Search

Background: The concept of "time toxicity" has emerged to address the impact of time spent in the healthcare system; however, little work has examined the phenomenon in the field of otolaryngology., Objective: To validate the use of Evaluation and Management (E/M) current procedural terminology codes as a method to assess time burden and to pilot this tool to characterize the time toxicity of office visits associated with a diagnosis of pituitary adenoma between 2016 and 2019., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of outpatient office visits quantified differences between timestamps documenting visit length and their associated E/M code visit length. The IBM MarketScan database was queried to identify patients with a diagnosis of pituitary adenoma in 2016 and to analyze their new and return claims between 2016 and 2019. One-way ANOVA and two-sample t-tests were used to examine claim quantity, time in office, and yearly visit time., Results: In the validation study, estimated visit time via E/M codes and actual visit time were statistically different ( P  < 0.01), with E/M codes underestimating actual time spent in 79.0% of visits. In the MarketScan analysis, in 2016, 2099 patients received a primary diagnosis of pituitary adenoma. There were 8490 additional-related claims for this cohort from 2016 to 2019. The plurality of new office visits were with endocrinologists (n = 857; 29.3%). Total time spent in office decreased yearly, from a mean of 113 min (2016) to 69 min (2019) ( P  < 0.001)., Conclusions: E/M codes underestimate the length of outpatient visits; therefore, time toxicity experienced by pituitary patients may be greater than reported. Further studies are needed to develop additional assessment tools for time toxicity and promote increased efficiency of care for patients with pituitary adenomas., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Identifying patients at risk of increased health care resource utilization is a valuable opportunity to develop targeted preoperative and perioperative interventions. In the present investigation, we sought to examine patient sociodemographic factors that predict prolonged length of stay (LOS) after traumatic spine fracture., Methods: We performed a cohort analysis using the National Trauma Data Bank tabulated during 2012-2016. Eligible patients were those who were diagnosed with cervical or thoracic spine fracture with spinal cord injury and who were treated surgically. We evaluated the effects of sociodemographic as well as psychosocial variables on LOS by negative binomial regression and adjusted for injury severity, injury mechanism, and hospital characteristics., Results: We identified 3856 eligible patients with a median LOS of 9 days (interquartile range, 6-15 days). Patients in older age categories, who were male (incidence rate ratio (IRR), 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.09), black (IRR, 1.12; CI, 1.05-1.19) or Hispanic (IRR, 1.09; CI, 1.03-1.16), insured by Medicaid (IRR, 1.24; CI, 1.17-1.31), or had a diagnosis of alcohol use disorder (IRR, 1.12; CI, 1.06-1.18) were significantly more likely to have a longer LOS. In addition, patients with severe injury on Injury Severity Score (IRR, 1.32; CI, 1.14-1.53) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (GCS score 3-8, IRR, 1.44; CI, 1.35-1.55; GCS score 9-11, IRR, 1.40; CI, 1.25-1.58) on admission had a significantly lengthier LOS. Patients admitted to a hospital in the Southern United States (IRR, 1.09; CI, 1.05-1.14) had longer LOS., Conclusions: Socioeconomic factors such as race, insurance status, and alcohol use disorder were associated with a prolonged LOS after surgical management of traumatic spine fracture with spinal cord injury., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services transitioned clinicians to the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), the largest mandatory pay-for-performance program in health care history. The first full MIPS program year was 2018, during which the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services raised participation requirements and performance thresholds. Using publicly available Medicare data, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of otolaryngologist participation and performance in the MIPS in 2017 and 2018. In 2018, otolaryngologists reporting as individuals were less likely ( P < .001) to earn positive payment adjustments (n = 1076/1584, 67.9%) than those participating as groups (n = 2802/2804, 99.9%) or in alternative payment models (n = 1705/1705, 100.0%). Approximately one-third (n = 1286/4472, 28.8%) of otolaryngologists changed reporting affiliations between 2017 and 2018. Otolaryngologists who transitioned from reporting as individuals to participating in alternative payment models (n = 137, 3.1%) achieved the greatest performance score improvements (median change, +23.4 points; interquartile range, 12.0-65.5). These findings have important implications for solo and independent otolaryngology practices in the era of value-based care.

Objective/hypothesis: Medicare reimbursement for physician work depends on the estimated time and intensity - which encompasses technical skill, cognitive load, and stress - required to perform services. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) quantitatively expresses intensity estimates as compensation rates per unit time. This study aimed to characterize compensation rates under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) for operative procedures commonly performed by otolaryngologists., Study Design: This study was a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis., Methods: This study was a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of fiscal year 2018 PFS specifications and publicly available Medicare Part B utilization data for the top 100 highest-volume procedures furnished by otolaryngologists to Medicare beneficiaries in inpatient and ambulatory surgical center (ASC) settings between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018. Co-primary outcomes were the estimated 1) total compensation rate ($/min) and 2) intraservice (i.e., "skin-to-skin" time) compensation rate ($/min) for each included procedure., Results: The analytic sample included 147 unique procedure types (settings non-mutually exclusive): 82 inpatient procedure types (n = 33,907 procedures) and 95 ASC procedure types (n = 34,765 procedures). In the inpatient setting, median total compensation rate and intraservice compensation rates were $1.50/min (interquartile range [IQR]: $1.19/min-$1.65/min) and $2.27/min (IQR: $1.69/min-$2.68/min), respectively. In the ASC setting, median total compensation rate and intraservice compensation rates were $1.48/min (interquartile range [IQR]: $1.27/min-$1.77/min) and $2.39/min (IQR: $1.82/min-$2.91/min), respectively. At the service line level, volume-weighted total (inpatient: $1.91/min, ASC: $1.90/min) and intraservice (inpatient: $3.84/min, ASC: $3.37/min) compensation rates were highest for rhinologic procedures., Conclusions: Compensation rates under the Medicare PFS varied widely for operative procedures commonly performed by otolaryngologists., Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 131:E1785-E1791, 2021., (© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).)

Objective: Surgical care is increasingly shifting to freestanding ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). The extent to which otolaryngologists use ASCs has implications for patient safety and health care spending. This study characterizes trends in utilization and resultant financial implications for common otolaryngologic procedures performed at ASC and hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs)., Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis., Setting: ASCs, HOPDs., Subjects and Methods: Subjects included Medicare beneficiaries undergoing outpatient otolaryngologic procedures between 2010 and 2017. Procedures included the 20 highest-volume procedures performed by otolaryngologists at ASCs in 2017. Main outcomes included absolute and relative percentage difference in the proportion of procedures furnished at ASCs and HOPDs and estimated Medicare cost savings resulting from increased ASC utilization between 2011 and 2017., Results: The proportion of outpatient otolaryngologic procedures performed at ASCs increased by 1.8% (relative difference: 10.0%; mean annual relative increase: 1.60%), and the proportion located at HOPDs decreased by 6.0% (relative difference: -11.8%; mean annual relative decrease: -1.6%) between 2010 and 2017. Rhinoplasty accounted for the largest absolute increase in ASC utilization over the study period (absolute [relative] 8.9% [33.5%]). Increased ASC utilization resulted in an estimated $7.1 million in cost savings to Medicare between 2011 and 2017., Conclusion: Otolaryngologists shifted outpatient surgical care from HOPDs to ASCs between 2010 and 2017, with resultant reductions in Medicare expenditures. Further research is necessary to examine the impact of this shift on patient safety.

Objective: We aim to examine the existing literature on, and identify knowledge gaps in, the study of adverse animal and human audiovestibular effects from exposure to acoustic or electromagnetic waves that are outside of conventional human hearing. Design/Setting/Participants: A review was performed, which included searches of relevant MeSH terms using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Primary outcomes included documented auditory and/or vestibular signs or symptoms in animals or humans exposed to infrasound, ultrasound, radiofrequency, and magnetic resonance imaging. The references of these articles were then reviewed in order to identify primary sources and literature not captured by electronic search databases. Results: Infrasound and ultrasound acoustic waves have been described in the literature to result in audiovestibular symptomology following exposure. Technology emitting infrasound such as wind turbines and rocket engines have produced isolated reports of vestibular symptoms, including dizziness and nausea and auditory complaints, such as tinnitus following exposure. Occupational exposure to both low frequency and high frequency ultrasound has resulted in reports of wide-ranging audiovestibular symptoms, with less robust evidence of symptomology following modern-day exposure via new technology such as remote controls, automated door openers, and wireless phone chargers. Radiofrequency exposure has been linked to both auditory and vestibular dysfunction in animal models, with additional historical evidence of human audiovestibular disturbance following unquantifiable exposure. While several theories, such as the cavitation theory, have been postulated as a cause for symptomology, there is extremely limited knowledge of the pathophysiology behind the adverse effects that particular exposure frequencies, intensities, and durations have on animals and humans. This has created a knowledge gap in which much of our understanding is derived from retrospective examination of patients who develop symptoms after postulated exposures. Conclusion and Relevance: Evidence for adverse human audiovestibular symptomology following exposure to acoustic waves and electromagnetic energy outside the spectrum of human hearing is largely rooted in case series or small cohort studies. Further research on the pathogenesis of audiovestibular dysfunction following acoustic exposure to these frequencies is critical to understand reported symptoms., (At least a portion of this work is authored by Philip D. Littlefield and Derek Rodgers behalf of the U.S. Government and, as regards Dr. Littlefield, Dr. Rodgers and the U.S. Government, is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign and other copyrights may apply.)

Patient advocacy organizations (PAOs) are nonprofits dedicated to benefiting patients and their families through activities such as education/counseling and research funding. Although medical drug/device companies may serve as important partners, industry donations may bias the efforts of PAOs. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the Kaiser Health News nonprofit database to identify and characterize otolaryngologic PAOs (n = 32) active in 2016. Among these PAOs, half (n = 16, 50.0%) focused on otologic diseases, and mean total annual revenue was $3.1 million. Among the 15 PAOs (46.9%) with publicly available donor lists, 10 (66.7%) received donations from industry. Few PAOs publicly reported the total amount donated by industry (n = 3, 9.4%) or published policies for mitigating potential financial conflicts of interest with donors (n = 3, 9.4%). Requiring drug and device companies to publicly report donations to PAOs may help patients, providers, and policy makers to better understand advocacy by these influential stakeholders.