Search

Verified compilation of open modules (i.e., modules whose functionality depends on other modules) provides a foundation for end-to-end verification of modular programs ubiquitous in contemporary software. However, despite intensive investigation in this topic for decades, the proposed approaches are still difficult to use in practice as they rely on assumptions about the internal working of compilers which make it difficult for external users to apply the verification results. We propose an approach to verified compositional compilation without such assumptions in the setting of verifying compilation of heterogeneous modules written in first-order languages supporting global memory and pointers. Our approach is based on the memory model of CompCert and a new discovery that a Kripke relation with a notion of memory protection can serve as a uniform and composable semantic interface for the compiler passes. By absorbing the rely-guarantee conditions on memory evolution for all compiler passes into this Kripke Memory Relation and by piggybacking requirements on compiler optimizations onto it, we get compositional correctness theorems for realistic optimizing compilers as refinements that directly relate native semantics of open modules and that are ignorant of intermediate compilation processes. Such direct refinements support all the compositionality and adequacy properties essential for verified compilation of open modules. We have applied this approach to the full compilation chain of CompCert with its Clight source language and demonstrated that our compiler correctness theorem is open to composition and intuitive to use with reduced verification complexity through end-to-end verification of non-trivial heterogeneous modules that may freely invoke each other (e.g., mutually recursively).

I present a formal connection between algebraic effects and game semantics, two important lines of work in programming languages semantics with applications in compositional software verification. Specifically, the algebraic signature enumerating the possible side-effects of a computation can be read as a game, and strategies for this game constitute the free algebra for the signature in a category of complete partial orders (cpos). Hence, strategies provide a convenient model of computations with uninterpreted side-effects. In particular, the operational flavor of game semantics carries over to the algebraic context, in the form of the coincidence between the initial algebras and the terminal coalgebras of cpo endofunctors. Conversely, the algebraic point of view sheds new light on the strategy constructions underlying game semantics. Strategy models can be reformulated as ideal completions of partial strategy trees (free dcpos on the term algebra). Extending the framework to multi-sorted signatures would make this construction available for a large class of games., Comment: In Proceedings ACT 2021, arXiv:2211.01102