Search

Barbara Kornek Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Abstract: In the context of an increasing repertoire of multiple sclerosis (MS) therapeutics, choosing the appropriate treatment for an individual patient is becoming increasingly challenging. Natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against alpha4beta1 integrin, has proven short-term and long-term efficacies in terms of relapse rate reduction, prevention of disability progression, and reduction of magnetic resonance imaging-detectable activity. It is well tolerated and has further been shown to improve patients’ quality of life. Its use is limited by the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), which occurs at an overall incidence of 3.78 cases per 1,000 patients. Three major risk factors for the occurrence of natalizumab-associated PML have been identified: John Cunningham virus (JCV) seropositivity, prior use of immunosuppressants, and treatment duration ≥2 years. Therefore, in patients considered for natalizumab therapy, as well as in patients receiving natalizumab, effective control of MS activity has to be balanced against the risk of an opportunistic central nervous system infection associated with a high risk of significant morbidity or death. Discontinuation of natalizumab is an issue in daily clinical practice, since it is an option to reduce the PML risk. However, after cessation of natalizumab therapy, currently, there is no approved strategy for avoiding postnatalizumab disease reactivation available. In this paper, short-term and long-term safety and efficacy data are reviewed. Issues in daily clinical practice, such as selection of patients, monitoring of patients, and natalizumab discontinuation, are discussed. Keywords: safety, long-term outcome, pediatric multiple sclerosis, adherence, PML, treatment discontinuation

Acute transverse myelitis (ATM) is a disease characterized by inflammation of the spinal cord and may have various causes. In the context of this work, the distinction between isolated ATM and initial manifestation of autoimmune-mediated diseases of the central nervous system such as multiple sclerosis (MS) is crucial. Hence, the aim of this work was to identify predictive factors associated with the conversion to definite MS in a collective of individuals after their initial episode of isolated ATM (no initial identified cause). In this retrospective data analysis from the Vienna MS Database, all patients from Jan. 1, 1999, to Dec. 31, 2019, with a diagnosis of isolated ATM (according to the criteria of the Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group) who underwent lumbar puncture were extracted. Electronic medical records were reviewed on the availability of clinical data including therapy and follow-up, laboratory results including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, evoked potentials (EP) as well as magnetic resonance imaging data. Among 42 patients with the diagnosis of isolated ATM, 12 (29%) were subsequently diagnosed with MS over a median follow-up period of 7.7 years. Univariately, MS converters were younger (32 years [25-39] vs. 42 years [31-50], p = 0.032), had a lower CSF/serum albumin ratio (29 [24-35] vs 37 [27-52], p = 0.037), lower CSF total protein (4.5 [2.8-4.8] vs. 5.5 [3.4-8.5], p = 0.023) and a higher proportion of CSF-specific oligoclonal bands (OCB; 83% vs. 30%, p = 0.002). In the multivariate regression analysis, the presence of CSF-specific OCB emerged as the sole predictive factor of subsequent MS diagnosis (OR: 14.42, 95% CI 1.39 to 149.48, p = 0.03). In a collective of 42 patients with isolated ATM and an MS conversion rate of nearly 30%, the only but highly predictive factor were CSF-specific OCB. This emphasizes the significance of conducting timely CSF analysis in such patients and underscores the need for tailored monitoring and follow-up strategies in this specific group., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: Autoimmune screening panels (ASPs) are often ordered as a part of the diagnostic workup in people with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS). However, data on the significance of ASP seropositivity in MS are scarce. This study aimed to investigate whether routine implementation of ASPs is viable in MS diagnostic workup., Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients from the Vienna Multiple Sclerosis Database who were diagnosed with MS according to current McDonald criteria between 2014 and 2021 and had an ASP performed., Results: We analyzed 212 patients (mean age at serology = 30.4 [SD = 8.5] years, 67% female). Red flag symptoms for presence of systemic autoimmune disease were reported by 5.6% of patients during initial evaluation (sicca syndrome [n = 5], joint pain [n = 4], dermatitis [n = 4]). Complement levels (C3c and C4) were below the lower reference level in 26 of 134 (19.4%) and three of 134 (2.2%), respectively. Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) were positive in 24 of 210 (11.4%), with 18 (8.6%), five (2.4%), and one (0.5%) having mildly, moderately, and strongly positive ANA titers. Extractable nuclear antibody subsets were positive in 10 of 211 (4.7%) patients. ASPs led to the diagnosis of mixed connective tissue disease (n = 1), psoriatic arthritis (n = 1), and Sjögren syndrome (n = 2; positive predictive value [PPV] = 4.9%, negative predictive value [NPV] = 99.3%). Among patients presenting with red flag symptoms, ASPs had better overall test performance (PPV = 100%, NPV = 88.9%)., Conclusions: The rate of ASP seropositivity in MS is low and within the range of the general population. Performance of ASPs without clinical suspicion of systemic autoimmune disease seems unwarranted., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are chronic active lesions associated with a severe disease course in multiple sclerosis (MS). This study was undertaken to investigate an association between retinal layer thinning (annualized loss of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [aLpRNFL] and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer [aLGCIPL]) and PRLs in patients with MS (pwMS)., Methods: In this study, pwMS with brain magnetic resonance imaging and ≥2 optical coherence tomography scans were included. Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed using progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) as the dependent variable, and aLpRNFL, aLGCIPL, or the number of PRLs as independent variables, adjusted for covariates., Results: We analyzed data from 97 pwMS (mean age = 35.2 years [SD = 9.9], 71.1% female, median disease duration = 2.3 years [interquartile range = 0.9-9.0]). The number of PRLs was associated with aLpRNFL and aLGCIPL. PIRA was observed in 18 (18.6%) pwMS, with aLpRNFL (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44 per %/year), aLGCIPL (HR = 1.61 per %/year), and the number of PRLs (HR = 1.24 per PRL) being associated with increased risk of PIRA., Conclusions: The number of PRLs is associated with inner retinal layer thinning and increased risk of PIRA. A combination of PRLs and retinal layer thinning could serve as a surrogate for pwMS at highest risk of disability progression., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Objectives: Isolated value of MRI metrics in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) as a surrogate marker of response to disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and, thus, as decision criteria for DMT escalation in the absence of clinical signs of disease activity is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether DMT escalation based on isolated MRI activity affects clinical outcome., Methods: Combining data from 5 MS centers in Austria and Switzerland, we included patients with RMS aged at least 18 years who (1) had initiated first-line, low-to-moderate-efficacy DMT (interferon β, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate) continued for ≥12 months, (2) were clinically stable (no relapses or disability progression) on DMT for 12 months, (3) had MRI at baseline and after 12 months on DMT, and (4) had available clinical follow-up for ≥2 years after the second MRI. The primary endpoint was occurrence of relapse during follow-up. The number of new T2 lesions (T2L) and DMT strategy (continuing low-/moderate-efficacy DMT vs escalating DMT) were used as covariates in regression analyses., Results: A total of 131 patients with RMS, median age of 36 (25th-75th percentiles: 29-43) years, 73% women, were included and observed over a median period of 6 (5-9) years after second MRI. Sixty-two (47%) patients had relapse. Patients who continued first-line DMT had a 3-fold increased risk of relapse given 2 new T2L (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2, lower limit [LL] of 95% CI: 1.5) and a 4-fold increased risk given ≥3 new T2L (HR 4.0, LL-CI: 2.1). Escalation of DMT lowered the risk of relapse in patients with 2 new T2L by approximately 80% (HR 0.2, upper limit [UL] of 95% CI: 1.3) and with ≥3 new T2L by 70% (HR 0.3, UL-CI: 0.8). In case of only 1 new T2L, the increased risk of relapse and the treatment effect did not reach statistical significance of 5%., Discussion: In our real-world cohort of patients clinically stable under low-to-moderate-efficacy DMT, escalation of DMT based on isolated MRI activity decreased risk of further relapse when at least 2 new T2L had occurred., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that clinically stable patients with MS on low-/moderate-efficacy DMT with ≥3 new T2L on MRI who escalate DMT have a reduced risk of relapse and Expanded Disability Status Scale progression.

Background: Employing a rebaselining concept may reduce noise in retinal layer thinning measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT)., Methods: From an ongoing prospective observational study, we included patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), who had OCT scans at disease-modifying treatment (DMT) start (baseline), 6-12 months after baseline (rebaseline), and ⩾12 months after rebaseline. Mean annualized percent loss (aL) rates (%/year) were calculated both from baseline and rebaseline for peripapillary-retinal-nerve-fiber-layer (aLpRNFL baseline /aLpRNFL rebaseline ) and macular-ganglion-cell-plus-inner-plexiform-layer (aLGCIPL baseline /aLGCIPL rebaseline ) by mixed-effects linear regression models., Results: We included 173 RMS patients (mean age 31.7 years (SD 8.8), 72.8% female, median disease duration 15 months (12-94) median baseline-to-last-follow-up-interval 37 months (18-71); 56.6% moderately effective DMT (M-DMT), 43.4% highly effective DMT (HE-DMT)). Both mean aLpRNFL baseline and aLGCIPL baseline significantly increased in association with relapse (0.51% and 0.26% per relapse, p < 0.001, respectively) and disability worsening (1.10% and 0.48%, p < 0.001, respectively) before baseline, but not with DMT class. Contrarily, neither aLpRNFL rebaseline nor aLGCIPL rebaseline was dependent on relapse or disability worsening before baseline, while HE-DMT significantly lowered aLpRNFL rebaseline (by 0.31%, p < 0.001) and aLGCIPL rebaseline (0.25%, p < 0.001) compared with M-DMT., Conclusions: Applying a rebaselining concept significantly improves differentiation of DMT effects on retinal layer thinning by avoiding carry-over confounding from previous disease activity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Gabriel Bsteh has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, MedWhizz, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. He has received unrestricted research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis.Harald Hegen has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Siemens and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. He is associate editor of Frontiers in Neurology.Nik Krajnc has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Alexion, BMS/Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi Genzyme and held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS).Fabian Föttinger has nothing to disclose.Patrick Altmann has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. He received a research grant from Quanterix International and was awarded a combined sponsorship from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, and Teva for a clinical study.Michael Auer has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme and Horizon Therapeutics.Klaus Berek has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding from Biogen, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Barbara Kornek has received honoraria for speaking and for consulting from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Sanofi Genzyme outside of the submitted work. No conflict of interest with respect to the present study.Fritz Leutmezer has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Actelion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Stefan Macher declares no conflict of interest relevant to this study.Tobias Monschein has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Markus Ponleitner has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker or consulting honoraria or travel funding from Amicus, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi Genzyme.Paulus Rommer has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from Alexion/Astra Zeneca, Allmiral, Amgen/Horizon, Amicus, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, and Roche.Christiane Schmied declares no conflict of interest relevant to this study.Karin Zebenholzer received speaking honoraria or travel grants from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme.Gudrun Zulehner has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Tobias Zrzavy has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Florian Deisenhammer has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi Genzyme. His institution received scientific grants from Biogen and Sanofi Genzyme.Franziska Di Pauli has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene BMS, Horizon, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva, and Roche. Her institution has received research grants from Roche.Berthold Pemp has received honoraria for consulting from Novartis, has received honoraria for advisory boards/consulting from Chiesi and GenSight, and has received speaker honoraria from Novartis, Chiesi, and Santen.Thomas Berger has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS/Celgene, Genesis, GSK, GW/Jazz Pharma, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva, and UCB. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.

Background/objective: Observational real-world study to analyze the clinical effects of alemtuzumab (ALEM) and subsequent disease-modifying therapy (DMT) usage in multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: Data retrieved from the Austrian MS treatment registry (AMSTR) included baseline (BL) characteristics (at ALEM start), annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA; ≥ 0.5-point Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score increase), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI; ≥ 0.5-point EDSS decrease), and safety outcomes until initiation of a subsequent DMT. The EDSS was re-baselined at 30 days from ALEM start (BL EDSS)., Results: Eighty-seven ALEM-treated patients (median age: 32 years, 72% female, 14% treatment-naïve) were followed for a median of 55 (interquartile range 31-68) months. We found significant reductions in the ARR from 1.16 before ALEM to 0.15 throughout Years 1-9 (p < 0.001). Subsequent DMTs were initiated in 19 patients (22%, 74% anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). At Year 5 (n = 53), more patients achieved CDI (58%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 45%-71%) than had experienced PIRA (14%, CI 7.5%-24%), and 58% remained relapse-free. Shorter MS duration (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86 (CI 0.80-0.93)) and no previous high-efficacy treatment (p < 0.001, HR 5.16 (CI 2.66-10.0)) were the best predictors of CDI, while PIRA was associated with a higher number of previous DMTs (p = 0.04, HR 3.06, CI 1.05-8.89). We found no new safety signals., Interpretation: ALEM had long-lasting beneficial effects on the ARR and disability improvement, especially when initiated early in the course of the disease. Only a subset of patients received subsequent DMTs., (© 2024 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Background and Purpose: Rituximab (RTX) is frequently used off-label in multiple sclerosis. However, studies on the risk-benefit profile of RTX in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis are scarce., Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis from Sweden, Austria and Germany, who received RTX treatment were identified by chart review. Annualized relapse rates, Expanded Disability Status Scale scores and magnetic resonance imaging parameters (new T2 lesions and contrast-enhancing lesions) were assessed before and during RTX treatment. The proportion of patients who remained free from clinical and disease activity (NEDA-3) during RTX treatment was calculated. Side effects such as infusion-related reactions, infections and laboratory abnormalities were assessed., Results: Sixty-one patients received RTX during a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 20.9 (35.6) months. The annualized relapse rate decreased from 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.92) to 0.03 (95% CI 0.02-0.14). The annual rate of new T2 lesions decreased from 1.25 (95% CI 0.70-2.48) to 0.08 (95% CI 0.03-0.25) and annual rates of new contrast-enhancing lesions decreased from 0.86 (95% CI 0.30-3.96) to 0. Overall, 70% of patients displayed no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3). Adverse events were observed in 67% of patients. Six patients discontinued treatment due to ongoing disease activity or adverse events., Conclusion: Our study provides class IV evidence that RTX reduces clinical and radiological activity in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Recent studies proposed cellular immunoprofiling as a surrogate for predicting treatment response and/or stratifying the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). However, applicability in real-world circumstances is not sufficiently addressed., Objective: We aimed to explore whether standard routine clinical leukocyte phenotyping before treatment initiation could help stratify patients according to treatment response or AEs in a real-world MS cohort., Methods: In this retrospective study, 150 pwMS were included, who had been newly initiated on a disease-modifying drug (DMD) and had been assessed for standard immunophenotyping before DMD initiation (baseline) and at least once during the following year. Multivariate models were used to assess an association of immune subsets and the association between immune cell profiles regarding treatment response and AEs., Results: We found that the composition of T cell subsets was associated with relapse activity, as an increased proportion of CD8 + lymphocytes at baseline indicated a higher likelihood of subsequent relapse (about 9% per 1% increase in CD8+ proportion of all CD3+ cells). This was particularly driven by patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy, where also EDSS worsening was associated with a higher number of CD8+ cells at baseline (3% increase per 10 cells). In the overall cohort, an increase in the proportion of NK cells was associated with a higher risk of EDSS worsening (5% per 1% increase). Occurrence of AEs was associated with a higher percentage of T cells and a lower number of percentual NKT cells at baseline., Conclusion: Immune cell profiles are associated with treatment response and the occurrence of AEs in pwMS. Hence, immunophenotyping may serve as a valuable biomarker to enable individually tailored treatment strategies in pwMS., Competing Interests: TZ has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. HH reports grants from Glock Health Science and Research, BlueSky Immunotherapies, Neutrolis, Clickmer, Janssen-Cilag, the Austrian Federal Ministry for Education Science and Research, as well as from the Austrian Federal Ministry for Defense and Sports, all outside of the submitted work. PA has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. He received a research grant from Quanterix International and was awarded a combined sponsorship from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Teva for a clinical study. BK has received honoraria for speaking and for consulting from Biogen, BMSCelgene, Johnson&Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva and Sanofi-Genzyme outside of the submitted work. No conflict of interest with respect to the present study. NK has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from BMS/Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme and held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). TM has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. KZ received speaking honoraria or travel grants from Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme. GZ has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. TB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS/Celgene, Genesis, GSK, GW/Jazz Pharma, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and UCB. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. PR has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Allmiral, Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, Roche. FL has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Actelion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Johnson&Johnson, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. GB has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Celgene/BMS, Novartis). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Zrzavy, Rieder, Wuketich, Thalhammer, Haslacher, Altmann, Kornek, Krajnc, Monschein, Schmied, Zebenholzer, Zulehner, Berger, Rommer, Leutmezer and Bsteh.)

Background: There is a lack of knowledge of disease course, prognosis, comorbidities and potential treatments of elderly MS patients., Objective: To characterize the disease course including disability progression and relapses, to quantify the use of DMTs and to identify comorbidities and risk factors for progression in elderly multiple sclerosis (MS) patients., Methods: This is a retrospective study of 1200 Austrian MS patients older than 55 years as of May 1st, 2017 representing roughly one-third of all the MS patients of this age in Austria. Data were collected from 15 MS centers including demographics, first symptom at onset, number of relapses, evolvement of disability, medication, and comorbidities., Results: Median observation time was 17.1 years with 957 (80%) relapsing and 243 (20%) progressive onsets. Average age at diagnosis was 45 years with a female predominance of 71%. Three-hundred and twenty-six (27%) patients were never treated with a DMT, while most treated patients received interferons (496; 41%) at some point. At last follow-up, 420 (35%) patients were still treated with a DMT. No difference was found between treated and never-treated patients in terms of clinical outcome; however, patients with worse disability progression had significantly more DMT switches. Pyramidal onset, number of comorbidities, dementia, epilepsy, and psychiatric conditions as well as a higher number of relapses were associated with worse outcome. The risk of reaching EDSS 6 rose with every additional comorbidity by 22%. In late and very-late-onset MS (LOMS, VLOMS) time to diagnosis took nearly twice the time compared to adult and early onset (AEOMS). The overall annualized relapse rate (ARR) decreased over time and patients with AEOMS had significantly higher ARR compared to LOMS and VLOMS. Four percent of MS patients had five medications or more fulfilling criteria of polypharmacy and 20% of psychiatric drugs were administered without a matching diagnosis., Conclusions: In this study, we identified number of comorbidities, pyramidal and cerebellar signs, and a higher number of relapses as unfavorable prognostic factors in elderly MS patients filling gaps of knowledge in patients usually underrepresented in clinical trials and may guide future therapeutic studies., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are an imaging biomarker in multiple sclerosis (MS), associated with a more severe disease., Objectives: To determine quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics of PRLs, lesions with diffuse susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI)-hypointense signal (DSHLs) and SWI-isointense lesions (SILs), their surrounding periplaque area (PPA) and the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM)., Methods: In a cross-sectional study, quantitative MRI metrics were measured in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) using the multi-dynamic multi-echo (MDME) sequence post-processing software "SyMRI.", Results: In 30 pwMS, 59 PRLs, 74 DSHLs, and 107 SILs were identified. Beside longer T1 relaxation times of PRLs compared to DSHLs and SILs (2030.5 (1519-2540) vs 1615.8 (1403.3-1953.5) vs 1199.5 (1089.6-1334.6), both p  < 0.001), longer T1 relaxation times were observed in the PRL PPA compared to the SIL PPA and the NAWM but not the DSHL PPA. Patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) had longer T1 relaxation times in PRLs compared to patients with late relapsing multiple sclerosis (lRMS) (2394.5 (2030.5-3040) vs 1869.3 (1491.4-2451.3), p  = 0.015) and also in the PRL PPA compared to patients with early relapsing multiple sclerosis (eRMS) (982 (927-1093.5) vs 904.3 (793.3-958.5), p  = 0.013)., Conclusion: PRLs are more destructive than SILs, leading to diffuse periplaque white matter (WM) damage. The quantitative MRI-based evaluation of the PRL PPA could be a marker for silent progression in pwMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: N.K. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Alexion, BMS/Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme and held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). V.S. has nothing to disclose. J.L. has nothing to disclose. L.H. has nothing to disclose. G.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. He has received unrestricted research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis. G.K. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. F.L. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Bayer, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. B.K. has received honoraria for speaking and for consulting from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Sanofi-Genzyme outside of the submitted work. No conflict of interest with respect to this study. P.S.R. has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Almirall, Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva and has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, and Roche. T.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS/Celgene, GSK, GW/Jazz Pharma, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, and UCB. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva). H.L. has received honoraria for lectures from Novartis, Biogen, ROCHE, Merck, and Sanofi-Aventis. A.D.-B.’s position as junior group leader for Translational Morphology in Neuroscience is supported by a research grant from Biogen. She has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene (BMS), Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi, and has received an unrestricted grant from Merck GmbH, an affiliate of Merck KGaA. S.H. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen and Sanofi-Aventis.

Background and Objectives: The optic nerve has been recommended as an additional region for demonstrating dissemination in space (DIS) in diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to investigate whether adding the optic nerve region as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) as part of the DIS criteria improves the 2017 diagnostic criteria., Methods: From a prospective observational study, we included patients with a first demyelinating event who had complete information to assess DIS and a spectral domain OCT scan obtained within 180 days. Modified DIS criteria (DIS + OCT) were constructed by adding the optic nerve to the current DIS regions based on validated thresholds for OCT intereye differences. Time to second clinical attack was the primary endpoint., Results: We analyzed 267 patients with MS (mean age 31.3 years [SD 8.1], 69% female) during a median observation period of 59 months (range: 13-98). Adding the optic nerve as a fifth region improved the diagnostic performance by increasing accuracy (DIS + OCT 81.2% vs DIS 65.6%) and sensitivity (DIS + OCT 84.2% vs DIS 77.9%) without lowering specificity (DIS + OCT 52.2% vs DIS 52.2%). Fulfilling DIS + OCT criteria (≥2 of 5 DIS + OCT regions involved) indicated a similar risk of a second clinical attack (hazard ratio [HR] 3.6, CI 1.4-14.5) compared with a 2.5-fold increased risk when fulfilling DIS criteria (HR 2.5, CI 1.2-11.8). When the analysis was conducted according to topography of the first demyelinating event, DIS + OCT criteria performed similarly in both optic neuritis and nonoptic neuritis., Discussion: Addition of the optic nerve, assessed by OCT, as a fifth region in the current DIS criteria improves diagnostic performance by increasing sensitivity without lowering specificity., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that adding the optic nerve as determined by OCT as a fifth DIS criterion to the 2017 McDonald criteria improves diagnostic accuracy., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: With the approval of natalizumab in Europe in 2006, the Austrian Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Registry (AMSTR) was established. Here, we present data from this registry about effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in patients treated up to 14 years., Patients/methods: Data retrieved from the AMSTR contained baseline characteristics and biannual documentation of annualised relapse rate (ARR) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score as well as adverse events and reasons for discontinuation on follow-up visits., Results: A total of 1596 natalizumab patients (71% women, n = 1133) were included in the analysis and the observed treatment duration ranged from 0 to 164 months (13.6 years). The mean ARR was 2.0 (SD = 1.13) at baseline, decreasing to 0.16 after 1 year and 0.01 after 10 years. A total of 325 patients (21.6%) converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) during the observational period. Of 1502 patients, 1297 (86.4%) reported no adverse events (AE) during follow-up visits. The most common reported AEs were infections and infusion-related reactions. John Cunningham virus (JCV) seropositivity was the most common specified reason for treatment discontinuation (53.7%, n = 607). There were five confirmed cases of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) with 1 death., Conclusion: The effectiveness of natalizumab in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) could be confirmed in our real-world cohort even after follow-up of up to 14 years, though after year 10, there were less than 100 remaining patients. A low number of AE were reported in this nationwide registry study, establishing Natalizumab's favourable safety profile during long-term use., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: Currently, there are no data available on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS), and little is known about the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this age group. We therefore investigated humoral immune responses after COVID-19 vaccination and/or infection in POMS., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed seroconversion rates and SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody levels in 30 POMS and one pediatric CIS patient treated with no disease-modifying therapy (no DMT), immunomodulatory DMT (IM-DMT), or immunosuppressive DMT (IS-DMT) from two Austrian MS centers., Results: The median age at MS onset was 15.39 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.97). The median age at the first COVID-19 vaccination was 17.43 years (IQR: 2.76). After two vaccine doses, seroconversion (≥0.8 BAU/ml) was reached in 25 of 28 patients (89.3%). All patients with no DMT or IM-DMT generated robust immune responses to vaccination (seroconversion: no DMT: 6/6, IM-DMT: 7/7 [100%]; median titers: no DMT: 2075 BAU [IQR: 1268.50], IM-DMT: 2500 BAU [IQR: 0]). In the IS-DMT group, seroconversion was achieved in 12 of 14 patients (80%), and median titers were 50.8 BAU (IQR 254.63). Titers were significantly higher in no DMT versus IS-DMT (P = 0.012) and in IM-DMT versus IS-DMT (P = 0.001). Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 11 of 31 patients, and symptoms were mild in all cases. One relapse occurred after infection, but no relapses were documented after vaccination., Conclusions: Generally, mRNA vaccinations were well tolerated in POMS patients with and without DMT. Immune response was significantly reduced in patients treated with IS-DMT. No unexpected adverse events or relapses related to vaccinations were observed., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: This study was undertaken to investigate baseline peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness for prediction of disability accumulation in early relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS)., Methods: From a prospective observational study, we included patients with newly diagnosed RMS and obtained spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scan within 90 days after RMS diagnosis. Impact of pRNFL and GCIPL thickness for prediction of disability accumulation (confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score ≥ 3.0) was tested by multivariate (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) Cox regression models., Results: We analyzed 231 MS patients (mean age = 30.3 years, SD = 8.1, 74% female) during a median observation period of 61 months (range = 12-93). Mean pRNFL thickness was 92.6 μm (SD = 12.1), and mean GCIPL thickness was 81.4 μm (SD = 11.8). EDSS ≥ 3 was reached by 28 patients (12.1%) after a median 49 months (range = 9-92). EDSS ≥ 3 was predicted with GCIPL < 77 μm (HR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.6-4.2, p < 0.001) and pRNFL thickness ≤ 88 μm (HR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.4-3.3, p < 0.001). Higher age (HR = 1.4 per 10 years, p < 0.001), incomplete remission of first clinical attack (HR = 2.2, p < 0.001), ≥10 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions (HR = 2.0, p < 0.001), and infratentorial MRI lesions (HR = 1.9, p < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of disability accumulation, whereas highly effective disease-modifying treatment was protective (HR = 0.6, p < 0.001). Type of first clinical attack and presence of oligoclonal bands were not significantly associated., Conclusions: Retinal layer thickness (GCIPL more than pRNFL) is a useful predictor of future disability accumulation in RMS, independently adding to established markers., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are chronic active lesions associated with a more severe disease course in multiple sclerosis (MS). Retinal layer thinning measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a biomarker of neuroaxonal damage associated with disability progression in MS., Objective: We aimed to determine a potential association between OCT parameters (peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), inner nuclear layer (INL) thickness), and PRLs in patients with MS (pwMS)., Methods: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, we included pwMS with both 3T brain MRI and an OCT scan. Regression models were calculated with OCT parameters (pRNFL, GCIPL, INL) as dependent variables, and the number of PRLs as an independent variable adjusted for covariates., Results: We analyzed data from 107 pwMS (mean age 34.7 years (SD 10.9), 64.5% female, median disease duration 6 years (IQR 1-13), median EDSS 1.5 (range 0-6.5)). Higher number of PRLs was associated with lower pRNFL (β = -0.18; 95% CI -0.98, -0.03; p  = 0.038) and GCIPL thickness (β = -0.21; 95% CI -0.58, -0.02; p  = 0.039)., Conclusion: The association between higher number of PRLs and lower pRNFL and GCIPL thicknesses provides additional evidence that pwMS with PRLs are affected by a more pronounced neurodegenerative process.

Objectives: Patients under rituximab therapy are at high risk for a severe COVID-19 disease course. Humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are vastly diminished in B-cell-depleted patients, even after a third vaccine dose. However, it remains unclear whether these patients benefit from a fourth vaccination and whether continued rituximab therapy affects antibody development., Methods: In this open-label extension trial, 37 rituximab-treated patients who received a third dose with either a vector or mRNA-based vaccine were vaccinated a fourth time with an mRNA-based vaccine (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2). Key endpoints included the humoral and cellular immune response as well as safety after a fourth vaccination., Results: The number of patients who seroconverted increased from 12/36 (33%) to 21/36 (58%) following the fourth COVID-19 vaccination. In patients with detectable antibodies to the spike protein's receptor-binding domain (median: 8.0 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL (quartiles: 0.4; 13.8)), elevated levels were observed after the fourth vaccination (134.0 BAU/mL (quartiles: 25.5; 1026.0)). Seroconversion and antibody increase were strongly diminished in patients who received rituximab treatment between the third and the fourth vaccination. The cellular immune response declined 12 weeks after the third vaccination, but could only be slightly enhanced by a fourth vaccination. No unexpected safety signals were detected, one serious adverse event not related to vaccination occurred., Conclusions: A fourth vaccine dose is immunogenic in a fraction of rituximab-treated patients. Continuation of rituximab treatment reduced humoral immune response, suggesting that rituximab affects a second booster vaccination. It might therefore be considered to postpone rituximab treatment in clinically stable patients., Trial Registration Number: 2021-002348-57., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PM reports speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen and Novartis and research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD and UCB. MB reports about personal fees from Eli-Lilly, DA received grants and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sandoz. JSS reports about grants, consulting and personal fees from AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, Astro, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung and UCB. DM received support for meeting attendances from Pfizer. HH received grants from Glock Health, BlueSky Immunotherapies and Neutrolis. AK reports about speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)