1. Development of clinical screening tool for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in patients with definite chronic pancreatitis.
- Author
-
Othman MO, Forsmark C, Yadav D, Singh VK, Lara LF, Park W, Zhang Z, Yu J, and Kort JJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Adult, Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pancreatitis, Chronic complications, Pancreatitis, Chronic diagnosis, Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency diagnosis
- Abstract
Background/objectives: No simple, accurate diagnostic tests exist for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), and EPI remains underdiagnosed in chronic pancreatitis (CP). We sought to develop a digital screening tool to assist clinicians to predict EPI in patients with definite CP., Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study of patients with definite CP with/without EPI. Overall, 49 candidate predictor variables were utilized to train a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model to rank all predictors and select a parsimonious set of predictors for EPI status. Five-fold cross-validation was used to assess generalizability, and the full CART model was compared with 4 additional predictive models. EPI misclassification rate (mRate) served as primary endpoint metric., Results: 274 patients with definite CP from 6 pancreatitis centers across the United States were included, of which 58 % had EPI based on predetermined criteria. The optimal CART decision tree included 10 variables. The mRate without/with 5-fold cross-validation of the CART was 0.153 (training error) and 0.314 (prediction error), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.889 and 0.682, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity without/with 5-fold cross-validation was 0.888/0.789 and 0.794/0.535, respectively. A trained second CART without pancreas imaging variables (n = 6), yielded 8 variables. Training error/prediction error was 0.190/0.351; sensitivity was 0.869/0.650, and specificity was 0.728/0.649, each without/with 5-fold cross-validation., Conclusion: We developed two CART models that were integrated into one digital screening tool to assess for EPI in patients with definite CP and with two to six input variables needed for predicting EPI status., (Published by Elsevier B.V.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF