Search

Objective: This study aimed to assess the utility of real-time remote auscultation using the cardiopulmonary simulators.Methods: In this open-label, randomized controlled trial, the researchers randomly assigned general internal medicine doctors to the real-time remote auscultation group (intervention group) or the classical auscultation group (control group). In the training session, participants listened to five different lung sounds and five cardiac sounds in a previously determined order with the correct classification. In the test session, participants had to classify the five lung sounds and five cardiac sounds in random order. For both sessions, the intervention group auscultated at a distance of 220 m, with an Internet-connected electronic stethoscope while watching the auscultation places on the computer screen. The control group performed direct auscultation using a classical stethoscope. The primary outcome was the total test score.Results: Twenty participants were included in the study. The total test scores of lung auscultation in the intervention (86%) and control (90%) groups were not significantly different (P = .54). The total test score of cardiac auscultation in the control group (94%) was superior to that in the intervention group (72%, P < .05). Valvular diseases were not misclassified as normal sounds in real-time remote cardiac auscultation. Discussion and Conclusions: The utility of real-time remote lung auscultation using an Internet-connected electronic stethoscope was comparable to that of classical lung auscultation. Classical cardiac auscultation was superior to real-time remote cardiac auscultation. However, real-time remote cardiac auscultation is useful for classifying valvular diseases and normal sounds. Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR UMIN000043153; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049259 The date of first registration:28/01/2021

Background The urgent need for telemedicine has become clear in the COVID-19 pandemic. To facilitate telemedicine, the development and improvement of remote examination systems are required. A system combining an electronic stethoscope and Bluetooth connectivity is a promising option for remote auscultation in clinics and hospitals. However, the utility of such systems remains unknown. Objective This study was conducted to assess the utility of real-time auscultation using a Bluetooth-connected electronic stethoscope compared to that of classical auscultation, using lung and cardiology patient simulators. Methods This was an open-label, randomized controlled trial including senior residents and faculty in the department of general internal medicine of a university hospital. The only exclusion criterion was a refusal to participate. This study consisted of 2 parts: lung auscultation and cardiac auscultation. Each part contained a tutorial session and a test session. All participants attended a tutorial session, in which they listened to 15 sounds on the simulator using a classic stethoscope and were told the correct classification. Thereafter, participants were randomly assigned to either the real-time remote auscultation group (intervention group) or the classical auscultation group (control group) for test sessions. In the test sessions, participants had to classify a series of 10 lung sounds and 10 cardiac sounds, depending on the study part. The intervention group listened to the sounds remotely using the electronic stethoscope, a Bluetooth transmitter, and a wireless, noise-canceling, stereo headset. The control group listened to the sounds directly using a traditional stethoscope. The primary outcome was the test score, and the secondary outcomes were the rates of correct answers for each sound. Results In total, 20 participants were included. There were no differences in age, sex, and years from graduation between the 2 groups in each part. The overall test score of lung auscultation in the intervention group (80/110, 72.7%) was not different from that in the control group (71/90, 78.9%; P=.32). The only lung sound for which the correct answer rate differed between groups was that of pleural friction rubs (P=.03); it was lower in the intervention group (3/11, 27%) than in the control group (7/9, 78%). The overall test score for cardiac auscultation in the intervention group (50/60, 83.3%) was not different from that in the control group (119/140, 85.0%; P=.77). There was no cardiac sound for which the correct answer rate differed between groups. Conclusions The utility of a real-time remote auscultation system using a Bluetooth-connected electronic stethoscope was comparable to that of direct auscultation using a classic stethoscope, except for classification of pleural friction rubs. This means that most of the real world’s essential cardiopulmonary sounds could be classified by a real-time remote auscultation system using a Bluetooth-connected electronic stethoscope. Trial Registration UMIN-CTR UMIN000040828; https://tinyurl.com/r24j2p6s and UMIN-CTR UMIN000041601; https://tinyurl.com/bsax3j5f

BACKGROUND With the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the need for telemedicine is rapidly growing worldwide. The development and improvement of remote physical examination systems, especially remote auscultation, are required to facilitate telemedicine. A Bluetooth system combined with an electronic stethoscope is a promising option for remote auscultation in clinics and hospitals. In our previous work, we demonstrated that the utility of a Bluetooth-connected real-time remote auscultation system for the lung simulator is comparable to that of classical direct auscultation. However, the utility of such systems remains unknown for cardiac auscultation. OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to evaluate the utility of real-time auscultation using a Bluetooth-connected electronic stethoscope compared to that of classical auscultation using a cardiology patient simulator. METHODS This was an open-label randomized controlled trial, including senior residents and faculty members in the Department of General Internal Medicine of a university hospital. The only exclusion criterion was a refusal to participate. All participants attended a tutorial session, in which they listened to 15 heart sounds on the cardiology patient simulator using a traditional stethoscope and were told the correct classification. Thereafter, participants were randomly assigned to either the real-time remote auscultation group (intervention group) or the classical auscultation group (control group) for test sessions. In the test sessions, participants had to classify a series of ten heart sounds. The intervention group remotely listened to the heart sounds using an electronic stethoscope, a Bluetooth transmitter, and a wireless, noise-canceling, stereo headset. The control group listened to the heart sounds directly using a classic stethoscope. The primary outcome was the test score. The secondary outcomes were the rates of correct answers for each heart sound. The two groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS In total, 20 participants were included; six and 14 were assigned to the intervention and control groups, respectively. There was no difference in age (P=.99), sex (P=.99), or years from graduation (P=.78) between the two groups. The overall test score in the intervention group (50/60, 83.3%) was not different from that in the control group (119/140, 85.0%) (P=.77). There was no heart sound for which the correct answer rate differed between groups. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that the utility of a real-time remote cardiac auscultation system using a Bluetooth-connected electronic stethoscope was comparable to that of direct auscultation using a classic stethoscope. This implies that the real world’s essential heart sounds could be classified by a real-time remote cardiac auscultation system using a Bluetooth-connected electronic stethoscope. CLINICALTRIAL UMIN-CTR UMIN000041601; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000047136

BACKGROUND The urgent need for telemedicine has become clear in the COVID-19 pandemic. To facilitate telemedicine, the development and improvement of remote examination systems are required. A system combining an electronic stethoscope and Bluetooth connectivity is a promising option for remote auscultation in clinics and hospitals. However, the utility of such systems remains unknown. OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to assess the utility of real-time auscultation using a Bluetooth-connected electronic stethoscope compared to that of classical auscultation, using lung and cardiology patient simulators. METHODS This was an open-label, randomized controlled trial including senior residents and faculty in the department of general internal medicine of a university hospital. The only exclusion criterion was a refusal to participate. This study consisted of 2 parts: lung auscultation and cardiac auscultation. Each part contained a tutorial session and a test session. All participants attended a tutorial session, in which they listened to 15 sounds on the simulator using a classic stethoscope and were told the correct classification. Thereafter, participants were randomly assigned to either the real-time remote auscultation group (intervention group) or the classical auscultation group (control group) for test sessions. In the test sessions, participants had to classify a series of 10 lung sounds and 10 cardiac sounds, depending on the study part. The intervention group listened to the sounds remotely using the electronic stethoscope, a Bluetooth transmitter, and a wireless, noise-canceling, stereo headset. The control group listened to the sounds directly using a traditional stethoscope. The primary outcome was the test score, and the secondary outcomes were the rates of correct answers for each sound. RESULTS In total, 20 participants were included. There were no differences in age, sex, and years from graduation between the 2 groups in each part. The overall test score of lung auscultation in the intervention group (80/110, 72.7%) was not different from that in the control group (71/90, 78.9%; P=.32). The only lung sound for which the correct answer rate differed between groups was that of pleural friction rubs (P=.03); it was lower in the intervention group (3/11, 27%) than in the control group (7/9, 78%). The overall test score for cardiac auscultation in the intervention group (50/60, 83.3%) was not different from that in the control group (119/140, 85.0%; P=.77). There was no cardiac sound for which the correct answer rate differed between groups. CONCLUSIONS The utility of a real-time remote auscultation system using a Bluetooth-connected electronic stethoscope was comparable to that of direct auscultation using a classic stethoscope, except for classification of pleural friction rubs. This means that most of the real world’s essential cardiopulmonary sounds could be classified by a real-time remote auscultation system using a Bluetooth-connected electronic stethoscope. CLINICALTRIAL UMIN-CTR UMIN000040828; https://tinyurl.com/r24j2p6s and UMIN-CTR UMIN000041601; https://tinyurl.com/bsax3j5f

We herein report the findings of 2 cases of normotensive scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) that developed soon after the commencement of a glucocorticoid therapy. We also review 8 cases of normotensive SRC reported in Japan, including our cases. The common characteristics of these 8 cases are as follows: the recent onset of systemic sclerosis, the presence of diffuse skin sclerosis, the presence of myositis and/or serositis, a high titer of antinuclear antibody and positivity for anti-Scl-70 antibody. In 7 of the 8 patients, thrombotic microangiopathy developed within one month of starting the glucocorticoid treatment. We should be careful with the use of glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis patients exhibiting these features in order to avoid cases of normotensive SRC.