raloxifene and warfarin was assessed in 15 healthy postmenopausal women., Methods: Single doses of warfarin (20 mg) were administered prior to and during 2 weeks of dosing with raloxifene 120 mg/day. Each warfarin dose was followed by pharmacokinetic sampling and prothrombin time measurements., Results: Raloxifene administration resulted in 7.1% and 14.1% decreases in the clearance (CLp/F) and 7.4% and 9.8% decreases in the volume of distribution (Vss/F) of R- and S-warfarin, respectively (all p < or = 0.05). In contrast to the slightly higher plasma concentrations of R- and S-warfarin, raloxifene reduced the maximum prothrombin time (PTmax) by 10% and the area under the PT versus time curve from 0-120 h (AUCPT) by 8% (p < 0.01)., Conclusions: Raloxifene administration may result in a small increase in systemic warfarin exposure that is associated with a diminution, not augmentation, of the pharmacodynamic effect. Due to the small magnitude of this effect, concomitant administration of raloxifene and warfarin is not likely to result in clinically significant drug-drug interaction.

Objective: We have previously shown that raloxifene, a selective oestrogen receptor modulator, 35 mg/day inhibits atherosclerosis in ovariectomized, cholesterol-fed rabbits. This effect was only partial as compared to 17beta-oestradiol 4 mg/day; however, plasma raloxifene concentrations were low relative to those obtained in raloxifene-treated women. We therefore investigate the effects of raloxifene at higher doses., Design: The study on atherosclerosis in ovariectomized, cholesterol-fed rabbits (n = 80) compared raloxifene 70 mg/day and 210 mg/day to 17beta-oestradiol 4 mg/day and placebo., Results: After 48 weeks of therapy, the aortic cholesterol content in the 70 mg/day and 210 mg/day raloxifene treatment groups were 471 +/- 56 nmol/mg protein and 456 +/- 56 nmol/mg protein, respectively. This was significantly less than in the placebo group (654 +/- 69 nmol/mg protein; P < 0.05). In the oestrogen-treated group, the aortic cholesterol content was 357 +/- 62 nmol/mg protein (P < 0.01 as compared to placebo). Differences in serum lipids between the treatment groups could only partly explain the effect on aortic cholesterol content, indicating that additional anti-atherogenic mechanisms may contribute to the decrease in aortic atherosclerosis. This anti-atherosclerotic activity of raloxifene was observed at plasma concentrations comparable to those in postmenopausal women during raloxifene treatment., Conclusions: We conclude that clinically relevant raloxifene treatment inhibits aortic atherosclerosis in ovariectomized, cholesterol-fed rabbits.

A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method was developed to quantify a decapeptide anticoagulant in rat and monkey plasma. The compound and internal standard, a nonapeptide analogue, were extracted from plasma with an amino solid-phase extraction column with an extraction efficiency in the range 75-90%. A C18 analytical column was used to separate the analytes by gradient elution followed by ultraviolet detection at 215 nm. Quantification of the decapeptide over the concentration range 0.1-10.1 micrograms/ml resulted in an assay relative error and relative standard deviation both less than 10%. The anticoagulant decapeptide was stable in both rat and monkey plasma frozen at -20 degrees C.

Rats were each administered a 9 mg/kg iv bolus dose of a 3H-labeled decapeptide anticoagulant, MDL 28,050. Tritium was eliminated rapidly with approximately 50% of the dose recovered in urine within the first 6 hr. Renal excretion accounted for 68% of the dose, whereas fecal excretion accounted for 16% of the dose. Continuous flow fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry was used to identify the major urinary metabolites of MDL 28,050. Trace amounts of parent drug were found, and other biotransformation products indicated that hydrolysis had occurred at four peptide bonds. Two initial sites of hydrolysis were identified as 4I-5P and 6E-7E, which resulted in the peptide fragments Suc-Y-E-P-I-OH + P-E-E-A-Cha-E-OH and Suc-Y-E-P-I-P-E-OH + E-A-Cha-E-OH, respectively. Further metabolism of these fragments resulted in the N-terminal pentapeptide and the C-terminal dipeptide.

The possible contribution of pulmonary metabolism to the putative first-pass metabolism of 2-arylpropionic acid nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs has not been documented. Isolated perfused rabbit lungs, perfused with 4.5% bovine serum albumin or 5% dextran, were used to study the pulmonary elimination of (R)- and rac-ibuprofen, fenoprofen, and flurbiprofen. In the absence of protein binding, ibuprofen was metabolized via inversion and other pathways, whereas fenoprofen metabolism was essentially restricted to inversion of the (R)-enantiomer; fraction inverted (+/- SE) was 0.37 +/- 0.05 for (R)-ibuprofen and 0.85 +/- 0.03 for (R)-fenoprofen. In the presence of protein, neither ibuprofen nor fenoprofen was metabolized. Flurbiprofen did not undergo pulmonary elimination under any condition studied. This study illustrates that even though a tissue is capable of metabolism, particularly inversion of 2-arylpropionics, the quantitative importance of such elimination pathways may be minimal in the presence of the high degree of protein binding that is characteristic of these drugs.

Disposition of the H2-receptor antagonist nizatidine was studied in serum, urine, and breast milk. Five lactating women and five nonlactating women participated; the disposition of nizatidine was studied in three of the lactating women. Single and multiple doses of 150 mg nizatidine were administered orally. The disposition of nizatidine (half-life, 1 1/2 hours; apparent serum clearance, 40 L/hr; renal clearance, 27 L/hr; and apparent volume of distribution, 1.4 L/kg) was similar in lactating and nonlactating women. These pharmacokinetic results were analogous to observations for men in other studies. Nizatidine breast milk concentrations were directly proportional to corresponding serum concentrations. On average, 96 micrograms nizatidine, less than 0.1% of the maternal dose, was secreted into milk during a 12-hour interval after either single or multiple doses.

The inversion from R- to S-enantiomer that occurs for some arylpropionic acids may have both toxicological and therapeutic implications. To characterize some properties of this inversion, arylpropionyl-CoA thioester formation was studied in rat tissue homogenates and subcellular fractions for the enantiomers of fenoprofen, ibuprofen, and flurbiprofen. Thioesters were formed from (R)-fenoprofen (64%) and (R)-ibuprofen (33%) but not from the corresponding S-enantiomers or the enantiomers of flurbiprofen. This correlates with the extensive inversion of fenoprofen and ibuprofen and lack of inversion of flurbiprofen in vivo. Subcellular fractions from rat liver showed thioester formation to occur in mitochondria and microsomes but not cytosol. Once formed, the thioesters were readily racemized by whole rat liver homogenate, mitochondria, and cytosol, but only partially inverted (S:R = 0.3) in microsomes. Thioester formation from fenoprofen and ibuprofen was studied in tissue homogenate obtained from liver, diaphragm, kidney, lung, skeletal muscle, smooth muscle, fat, caecum, and intestines. The liver was at least 50-fold more efficient than the other tissues studied and would be expected to be a major organ of enantiomeric inversion. Our data support the hypothesis that R- to S-enantiomeric inversion of arylpropionic acids proceeds via the stereoselective formation of CoA thioesters followed by enzymatic racemization and hydrolysis of the thioesters to regenerate free acid.

Ultrafiltration was used to study the enantioselective binding of R-, S- and racemic flurbiprofen, an arylpropionic acid nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, to human plasma protein in eight normal volunteers. The percent free of the R was greater than that of the S for most subjects, but the ratio of percent unbound R to S ranged from 0.52 to 1.33. In extensive studies with a single representative plasma, the percent unbound of the individual enantiomers was independent of concentration up to 26 micrograms/ml, although the binding of the S enantiomer (0.048 +/- 0.007%) was greater than that of the R (0.082 +/- 0.017%), whereas that of the racemate (0.065 +/- 0.028%) was intermediate. At supratherapeutic concentrations of the enantiomers, the percent free of both R- and S-flurbiprofen increased to 0.252 at 100 micrograms/ml. A one-site binding model with nonspecific binding described the data well for R-, S- and racemic flurbiprofen; resulting Ka values were 3.39 X 10(6), 7.31 X 10(6) and 4.35 X 10(6) M-1, respectively. The binding of each enantiomer in the presence of varying amounts of its antipode was described best by a simple competitive inhibition model where mutual displacement occurred as concentrations increased beyond 26 micrograms/ml. The binding of racemic flurbiprofen in elderly and obese volunteers and patients with liver disease was not significantly different from normal subjects, but binding was less in hypoalbuminemic patients and patients with renal impairment. Uremia decreased the binding of R-flurbiprofen preferentially.

The absolute and relative bioavailability of nizatidine, an H2-blocker, was studied in healthy male volunteers. The absolute oral bioavailability, relative to that after intravenous administration, was 98% +/- 14%. The bioavailability of single and multiple oral doses of 150 mg nizatidine was unaffected by concurrent food ingestion; nizatidine may be administered either with or without food. The relative bioavailability of nizatidine was compared when given simultaneously with placebo or Gelusil, 30 minutes after propantheline, or 60 minutes before activated charcoal. Gelusil reduced the amount of nizatidine absorbed by about 10%, charcoal reduced it by about 30%, and propantheline did not affect it.

In this report, the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and hormonal effects of nizatidine are reviewed in healthy volunteers and in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. The absolute oral bioavailability of nizatidine exceeded 90%; the half-life (t1/2), plasma clearance (Clp), and volume of distribution (Vd) of iv nizatidine were 1.3 h, 461/h, and 1.21/kg, respectively. Within 16 h of dosing volunteers with nizatidine, more than 90% of the administered dose was recovered in urine as parent drug and metabolites; unchanged nizatidine accounted for 65 and 75% of the recovered substances, after oral and intravenous administration, respectively. Renal impairment decreased the elimination of nizatidine and dosage reductions are recommended for patients with creatinine clearance (Clcr) less than 50 ml/min/m2. Nizatidine suppressed gastric acid secretion produced by sham meals, protein meals, or pentagastrin; its antisecretory activity was dose and concentration dependent. Nizatidine was three times more potent than cimetidine. Nizatidine, after oral or iv administration, did not alter hormone concentrations in plasma.

The concentrations of the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of fenoprofen (alpha-methyl-3-phenoxy-benzeneacetic acid) were measured in plasma and urine of volunteers after oral administration of the (R,S)-racemate. In addition, urinary concentrations of the (R)- and (S)-4'-hydroxy metabolite of fenoprofen, the major metabolite, were measured. The (R)-enantiomer of fenoprofen was stereoselectively inverted to (S)-fenoprofen, which was the major isomeric form found in plasma and urine. A potency comparison of the enantiomers in vitro showed the (S)-isomer to be 35 times more active than the (R)-isomer in inhibiting the fatty acid cyclo-oxygenase pathway from human platelets. In vivo, the similar pharmacological potency of the two enantiomers previously observed in experimental animals may have been due to the rapid inversion of the (R)- to (S)-isomer.