Search

In Business Process Management (BPM), effectively comprehending process models is crucial yet poses significant challenges, particularly as organizations scale and processes become more complex. This paper introduces a novel framework utilizing the advanced capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance the interpretability of complex process models. We present different methods for abstracting business process models into a format accessible to LLMs, and we implement advanced prompting strategies specifically designed to optimize LLM performance within our framework. Additionally, we present a tool, AIPA, that implements our proposed framework and allows for conversational process querying. We evaluate our framework and tool by i) an automatic evaluation comparing different LLMs, model abstractions, and prompting strategies and ii) a user study designed to assess AIPA's effectiveness comprehensively. Results demonstrate our framework's ability to improve the accessibility and interpretability of process models, pioneering new pathways for integrating AI technologies into the BPM field.

A stable cutset in a graph $G$ is a set $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that vertices of $S$ are pairwise non-adjacent and such that $G-S$ is disconnected, i.e., it is both stable (or independent) set and a cutset (or separator). Unlike general cutsets, it is $NP$-complete to determine whether a given graph $G$ has any stable cutset. Recently, Rauch et al.\ [FCT 2023] gave a number of fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms, time $f(k)\cdot |V(G)|^c$, for Stable Cutset under a variety of parameters $k$ such as the size of a (given) dominating set, the size of an odd cycle transversal, or the deletion distance to $P_5$-free graphs. Earlier works imply FPT algorithms relative to clique-width and relative to solution size. We complement these findings by giving the first results on the existence of polynomial kernelizations for \stablecutset, i.e., efficient preprocessing algorithms that return an equivalent instance of size polynomial in the parameter value. Under the standard assumption that $NP\nsubseteq coNP/poly$, we show that no polynomial kernelization is possible relative to the deletion distance to a single path, generalizing deletion distance to various graph classes, nor by the size of a (given) dominating set. We also show that under the same assumption no polynomial kernelization is possible relative to solution size, i.e., given $(G,k)$ answering whether there is a stable cutset of size at most $k$. On the positive side, we show polynomial kernelizations for parameterization by modulators to a single clique, to a cluster or a co-cluster graph, and by twin cover., Comment: For Dieter Kratsch on his 65th birthday

The rapid development of cutting-edge technologies, the increasing volume of data and also the availability and processability of new types of data sources has led to a paradigm shift in data-based management and decision-making. Since business processes are at the core of organizational work, these developments heavily impact BPM as a crucial success factor for organizations. In view of this emerging potential, data-driven business process management has become a relevant and vibrant research area. Given the complexity and interdisciplinarity of the research field, this position paper therefore presents research insights regarding data-driven BPM., Comment: position paper, 34 pages, 10 figures

Recently, Bojikian and Kratsch [2023] have presented a novel approach to tackle connectivity problems parameterized by clique-width ($\operatorname{cw}$), based on counting small representations of partial solutions (modulo two). Using this technique, they were able to get a tight bound for the Steiner Tree problem, answering an open question posed by Hegerfeld and Kratsch [ESA, 2023]. We use the same technique to solve the Connected Odd Cycle Transversal problem in time $\mathcal{O}^*(12^{\operatorname{cw}})$. We define a new representation of partial solutions by separating the connectivity requirement from the 2-colorability requirement of this problem. Moreover, we prove that our result is tight by providing SETH-based lower bound excluding algorithms with running time $\mathcal{O}^*((12-\epsilon)^{\operatorname{lcw}})$ even when parameterized by linear clique-width. This answers the second question posed by Hegerfeld and Kratsch in the same paper.

Recently, Hegerfeld and Kratsch [ESA 2023] obtained the first tight algorithmic results for hard connectivity problems parameterized by clique-width. Concretely, they gave one-sided error Monte-Carlo algorithms that given a $k$-clique-expression solve Connected Vertex Cover in time $6^kn^{O(1)}$ and Connected Dominating Set in time $5^kn^{O(1)}$. Moreover, under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH) these results were showed to be tight. However, they leave open several important benchmark problems, whose complexity relative to treewidth had been settled by Cygan et al. [SODA 2011 & TALG 2018]. Among which is the Steiner Tree problem. As a key obstruction they point out the exponential gap between the rank of certain compatibility matrices, which is often used for algorithms, and the largest triangular submatrix therein, which is essential for current lower bound methods. Concretely, for Steiner Tree the $GF(2)$-rank is $4^k$, while no triangular submatrix larger than $3^k$ was known. This yields time $4^kn^{O(1)}$, while the obtainable impossibility of time $(3-\varepsilon)^kn^{O(1)}$ under SETH was already known relative to pathwidth. We close this gap by showing that Steiner Tree can be solved in time $3^kn^{O(1)}$ given a $k$-clique-expression. Hence, for all parameters between cutwidth and clique-width it has the same tight complexity. We first show that there is a ``representative submatrix'' of GF(2)-rank $3^k$ (ruling out larger triangular submatrices). At first glance, this only allows to count (modulo 2) the number of representations of valid solutions, but not the number of solutions (even if a unique solution exists). We show how to overcome this problem by isolating a unique representative of a unique solution, if one exists. We believe that our approach will be instrumental for settling further open problems in this research program.

In this work, we study two natural generalizations of clique-width introduced by Martin F\"urer. Multi-clique-width (mcw) allows every vertex to hold multiple labels [ITCS 2017], while for fusion-width (fw) we have a possibility to merge all vertices of a certain label [LATIN 2014]. F\"urer has shown that both parameters are upper-bounded by treewidth thus making them more appealing from an algorithmic perspective than clique-width and asked for applications of these parameters for problem solving. First, we determine the relation between these two parameters by showing that $\operatorname{mcw} \leq \operatorname{fw} + 1$. Then we show that when parameterized by multi-clique-width, many problems (e.g., Connected Dominating Set) admit algorithms with the same running time as for clique-width despite the exponential gap between these two parameters. For some problems (e.g., Hamiltonian Cycle) we show an analogous result for fusion-width: For this we present an alternative view on fusion-width by introducing so-called glue-expressions which might be interesting on their own. All algorithms obtained in this work are tight up to (Strong) Exponential Time Hypothesis., Comment: Conference version to appear at Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023)

An $\alpha$-approximate polynomial Turing kernelization is a polynomial-time algorithm that computes an $(\alpha c)$-approximate solution for a parameterized optimization problem when given access to an oracle that can compute $c$-approximate solutions to instances with size bounded by a polynomial in the parameter. Hols et al. [ESA 2020] showed that a wide array of graph problems admit a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate polynomial Turing kernelization when parameterized by the treewidth of the graph and left open whether Dominating Set also admits such a kernelization. We show that Dominating Set and several related problems parameterized by treewidth do not admit constant-factor approximate polynomial Turing kernelizations, even with respect to the much larger parameter vertex cover number, under certain reasonable complexity assumptions.On the positive side, we show that all of them do have a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate polynomial Turing kernelization for every $\varepsilon>0$ for the joint parameterization by treewidth and maximum degree, a parameter which generalizes cutwidth, for example.

We study connectivity problems from a fine-grained parameterized perspective. Cygan et al. (TALG 2022) obtained algorithms with single-exponential running time $\alpha^{tw} n^{O(1)}$ for connectivity problems parameterized by treewidth ($tw$) by introducing the cut-and-count-technique, which reduces connectivity problems to locally checkable counting problems. In addition, the bases $\alpha$ were proven to be optimal assuming the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH). As only sparse graphs may admit small treewidth, these results do not apply to graphs with dense structure. A well-known tool to capture dense structure is the modular decomposition, which recursively partitions the graph into modules whose members have the same neighborhood outside of the module. Contracting the modules yields a quotient graph describing the adjacencies between modules. Measuring the treewidth of the quotient graph yields the parameter modular-treewidth, a natural intermediate step between treewidth and clique-width. We obtain the first tight running times for connectivity problems parameterized by modular-treewidth. For some problems the obtained bounds are the same as relative to treewidth, showing that we can deal with a greater generality in input structure at no cost in complexity. We obtain the following randomized algorithms for graphs of modular-treewidth $k$, given an appropriate decomposition: Steiner Tree can be solved in time $3^k n^{O(1)}$, Connected Dominating Set can be solved in time $4^k n^{O(1)}$, Connected Vertex Cover can be solved in time $5^k n^{O(1)}$, Feedback Vertex Set can be solved in time $5^k n^{O(1)}$. The first two algorithms are tight due to known results and the last two algorithms are complemented by new tight lower bounds under SETH., Comment: 77 pages, 7 figures, shortened abstract due to character limit

The complexity of problems involving global constraints is usually much more difficult to understand than the complexity of problems only involving local constraints. A natural form of global constraints are connectivity constraints. We study connectivity problems from a fine-grained parameterized perspective. In a breakthrough, Cygan et al. (TALG 2022) first obtained algorithms with single-exponential running time c^{tw} n^O(1) for connectivity problems parameterized by treewidth by introducing the cut-and-count-technique. Furthermore, the obtained bases c were shown to be optimal under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH). However, since only sparse graphs may admit small treewidth, we lack knowledge of the fine-grained complexity of connectivity problems with respect to dense structure. The most popular graph parameter to measure dense structure is arguably clique-width, which intuitively measures how easily a graph can be constructed by repeatedly adding bicliques. Bergougnoux and Kant\'e (TCS 2019) have shown, using the rank-based approach, that also parameterized by clique-width many connectivity problems admit single-exponential algorithms. Unfortunately, the obtained running times are far from optimal under SETH. We show how to obtain optimal running times parameterized by clique-width for two benchmark connectivity problems, namely Connected Vertex Cover and Connected Dominating Set. These are the first tight results for connectivity problems with respect to clique-width and these results are obtained by developing new algorithms based on the cut-and-count-technique and novel lower bound constructions. Precisely, we show that there exist one-sided error Monte-Carlo algorithms that given a k-clique-expression solve Connected Vertex Cover in time 6^k n^O(1), and Connected Dominating Set in time 5^k n^O(1). Both results are shown to be tight under SETH., Comment: shortened abstract due to character limit; 56 pages, 11 figures

In this work we start the investigation of tight complexity bounds for connectivity problems parameterized by cutwidth assuming the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH). Van Geffen et al. posed this question for odd cycle transversal and feedback vertex set. We answer it for these two and four further problems, namely connected vertex cover, connected domintaing set, steiner tree, and connected odd cycle transversal. For the latter two problems it sufficed to prove lower bounds that match the running time inherited from parameterization by treewidth; for the others we provide faster algorithms than relative to treewidth and prove matching lower bounds. For upper bounds we first extend the idea of Groenland et al.~[STACS~2022] to solve what we call coloring-like problem. Such problems are defined by a symmetric matrix $M$ over $\mathbb{F}_2$ indexed by a set of colors. The goal is to count the number (modulo some prime $p$) of colorings of a graph such that $M$ has a $1$-entry if indexed by the colors of the end-points of any edge. We show that this problem can be solved faster if $M$ has small rank over $\mathbb{F}_p$. We apply this result to get our upper bounds for connected vertex cover and connected dominating set. The upper bounds for odd cycle transversal and feedback vertex set use a subdivision trick to get below the bounds that matrix rank would yield., Comment: 77 pages, 17 figures; accepted at STACS 2023

Many computational problems admit fast algorithms on special inputs, however, the required properties might be quite restrictive. E.g., many graph problems can be solved much faster on interval or cographs, or on graphs of small modular-width or small tree-width, than on general graphs. One challenge is to attain the greatest generality of such results, i.e., being applicable to less restrictive input classes, without losing much in terms of running time. Building on the use of algebraic expressions we present a clean and robust way of combining such homogeneous structure into more complex heterogeneous structure, and we show-case this for the combination of modular-width, tree-depth, and a natural notion of modular tree-depth. We give a generic framework for designing efficient parameterized algorithms on the created graph classes, aimed at getting competitive running times that match the homogeneous cases. To show the applicability we give efficient parameterized algorithms for Negative Cycle Detection, Vertex-Weighted All-Pairs Shortest Paths, and Triangle Counting.

We study the parameterized problem of satisfying ``almost all'' constraints of a given formula $F$ over a fixed, finite Boolean constraint language $\Gamma$, with or without weights. More precisely, for each finite Boolean constraint language $\Gamma$, we consider the following two problems. In Min SAT$(\Gamma)$, the input is a formula $F$ over $\Gamma$ and an integer $k$, and the task is to find an assignment $\alpha \colon V(F) \to \{0,1\}$ that satisfies all but at most $k$ constraints of $F$, or determine that no such assignment exists. In Weighted Min SAT$(\Gamma$), the input additionally contains a weight function $w \colon F \to \mathbb{Z}_+$ and an integer $W$, and the task is to find an assignment $\alpha$ such that (1) $\alpha$ satisfies all but at most $k$ constraints of $F$, and (2) the total weight of the violated constraints is at most $W$. We give a complete dichotomy for the fixed-parameter tractability of these problems: We show that for every Boolean constraint language $\Gamma$, either Weighted Min SAT$(\Gamma)$ is FPT; or Weighted Min SAT$(\Gamma)$ is W[1]-hard but Min SAT$(\Gamma)$ is FPT; or Min SAT$(\Gamma)$ is W[1]-hard. This generalizes recent work of Kim et al. (SODA 2021) which did not consider weighted problems, and only considered languages $\Gamma$ that cannot express implications $(u \to v)$ (as is used to, e.g., model digraph cut problems). Our result generalizes and subsumes multiple previous results, including the FPT algorithms for Weighted Almost 2-SAT, weighted and unweighted $\ell$-Chain SAT, and Coupled Min-Cut, as well as weighted and directed versions of the latter. The main tool used in our algorithms is the recently developed method of directed flow-augmentation (Kim et al., STOC 2022)., Comment: v2. Major update to all three flow-augmentation papers

In this report we present an algorithm solving Triangle Counting in time $O(d^2n+m)$, where n and m, respectively, denote the number of vertices and edges of a graph G and d denotes its twin-width, a recently introduced graph parameter. We assume that a compact representation of a d-contraction sequence of G is given., Comment: 6 pages

We show a flow-augmentation algorithm in directed graphs: There exists a randomized polynomial-time algorithm that, given a directed graph $G$, two vertices $s,t \in V(G)$, and an integer $k$, adds (randomly) to $G$ a number of arcs such that for every minimal $st$-cut $Z$ in $G$ of size at most $k$, with probability $2^{-\mathrm{poly}(k)}$ the set $Z$ becomes a minimum $st$-cut in the resulting graph. We also provide a deterministic counterpart of this procedure. The directed flow-augmentation tool allows us to prove fixed-parameter tractability of a number of problems parameterized by the cardinality of the deletion set, whose parameterized complexity status was repeatedly posed as open problems: (1) Chain SAT, defined by Chitnis, Egri, and Marx [ESA'13, Algorithmica'17], (2) a number of weighted variants of classic directed cut problems, such as Weighted $st$-Cut} or Weighted Directed Feedback Vertex Set. By proving that Chain SAT is FPT, we confirm a conjecture of Chitnis, Egri, and Marx that, for any graph $H$, if the List $H$-Coloring problem is polynomial-time solvable, then the corresponding vertex-deletion problem is fixed-parameter tractable., Comment: v2. Major update of three flow-augmentation papers. Includes a deterministic version. Weighted Almost 2-SAT algorithm has been removed, as it is superseded by a more general algorithm of Flow-Augmentation III (arXiv:2207.07422)

Parameterized complexity seeks to use input structure to obtain faster algorithms for NP-hard problems. This has been most successful for graphs of low treewidth: Many problems admit fast algorithms relative to treewidth and many of them are optimal under SETH. Fewer such results are known for more general structure such as low clique-width and more restrictive structure such as low deletion distance to a sparse graph class. Despite these successes, such results remain "islands'' within the realm of possible structure. Rather than adding more islands, we seek to determine the transitions between them, that is, we aim for structural thresholds where the complexity increases as input structure becomes more general. Going from deletion distance to treewidth, is a single deletion set to a graph with simple components enough to yield the same lower bound as for treewidth or does it take many disjoint separators? Going from treewidth to clique-width, how much more density entails the same complexity as clique-width? Conversely, what is the most restrictive structure that yields the same lower bound? For treewidth, we obtain both refined and new lower bounds that apply already to graphs with a single separator $X$ such that $G-X$ has treewidth $r=O(1)$, while $G$ has treewidth $|X|+O(1)$. We rule out algorithms running in time $O^*((r+1-\epsilon)^{k})$ for Deletion to $r$-Colorable parameterized by $k=|X|$. For clique-width, we rule out time $O^*((2^r-\epsilon)^k)$ for Deletion to $r$-Colorable, where $X$ is now allowed to consist of $k$ twinclasses. There are further results on Vertex Cover, Dominating Set and Maximum Cut. All lower bounds are matched by existing and newly designed algorithms., Comment: 52 pages, 16 figures, shortened abstract due to character limit

An enumeration kernel as defined by Creignou et al. [Theory Comput. Syst. 2017] for a parameterized enumeration problem consists of an algorithm that transforms each instance into one whose size is bounded by the parameter plus a solution-lifting algorithm that efficiently enumerates all solutions from the set of the solutions of the kernel. We propose to consider two new versions of enumeration kernels by asking that the solutions of the original instance can be enumerated in polynomial time or with polynomial delay from the kernel solutions. Using the NP-hard Matching Cut problem parameterized by structural parameters such as the vertex cover number or the cyclomatic number of the input graph, we show that the new enumeration kernels present a useful notion of data reduction for enumeration problems which allows to compactly represent the set of feasible solutions.

Process mining is one of the most active research streams in business process management. In recent years, numerous methods have been proposed for analyzing structured process data. Yet, in many cases, it is only the digitized parts of processes that are directly captured from process-aware information systems, and manual activities often result in blind spots. While the use of video cameras to observe these activities could help to fill this gap, a standardized approach to extracting event logs from unstructured video data remains lacking. Here, we propose a reference architecture to bridge the gap between computer vision and process mining. Various evaluation activities (i.e., competing artifact analysis, prototyping, and real-world application) ensured that the proposed reference architecture allows flexible, use-case-driven, and context-specific instantiations. Our results also show that an exemplary software prototype instantiation of the proposed reference architecture is capable of automatically extracting most of the process-relevant events from unstructured video data.

We present an undirected version of the recently introduced flow-augmentation technique: Given an undirected multigraph $G$ with distinguished vertices $s,t \in V(G)$ and an integer $k$, one can in randomized $k^{O(1)} \cdot (|V(G)| + |E(G)|)$ time sample a set $A \subseteq \binom{V(G)}{2}$ such that the following holds: for every inclusion-wise minimal $st$-cut $Z$ in $G$ of cardinality at most $k$, $Z$ becomes a minimum-cardinality cut between $s$ and $t$ in $G+A$ (i.e., in the multigraph $G$ with all edges of $A$ added) with probability $2^{-O(k \log k)}$. Compared to the version for directed graphs [STOC 2022], the version presented here has improved success probability ($2^{-O(k \log k)}$ instead of $2^{-O(k^4 \log k)}$), linear dependency on the graph size in the running time bound, and an arguably simpler proof. An immediate corollary is that the Bi-objective $st$-Cut problem can be solved in randomized FPT time $2^{O(k \log k)} (|V(G)|+|E(G)|)$ on undirected graphs., Comment: v2. Major update of all three flow-augmentation papers. The partial dichotomy part has been removed from this work, as it is superseded by the full dichotomy of Flow-Augmentation III (arXiv:2207.07422)

We extend the notion of lossy kernelization, introduced by Lokshtanov et al. [STOC 2017], to approximate Turing kernelization. An $\alpha$-approximate Turing kernel for a parameterized optimization problem is a polynomial-time algorithm that, when given access to an oracle that outputs $c$-approximate solutions in $O(1)$ time, obtains an $(\alpha \cdot c)$-approximate solution to the considered problem, using calls to the oracle of size at most $f(k)$ for some function $f$ that only depends on the parameter. Using this definition, we show that Independent Set parameterized by treewidth $\ell$ has a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate Turing kernel with $O(\frac{\ell^2}{\varepsilon})$ vertices, answering an open question posed by Lokshtanov et al. [STOC 2017]. Furthermore, we give $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate Turing kernels for the following graph problems parameterized by treewidth: Vertex Cover, Edge Clique Cover, Edge-Disjoint Triangle Packing and Connected Vertex Cover. We generalize the result for Independent Set and Vertex Cover, by showing that all graph problems that we will call "friendly" admit $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate Turing kernels of polynomial size when parameterized by treewidth. We use this to obtain approximate Turing kernels for Vertex-Disjoint $H$-packing for connected graphs $H$, Clique Cover, Feedback Vertex Set and Edge Dominating Set.

Given two disjoint sets $W_1$ and $W_2$ of points in the plane, the Optimal Discretization problem asks for the minimum size of a family of horizontal and vertical lines that separate $W_1$ from $W_2$, that is, in every region into which the lines partition the plane there are either only points of $W_1$, or only points of $W_2$, or the region is empty. Equivalently, Optimal Discretization can be phrased as a task of discretizing continuous variables: we would like to discretize the range of $x$-coordinates and the range of $y$-coordinates into as few segments as possible, maintaining that no pair of points from $W_1 \times W_2$ are projected onto the same pair of segments under this discretization. We provide a fixed-parameter algorithm for the problem, parameterized by the number of lines in the solution. Our algorithm works in time $2^{O(k^2 \log k)} n^{O(1)}$, where $k$ is the bound on the number of lines to find and $n$ is the number of points in the input. Our result answers in positive a question of Bonnet, Giannopolous, and Lampis [IPEC 2017] and of Froese (PhD thesis, 2018) and is in contrast with the known intractability of two closely related generalizations: the Rectangle Stabbing problem and the generalization in which the selected lines are not required to be axis-parallel., Comment: Accepted to ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2021). 53 pages, 18 figures

A breakthrough result of Cygan et al. (FOCS 2011) showed that connectivity problems parameterized by treewidth can be solved much faster than the previously best known time $\mathcal{O}^*(2^{\mathcal{O}(tw \log(tw))})$. Using their inspired Cut\&Count technique, they obtained $\mathcal{O}^*(\alpha^{tw})$ time algorithms for many such problems. Moreover, they proved these running times to be optimal assuming the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis. Unfortunately, like other dynamic programming algorithms on tree decompositions, these algorithms also require exponential space, and this is widely believed to be unavoidable. In contrast, for the slightly larger parameter called treedepth, there are already several examples of algorithms matching the time bounds obtained for treewidth, but using only polynomial space. Nevertheless, this has remained open for connectivity problems. In the present work, we close this knowledge gap by applying the Cut\&Count technique to graphs of small treedepth. While the general idea is unchanged, we have to design novel procedures for counting consistently cut solution candidates using only polynomial space. Concretely, we obtain time $\mathcal{O}^*(3^d)$ and polynomial space for Connected Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, and Steiner Tree on graphs of treedepth $d$. Similarly, we obtain time $\mathcal{O}^*(4^d)$ and polynomial space for Connected Dominating Set and Connected Odd Cycle Transversal., Comment: 27 pages; accepted at STACS 2020

Computing all-pairs shortest paths is a fundamental and much-studied problem with many applications. Unfortunately, despite intense study, there are still no significantly faster algorithms for it than the $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ time algorithm due to Floyd and Warshall (1962). Somewhat faster algorithms exist for the vertex-weighted version if fast matrix multiplication may be used. Yuster (SODA 2009) gave an algorithm running in time $\mathcal{O}(n^{2.842})$, but no combinatorial, truly subcubic algorithm is known. Motivated by the recent framework of efficient parameterized algorithms (or "FPT in P"), we investigate the influence of the graph parameters clique-width ($cw$) and modular-width ($mw$) on the running times of algorithms for solving All-Pairs Shortest Paths. We obtain efficient (and combinatorial) parameterized algorithms on non-negative vertex-weighted graphs of times $\mathcal{O}(cw^2n^2)$, resp. $\mathcal{O}(mw^2n + n^2)$. If fast matrix multiplication is allowed then the latter can be improved to $\mathcal{O}(mw^{1.842}n + n^2)$ using the algorithm of Yuster as a black box. The algorithm relative to modular-width is adaptive, meaning that the running time matches the best unparameterized algorithm for parameter value $mw$ equal to $n$, and they outperform them already for $mw \in \mathcal{O}(n^{1 - \varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$.

The area of parameterized approximation seeks to combine approximation and parameterized algorithms to obtain, e.g., (1+eps)-approximations in f(k,eps)n^{O(1)} time where k is some parameter of the input. We obtain the following results on parameterized approximability: 1) In the maximum independent set of rectangles problem (MISR) we are given a collection of n axis parallel rectangles in the plane. Our goal is to select a maximum-cardinality subset of pairwise non-overlapping rectangles. This problem is NP-hard and also W[1]-hard [Marx, ESA'05]. The best-known polynomial-time approximation factor is O(loglog n) [Chalermsook and Chuzhoy, SODA'09] and it admits a QPTAS [Adamaszek and Wiese, FOCS'13; Chuzhoy and Ene, FOCS'16]. Here we present a parameterized approximation scheme (PAS) for MISR, i.e. an algorithm that, for any given constant eps>0 and integer k>0, in time f(k,eps)n^{g(eps)}, either outputs a solution of size at least k/(1+eps), or declares that the optimum solution has size less than k. 2) In the (2-dimensional) geometric knapsack problem (TDK) we are given an axis-aligned square knapsack and a collection of axis-aligned rectangles in the plane (items). Our goal is to translate a maximum cardinality subset of items into the knapsack so that the selected items do not overlap. In the version of TDK with rotations (TDKR), we are allowed to rotate items by 90 degrees. Both variants are NP-hard, and the best-known polynomial-time approximation factors are 558/325+eps and 4/3+eps, resp. [Galvez et al., FOCS'17]. These problems admit a QPTAS for polynomially bounded item sizes [Adamaszek and Wiese, SODA'15]. We show that both variants are W[1]-hard. Furthermore, we present a PAS for TDKR. For all considered problems, getting time f(k,eps)n^{O(1)}, rather than f(k,eps)n^{g(eps)}, would give FPT time f'(k)n^{O(1)} exact algorithms using eps=1/(k+1), contradicting W[1]-hardness., Comment: Abstract shortened

The Vertex Cover problem plays an essential role in the study of polynomial kernelization in parameterized complexity, i.e., the study of provable and efficient preprocessing for NP-hard problems. Motivated by the great variety of positive and negative results for kernelization for Vertex Cover subject to different parameters and graph classes, we seek to unify and generalize them using so-called blocking sets, which have played implicit and explicit roles in many results. We show that in the most-studied setting, parameterized by the size of a deletion set to a specified graph class $\mathcal{C}$, bounded minimal blocking set size is necessary but not sufficient to get a polynomial kernelization. Under mild technical assumptions, bounded minimal blocking set size is showed to allow an essentially tight efficient reduction in the number of connected components. We then determine the exact maximum size of minimal blocking sets for graphs of bounded elimination distance to any hereditary class $\mathcal{C}$, including the case of graphs of bounded treedepth. We get similar but not tight bounds for certain non-hereditary classes $\mathcal{C}$, including the class $\mathcal{C}_{LP}$ of graphs where integral and fractional vertex cover size coincide. These bounds allow us to derive polynomial kernels for Vertex Cover parameterized by the size of a deletion set to graphs of bounded elimination distance to, e.g., forest, bipartite, or $\mathcal{C}_{LP}$ graphs.

In the fundamental Maximum Matching problem the task is to find a maximum cardinality set of pairwise disjoint edges in a given undirected graph. The fastest algorithm for this problem, due to Micali and Vazirani, runs in time $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{n}m)$ and stands unbeaten since 1980. It is complemented by faster, often linear-time, algorithms for various special graph classes. Moreover, there are fast parameterized algorithms, e.g., time $\mathcal{O}(km\log n)$ relative to tree-width $k$, which outperform $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{n}m)$ when the parameter is sufficiently small. We show that the Micali-Vazirani algorithm, and in fact any algorithm following the phase framework of Hopcroft and Karp, is adaptive to beneficial input structure. We exhibit several graph classes for which such algorithms run in linear time $\mathcal{O}(n+m)$. More strongly, we show that they run in time $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{k}m)$ for graphs that are $k$ vertex deletions away from any of several such classes, without explicitly computing an optimal or approximate deletion set; before, most such bounds were at least $\Omega(km)$. Thus, any phase-based matching algorithm with linear-time phases obliviously interpolates between linear time for $k=\mathcal{O}(1)$ and the worst case of $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{n}m)$ when $k=\Theta(n)$. We complement our findings by proving that the phase framework by itself still allows $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ phases, and hence time $\Omega(\sqrt{n}m)$, even on paths, cographs, and bipartite chain graphs.

In the NP-hard Edge Dominating Set problem (EDS) we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and an integer $k$, and need to determine whether there is a set $F\subseteq E$ of at most $k$ edges that are incident with all (other) edges of $G$. It is known that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable and admits a polynomial kernel when parameterized by $k$. A caveat for this parameter is that it needs to be large, i.e., at least equal to half the size of a maximum matching of $G$, for instances not to be trivially negative. Motivated by this, we study the existence of polynomial kernels for EDS when parameterized by structural parameters that may be much smaller than $k$. Unfortunately, at first glance this looks rather hopeless: Even when parameterized by the deletion distance to a disjoint union of paths $P_3$ of length two there is no polynomial kernelization (under standard assumptions), ruling out polynomial kernels for many smaller parameters like the feedback vertex set size. In contrast, somewhat surprisingly, there is a polynomial kernelization for deletion distance to a disjoint union of paths $P_5$ of length four. As our main result, we fully classify for all finite sets $\mathcal{H}$ of graphs, whether a kernel size polynomial in $|X|$ is possible when given $X$ such that each connected component of $G-X$ is isomorphic to a graph in $\mathcal{H}$.