Search

Introduction: An adverse drug reaction case report refers to a scientific publication that is written by a health care professional who suspects a casual relationship between a drug and an adverse drug reaction (ADR). ADR case reports help to identify potential risks associated with the use of drug. Most of the case reports do not mention about reporting the ADR to regulatory authorities. With this objective, the aim of this study was to analyze the number of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) published as case reports (PubMed indexed journals) from January 2018 to June 2019, and observe if they are translated in regulatory frameworks like Vigibase, and package inserts. Materials And Methods: 321 ADRs were obtained with the keywords “Adverse Drug Reaction”. Out of those, 158 were independently extracted by two investigators, observed and categorized according to classes of the drugs, geographic location, severity, hospitalization, Completeness of ADR, whether reported to the regulatory authority (Vigibase), or listed in the package insert. Literature review articles were excluded. Results: Out of the 158 ADRs, antibiotics accounted for 12.65%, CNS drugs and monoclonal antibodies11.39%, anticancer drugs 9.49%, CVS drugs 4.43%, anti-viral 3.79%, others 45.56%, respectively. According to geographic region, 26 ADRs published were from USA, Australia 4, Italy 3, India 17, Turkey 9, Singapore and UK 1, China 20, Denmark and Canada 2, Japan 10, France 9, Austria 1, Korea 5, South America 3, Switzerland 2, respectively. Depending upon the severity, causality assessment was done only for 45 ADRs, and not done for 113 ADRs. 41.13% patients (from 65 case reports) were hospitalized. Among the 158 ADRs, 14 ADRs were not found in Vigibase. 32 ADRs were not mentioned in the Drug package inserts. When categorized according to the completeness of case reports, weight accounted for1.89%, lab values and procedure for diagnosis, 96.8%, risk factors, 95.56%, prior exposure, 88.60%, Post ADR status, 60.12%, start-stop medication, route of administration, first dose, last dose, duration of illness accounted for 100%, respectively. Conclusion: Depending upon our observation, we have noticed that there is deficiency in reporting of suspected ADRs to regulatory authorities. Reporting can be included as mandatory criteria for ADR case reports. Also, there is an increased need to aware various healthcare workers for reporting ADR.

Background: Bedside evaluation of congestion is a mainstay of heart failure (HF) management. Whether detected physical examination signs have changed over time as obesity prevalence has increased in HF populations, or if the associated prognosis differs for HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF or HFpEF) is uncertain. Methods: From 2005 to 2014, the ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) conducted adjudicated hospital surveillance of acute decompensated HF. We analyzed trends in physical examination findings, imaging signs, and symptoms related to congestion, both over time and by obesity class, and associated 28-day mortality risks. Results: Of 24 937 weighted hospitalizations for acute decompensated HF (mean age 75 years, 53% women, 32% Black), 47% had HFpEF. The prevalence of obesity increased from 2005 to 2014 for both HF types. With increasing obesity category, detected edema increased, while jugular venous distension decreased, and rales remained stable. Detected edema also increased over time, for both HF types. Associations between 28-day mortality and individual signs and symptoms of congestion were similar for HFpEF and HFrEF; however, the adjusted mortality risk with all 3 (edema, rales, and jugular venous distension) versus P for interaction by HF type =0.02. Conclusions: In patients hospitalized with acute decompensated HF, detected physical examination findings differ both temporally and by obesity. Combined findings from the physical examination are more prognostic of 28-day mortality for patients with HFpEF than HFrEF.

Introduction: Bedside evaluation of congestion remains important in both heart failure (HF) with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF and HFpEF). Whether presence of physical exam findings have changed over time, or if prognosis of physical examination differs by HF type is uncertain. Methods: From 2005-2014, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study conducted hospital surveillance of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Events were verified by physician review, and clinical data were abstracted from the medical record. We examined presence of 3 physical exam findings suggesting congestion: lower extremity edema, jugular venous distension, and pulmonary rales > 1/3 of the lung field. Analyses were weighted by sampling fractions. Results: Of 24,937 hospitalizations for ADHF (mean age 75 years, 53% women, 32% black), 47% were HFpEF. Presence of edema increased from 2005-2009 to 2010-2014, both for HFpEF (66% to 72%; P for annual trend = 0.002) and HFrEF (62% to 67%; P for annual trend = 0.009), while presence of rales and jugular distention remained stable. There were 2640 (11%) and 7766 (31%) deaths within 28 days and 1 year of hospitalization, respectively. Patients with HFpEF and all 3 physical exam signs had a greater risk of short- and long-term mortality ( Figure ). After adjustments for demographics and length of stay, there was a differential association between clinical signs and 28-day mortality by HF type ( P for interaction = 0.02). Presence of all 3 vs. Conclusion: The presence of edema on physical examination of patients with ADHF has increased in recent years, both for HFpEF and HFrEF. However, the prognostic utility of physical exam signs of congestion may differ by HF type.

The roles of NK cells, surfactant protein D (SP-D), and IFN-γ, as well as the effect of ozone (O3) inhalation, were studied on recirculation of pulmonary dendritic cells (DC) to the mediastinal lymph nodes. O3 exposure and lack of SP-D reduced NK cell IFN-γ and lung tissue CCL21 mRNA expression and impaired DC homing to the mediastinal lymph nodes. Notably, addition of recombinant SP-D to naive mononuclear cells stimulated IFN-γ release in vitro. Because NKp46, a glycosylated membrane receptor, was necessary for dose-dependent SP-D binding to NK cells in vitro and DC migration in vivo, we speculate that SP-D may constitutively stimulate IFN-γ production by NK cells, possibly via NKp46. This mechanism could then initiate the IFN-γ/IL-12 feedback circuit, a key amplifier of DC lymph node homing. Inhibition of this process during an acute inflammatory response causes DC retention in the peripheral lung tissue and contributes to injury.

A 24-year-old pregnant woman was found to have a mass in the posterior vagina; a partly cystic and partly solid lesion was excised. Histology showed a papillary mural neoplasm covered by intact squamous epithelium. Immunohistochemical staining showed diffuse positivity with CAM 5.2, EP4, CEA, and EMA and focal immunoreactivity with CA-125. This lesion was interpreted as an intramural mullerian papilloma, only the second such tumor described in the vagina and the first in an adult.