Search

The mouse gene coding for ribosomal protein L23 (Rpl23 )has been fully sequenced,including 580 bp of the 5 ) upstream region.The 5-kb gene comprises 5 exons and con- tains an unusually long (3,153 bp)third intron.The gene was mapped to the distal region of mouse chromosome 11,homolo- gous to human chromosome 17q21 .q22. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mammary gland development starts in utero with one or several pairs of mammary rudiments (MRs) budding from the surface ectodermal component of the mammalian embryonic skin. Mice develop five pairs, numbered MR1 to MR5 from pectoral to inguinal position. We have previously shown that Gli3(Xt-J/Xt-J) mutant embryos, which lack the transcription factor Gli3, do not form MR3 and MR5. We show here that two days after the MRs emerge, Gli3(Xt-J/Xt-J) MR1 is 20% smaller, and Gli3(Xt-J/Xt-J) MR2 and MR4 are 50% smaller than their wild type (wt) counterparts. Moreover, while wt MRs sink into the underlying dermis, Gli3(Xt-J/Xt-J) MR4 and MR2 protrude outwardly, to different extents. To understand why each of these five pairs of functionally identical organs has its own, distinct response to the absence of Gli3, we determined which cellular mechanisms regulate growth of the individual MRs, and whether and how Gli3 regulates these mechanisms. We found a 5.5 to 10.7-fold lower cell proliferation rate in wt MRs compared to their adjacent surface ectoderm, indicating that MRs do not emerge or grow via locally enhanced cell proliferation. Cell-tracing experiments showed that surface ectodermal cells are recruited toward the positions where MRs emerge, and contribute to MR growth during at least two days. During the second day of MR development, peripheral cells within the MRs undergo hypertrophy, which also contributes to MR growth. Limited apoptotic cell death counterbalances MR growth. The relative contribution of each of these processes varies among the five MRs. Furthermore, each of these processes is impaired in the absence of Gli3, but to different extents in each MR. This differential involvement of Gli3 explains the variation in phenotype among Gli3(Xt-J/Xt-J) MRs, and may help to understand the variation in numbers and positions of mammary glands among mammals.

Little is known about the regulation of cell fate decisions that lead to the formation of five pairs of mammary placodes in the surface ectoderm of the mouse embryo. We have previously shown that fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) is required for the formation of mammary placodes 1, 2, 3 and 5. Here, we have found that Fgf10 is expressed only in the somites underlying placodes 2 and 3, in gradients across and within these somites. To test whether somitic FGF10 is required for the formation of these two placodes, we analyzed a number of mutants with different perturbations of somitic Fgf10 gradients for the presence of WNT signals and ectodermal multilayering, markers for mammary line and placode formation. The mammary line is displaced dorsally, and formation of placode 3 is impaired in Pax3ILZ/ILZ mutants, which do not form ventral somitic buds. Mammary line formation is impaired and placode 3 is absent in Gli3Xt-J/Xt-J and hypomorphic Fgf10 mutants, in which the somitic Fgf10 gradient is shortened dorsally and less overall Fgf10 is expressed, respectively. Recombinant FGF10 rescued mammogenesis in Fgf10(-/-) and Gli3Xt-J/Xt-J flanks. We correlate increasing levels of somitic FGF10 with progressive maturation of the surface ectoderm, and show that full expression of somitic Fgf10, co-regulated by GLI3, is required for the anteroposterior pattern in which the flank ectoderm acquires a mammary epithelial identity. We propose that the intra-somitic Fgf10 gradient, together with ventral elongation of the somites, determines the correct dorsoventral position of mammary epithelium along the flank.

Lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF1), a nuclear mediator of Wnt signaling, is required for the formation of organs that depend on inductive interactions between epithelial and mesenchymal tissues. In previous tissue recombination experiments with normal and Lef1(-/-) tooth germs, we found that the effect of LEF1 expression in the epithelium is tissue nonautonomous and transferred to the subjacent mesenchyme. Here we examine the molecular basis for LEF1 function and find that the epithelium of the developmentally arrested Lef1(-/-) tooth rudiments fails to express Fgf4, Shh, and Bmp4, but not Wnt10a. We identify the Fgf4 gene as a direct transcriptional target for LEF1 and show that beads soaked with recombinant FGF4 protein can fully overcome the developmental arrest of Lef1(-/-) tooth germs. In addition, we find that FGF4 beads induce rapidly the expression of Fgf3 in dental mesenchyme and that both epithelial and mesenchymal FGF proteins induce the delayed expression of Shh in the epithelium. Taken together, these data indicate that a single target of LEF1 can account for the function of LEF1 in tooth development and for a relay of a Wnt signal reception to a cascade of FGF signaling activities, allowing for a sequential and reciprocal communication between epithelium and mesenchyme.

Development of the mammary glands is initiated in the embryo but the major part of their development occurs in the adult. While development in puberty and pregnancy is dependent on hormones, prenatal and early postnatal development appear to progress autonomously. Mutual and reciprocal epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are critical for both phases of development. Specific steps such as the formation of the bud, the first appearance of hormone receptors, formation of the primary sprout and ductal elongation have been shown to be governed by epithelial-mesenchymal signaling. In recent years, some of the signaling molecules that are required in these processes have been identified through gene inactivation. We discuss the potential role of these factors in mediating growth and differentiation. In addition we provide evidence that mammary epithelial cells from late embryonic stages are already capable of synthesizing milk proteins when subjected to appropriate hormonal stimulation.

Cell type-specific differences in the transcriptional control of the mouse gene coding for the alpha 1 chain of collagen type I (Col1a1) have been revealed previously with the help of the Mov13 mouse strain which carries a retroviral insert in the first intron of the gene. Transcription of this mutant Col1a1 allele is completely blocked in all mesodermal cell types tested so far, with the exception of the odontoblast where it is expressed at an apparently normal rate (Kratochwil et al. [1989] Cell 57:807-816). To define the tissue specificity of the mutant allele more precisely, we have now studied its expression in osteoblasts, another skeletogenic cell type which, like odontoblasts, produces high amounts of collagen I. Evidence for transcription of the Mov13 allele was obtained by in situ hybridization in homozygous (M/M) and heterozygous (M/+) bone tissue, in grafts as well as in vivo. The presence of mouse collagen I and the development of bone tissue were demonstrated in M/M skeletal elements grown on the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). Further support for expression of the mutant gene was obtained from two 16 day M/M fetuses in vivo. Bone tissue of diverse embryological origin (vertebrae and ribs of somitic origin, long bones derived from lateral plate, calvariae from head paraxial mesoderm, and mandibulae from head neural crest) expresses the mutant allele. However, in situ hybridization experiments indicate that only a subpopulation of osteoblasts is capable of transcribing it at a high rate, resulting in severe impairment of bone development in grafts and in vivo. Therefore, osteoblasts, in comparison to odontoblasts and fibroblast-like cells, assume an intermediate position with respect to transcription of the Mov13 allele. We suggest that this diversity in the utilization of the mutant collagen gene reflects cell type-specific differences in the transcriptional regulation of the wild type (wt) Col1a1 gene.

Interstitial collagens are thought to mediate epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during organogenesis. We have used the collagen I-deficient mouse mutant Mov13 to directly investigate the role of this major representative of the interstitial collagens in epithelial branching morphogenesis. Since homozygous embryos die at midgestation, we have studied the development of organ rudiments from Mov13 homozygous (i.e., collagen I-deficient), heterozygous, and wild-type embryos in culture. Development of all explants, including lung, kidney, salivary glands, pancreas, and skin, was normal by light and electron microscopic criteria and was independent of the genotype of the donor embryo. Metabolic labeling and immune staining verified the complete absence of collagen I in homozygous explants while revealing substantial production of collagens III and V in explants of all three genotypes. These results indicate either that collagen I has no role in the morphogenesis of these organs, or that its function is shared, or can be substituted for, by other fibrillar collagens.

The collagen I-deficient mouse mutant (Mov13 - an embryonic recessive lethal) was used to investigate the function of this major constituent of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in organ development. All epithelial-mesenchymal organs tested as explants (lung, kidney, pancreas, salivary glands, skin) developed normally and, in particular, showed typical branching morphogenesis in the absence of collagen I. It is concluded that the ECM of these organs can organize for proper developmental function in the absence of the major interstitial collagen, but a possible morphogenetic function of other fibrillar collagens (types III and V) cannot be excluded. The only insufficiencies in the mutant were seen in the cornea where deposition and organization of the collagenous stroma was highly inadequate; but even there, development and migration of cells proceeded normally. In summary, the results indicate that 'cellular' development in epithelial-mesenchymal organs (including growth, morphogenesis, and differentiation) does not depend on collagen I.

We demonstrate the presence of a high affinity androgen-binding site in the embryonic mouse mammary gland, and describe its appearance and development from the initial formation of the gland bud (day 12) through the androgen-responsive stage (day 14) until term (day 19). Binding assays were done on entire organ rudiments exposed to the ligand [( 3H] testosterone, [3H]5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone, or [3H]methyltrienolone) in vitro, and receptor levels are expressed per gland. In competition experiments, the binding site shows a ligand specificity of a typical rodent androgen receptor. Scatchard analysis yielded a figure of 90-100 million binding sites for one 14-day gland, or approximately 30,000 per target cell. The apparent dissociation constant Kd for ligand binding by the intact tissue was between 0.55 and 0.75 X 10(-9) M. The first binding sites become detectable at the time of mammary bud formation (day 12); their number increases about 20-fold towards the responsive stage (day 14), and they persist at high levels at least until birth. The loss of androgen responsiveness on day 15 is neither accompanied by a loss of receptors nor by a change of their binding affinity.

In the androgen-induced destruction of the mammary rudiments of 14 day male mouse fetuses, the hormone acts directly only on the mesenchyme, which then condenses around the epithelial gland buds and--in some unknown way--causes their necrosis. In this paper we report that an organ-specific but not species-specific influence of mammary epithelium on the surrounding mesenchyme is required to allow its response to the hormone. This epithelial "signal" has a very short range; its transmission may depend on contact between the two tissues. The requirement for epithelial contact, however, may only exist for those mesenchymal cells that initiate the reaction at the tissue interface, whereas the hormone must act on all the cells that eventually form the mesenchymal condensation. Mesenchyme of the mammary region only is competent to produce this testosterone response. All the mesenchymal cells required for the reaction are already present at the epithelial surface at least 2 days before the hormone response occurs, and our experiments exclude the participation of any cells that could have arrived at the mammary bud through migration from more distant sites.