Search

Background: Self-care is often the first choice for people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Self-care includes the use of non-prescription medications with no doctor's supervision, as well as the use of other modern and traditional treatment methods with no consultation of the health care provider. Self-care may have positive effects on the successful outcome of a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences and attitudes of patients and health care providers to the self-care of chronic musculoskeletal pain., Methods: Qualitative Phenomenological study, where the data were collected by the method of an audio-taped interview in 15 patients at the outpatient clinic for pain management and in 20 health care providers involved in the treatment of those patients. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by principles of Interpretative Thematic Analysis., Results: Topics identified in patients: a) positive aspects of self-care, b) a need for pain self-care, c) social aspects of pain self-care. Topics identified in health care providers: a) aspects of self-care, b) a need for self-care c) risks of self-care. Most of patients have positive attitude to self-care and this is the first step to pain management and to care for itself. The most frequent factors influencing decision about the self-care are heavy pain, unavailability of the doctor, long awaiting time for the therapy, or ineffectiveness of methods of conventional medicine. The health care providers believe that self-care of chronic musculoskeletal pain may be a patient's contribution to clinical treatment. However, good awareness of methods used is important in this context, to avoid adverse effects of self-care., Conclusion: Patients understand the self-care of musculoskeletal pain as an individually adjusted treatment and believe in its effectiveness. Health care providers support self-care as an adjunction to clinical management only, and think that self-care of musculoskeletal pain acts as a placebo, with a short-lived effect on chronic musculoskeletal pain.

A 70-year old female patient was admitted to the hospital because of scheduled thoracotomy and biopsy of posterior mediastinal retrocardiac tumor of unrecognized etiology. The patient had no complaints regarding the tumor. Routine anesthesiological preoperative examination revealed status ASA III. Induction in anesthesia was usually stable. At the moment when the surgeon intraoperatively touched the tumor, hemodinamic instability started and arterial blood pressure and heart rate dramatically increased. Our first reaction was to deepen the anesthesia. Very soon it was obvious that blood pressure increased by the surgeon's manipulation of the tumor and we started to doubt on catecholamine-secreting tumor. During the course of the operation there were several hypertensive episodes and we managed them by alternately using atenolol, glyceroltrinitrate and anesthetic drug. The patient was extubated 5 hours after transfer to the intensive care unit. Postoperative period was hemodynamically stable. The level of catecholamines in 24-hour urine collection was significantly increased. Pathohistologic diagnosis was mediastinal paraganglioma.