Search

Evolution is a key aspect of the biology of many pathogens, driving processes ranging from immune escape to changes in virulence. Because evolution is inherently subject to feedbacks, and because pathogen evolution plays out at scales ranging from within-host to between-host and beyond, evolutionary questions provide special challenges to the modelling community. In this article, we provide an overview of five challenges in modelling the evolution of pathogens and their hosts, and point to areas for development, focussing in particular on the issue of linking theory and data.

: Introduction: In many countries, mortality due to suicide is higher among people living with HIV than in the general population. We aimed to analyse trends in suicide mortality before and after the introduction of triple combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), and to identify risk factors associated with death from suicide in Switzerland. Methods: We analysed data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study from the pre‐cART (1988‐1995), earlier cART (1996‐2008) and later cART (2009‐2017) eras. We used multivariable Cox regression to assess risk factors for death due to suicide in the ART era and computed standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) to compare mortality rates due to suicide among persons living with HIV with the general population living in Switzerland, using data from the Swiss National Cohort. Results and Discussion: We included 20,136 persons living with HIV, of whom 204 (1.0%) died by suicide. In men, SMRs for suicide declined from 12.9 (95% CI 10.4‐16.0) in the pre‐cART era to 2.4 (95% CI 1.2‐5.1) in the earlier cART and 3.1 (95% CI 2.3‐4.3) in the later cART era. In women, the corresponding ratios declined from 14.2 (95% CI 7.9‐25.7) to 10.2 (3.8‐27.1) and to 3.3 (95% CI 1.5‐7.4). Factors associated with death due to suicide included gender (adjusted hazard ratio 0.58 (95% CI 0.38‐0.87) comparing women with men), nationality (1.95 (95% CI 1.34‐2.83) comparing Swiss with other), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention clinical stage (0.33 (95% CI 0.24‐0.46) comparing stage A with C), transmission group (2.64 (95% CI 1.71‐4.09) for injection drug use and 2.10 (95% CI 1.36‐3.24) for sex between men compared to other), and mental health (2.32 (95% CI 1.71‐3.14) for a history of psychiatric treatment vs. no history). There was no association with age. Conclusions: Suicide rates have decreased substantially among people living with HIV in the last three decades but have remained about three times higher than in the general population since the introduction of cART. Continued emphasis on suicide prevention among men and women living with HIV is important., Introduction Depression, anxiety and other mental health problems are common among people living with HIV, and more common than in the general population or among comparable HIV‐negative people. In the [...]

: Introduction: There is paucity of data related to potential gender differences in the use of interventions to prevent and treat cardiovascular disease (CVD) among HIV‐positive individuals. We investigated whether such differences exist in the observational D:A:D cohort study. Methods: Participants were followed from study enrolment until the earliest of death, six months after last visit or February 1, 2015. Initiation of CVD interventions [lipid‐lowering drugs (LLDs), angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), anti‐hypertensives, invasive cardiovascular procedures (ICPs) were investigated and Poisson regression models calculated whether rates were lower among women than men, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Women (n = 12,955) were generally at lower CVD risk than men (n = 36,094). Overall, initiation rates of CVD interventions were lower in women than men; LLDs: incidence rate 1.28 [1.21, 1.35] vs. 2.40 [2.34, 2.46]; ACEIs: 0.88 [0.82, 0.93] vs. 1.43 [1.39, 1.48]; anti‐hypertensives: 1.40 [1.33, 1.47] vs. 1.72 [1.68, 1.77] and ICPs: 0.08 [0.06, 0.10] vs. 0.30 [0.28, 0.32], and this was also true for most CVD interventions when exclusively considering periods of follow‐up for which individuals were at high CVD risk. In fully adjusted models, women were less likely to receive CVD interventions than men (LLDs: relative rate 0.83 [0.78, 0.88]; ACEIs: 0.93 [0.86, 1.01]; ICPs: 0.54 [0.43, 0.68]), except for the receipt of anti‐hypertensives (1.17 [1.10, 1.25]). Conclusion: The use of most CVD interventions was lower among women than men. Interventions are needed to ensure that all HIV‐positive persons, particularly women, are appropriately monitored for CVD and, if required, receive appropriate CVD interventions., Introduction HIV‐positive individuals are known to be at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population, partly due to an increased prevalence of some CVD risk factors, [...]

Objectives: Understanding the drivers of HIV‐1 transmission is of importance for curbing the ongoing epidemic. Phylogenetic methods based on single viral sequences allow us to assess whether two individuals are part of the same viral outbreak, but cannot on their own assess who potentially transmitted the virus. We developed and assessed a molecular epidemiology method with the main aim to screen cohort studies for and to characterize individuals who are 'potential HIV‐1 transmitters', in order to understand the drivers of HIV‐1 transmission. Methods: We developed and validated a molecular epidemiology approach using longitudinally sampled viral Sanger sequences to characterize potential HIV‐1 transmitters in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Results: Our method was able to identify 279 potential HIV‐1 transmitters and allowed us to determine the main epidemiological and virological drivers of transmission. We found that the directionality of transmission was consistent with infection times for 72.9% of 85 potential HIV‐1 transmissions with accurate infection date estimates. Being a potential HIV‐1 transmitter was associated with risk factors including viral load [adjusted odds ratiomultivariable (95% confidence interval): 1.86 (1.49–2.32)], syphilis coinfection [1.52 (1.06–2.19)], and recreational drug use [1.45 (1.06–1.98)]. By contrast for the potential HIV‐1 recipients, this association was weaker or even absent [1.18 (0.82–1.72), 0.89 (0.52–1.55) and 1.53 (0.98–2.39), respectively], indicating that inferred directionality of transmission is useful at the population level. Conclusions: Our results indicate that longitudinally sampled Sanger sequences do not provide sufficient information to identify transmitters with high certainty at the individual level, but that they allow the drivers of transmission at the population level to be characterized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Chemsex refers to the use of sex‐enhancing drugs among men who have sex with men (MSM) in combination with specific sexual and social behaviours. Longitudinal data on this development and the associated health risks are scarce. Methods: Data on all recreational drugs reported in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) from 2007 to 2017 were collected. Drug use was analysed longitudinally for all drug classes. In addition, potential associations between patient characteristics and the consumption of methamphetamine, γ‐hydroxybutric acid/γ‐butyrolactone (GHB/GBL), 3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA/XTC), cocaine and amphetamine were analysed. Results: We analysed 166 167 follow‐up entries for 12 527 SHCS participants, including 7101 free text field entries containing information about recreational drugs other than cannabis, cocaine and heroin. Overall, we observed a stable percentage (9.0%) of recreational drug use (excluding cannabis, amyl nitrite and prescription drugs). For MSM, however, there was an increase in overall drug use from 8.8% in 2007 to 13.8% in 2017, with particularly large increases for methamphetamine (from 0.2 to 2.4%; P < 0.001) and GHB/GBL (from 1.0 to 3.4%; P < 0.001). The use of each of the potentially sex‐enhancing drugs methamphetamine, GHB/GBL, cocaine, XTC/MDMA and amphetamine was significantly associated with condomless sex with nonsteady partners, and higher prevalences of depression, syphilis and hepatitis C. Conclusions: The significant increase in the use of chemsex drugs among MSM in the SHCS and the strong association with coinfections and depression highlights the need for harm reduction programmes tailored to MSM. According to our results, improving knowledge about recreational drugs is important for all health care professionals working with people living with HIV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Despite the huge success of antiretroviral therapy (ART), there is an ongoing HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men (MSM) in resource‐rich countries. Understanding the driving factors underlying this process is important for curbing the epidemic. Methods: We simulated the HIV epidemic in MSM in Switzerland by stratifying a mathematical model by CD4 count, the care cascade and condom use. The model was parametrised with clinical, epidemiological and behavioural data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and surveys in the HIV‐negative population. Results: According to our model, 3.4% of the cases that would otherwise have occurred in 2008–2015 were prevented by early initiation of ART. Only 0.6% of the cases were attributable to a change in condom use in the HIV‐positive population, as less usage is mainly seen in virally suppressed MSM. Most new infections were attributable to transmission from recently infected undiagnosed individuals. It was estimated that doubling the diagnosis rate would have resulted in 11.8% fewer cases in 2001–2015. Moreover, it was estimated that introducing pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for 50% of those MSM not using condoms with occasional partners would have resulted in 22.6% fewer cases in 2012–2015. Conclusions: By combining observational data on the relevant epidemiological and clinical processes with a mathematical model, we showed that the 'test and treat' approach is most effective in reducing the number of new cases. Only a moderate population‐level effect was estimated for early initiation of ART and a weak effect for the change in condom use of diagnosed MSM. Protecting HIV‐negative individuals who are not using condoms with PrEP was shown to have a major impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: By analyzing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) pol sequences from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS), we explored whether the prevalence of non-B subtypes reflects domestic transmission or migration patterns. METHODS: Swiss non-B sequences and sequences collected abroad were pooled to construct maximum likelihood trees, which were analyzed for Swiss-specific subepidemics, (subtrees including >=80% Swiss sequences, bootstrap >70%; macroscale analysis) or evidence for domestic transmission (sequence pairs with genetic distance <1.5%, bootstrap >=98%; microscale analysis). RESULTS: Of 8287 SHCS participants, 1732 (21%) were infected with non-B subtypes, of which A (n = 328), C (n = 272), CRF01_AE (n = 258), and CRF02_AG (n = 285) were studied further. The macroscale analysis revealed that 21% (A), 16% (C), 24% (CRF01_AE), and 28% (CRF02_AG) belonged to Swiss-specific subepidemics. The microscale analysis identified 26 possible transmission pairs: 3 (12%) including only homosexual Swiss men of white ethnicity; 3 (12%) including homosexual white men from Switzerland and partners from foreign countries; and 10 (38%) involving heterosexual white Swiss men and females of different nationality and predominantly nonwhite ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Of all non-B infections diagnosed in Switzerland, <25% could be prevented by domestic interventions. Awareness should be raised among immigrants and Swiss individuals with partners from high prevalence countries to contain the spread of non-B subtypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

HIV-1 RNA genetic diversity predicts time since infection, which is important for clinical care and research. It is unclear, however, whether proviral DNA genetic diversity sampled under suppressive antiretroviral therapy can be used for this purpose. We tested whether proviral genetic diversity from next-generation sequencing predicts time since infection and recency in 221 people with HIV-1 with known infection time. Proviral diversity was significantly associated with time since infection (P < 5×10-7, R2 up to 25%) and predictive of treatment initiation during recent infection (area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic up to 0.85). This shows the utility of proviral genetic diversity as a proxy for time since infection., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. A. R. has received research grants from Gilead; travel expenses from Gilead and Pfizer; and honoraria for data safety monitoring board or advisory board consultations from MSD and Moderna, all paid to his institution. D. L. B. has received personal consulting fees from Gilead, MSD, and ViiV; personal honoraria for presentations from Gilead, Pfizer, MSD, and ViiV; and travel expenses from Gilead and ViiV, paid to his institution. E. B. has received research grants from MSD; consulting fees from Moderna; honoraria for presentations from Pfizer; travel expenses from ViiV, MSD, Gilead, and Pfizer; and honoraria for data safety monitoring board or advisory board consultations from ViiV, MSD, Pfizer, Gilead, Moderna, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, and Ely Lilly, all paid to his institution. H. F. G. has received research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss HIV Cohort Study, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, Gilead, ViiV, and Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, paid to his institution; personal honoraria for data safety monitoring board or advisory board consultations from Merck, ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Novartis, and GSK; and personal travel expenses from Gilead. J. N. has received research grants from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and the cantonal hospital St Gallen, paid to her institution. K. J. M. has received unrestricted research grants from Gilead and Novartis, paid to her institution; and personal honoraria for advisory board consultations from ViiV. M. C. has received research grants from Gilead, ViiV, and MSD; payment for expert testimony from Gilead, ViiV, and MSD; and travel expenses from Gilead, all paid to his institution. M. S. has received honoraria for data safety monitoring board advisory board consultations from Gilead, ViiV, Moderna, Pfizer, and MSD; and travel expenses for conferences from Gilead, all paid to his institution. P. F. has received personal travel expenses from the University Zurich; payment for equipment from the University Zurich; and personal honoraria for presentations from the University Zurich. R. D. K. has received research grants from Gilead and NIH, paid to his institution. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

The development of broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb)-based therapeutic HIV-1 vaccines and cure concepts depends on monitoring bnAb plasma activity in people with HIV (PWH) on suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART). To enable this, analytical strategies must be defined to reliably distinguish antibody-based neutralization from drug inhibition. Here, we explore strategies that either utilize drug-resistant viruses or remove drugs from plasma. We develop ART-DEX (ART dissociation and size exclusion), an approach which quantitatively separates drugs from plasma proteins following pH-triggered release allowing accurate definition of antibody-based neutralization. We demonstrate that ART-DEX, alone or combined with ART-resistant viruses, provides a highly effective and scalable means of assessing antibody neutralization during ART. Implementation of ART-DEX in standard neutralization protocols should be considered to enhance the analytical capabilities of studies evaluating bnAb therapeutics and therapeutic vaccines, furthering the development of advanced ART and HIV-1 cure strategies., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests A.T. has received unrelated unrestricted research grants from the SNSF, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gilead Sciences, Novartis Biomedical Research Foundation, University of Zurich (UZH) Foundation, UZH Clinical Research Priority Program, the SHCS, honoraria from Roche Diagnostics and the Institute for biomedical research Bellinzona for consultant and scientific board activity, and directs the Swiss National Reference Center for Retroviruses together with M.H. H.F.G. has received unrelated unrestricted research grants from the SNSF, the SHCS, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, University of Zurich Clinical Research Priority Program, Systems.X, the National Institutes of Health, Gilead Sciences, and Roche. H.F.G. has further received personal fees from Merck, Gilead Sciences, ViiV, Janssen, GSK, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis for consultancy or DSMB membership and a travel grant from Gilead. M.H. directs the Swiss National Reference Center for Retroviruses and has received unrelated unrestricted research grant from the UZH Clinical Research Priority Program, the SNSF, the SHCS, and the ETH PHRT. I.A.A. has received honoraria from MSD and Sanofi, a travel grant from Gilead Sciences, a grant from ProMedica Foundation, and she is member of the EKIF (Eidgenössische Kommission für Impffragen) of the Federal Office of Public Health. R.D.K. has received grants from SNSF, the National Institutes of Health, and Gilead Sciences., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The REPRIEVE trial suggests that primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention could be considered among people with HIV at low CVD risk. We found cisgender women with low/moderate and high CVD risk are less likely to receive statins than cisgender men. Efforts are needed to guarantee equal access to statin-based CVD prevention., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interests. I.A.A. has received honoraria from MSD and Sanofi, a travel grant from Gilead Sciences, and a grant from the Promedica foundation. R.D.K. has received research fundings from Gilead unrelated to this work. K.A.P.'s institution has received travel grants and advisory fees from MSD, Gilead, and ViiV healthcare unrelated to this work. H.F.G. has received grants from the SNF, SHCS, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, University of Zurich's Clinical Research Priority Program, viral disease; Zurich Primary HIV Infection; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; National Institutes of Health; Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare; and Roche; and personal fees from Merck, Gilead Sciences, ViiV, GSK, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis, for consultancy or DSMB membership and a travel grant from Gilead. C.M. received speaker honoraria from Gilead and ViiV unrelated to this work. M.S. received advisory fees from Gilead, MSD, Moderna, Pfizer, and ViiV healthcare unrelated to this work and a travel grant from Gilead. E.B.'s institution received research grants from SHCS, Swiss National Science Foundation, Gilead, and Merck; advisory fees and travel grants from Gilead, Merck, ViiV, Pfizer, Abbvie, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, and Ely Lilly unrelated to the present work. B.S. reports support to his institution for travel grants from Gilead Sciences and ViiV healthcare, and for advisory boards from MSD., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Autoantibodies neutralizing type I interferons (IFN-Is) can underlie infection severity. Here, we trace the development of these autoantibodies at high-resolution using longitudinal samples from 1,876 well-treated individuals living with HIV over a 35-year period. Similar to general populations, ∼1.9% of individuals acquired anti-IFN-I autoantibodies as they aged (median onset ∼63 years). Once detected, anti-IFN-I autoantibodies persisted lifelong, and titers increased over decades. Individuals developed distinct neutralizing and non-neutralizing autoantibody repertoires at discrete times that selectively targeted combinations of IFNα, IFNβ, and IFNω. Emergence of neutralizing anti-IFNα autoantibodies correlated with reduced baseline IFN-stimulated gene levels and was associated with subsequent susceptibility to severe COVID-19 several years later. Retrospective measurements revealed enrichment of pre-existing autoreactivity against other autoantigens in individuals who later developed anti-IFN-I autoantibodies, and there was evidence for prior viral infections or increased IFN at the time of anti-IFN-I autoantibody triggering. These analyses suggest that age-related loss of self-tolerance prior to IFN-I immune-triggering poses a risk of developing lifelong functional IFN-I deficiency., (© 2024 Fernbach et al.)

Introduction: HIV drug resistance poses a challenge to the United Nation's goal of ending the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) dolutegravir, which has a higher resistance barrier, was endorsed by the WHO in 2019 for first-line, second-line and third-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). This multiplicity of roles of dolutegravir in ART may facilitate the emergence of dolutegravir resistance., Methods and Analysis: Nested within the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA), DTG RESIST is a multicentre study of adults and adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and South and Central America who experienced virological failure on dolutegravir-based ART. At the time of virological failure, whole blood will be collected and processed to prepare plasma or dried blood spots. Laboratories in Durban, Mexico City and Bangkok will perform genotyping. Analyses will focus on (1) individuals who experienced virological failure on dolutegravir and (2) those who started or switched to such a regimen and were at risk of virological failure. For population (1), the outcome will be any InSTI drug resistance mutations, and for population (2) virological failure is defined as a viral load >1000 copies/mL. Phenotypic testing will focus on non-B subtype viruses with major InSTI resistance mutations. Bayesian evolutionary models will explore and predict treatment failure genotypes. The study will have intermediate statistical power to detect differences in resistance mutation prevalence between major HIV-1 subtypes; ample power to identify risk factors for virological failure and limited power for analysing factors associated with individual InSTI drug resistance mutations., Ethics and Dissemination: The research protocol was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa and the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Bern, Switzerland. All sites participate in International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS and have obtained ethics approval from their local ethics committee to collect additional data., Trial Registration Number: NCT06285110., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Factors influencing susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remain to be resolved. Using data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study on 6270 people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and serologic assessment for SARS-CoV-2 and circulating human coronavirus (HCoV) antibodies, we investigated the association of HIV-related and general parameters with SARS-CoV-2 infection., Methods: We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test results, COVID-19-related hospitalizations, and deaths reported to the Swiss HIV Cohort Study between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2021. Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and HCoVs were determined in prepandemic (2019) and pandemic (2020) biobanked plasma samples and compared with findings in HIV-negative individuals. We applied logistic regression, conditional logistic regression, and bayesian multivariate regression to identify determinants of SARS-CoV-2 infection and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in people with HIV., Results: No HIV-1-related factors were associated with SARS-CoV-2 acquisition. High prepandemic HCoV antibodies were associated with a lower risk of subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection and with higher SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses on infection. We observed a robust protective effect of smoking on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46 [95% confidence interval, .38-.56]; P < .001), which occurred even in previous smokers and was highest for heavy smokers., Conclusions: Our findings of 2 independent protective factors, smoking and HCoV antibodies, both affecting the respiratory environment, underscore the importance of the local immune milieu in regulating susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . I. A. A. has received honoraria from MSD and Sanofi, a travel grant from Gilead Sciences, and a grant from Promedica Foundation. M. C.’s institution received research grants and fees for expert opinion given to Gilead, MSD and ViiV. D. L. B. reports honoraria paid to himself for advisory boards from the companies AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Gilead, MSD and ViiV. H. F. G. reports honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV, GSK, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis for serving on data and safety monitoring and/or advisory boards; a travel grant from Gilead Sciences; and grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), the SHCS, the Yvonne Jacob Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health, as well as unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences, all paid to the author’s institution. A. T. has received honoraria from Roche Diagnostics for consultant activity; grants from the SNSF, the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, and the Pandemiefonds of the UZH Foundation; and unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences. R. D. K. has received grants from SNSF, the National Institutes of Health, and Gilead Sciences. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

The pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection is governed by a highly dynamic, time-dependent interaction between the host and the viral genome. In this study, we developed a novel systematic approach to assess the host-virus interaction, using average pairwise viral diversity as a proxy for time since infection, and applied this method to nearly whole viral genome sequences (n = 4,464), human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotyping data (n = 1,044), and viral RNA load (VL) measurements during the untreated chronic phase (n = 829) of Swiss HIV Cohort Study participants. Our systematic genome-wide screen revealed for 98 HLA/viral-variant pairs a signature of immune-driven selection in the form of an HLA-dependent effect of infection time on the presence of HIV amino acid variants. Of these pairs, 12 were found to have an effect on VL. Furthermore, 28/58 pairs were validated by time-to-event analyses and 48/92 by computational HLA-epitope predictions. Our diversity-based approach allows a powerful and systematic investigation of the interaction between the virus and cellular immunity, revealing a notable subset of such interaction effects. From an evolutionary perspective, these observations underscore the complexity of HLA-mediated selection pressures on the virus that shape viral evolution and pathogenesis., Competing Interests: K.J.M. has received travel grants and honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Roche Diagnostics, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ViiV, and Abbott; and the University of Zurich has received research grants from Gilead Science, Novartis, Roche, and Merck Sharp & Dohme for studies in which K.J.M. serves as principal investigator, and advisory board honoraria from Gilead Sciences and ViiV. A.R. reports support to his institution for advisory board and/or travel grants from MSD, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, and Moderna, and an investigator-initiated trial (IIT) grant from Gilead Sciences. All honoraria went to his home institution, not to A.R. personally, and all honoraria were provided outside of the submitted work. M.S. reports advisory board consultations from Gilead, ViiV, MSD, paid to his institution, and travel grants for conferences from Gilead, paid to his institution. E.B.’s institution has received research grants from Gilead and Merck unrelated to this work; E.B.’s institution has also received consultancy fees and travel grants from Gilead, ViiV, Merck, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Moderna, Abbvie, and Ely Lilly. J.N. has received travel grants from Gilead. H.F.G. has received grants from the Yvonne-Jacob Foundation, the Clinical Research Priority Program of the University of Zurich, and Gilead Sciences, and, outside of this study, grants for unrestricted research from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gilead, and ViiV; and personal fees as a consultant for Merck, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences and as a member of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Merck. H.F.G.’s institution has received educational grants unrelated to this work from Gilead, ViiV, MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, and Sandoz. C.P. has received fellowships from the Collegium Helveticum. R.D.K. has received grants from Gilead Sciences, the National Institutes of Health, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. N.N.J. has received support from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2024 Neuner-Jehle et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

When and under which conditions antibiotic combination therapy decelerates rather than accelerates resistance evolution is not well understood. We examined the effect of combining antibiotics on within-patient resistance development across various bacterial pathogens and antibiotics. We searched CENTRAL, EMBASE and PubMed for (quasi)-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to November 24 th , 2022. Trials comparing antibiotic treatments with different numbers of antibiotics were included. A patient was considered to have acquired resistance if, at the follow-up culture, a resistant bacterium (as defined by the study authors) was detected that had not been present in the baseline culture. We combined results using a random effects model and performed meta-regression and stratified analyses. The trials' risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. 42 trials were eligible and 29, including 5054 patients, were qualified for statistical analysis. In most trials, resistance development was not the primary outcome and studies lacked power. The combined odds ratio (OR) for the acquisition of resistance comparing the group with the higher number of antibiotics with the comparison group was 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.25), with substantial between-study heterogeneity ( I 2 =77%). We identified tentative evidence for potential beneficial or detrimental effects of antibiotic combination therapy for specific pathogens or medical conditions. The evidence for combining a higher number of antibiotics compared to fewer from RCTs is scarce and overall, is compatible with both benefit or harm. Trials powered to detect differences in resistance development or well-designed observational studies are required to clarify the impact of combination therapy on resistance., Competing Interests: Competing Interest Statement: We declare no competing interests.

Background: Bivalent mRNA vaccines, designed to combat emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, incorporate ancestral strains and a new variant. Our study assessed the immune response in previously vaccinated individuals of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) and the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS) following bivalent mRNA vaccination., Methods: Eligible SHCS and STCS participants received approved bivalent mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (mRNA-1273.214 or BA.1-adapted BNT162b2) within clinical routine. Blood samples were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months post vaccination. We analyzed the proportion of participants with anti-spike protein antibody response ≥1642 units/ml (indicating protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection), and in a subsample T-cell response (including mean concentrations), stratifying results by cohorts and population characteristics., Results: In SHCS participants, baseline anti-spike antibody concentrations ≥1642 were observed in 87% (96/112), reaching nearly 100% at follow-ups. Among STCS participants, 58% (35/60) had baseline antibodies ≥1642, increasing to 80% at 6 months. Except for lung transplant recipients, all participants showed a five-fold increase in geometric mean antibody concentrations at 4 weeks and a reduction by half at 6 months. At baseline, T-cell responses were positive in 96% (26/27) of SHCS participants and 36% (16/45) of STCS participants (moderate increase to 53% at 6 months). Few participants reported SARS-CoV-2 infections, side-effects, or serious adverse events., Conclusions: Bivalent mRNA vaccination elicited a robust humoral response in individuals with HIV or solid organ transplants, with delayed responses in lung transplant recipients. Despite a waning effect, antibody levels remained high at 6 months and adverse events were rare., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Although sex hormones are recognized to induce immune variations, the effect of hormonal therapy use on immunity is only poorly understood. Here, we quantified how hormonal therapy use affects HIV-1 immune markers in cis women (CW) and trans women and non-binary people (TNBP) with HIV., Methods: We considered CD4, CD8 and lymphocyte measurements from cis men (CM), CW and TNBP in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. We modelled HIV-1 markers using linear mixed-effects models with an interaction between 'gender' (CW, TNBP) and 'hormonal therapy use' (yes/no). Models were adjusted on age, ethnicity, education level, time since start of antiretroviral therapy and use of intravenous drugs. We assessed the inflammatory effect of hormonal therapy use in 31 TNBP using serum proteomics measurements of 92 inflammation markers., Results: We included 54 083 measurements from 3092 CW and 83 TNBP, and 147 230 measurements from 8611 CM. Hormonal therapy use increased CD4 count and CD4:CD8 ratio in TNBP more than in CW (p interaction  = 0.02 and 0.007, respectively). TNBP with hormonal therapy use had significantly higher CD4 counts [median = 772 cells/μL, interquartile range (IQR): 520-1006] than without (617 cells/μL, 426-892). This was similar to the effect of CW versus CM on CD4 T cells. Hormonal therapy use did not affect serum protein concentrations in TNBP., Conclusion: This study highlights the potential role of hormonal therapy use in modulating the immune system among other biological and social factors, especially in TNBP with HIV., (© 2024 The Author(s). HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.)

People with HIV may report neurocognitive complaints, with or without associated neurocognitive impairment, varying between individuals and populations. While the HIV genome could play a major role, large systematic viral genome-wide screens to date are lacking. The Swiss HIV Cohort Study biannually enquires neurocognitive complaints. We quantified broad-sense heritability estimates using partial 'pol' sequences from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study resistance database and performed a viral near full-length genome-wide association study for the longitudinal area under the curve of neurocognitive complaints. We performed all analysis (i) restricted to HIV Subtype B and (ii) including all HIV subtypes. From 8547 people with HIV with neurocognitive complaints, we obtained 6966 partial 'pol' sequences and 2334 near full-length HIV sequences. Broad-sense heritability estimates for presence of memory loss complaints ranged between 1% and 17% (Subtype B restricted 1-22%) and increased with the stringency of the phylogenetic distance thresholds. The genome-wide association study revealed one amino acid (Env L641E), after adjusting for multiple testing, positively associated with memory loss complaints ( P = 4.3 * 10 -6 ). Other identified mutations, while insignificant after adjusting for multiple testing, were reported in other smaller studies (Tat T64N, Env *291S). We present the first HIV genome-wide association study analysis of neurocognitive complaints and report a first estimate for the heritability of neurocognitive complaints through HIV. Moreover, we could identify one mutation significantly associated with the presence of memory loss complaints. Our findings indicate that neurocognitive complaints are polygenetic and highlight advantages of a whole genome approach for pathogenicity determination., Competing Interests: An.R. received research grants from Gilead, paid to his institution; travel expenses from Gilead and Pfizer, paid to his institution; and honoraria for data safety monitoring board or advisory board consultations from MSD and Moderna, paid to his institution. C.P. received personal research grants from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, Collegium Helveticum and the University of Zurich. E.B. received research grants from MSD, paid to his institution; consulting fees from Moderna, paid to his institution; honoraria for presentations from Pfizer, paid to his institution; travel expenses from ViiV, MSD, Gilead and Pfizer, paid to his institution; and honoraria for data safety monitoring board or advisory board consultations from ViiV, MSD, Pfizer, Gilead, Moderna, AstraZeneca, AbbVie and Ely Lilly, paid to his institution. H.F.G. has received research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss HIV Cohort Study, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, NIH, Gilead, ViiV and Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, paid to his institution; personal honoraria for data safety monitoring board or advisory board consultations from Merck, ViiV healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Novartis and GSK; and personal travel expenses from Gilead. J.N. received research grants from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and the cantonal hospital St. Gallen, paid to her institution, and travel expenses from Gilead. K.J.M. received unrestricted research grants from Gilead and Novartis, paid to her institution, and personal honoraria for advisory board consultations from ViiV. M.C. received research grants from Gilead, ViiV and MSD, paid to his institution; payment for expert testimony from Gilead, ViiV and MSD, paid to his institution; and travel expenses from Gilead, paid to his institution. M.S. received honoraria for data safety monitoring board advisory board consultations from Gilead, ViiV, Moderna, Pfizer and MSD, paid to his institution, and travel expenses for conferences from Gilead, paid to his institution. P.F. received personal travel expenses from the University Zurich, payment for equipment from the University Zurich and personal honoraria for presentations from the University of Zurich. R.D.K. received research grants from Gilead and NIH, paid to his institution. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Objective: We developed a robust characterization of immune recovery trajectories in people living with HIV on antiretroviral treatment (ART) and relate our findings to epidemiological risk factors and bacterial pneumonia., Methods: Using data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and the Zurich Primary HIV Infection Cohort Study (n = 5907), we analyzed the long-term trajectories of CD4 cell and CD8 cell counts and their ratio in people living with HIV on ART for at least 8 years by fitting nonlinear mixed-effects models. The determinants of long-term immune recovery were investigated using generalized additive models. In addition, prediction accuracy of the modeled trajectories and their impact on the fit of a model for bacterial pneumonia was assessed., Results: Overall, our population showed good immune recovery (median plateau [interquartile range]-CD4: 718 [555-900] cells/μL, CD8: 709 [547-893] cells/μL, CD4/CD8: 1.01 [0.76-1.37]). The following factors were predictive of recovery: age, sex, nadir/zenith value, pre-ART HIV-1 viral load, hepatitis C, ethnicity, acquisition risk, and timing of ART initiation. The fitted models proved to be an accurate and efficient way of predicting future CD4 and CD8 cell recovery dynamics: Compared with carrying forward the last observation, mean squared errors of the fitted values were lower by 1.3%-18.3% across outcomes. When modeling future episodes of bacterial pneumonia, using predictors derived from the recovery dynamics improved most model fits., Conclusion: We described and validated a method to characterize individual immune recovery trajectories of people living with HIV on suppressive ART. These trajectories accurately predict long-term immune recovery and the occurrence of bacterial pneumonia., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

To prevent hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection, within the Swiss HCVree Trial , a preventive risk reduction intervention was implemented alongside curative treatment. Formative qualitative research identified three response patterns to the intervention. This mixed-methods study's aim was to cross-validate group differences in (a) the content of sexual risk reduction goals set during intervention and (b) the extent of their behavioural change in condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners (nsCAI), sexualised and intravenous drug use at start and six-month post-intervention. Qualitative thematic analysis was used to summarise goal setting domains. Quantitative descriptive analysis was used to evaluate group differences based on assumptions of the group descriptions. Results largely confirmed assumptions on inter-group response differences in goal setting and behaviour: as expected group 1 Avoid risks showed the lowest HCV risk profile with changes in nsCAI. Group 2 Minimize-risks and Group 3 Accept-risks showed unchanged nsCAI. Group 3 had the highest HCV risk profile. Differences in their goal preferences (1: condom use; 2 reduction blood exposure; 3 safer dating) highlight diversity in attitudes to behavioural change. Our results improve understanding of variability in intervention responses such as changes in attitudes and behaviour. This provides evidence for intervention tailoring and outcome measurement.

Numerous clinical parameters link to severe coronavirus disease 2019, but factors that prevent symptomatic disease remain unknown. We investigated the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and endemic human coronavirus (HCoV) antibody responses on symptoms in a longitudinal children cohort ( n = 2,917) and a cross-sectional cohort including children and adults ( n = 882), all first exposed to SARS-CoV-2 (March 2020 to March 2021) in Switzerland. Saliva ( n = 4,993) and plasma ( n = 7,486) antibody reactivity to the four HCoVs (subunit S1 [S1]) and SARS-CoV-2 (S1, receptor binding domain, subunit S2 [S2], nucleocapsid protein) was determined along with neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron (BA.2) in a subset of individuals. Inferred recent SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a strong correlation between mucosal and systemic SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike responses. Individuals with pre-existing HCoV-S1 reactivity exhibited significantly higher antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in both plasma (IgG regression coefficients = 0.20, 95% CI = [0.09, 0.32], P < 0.001) and saliva (IgG regression coefficient = 0.60, 95% CI = [0.088, 1.11], P = 0.025). Saliva neutralization activity was modest but surprisingly broad, retaining activity against Wuhan (median NT50 = 32.0, 1Q-3Q = [16.4, 50.2]), Alpha (median NT50 = 34.9, 1Q-3Q = [26.0, 46.6]), and Delta (median NT50 = 28.0, 1Q-3Q = [19.9, 41.7]). In line with a rapid mucosal defense triggered by cross-reactive HCoV immunity, asymptomatic individuals presented with higher pre-existing HCoV-S1 activity in plasma (IgG HKU1, odds ratio [OR] = 0.53, 95% CI = [0.29,0.97], P = 0.038) and saliva (total HCoV, OR = 0.55, 95% CI = [0.33, 0.91], P = 0.019) and higher SARS-CoV-2 reactivity in saliva (IgG S2 fold change = 1.26, 95% CI = [1.03, 1.54], P = 0.030). By investigating the systemic and mucosal immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 and HCoVs in a population without prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2 or vaccination, we identified specific antibody reactivities associated with lack of symptom development.IMPORTANCEKnowledge of the interplay between human coronavirus (HCoV) immunity and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is critical to understanding the coexistence of current endemic coronaviruses and to building knowledge potential future zoonotic coronavirus transmissions. This study, which retrospectively analyzed a large cohort of individuals first exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in Switzerland in 2020-2021, revealed several key findings. Pre-existing HCoV immunity, particularly mucosal antibody responses, played a significant role in improving SARS-CoV-2 immune response upon infection and reducing symptoms development. Mucosal neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2, although low in magnitude, retained activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants underlining the importance of maintaining local mucosal immunity to SARS-CoV-2. While the cross-protective effect of HCoV immunity was not sufficient to block infection by SARS-CoV-2, the present study revealed a remarkable impact on limiting symptomatic disease. These findings support the feasibility of generating pan-protective coronavirus vaccines by inducing potent mucosal immune responses., Competing Interests: H.F.G. reports having received honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV, GSK, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis for serving on DSMB and/or advisory boards and has received a travel grant from Gilead Sciences. In addition, he has received grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, the Yvonne Jacob Foundation, and the NIH and unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences, all paid to the institution. A.T. has received honoraria from Roche Diagnostics for consultant activity, grants from the SNSF, the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, and the Pandemiefonds of the UZH foundation, and unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences. I.A.A. has received honoraria from MSD and Sanofi, a travel grant from Gilead Sciences, and a grant from Promedica foundation. R.D.K. has received grants from SNSF, the National Institutes of Health, and Gilead Sciences. C.P. has received a grant from the Collegium Helveticum.

Background: Infectious diseases (IDs) are highly relevant after solid organ transplantation in terms of morbidity and mortality, being among the most common causes of death. Patients undergoing kidney retransplantation (re-K-Tx) have been already receiving immunosuppressive therapy over a prolonged period, potentially facilitating subsequent infections. Comparing ID events after re-K-Tx and first kidney transplantation (f-K-Tx) can delineate patterns and risks of ID events associated with prolonged immunosuppression., Methods: We included adult patients with records on f-K-Tx and re-K-Tx in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. We analyzed ID events after f-K-Tx and re-K-Tx within the same patients and compared infection rates, causative pathogens, and infection sites. Recurrent time-to-event analyses were performed for comparison of infection rates., Results: A total of 59 patients with a median age of 47 years (range, 18-73) were included. Overall, 312 ID events in 52 patients occurred. In multivariable recurrent event modeling, the rate of ID events was significantly lower after re-K-Tx (hazard ratio, 0.70; P = .02). More bacterial (68.9% vs 60.4%) and fungal (4.0% vs 1.1%) infections were observed after f-K-Tx but fewer viral infections (27.0% vs 38.5%) as compared with re-K-Tx ( P = .11). After f-K-Tx, urinary and gastrointestinal tract infections were more frequent; after re-K-Tx, respiratory tract and surgical site infections were more frequent ( P < .001)., Conclusions: ID events were less frequent after re-K-Tx. Affected sites differed significantly after f-K-Tx vs re-K-Tx., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. P. W. S. received travel grants from Pfizer and Gilead, speaker's honorary from Pfizer, and fees for advisory board activity from Pfizer and Gilead outside the submitted work. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

The Zurich Primary HIV Infection (ZPHI) study is a longitudinal cohort study established in 2002, aiming to study the clinical, epidemiological, and biological characteristics of primary HIV infection. The ZPHI enrolls individuals with documented primary HIV-1 infection. At the baseline and thereafter, the socio-demographic, clinical, and laboratory data are systematically collected, and regular blood sampling is performed for biobanking. By the end of December 2022, 486 people were enrolled, of which 353 were still undergoing active follow-up. Of the 486 participants, 86% had an acute infection, and 14% a recent HIV-1 infection. Men who have sex with men accounted for 74% of the study population. The median time from the estimated date of infection to diagnosis was 32 days. The median time from diagnosis to the initiation of antiretroviral therapy was 11 days, and this has consistently decreased over the last two decades. During the seroconversion phase, 447 (92%) patients reported having symptoms, of which only 73% of the patients were classified as having typical acute retroviral syndrome. The ZPHI study is a well-characterized cohort belonging to the most extensively studied primary HIV infection cohort. Its findings contribute to advancing our understanding of the early stages of HIV infection and pathogenesis, and it is paving the way to further improve HIV translational research and HIV medicine.

Objectives: Our objective was to obtain long-term data on the incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and their association with behavioural factors after widespread pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation., Methods: This was a time-to-event analysis of a national PrEP cohort in Switzerland (SwissPrEPared study). Participants were people without HIV interested in taking PrEP with at least two STI screening visits. Primary outcomes were incidence rate of gonorrhoea, chlamydia, and syphilis. The association between behavioural factors and STI diagnosis was expressed using hazard ratios. We adjusted for testing frequency and calendar year., Results: This analysis included 3907 participants enrolled between April 2019 and April 2022, yielding 3815.7 person-years of follow-up for gonorrhoea (15 134 screenings), 3802.5 for chlamydia (15 141 screenings), and 3858.6 for syphilis (15 001 screenings). The median age was 39 years (interquartile range [IQR] 32-47), 93.8% (n = 3664) identified as men who have sex with men (MSM). The incidence was 22.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.3-24.4) per 100 person-years for gonorrhoea, 26.3 (95% CI 24.7-28.0) for chlamydia, and 4.4 (95% CI 3.8-5.1) for syphilis. Yearly incidence rates decreased between 2019 (all bacterial STIs: 81.6; 95% CI 59.1-109.9) and 2022 (all bacterial STIs: 49.8; 95% CI 44.6-55.3). Participants reporting chemsex substance use were at higher risk of incident STIs, as were those reporting multiple sexual partners. Younger age was associated with a higher risk of gonorrhoea and chlamydia., Conclusions: Incidence rates of bacterial STIs decreased over time. Young MSM, those with multiple partners, and those using chemsex substances were at increased risk of STIs., (© 2023 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.)

Background: People with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (PWH) are frequently coinfected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and at risk for progressing from asymptomatic latent TB infection (LTBI) to active tuberculosis (TB). LTBI testing and preventive treatment (TB specific prevention) are recommended, but its efficacy in low transmission settings is unclear., Methods: We included PWH enrolled from 1988 to 2022 in the Swiss HIV Cohort study (SHCS). The outcome, incident TB, was defined as TB ≥6 months after SHCS inclusion. We assessed its risk factors using a time-updated hazard regression, modeled the potential impact of modifiable factors on TB incidence, performed mediation analysis to assess underlying causes of time trends, and evaluated preventive measures., Results: In 21 528 PWH, LTBI prevalence declined from 15.1% in 2001% to 4.6% in 2021. Incident TB declined from 90.8 cases/1000 person-years in 1989 to 0.1 in 2021. A positive LTBI test showed a higher risk for incident TB (hazard ratio [HR] 9.8, 5.8-16.5) but only 10.5% of PWH with incident TB were tested positive. Preventive treatment reduced the risk in LTBI test positive PWH for active TB (relative risk reduction, 28.1%, absolute risk reduction 0.9%). On population level, the increase of CD4 T-cells and reduction of HIV viral load were the main driver of TB decrease., Conclusions: TB specific prevention is effective in selected patient groups. On a population level, control of HIV-1 remains the most important factor for incident TB reduction. Accurate identification of PWH at highest risk for TB is an unmet clinical need., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . A. C. received grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences for unrelated research. R. D. K. received grants from Gilead Sciences and National Institutes of Health (NIH) for unrelated research. D. L. B. received honoraria for working on the advisory board of Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. D. L. B. received honoraria for presentations from Gilead Sciences and Merck. E. B. received grants from MSD for unrelated research. E. B. received payments for travel reimbursement from ViiV, MSD, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, and Abbvie. E. B. received honoraria for working on the advisory board of ViiV, MSD, Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, AstraZeneca, and Ely Lilly. H. H. H. received honoraria for working on the advisory board of AiCuris, Merck, Vera Dx, and Molecular Partners. H. H. H. received honoraria for presentations from Merck, Gilead Sciences, Biotest, and Vera Dx. J. N. received honoraria for presentations from Oxford Immunotec and ViiV. H. F. G. received honoraria for working on the advisory board of Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). H. F. G. received payments for travel reimbursements from Gilead Sciences. H. F. G. received grants from NIH, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, and Gilead Sciences. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: The widespread use of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir in first-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) might facilitate emerging resistance. The DTG RESIST study combined data from HIV cohorts to examine patterns of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and identify risk factors for dolutegravir resistance., Methods: We included cohorts with INSTI resistance data from two collaborations (ART Cohort Collaboration, International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS in Southern Africa), and the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort. Eight cohorts from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Switzerland, South Africa, and the UK contributed data on individuals who were viraemic on dolutegravir-based ART and underwent genotypic resistance testing. Individuals with unknown dolutegravir initiation date were excluded. Resistance levels were categorised using the Stanford algorithm. We identified risk factors for resistance using mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression models., Findings: We included 599 people with genotypic resistance testing on dolutegravir-based ART between May 22, 2013, and Dec 20, 2021. Most had HIV-1 subtype B (n=351, 59%), a third had been exposed to first-generation INSTIs (n=193, 32%), 70 (12%) were on dolutegravir dual therapy, and 18 (3%) were on dolutegravir monotherapy. INSTI DRMs were detected in 86 (14%) individuals; 20 (3%) had more than one mutation. Most (n=563, 94%) were susceptible to dolutegravir, seven (1%) had potential low, six (1%) low, 17 (3%) intermediate, and six (1%) high-level dolutegravir resistance. The risk of dolutegravir resistance was higher on dolutegravir monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 34·1, 95% CI 9·93-117) and dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual therapy (aOR 9·21, 2·20-38·6) compared with combination ART, and in the presence of potential low or low (aOR 5·23, 1·32-20·7) or intermediate or high-level (aOR 13·4, 4·55-39·7) nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance., Interpretation: Among people with viraemia on dolutegravir-based ART, INSTI DRMs and dolutegravir resistance were rare. NRTI resistance substantially increased the risk of dolutegravir resistance, which is of concern, notably in resource-limited settings. Monitoring is important to prevent resistance at the individual and population level and ensure the long-term sustainability of ART., Funding: US National Institutes of Health, Swiss National Science Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SMI reports grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism for the work of ART-CC (payment to institution). AvS reports funding from the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport for the maintenance of the ATHENA database, and grant funding from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (payment to institution). MJG reports honoraria as an ad-hoc member of HIV National Advisory Boards from Merck, Gilead Sciences, and ViiV, and a leadership position as Medical Director of the Southern Alberta HIV Clinic. CAS has received funding from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Janssen-Cilag for membership of Data Safety and Monitoring Committees and Advisory Committees and for preparation of educational material. HFG has received personal fees from Merck, Gilead Sciences, ViiV, GSK, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis, as an advisor or consultant or for Data Safety Monitoring Board membership, and has received a travel grant from Gilead. JACS reports funding for research in this publication from the NIH National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (payment to institution), UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (payment to institution), and the University of Bern (payment to institution). RL reports support for research in this publication by the NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under award number R01AI152772, and support from the NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under award number R01AI167699 for a separate project pertaining to HIV treatment strategies. ME reports funding for research in this publication from the Swiss National Science Foundation (32FP30-18949) and the NIH (Cooperative Agreement AI069924 and R01 AI152772-01). RDK reports funding for research in this publication from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and reports grant funding from Gilead Sciences. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Serological data on endemic human coronaviruses (HCoVs) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in southern Africa are scarce. Here, we report on (1) endemic HCoV seasonality, (2) SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence, and (3) correlates of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and strength of SARS-CoV-2 and endemic HCoV serological responses among adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)., Methods: Plasma samples were collected from February 2020 to July 2021 within an HIV cohort in Lesotho. We used the AntiBody CORonavirus Assay (ABCORA) multiplex immunoassay to measure antibody responses to endemic HCoV (OC43, HKU1, NL63, and 229E) and SARS-CoV-2 antigens., Results: Results for 3173 samples from 1403 adults were included. Serological responses against endemic HCoVs increased over time and peaked in winter and spring. SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity reached >35% among samples collected in early 2021 and was associated with female sex, obesity, working outside the home, and recent tiredness or fever. Positive correlations were observed between the strength of response to endemic HCoVs and to SARS-CoV-2 and between older age or obesity and the immunoglobulin G response to SARS-CoV-2., Conclusions: These results add to our understanding of the impact of biological, clinical, and social/behavioral factors on serological responses to coronaviruses in southern Africa., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . J. A. B. has received funds from the University of Basel Research Fund. I. A. A. has received honoraria from MSD and Sanofi, a travel grant from Gilead Sciences, and a grant from Promedica Foundation. A. T. has received honoraria from Roche Diagnostics for consultant activity; grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, Pandemiefonds, University of Zurich Foundation; and unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences. N. D. L. reports receiving travel grants to attend scientific conferences from Gilead Sciences and grants from SNSF, Fondation Botnar, the Botnar Center for Child Health, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, and Moritz Straus Stiftung. R. D. K. has received grants from SNSF, the National Institutes of Health, and Gilead Sciences. H. F. G. reports having received honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV, GSK, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis for serving on data and safety monitoring boards and/or advisory boards and has received a travel grant from Gilead Sciences. In addition, he has received grants from SNSF, the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, the Yvonne Jacob Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health and unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences, all paid to the institution. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Starting combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) during primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection results in a smaller HIV-1 latent reservoir, reduced immune activation, and less viral diversity compared to starting cART during chronic infection. We report results of a 4-year study designed to determine whether these properties would allow sustained virological suppression after simplification of cART to dolutegravir (DTG) monotherapy., Methods: EARLY-SIMPLIFIED is a randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial. People with HIV (PWH) who started cART <180 days after a documented primary HIV-1 infection with suppressed viral load were randomized (2:1) to DTG monotherapy with 50 mg daily or continuation of cART. The primary endpoints were the proportion of PWH with viral failure at 48, 96, 144, and 192 weeks; noninferiority margin was 10%. After 96 weeks, randomization was lifted and patients were permitted to switch treatment groups as desired., Results: Of 101 PWH randomized, 68 were assigned to DTG monotherapy and 33 to cART. At week 96 in the per-protocol population, 64/64 (100%) showed virological response in the DTG monotherapy group versus 30/30 (100%) in the cART group (difference, 0.00%; upper bound of 95% confidence interval 6.22%). This demonstrated noninferiority of DTG monotherapy at the prespecified level. At week 192, the study end, no virological failure occurred in either group during 13 308 and 4897 person weeks of follow-up for the DTG monotherapy (n = 80) and cART groups, respectively., Conclusions: This trial suggests that early cART initiation during primary HIV infection allows sustained virological suppression after switching to DTG monotherapy., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. H. F. G. has received grants from the SNF, SHCS, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, University of Zurich's Clinical Research Priority Program, viral disease; Zurich Primary HIV Infection, Systems.X, National Institutes of Health, Gilead Sciences, and Roche; and personal fees from Merck, Gilead Sciences, ViiV, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, GSK, and Novartis, for consultancy or DSMB membership and a travel grant from Gilead. D. L. B. reports Advisory Board honoraria paid to himself as a consultant for Gilead, ViiV, and Merck; and travel support from ViiV. K. J. M. has received travel grants and advisory board honoraria from Gilead Sciences (DACH Virology) and ViiV; and the University of Zurich received unrestricted research grants from Gilead Science and Novartis for a study for which K. J. M. serves as principal investigator. B. H. reports grants from Gilead Science, Federal Office of Public Health, and Swiss National Science Foundation (paid to institution); honoraria for a speaking engagement from ViiV Healthcare; travel support from Gilead Science; participation on Advisory Boards for Gilead Science and ViiV Healthcare; and support for clinic equipment to institution from Gilead Science and ViiV Healthcare. R. D. K. reports grants or contracts from Swiss National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health and Gilead Sciences. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Understanding the balance between epitope shielding and accessibility on HIV-1 envelope (Env) trimers is essential to guide immunogen selection for broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) based vaccines. To investigate the antigenic space of Env immunogens, we created a strategy based on synthetic, high diversity, Designed Ankyrin Repeat Protein (DARPin) libraries. We show that DARPin Antigenicity Analysis (DANA), a purely in vitro screening tool, has the capability to extrapolate relevant information of antigenic properties of Env immunogens. DANA screens of stabilized, soluble Env trimers revealed that stronger trimer stabilization led to the selection of highly mutated DARPins with length variations and framework mutations mirroring observations made for bnAbs. By mimicking heterotypic prime-boost immunization regimens, DANA may be used to select immunogen combinations that favor the selection of trimer-reactive binders. This positions DANA as a versatile strategy for distilling fundamental antigenic features of immunogens, complementary to preclinical immunogenicity testing., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

• Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance has implications for antiretroviral treatment strategies and for containing the HIV pandemic because the development of HIV drug resistance leads to the requirement for antiretroviral drugs that may be less effective, less well-tolerated, and more expensive than those used in first-line regimens.  • HIV drug resistance studies are designed to determine which HIV mutations are selected by antiretroviral drugs and, in turn, how these mutations affect antiretroviral drug susceptibility and response to future antiretroviral treatment regimens.  • Such studies collectively form a vital knowledge base essential for monitoring global HIV drug resistance trends, interpreting HIV genotypic tests, and updating HIV treatment guidelines.  • Although HIV drug resistance data are collected in many studies, such data are often not publicly shared, prompting the need to recommend best practices to encourage and standardize HIV drug resistance data sharing.  • In contrast to other viruses, sharing HIV sequences from phylogenetic studies of transmission dynamics requires additional precautions as HIV transmission is criminalized in many countries and regions.  • Our recommendations are designed to ensure that the data that contribute to HIV drug resistance knowledge will be available without undue hardship to those publishing HIV drug resistance studies and without risk to people living with HIV., Competing Interests: SJL has received research funding paid to her institution from Gilead Sciences. VC has received travel grants, advisor honorarium and research grant from Merck Sharp & Dohme, ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences. FCS has been a consultant to ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences and Merck Sharp & Dohme, and received research grants paid to her institution from Gilead Sciences. CC has received honoraria and conference travels grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Gilead Sciences, and ViiV Healthcare. DD has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards and conference travel grants ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. LF has received NIH research grants paid to her institution. RKG has received honoraria for participation on advisory boards from Gilead-Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline. RDK has received research grants from Gilead Sciences paid to his institution. DRK is a consultant to and has received honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Roche, and ViiV Healthcare. DRK has also received honoraria from Gilead for expert testimony and speaking fees from Gilead Sciences and Janssen Pharmaceuticals and has received research support paid to his institution from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare. AGM received travel grants, honoraria and study grants from Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, ViiV Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, and Astra Zeneca. RP has received research grants paid to his institution from Merck Sharp & Dohme and ViiV Healthcare and consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, Atea Pharmaceuticals, Roche, and Shinogi Pharmaceuticals. PCS is a co-founder of, shareholder in, and consultant to Sherlock Biosciences and Delve Bio, and a board member of and shareholder in Danaher Corporation. JMS has received research support, honorarium, or consulting fees from the following: Abbvie, Merck, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Tibotec-Janssen, Teva, Virology Education and ViiV Healthcare. He has received travel support and stipends for advisory work for the World Health Organization. WS has received speaking honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, ViiV Healthcare, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Abbott Pharmaceuticals. AMJW has received research support paid to her institution by Gilead Sciences and has consulted for Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare. JOW receives funding from grants and contracts to his institution from NIH and CDC pertaining to work on HIV molecular epidemiology. HFG has received grants paid to his institution from Gilead Sciences, and Roche, and has received consulting fees from Merck, Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis. RWS has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards from Gilead Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline and speaking honoraria from Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare., (Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.)

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, mainly Enterococcus faecium (VREfm), are causing nosocomial infections and outbreaks. Bacterial typing methods are used to assist in outbreak investigations. Most of them, especially genotypic methods like multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), whole genome sequencing (WGS), or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, are quite expensive and time-consuming. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy assesses the biochemical composition of bacteria, such as carboxyl groups in polysaccharides. It is an affordable technique and has a faster turnaround time. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate FT-IR spectroscopy for VREfm outbreak investigations. Basic performance requirements like reproducibility and the effects of incubation time were assessed in distinct sample sets. After determining a FT-IR spectroscopy cut-off range, the clustering agreement between FT-IR and WGS within a retrospective (n: 92 isolates) and a prospective outbreak (n: 15 isolates) was investigated. For WGS an average nucleotide identity (ANI) cut-off score of 0.999 was used. Basic performance analysis showed reproducible results. Moreover, FT-IR spectroscopy readouts showed a high agreement with WGS-ANI analysis in clinical outbreak investigations (V-measure 0.772 for the retrospective and 1.000 for the prospective outbreak). FT-IR spectroscopy had a higher discriminatory power than MLST in the outbreak investigations. After determining cut-off values to achieve optimal resolution, FT-IR spectroscopy is a promising technique to assist in outbreak investigation as an affordable, easy-to-use tool with a turnaround time of less than one day. IMPORTANCE Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, mainly Enterococcus faecium (VREfm), are a frequent cause of nosocomial outbreaks. Several bacterial typing methods are used to track transmissions and investigate outbreaks, whereby genome-based techniques are used as a gold standard. Current methods are either expensive, time-consuming, or both. Additionally, often, specifically trained staff needs to be available. This study provides insight into the use of Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, an affordable, easy-to-use tool with a short turnaround time as a typing method for VREfm. By assessing clinical samples, this work demonstrates promising results for species discrimination and reproducibility. FT-IR spectrosopy shows a high level of agreement in the analysis of VREfm outbreaks in comparison with whole genome sequencing-based methods.

Background: Bone mineral density (BMD) loss may be accelerated in people with HIV (PLWH). It is unknown whether a polygenic risk score (PRS) is associated with low BMD in PLWH., Methods: Swiss HIV Cohort Study participants of self-reported European descent underwent ≥2 per-protocol dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements ≥2 years apart (2011-2020). Univariable and multivariable odds ratios (ORs) for DXA-defined osteoporosis were based on traditional and HIV-related risk factors and a genome-wide PRS built from 9413 single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with low BMD in the general population. Controls were free from osteoporosis/osteopenia on all DXA measurements., Results: We included 438 participants: 149 with osteoporosis and 289 controls (median age, 53 years; 82% male, 95% with suppressed HIV RNA). Participants with unfavorable osteoporosis PRS (top vs bottom quintile) had univariable and multivariable-adjusted osteoporosis ORs of 4.76 (95% CI, 2.34-9.67) and 4.13 (1.86-9.18), respectively. For comparison, hepatitis C seropositivity, 5-year tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure, and parent history of hip fracture yielded univariable osteoporosis ORs of 2.26 (1.37-3.74), 1.84 (1.40-2.43), and 1.54 (0.82-2.9)., Conclusions: In PLWH in Switzerland, osteoporosis was independently associated with a BMD-associated PRS after adjustment for established risk factors, including exposure to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. P. E. T.’s institution reports grants and other fees from Gilead, Merck, and ViiV, outside the submitted work. A. C. has received unrestricted educational and research grants from MSD, Gilead, and ViiV. B. L. received personal fees from Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland, during the conduct of the study and reports personal fees from Gilead and ViiV, outside the submitted work. C. M. has received speaker honoraria from ViiV, MSD, and Pfizer unrelated to this work. E. B.’s institution reports fees for advisory board participation from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, MSD, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, and Ely Lilly and travel grants from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, MSD, and Abbvie, outside the submitted work. H. F. G. reports honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV, GSK, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis for serving on data and safety monitoring and/or advisory boards and has received a travel grant from Gilead Sciences. In addition, he has received grants from the Yvonne Jacob Foundation and unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences, all paid to the institution. G. W. reports support to his home institution for advisory boards and/or travel grants from MSD, Gilead Sciences, and Abbvie and an unrestricted research grant from Gilead Sciences; all remuneration was provided outside the submitted work. I. C. S.'s institution received a lecture fee from ViiV, outside the submitted work. R. D. K. has received personal fees from Gilead Sciences, outside the submitted work. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Genotypic resistance testing (GRT) is routinely performed upon diagnosis of HIV-1 infection or during virological failure using plasma viral RNA. An alternative source for GRT could be cellular HIV-1 DNA., Objectives: A substantial number of participants in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) never received GRT. We applied a method that enables access to the near full-length proviral HIV-1 genome without requiring detectable viraemia., Methods: Nine hundred and sixty-two PBMC specimens were received. Our two-step nested PCR protocol was applied to generate two overlapping long-range amplicons of the HIV-1 genome, sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and analysed by MinVar, a pipeline to detect drug resistance mutations (DRMs)., Results: Six hundred and eighty-one (70.8%) of the samples were successfully amplified, sequenced and analysed by MinVar. Only partial information of the pol gene was contained in 82/681 (12%), probably due to naturally occurring deletions in the proviral sequence. All common HIV-1 subtypes were successfully sequenced. We detected at least one major DRM at high frequency (≥15%) in 331/599 (55.3%) individuals. Excluding APOBEC-signature (G-to-A mutation) DRMs, 145/599 (24.2%) individuals carried at least one major DRM. RT-inhibitor DRMs were most prevalent. The experienced time on ART was significantly longer in DRM carriers (P = 0.001) independent of inclusion or exclusion of APOBEC-signature DRMs., Conclusions: We successfully applied a reliable and efficient method to analyse near full-length HIV-1 proviral DNA and investigated DRMs in individuals with undetectable or low viraemia. Additionally, our data underscore the need for new computational tools to exclude APOBEC-related hypermutated NGS sequence reads for reporting DRMs., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to reduce HCV mortality, but estimates are difficult to obtain. We aimed to identify electronic health records of individuals with HCV infection, and assess mortality and morbidity. We applied electronic phenotyping strategies on routinely collected data from patients hospitalized at a tertiary referral hospital in Switzerland between 2009 and 2017. Individuals with HCV infection were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes, prescribed medications and laboratory results (antibody, PCR, antigen or genotype test). Controls were selected using propensity score methods (matching by age, sex, intravenous drug use, alcohol abuse and HIV co-infection). Main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and attributable mortality (in HCV cases and study population). The non-matched dataset included records from 165,972 individuals (287,255 hospital stays). Electronic phenotyping identified 2285 stays with evidence of HCV infection (1677 individuals). Propensity score matching yielded 6855 stays (2285 with HCV, 4570 controls). In-hospital mortality was higher in HCV cases (RR 2.10, 95%CI 1.64 to 2.70). Among those infected, 52.5% of the deaths were attributable to HCV (95%CI 38.9 to 63.1). When cases were matched, the fraction of deaths attributable to HCV was 26.9% (HCV prevalence: 33%), whilst in the non-matched dataset, it was 0.92% (HCV prevalence: 0.8%). In this study, HCV infection was strongly associated with increased mortality. Our methodology may be used to monitor the efforts towards meeting the WHO elimination targets and underline the importance of electronic cohorts as a basis for national longitudinal surveillance., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Viral Hepatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Although sex and gender are recognized as major determinants of health and immunity, their role is rarely considered in clinical practice and public health. We identified six bottlenecks preventing the inclusion of sex and gender considerations from basic science to clinical practice, precision medicine and public health policies. (i) A terminology-related bottleneck, linked to the definitions of sex and gender themselves, and the lack of consensus on how to evaluate gender. (ii) A data-related bottleneck, due to gaps in sex-disaggregated data, data on trans/non-binary people and gender identity. (iii) A translational bottleneck, limited by animal models and the underrepresentation of gender minorities in biomedical studies. (iv) A statistical bottleneck, with inappropriate statistical analyses and results interpretation. (v) An ethical bottleneck posed by the underrepresentation of pregnant people and gender minorities in clinical studies. (vi) A structural bottleneck, as systemic bias and discriminations affect not only academic research but also decision makers. We specify guidelines for researchers, scientific journals, funding agencies and academic institutions to address these bottlenecks. Following such guidelines will support the development of more efficient and equitable care strategies for all., Competing Interests: K.A.-P.'s institution has received travel grants and advisory fees from MSD, Gilead and ViiV healthcare unrelated to this work. I.A.A. has received travel grants and advisory fees from Gilead and Sanofi unrelated to this work. R.D.K. has received research fundings from Gilead unrelated to this work., (© 2023 The Authors.)