Search

Aims: Multifactorial falls prevention programmes (MFFPs) can prevent falls and fall-related injuries. We aimed to study MFFP patients' mortality compared with their sex-, age- and residence-matched population-based controls., Methods: This study is a Finnish single-centre retrospective register-based controlled cohort study of a total of 527 home-dwelling MFFP patients and their 3:1 age-, sex- and residence-matched population-based controls ( n = 1581), who had not attended the MFFP., Results: During the follow-up, the cumulative mortality of all patients was 40.4, and of controls 39.1 %. Hazard ratio was 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.99), p = 0.041. Case patients had a 2.7 times greater risk to die due to accidents, but they had a lower risk to die due to dementia, compared with the control group. The 72-years-old or older participants had a lower mortality rate than the controls during follow-up., Conclusions: The MFFP seems to relate to a lower all-cause mortality when comparing MFFP patients with their age-, sex- and residence-matched controls. However, the MFFP did not seem to relate to a lower injury-related mortality. The relationship between the MFFP and lower all-cause mortality seemed to be strongest in the patients aged 72 years or older. Due to the study setting and population-based control group, it is difficult to draw solid conclusions and further studies are needed. A randomized controlled trial comparing the MFFP with standard care would give better insight on the effectiveness of a MFFP on mortality., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Insufficient integration of immigrants into the labour market has been identified as a major problem in the Scandinavian countries Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Integration depends, inter alia, on immigration and integration policy, and for most of the post-war period the policies of the three countries displayed strong similarities. However, in the early 2000s Denmark increasingly deviated from its two neighbours, introducing more restrictive immigration and stricter integration policies. Comparing both pre- and post-reform immigrants across Scandinavia, we assess the wider impact of this comprehensive policy reversal by tracking the evolution of employment and earnings gaps between 1993 and 2006. We use large data sets with individual-level register information allowing us to account for immigrant labour force composition and to examine sub-groups of immigrants. The results do not indicate that the Danish reforms had any clear-cut effect on either employment or earnings among non-Western immigrants. Moreover, integration in Norway and Sweden was not unequivocally worse despite the absence of similar reforms, raising questions regarding the aptness of the Danish reversal., Competing Interests: Compliance with Ethical StandardsThere are no conflicts of interest.