Search

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted MRI sequences such as the magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence are important for assessing regional cortical atrophy in the clinical evaluation of dementia but have long acquisition times and are prone to motion artifact. The recently developed Scout Accelerated Motion Estimation and Reduction (SAMER) retrospective motion correction method addresses motion artifact within clinically-acceptable computation times and has been validated through qualitative evaluation in inpatient and emergency settings. Methods: We evaluated the quantitative accuracy of morphometric analysis of SAMER motion-corrected compared to non-motion-corrected MPRAGE images by estimating cortical volume and thickness across neuroanatomical regions in two subject groups: (1) healthy volunteers and (2) patients undergoing evaluation for dementia. In part (1), we used a set of 108 MPRAGE reconstructed images derived from 12 healthy volunteers to systematically assess the effectiveness of SAMER in correcting varying degrees of motion corruption, ranging from mild to severe. In part (2), 29 patients who were scheduled for brain MRI with memory loss protocol and had motion corruption on their clinical MPRAGE scans were prospectively enrolled. Results: In part (1), SAMER resulted in effective correction of motion-induced cortical volume and thickness reductions. We observed systematic increases in the estimated cortical volume and thickness across all neuroanatomical regions and a relative reduction in percent error values compared to reference standard scans of up to 66 % for the cerebral white matter volume. In part (2), SAMER resulted in statistically significant volume increases across anatomical regions, with the most pronounced increases seen in the parietal and temporal lobes, and general reductions in percent error relative to reference standard clinical scans. Conclusion: SAMER improves the accuracy of morphometry through systematic increases and recovery of the estimated cortical volume and cortical thickness following motion correction, which may affect the evaluation of regional cortical atrophy in patients undergoing evaluation for dementia.

Abstract Flow-related artifacts have been observed in highly accelerated T1-weighted contrast-enhanced wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (CAIPI) magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) imaging and can lead to diagnostic uncertainty. We developed an optimized flow-mitigated Wave-CAIPI MPRAGE acquisition protocol to reduce these artifacts through testing in a custom-built flow phantom. In the phantom experiment, maximal flow artifact reduction was achieved with the combination of flow compensation gradients and radial reordered k-space acquisition and was included in the optimized sequence. Clinical evaluation of the optimized MPRAGE sequence was performed in 64 adult patients, who all underwent contrast-enhanced Wave-CAIPI MPRAGE imaging without flow-compensation and with optimized flow-compensation parameters. All images were evaluated for the presence of flow-related artifacts, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), gray-white matter contrast, enhancing lesion contrast, and image sharpness on a 3-point Likert scale. In the 64 cases, the optimized flow mitigation protocol reduced flow-related artifacts in 89% and 94% of the cases for raters 1 and 2, respectively. SNR, gray-white matter contrast, enhancing lesion contrast, and image sharpness were rated as equivalent for standard and flow-mitigated Wave-CAIPI MPRAGE in all subjects. The optimized flow mitigation protocol successfully reduced the presence of flow-related artifacts in the majority of cases. Relevance statement As accelerated MRI using novel encoding schemes become increasingly adopted in clinical practice, our work highlights the need to recognize and develop strategies to minimize the presence of unexpected artifacts and reduction in image quality as potential compromises to achieving short scan times. Key points • Flow-mitigation technique led to an 89–94% decrease in flow-related artifacts. • Image quality, signal-to-noise ratio, enhancing lesion conspicuity, and image sharpness were preserved with the flow mitigation technique. • Flow mitigation reduced diagnostic uncertainty in cases where flow-related artifacts mimicked enhancing lesions. Graphical Abstract