Search

Your search keyword '"Krautter, Kai"' showing total 34 results
Start Over Author "Krautter, Kai"
34 results on '"Krautter, Kai"'

3. A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

Author

Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N., Govaart, Gisela H., Norris, Emma, O’Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J., Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R., Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L., Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J., Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A., Lonsdorf, Tina B., Lim, Michele C., Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B., Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F., Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J., Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R., Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A., Wolska, Julia K., Henderson, Emma L., Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G., Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M., Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L., Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K., Baum, Myriam A., Williams, Emily A., Assaneea, Asma A., Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G., Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M. J., Melia, Claire R., Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H., Pickering, Jade S., Evans, Thomas R., Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A., Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G., Rinke, Eike M., Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E., Blake, Ashley R., Cockcroft, Jamie P., Micheli, Leticia, Bret, Brice Beffara, Flack, Zoe M., Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X., Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J., Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T., Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E., Iley, Bethan J., Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J., Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F., Millager, Ryan A., Fox, Kerry J., AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R., Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A., Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., and Aczel, Balazs

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Research: How Passion Can Backfire at Work.

Author

Bailey, Erica R., Krautter, Kai, Wen Wu, Galinsky, Adam D., and Jachimowicz, Jon M.

Subjects
ORGANIZATIONAL behavior, BUSINESS schools, BUSINESSPEOPLE, FULL-time employment, SUCCESSFUL people, EMPLOYEE psychology
Abstract

The article describes instances when passion and overconfidence may lead to burnout, frustration and worse performance at work and suggests strategies for managers to prevent the pitfalls of passion.

Published
2024

7. The effectiveness of preregistration in psychology: Assessing preregistration strictness and preregistration-study consistency

Author

Van den Akker, Olmo, primary, Bakker, Marjan, additional, van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., additional, Pennington, Charlotte Rebecca, additional, Verweij, Leone, additional, Elsherif, Mahmoud Medhat, additional, Claesen, Aline, additional, Gaillard, Stefan Daniel Michel, additional, Yeung, Siu Kit, additional, Frankenberger, Jan-Luca, additional, Krautter, Kai, additional, Cockcroft, Jamie Philip, additional, Kreuer, Katharina Sybille, additional, Evans, Thomas Rhys, additional, Heppel, Frédérique, additional, Schoch, Sarah Fiona, additional, Korbmacher, Max, additional, Yamada, Yuki, additional, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, additional, Alzahawi, Shilaan, additional, Sarafoglou, Alexandra, additional, Sitnikov, Maksim, additional, Dechterenko, Filip, additional, Wingen, Sophia, additional, Grinschgl, Sandra, additional, Hartmann, Helena, additional, Stewart, Suzanne, additional, Oliveira, Catia Margarida, additional, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, additional, Baker, Bradley James, additional, and Wicherts, Jelte M., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Don’t Let Passion Lead to Burnout on Your Team.

Author

BREDEHORST, JOY, KRAUTTER, KAI, MEURIS, JIRS, and JACHIMOWICZ, JON M.

Subjects
JOB involvement, PSYCHOLOGICAL burnout, REST periods, EMPLOYEES' workload, WORK-life balance, WORK orientations
Abstract

The article presents the authors' recommendations for managers and employees to recognize when passion for one's work may be a detriment to one's well-being and ultimately lead to burnout. Topics include research into how passion disrupts the recovery necessary to avoid exhaustion, making rest and recovery a priority, and inequities in maintaining passion for certain groups. A brief description of the origin of the word "passion" offers insight into its potentially deceptive use in the context of work.

Published
2024

10. The Challenge of Maintaining Passion for Work over Time: A Daily Perspective on Passion and Emotional Exhaustion.

Author

Bredehorst, Joy, Krautter, Kai, Meuris, Jirs, and Jachimowicz, Jon M.

Subjects
PSYCHOLOGICAL burnout, TIME perspective, WORKING hours
Abstract

Passion for work is highly coveted, but many employees report struggling to maintain their passion over time. In the current research, we explain the challenge of pursuing passion by conceptualizing passion as an attribute with temporal variation. Viewed through a daily lens, we argue that self-regulation plays a critical role in understanding the challenges underlying the daily maintenance of passion. More specifically, we hypothesize that—unless employees adequately regulate their passion on any given day—higher levels of passion will lead them to invest more time and energy into their work, decreasing their psychological detachment from work after the workday, and consequently resulting in higher levels of emotional exhaustion the next day. Higher levels of emotional exhaustion on a given day subsequently prompt a greater need for recovery, shifting employees' focus away from devoting time and energy into work, thereby eroding their passion on the following day. Two daily-diary studies covering 30 and 10 consecutive working days provided support for our predictions (Ntotal = 798; ktotal = 15,702). Employees who felt more in charge of their passion on any given day engaged in self-regulation during their workday, increasing their psychological detachment from work and subsequently being less likely to suffer the detrimental consequences of higher daily passion. Our theory and findings demonstrate the daily interplay between passion and emotional exhaustion and specify why passion may be self-limiting unless employees adequately manage it, reflecting a challenge they need to navigate each day in pursuing their passion. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1673. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Author

Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lueke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Vel Tromp, Myrthe, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Wolska, Julia, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan, Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, Sadhwani, Shanu, FORRT, Pownall, Madeleine [0000-0002-3734-8006], Azevedo, Flávio [0000-0001-9000-8513], Slack, Hannah R [0000-0003-2522-8717], Flack, Zoe [0000-0001-8123-5589], Elsherif, Mahmoud M [0000-0002-0540-3998], Gilligan-Lee, Katie A [0000-0002-5406-2149], de Oliveira, Catia M F [0000-0002-2976-3330], Gjoneska, Biljana [0000-0003-1200-6672], Terry, Jenny [0000-0002-6843-7116], Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan [0000-0003-3412-4311], Baker, Bradley J [0000-0002-1697-4198], Pittelkow, Merle-Marie [0000-0002-7487-7898], Schmidt, Kathleen [0000-0002-9946-5953], Pennington, Charlotte R [0000-0002-5259-642X], Shaw, John J [0000-0003-3190-6772], Hartmann, Helena [0000-0002-1331-6683], Zaneva, Mirela [0000-0003-3569-931X], Walker, Daniel [0000-0002-9369-6953], Weisberg, Yanna [0000-0002-4219-6625], Izydorczak, Kamil [0000-0002-9870-3825], Arriaga, Patrícia [0000-0001-5766-0489], Bochynska, Agata [0000-0001-6211-8600], Micheli, Leticia [0000-0003-0066-8222], Brekelmans, Gwen [0000-0002-8976-6808], Tyler, Samantha L [0000-0001-9602-5015], Iley, Bethan J [0000-0002-5813-3303], Sladekova, Martina [0000-0001-5059-6576], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology, MetaArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Open scholarship, Teaching, Pedagogy, Open Research, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences, Higher Education, MetaArXiv|Medicine and Health Sciences, Open Scholarship, Reproducibility, MetaArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Open Science, MetaArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology, ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Higher education, Open research, Open science, SDG 4 - Quality Education
Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness, and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (1) students’ scientific literacies (i.e., students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science, and the development of transferable skills); (2) student engagement (i.e., motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration, and engagement in open research), and (3) students’ attitudes towards science (i.e., trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

Published
2023

12. The effectiveness of preregistration in psychology: Assessing preregistration strictness and preregistration-study consistency

Author

Korbmacher, Max, Evans, Thomas, Cockcroft, Jamie, van Assen, Marcel, Schoch, Sarah, Heppel, Frédérique, Verweij, Leone, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Van den Akker, Olmo, Gaillard, Stefan, Elsherif, Mahmoud, Yamada, Yuki, Oliveira, Catia, Frankenberger, Jan-Luca, Stewart, Suzanne, Pennington, Charlotte, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Hartmann, Helena, Kreuer, Katharina, Dechterenko, Filip, Grinschgl, Sandra, Yeung, Siu Kit, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Claesen, Aline, Krautter, Kai, Wingen, Sophia, Sarafoglou, Alexandra, Wicherts, Jelte, Bakker, Marjan, Sitnikov, Maksim, and Baker, Bradley

Subjects
bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology, MetaArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, MetaArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences
Abstract

Study preregistration has become increasingly popular in psychology, but its effectiveness in restricting potentially biasing researcher degrees of freedom remains unclear. We used an extensive protocol to assess the strictness of preregistrations and the consistency between preregistration and publications of 300 preregistered psychology studies. We found that preregistrations often lack methodological details and that undisclosed deviations from preregistered plans are frequent. Combining the strictness and consistency results highlights that biases due to researcher degrees of freedom are prevalent and likely in many preregistered studies. More comprehensive registration templates typically yielded stricter and hence better preregistrations. We did not find that effectiveness of preregistrations differed over time or between original and replication studies. Furthermore, we found that operationalizations of variables were generally more effectively preregistered than other study parts. Inconsistencies between preregistrations and published studies were mainly encountered for data collection procedures, statistical models, and exclusion criteria. Our results indicate that, to unlock the full potential of preregistration, researchers in psychology should aim to write stricter preregistrations, adhere to these preregistrations more faithfully, and more transparently report any deviations from the preregistrations. This could be facilitated by training and education to improve preregistration skills, as well as the development of more comprehensive templates.

Published
2023

13. Stop Assuming Introverts Aren't Passionate About Work.

Author

Krautter, Kai, Büchner, Anabel, and Jachimowicz, Jon M.

Subjects
INTROVERTS, ORGANIZATIONAL behavior, BUSINESS schools, FULL-time employment, PSYCHOLOGICAL tests, BASKETBALL coaching, CIVIL service
Abstract

This article discusses the common assumption that extroverted employees are more passionate about their work than introverted employees. The authors conducted research and found that extroverted employees are perceived as more passionate, even if their actual level of passion is the same as introverted employees. This perception can lead to inequities in the workplace, as extroverted employees are often rewarded and seen as higher-status. The article suggests that managers should learn how their employees express passion, collaborate with them to bridge any gaps in perception, and reward true passion based on meritocratic measures. It also advises introverted employees to find ways to make their passion more visible, but to be mindful of the potential costs of engaging in extroverted behaviors. The authors emphasize that introversion and passion are not mutually exclusive, and that society should recognize that passion can be expressed in different ways. [Extracted from the article]

Published
2023

14. Examples of best practice in embedding open and reproducible scholarship from Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Author

Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas Rhys, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M. F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lüke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Tromp, Myrthe Vel, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan J., Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, and Sadhwani, Shanu

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' scientific literacies (i.e. students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

15. Norming Optimal Levels Of Extraversion In Different Situations (Flextraversion Study 1b)

Author

Baron, Cora, Krautter, Kai, and Sun, Jessie

Subjects
FOS: Psychology, big five, rigidity, personality, variability, extraversion, situational demands, Personality and Social Contexts, Psychology, situation-specific optimality, Social and Behavioral Sciences, norming, flextraversion
Abstract

People tend to feel happier when they act more extraverted, but is extraverted behavior always beneficial? We propose that flextraverts—people who adapt their levels of extraversion towards what is optimal in a given situation—achieve better outcomes than both rigid people (who show little variability in their extraversion) and inconsistent people (who randomly fluctuate between extraverted and introverted states without being calibrated to situational demands). In this study, we aim to examine whether different situations have different optimal levels of extraversion, and the extent to which participants agree with each other about the extraversion optimality of each situation.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

16. Latent classes of mental health trajectories

Author

Hart, Alexander, Reis, Dorota, Krautter, Kai, and Friese, Malte

Subjects
FOS: Psychology, Health Psychology, Personality and Social Contexts, Psychology, Social and Behavioral Sciences
Abstract

The main objective of the present paper is to examine whether distinct trajectories of mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic represent the data best (covering a time span from March 2020 to February 2021).

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. No Party No Joy – Change vs. Stability in Personality and Subjective Well-Being during two COVID-19 lockdowns

Author

Krautter, Kai, Reis, Dorota, Hart, Alexander, and Friese, Malte

Subjects
FOS: Psychology, lockdown, covid-19, personality change, subjective well-being, extraversion, Psychology, neuroticism, multilevel contrast analyses, Social and Behavioral Sciences, ri-clpm, major life event
Abstract

In this study, we are interested in how students’ personality (extraversion and neuroticism) and subjective well- being change during two COVID-19 lockdowns. We already surveyed a cohort of first-year students at four times of measurement (October 2019, January 2020, April 2020, May 2020) and now repeat and pre-register the same survey with this year’s cohort (November 2020, February 2021, April 2021, May 2021).

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Pitfalls and Inequalities Complicating the Pursuit of Passion

Author

Jachimowicz, Jon Michael, primary, Berry, Zachariah, additional, Bredehorst, Joy, additional, He, Joyce, additional, Krautter, Kai, additional, Gorges, Megan, additional, Lucas, Brian J., additional, Meuris, Jirs, additional, Moore, Celia, additional, and Ward, Sarah, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. Research without borders : how to identify and overcome potential pitfalls in international large-team online research projects

Author

Baum, Myriam A., Hart, Alexander, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Ilchovska, Zlatomira, Moreau, David, Dokokova, Marie, LaPlume, Annalise A., Krautter, Kai, Staal, Justine, and Medical Informatics

Abstract

This case study is based on experiences with an international meta-scientific project across different fields of research, assessing the use of Open Science practices in these fields, as well as individual researchers’ reasons for not engaging in Open Science practices. The project was conducted by a cross-cultural and diverse group of researchers. In the present article, we share insights into potential pitfalls when conducting an international study, as well as possible solutions to overcome them. Specifically, we highlight various issues focusing on two key phases: designing an online survey with a focus on cross-cultural data collection, and recruiting a cross-cultural online sample of researchers.

Published
2022

23. Heterogeneity in mental health change during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Germany: The role of social factors.

Author

Reis, Dorota, Krautter, Kai, Hart, Alexander, and Friese, Malte

Subjects
*MENTAL health, *SOCIAL factors, *SATISFACTION, *RESEARCH funding, *DESCRIPTIVE statistics, *COVID-19 pandemic, *LATENT structure analysis, *PSYCHOLOGICAL distress
Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic constitutes a prolonged global crisis, but its effects on mental health seem inconsistent. This inconsistency highlights the importance of considering the differential impact of the pandemic on individuals. There is some evidence that mental health trajectories are heterogeneous and that both sociodemographic and personal characteristics are associated with higher risk for mental health issues. By contrast, information on the role of social factors as potential determinants of initial reactions to the pandemic and on heterogeneous trajectories over time is lacking. We analysed seven assessments of a large‐scale (N = 2203) longitudinal study across 1.5 years, beginning in March 2020. Using self‐report data on mental health and life satisfaction, we applied latent change models to examine initial reactions and mean changes across the pandemic. In addition, we applied latent class growth analyses to investigate whether there were distinct groups with different patterns of change. Results showed that on average, levels of life satisfaction and anxiety decreased (d = −0.31 and d = −0.11, respectively), levels of depressive symptoms increased (d = 0.13), and stress levels remained unchanged (d = −0.01) during the first year of the pandemic. For each outcome, we identified four distinct mental health trajectories. Between 5% (for anxiety) and 11% (for life satisfaction) of the sample reported consistently high—and even increasing—impairments in mental health and well‐being. The trajectories of a sizeable number of people covaried with the course of the pandemic, such that people experienced better mental health when the number of COVID cases was low and when fewer restrictions were placed on public life. Low emotional support, high instrumental support, and the tendency to compare oneself with others were associated with more mental health issues. Findings show that whereas a substantial portion of people were largely unaffected by the pandemic, some individuals experienced consistently high levels of psychological distress. Social factors appear to play a crucial role in the maintenance of well‐being. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. No party no joy?-Changes in university students' extraversion, neuroticism, and subjective well-being during two COVID-19 lockdowns

Author

Krautter, Kai, Friese, Malte, Hart, Alexander, and Reis, Dorota

Subjects
Extraversion, Psychological, Neuroticism, Cohort Studies, Universities, Communicable Disease Control, Humans, COVID-19, Students, Applied Psychology, Personality
Abstract

The COVID-19 lockdowns represent a major life event with an immense impact on university students' lives. Findings prior to the pandemic suggest that changes in personality and subjective well-being (SWB) can occur after critical life events or psychological interventions. The present study examined how university students' extraversion, neuroticism, and SWB changed during two COVID-19 lockdowns in Germany. To this end, we conducted a partly preregistered, two-cohort study with four measurement points each from October 2019 to May 2021 (N

Published
2021

28. Research on Meaningful Work: Planting the Seeds for the Future.

Author

Murray, Justine, Jachimowicz, Jon Michael, Schabram, Kira Franziska, Myers, Christopher G., Sonenshein, Scott, Dobrow, Shoshana, Tosti-Kharas, Jennifer, Lysova, Evgenia, Cho, Yuna, Draga, Solomiya, Fetzer, Greg, Hedden, Luke, Krautter, Kai, Lin, Yuxin, Nielsen, Jordan, Quan, Shawn Xiaoshi, Rogers, Benjamin Alan, Ward, Sarah, Weinstein, Molly L., and Weisman, Hannah

Abstract

The last two decades have seen a significant uptick in research on meaningful work, defined as work that is purposeful and significant. Prior work has established the link between experienced meaningfulness and positive organizational and employee outcomes, revealed how workers can make their jobs more meaningful, and illuminated numerous downsides of experiencing one's work as meaningful. Recent reviews highlight that meaningful work has become a central topic in the organizational literature. At the same time, these reviews also highlight several limitations that currently hold the field back, including a predominant focus on calling orientations, an assumption that work orientations are static, a lack of standardized definitions and measures, and limited generalizability. Having now firmly established its place in the organizational literature, we believe it is time to "take stock" of where we are and, with a thought to addressing these limitations in mind, set the foundation for the next generation of meaningful work research. This symposium aims to take a step toward addressing this gap. It features the work of 13 early career researchers whose work begins to build on and move beyond these limitations. Guided by experienced scholars who will act as discussants, we hope this forum will encourage dialogue that will guide and enhance the next generation of meaningful work research. By showcasing diverse methods and topics, we also aim to attract scholars beyond the meaningful work community, fostering new perspectives and integrating them into the field. Work Meaningfulness During a Merger Author: Yuna Cho; HKU Business School, The U. of Hong Kong Author: Winnie Jiang; INSEAD Author: Lucas Dufour; Toronto Metropolitan U. How, why, and with what consequence passionate nurses cope with promotion out of meaningful roles Author: Solomiya Draga; U. of Toronto A change is gonna come: How life events shape changes in work orientation Author: Greg Fetzer; U. of Liverpool Author: Elise B. Jones; US Coast Guard Academy Finding and Feeling Meaningfulness in an Invisible Occupation Author: Luke Hedden; U. of Miami There's Always More You Can Do: The Perils of Being Too Passionate for Work Author: Kai Krautter; Harvard Business School Author: Wen Wu; Beijing Jiaotong U. Collective mental time travel as a way to unite dispersed stakeholders addressing grand challenges Author: Yuxin Lin; U. of Arizona Self-Imposed Constraints in Meaningful Work: The Role of Constraints and the Agency to Craft Them Author: Justine Murray; Harvard Business School Author: Kira Franziska Schabram; U. of Washington Author: Jon Michael Jachimowicz; Harvard Business School Thwarted Prosocial Impact in Organizations: Consequences, Mechanisms, and Boundary Conditions Author: Jordan Nielsen; Purdue U. Author: Daniel Goering; Missouri State U. Let My People Go Hunting and Gathering: The Meaning of Work in Rural Alaska Author: Shawn Xiaoshi Quan; U. of Washington Author: Kira Franziska Schabram; U. of Washington How Role Archetypal Narratives Shape the Experience of Meaningfulness Amidst Distress Author: Benjamin Alan Rogers; Boston College A Tripartite Approach to Meaningful Work: Examining Purpose, Significance, and Coherence Author: Sarah Ward; U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Author: Vlad Costin; U. of Sussex Meaningful Work Ideology Theory (MWIT) Author: Molly L. Weinstein; Northwestern U. Author: Eli Finkel; Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern U. Pursue Your Higher (And) Lower Calling? A Construal Approach to Calling Orientation Maintenance Author: Hannah Weisman; Harvard Business School Author: Haoyue Zhang; Nanyang Business School, NTU Singapore Author: Stuart Bunderson; Wash U. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

29. Pitfalls and Inequalities Complicating the Pursuit of Passion.

Author

Jachimowicz, Jon Michael, Berry, Zachariah, Bredehorst, Joy, He, Joyce, Krautter, Kai, Gorges, Megan, Lucas, Brian J., Meuris, Jirs, Moore, Celia, and Ward, Sarah

Abstract

Pursuing passion for work is highly valuable to both employees and their organizations. However, many employees struggle to pursue and maintain their passion over time, a challenge which may be exacerbated by underlying inequalities. The papers in this symposium demonstrate the pitfalls and underlying inequalities which complicate the pursuit of passion. Across four presentations, we show that (1) the experience of passion is fundamentally self-limiting, that (2) employees do not give up on a job with poor working conditions because of their passion, (3) gender inequalities in the household place an additional burden on women's pursuit of passion, and (4) mid-performing passionate men are better evaluated than mid-performing passionate women. Together, these presentations recast our understanding of passion, demonstrating that passion can at times drain employees, and may even exacerbate underlying inequalities. * Challenge of Maintaining Passion for Work Over Time: A Dynamic Perspective on Passion and Exhaustion * Presenter: Joy Bredehorst; Boston Consulting Group * Presenter: Kai Krautter; Harvard U. * Presenter: Jirs Meuris; U. of Wisconsin-Madison * Presenter: Jon Michael Jachimowicz; Harvard Business School * People that Give Up on a Passion Overestimate the Negativity of Observers' Judgments * Presenter: Zachariah Berry; Cornell U. * Presenter: Brian J. Lucas; Cornell U. * How Daily Passion-Fueled Increases in Working Hours Exacerbate Gender Inequality * Presenter: Kai Krautter; Harvard U. * Presenter: Megan Gorges; Harvard Business School * Presenter: Zachariah Berry; Cornell U. * Presenter: Sarah Ward; U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign * Presenter: Jon Michael Jachimowicz; Harvard Business School * Perceptions of Passion Boost the Status and Potential of Average-Performing Men Only * Presenter: Joyce He; U. of California, Los Angeles * Presenter: Celia Moore; Imperial College Business School [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

30. A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

Author

Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M, Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N, Govaart, Gisela H, Norris, Emma, O'Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J, Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R, Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L, Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J, Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A, Lonsdorf, Tina B, Lim, Michele C, Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B, Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F, Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L K, Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J, Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R, Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A, Wolska, Julia K, Henderson, Emma L, Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G, Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M, Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L, Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K, Baum, Myriam A, Williams, Emily A, Assaneea, Asma A, Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G, Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M J, Melia, Claire R, Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H, Pickering, Jade S, Evans, Thomas R, Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A, Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G, Rinke, Eike M, Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E, Blake, Ashley R, Cockcroft, Jamie P, Micheli, Leticia, Bret, Brice Beffara, Flack, Zoe M, Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X, Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J, Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T, Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E, Iley, Bethan J, Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J, Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F, Millager, Ryan A, Fox, Kerry J, AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R, Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A, Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H, Aczel, Balazs, Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M, Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N, Govaart, Gisela H, Norris, Emma, O'Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J, Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R, Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L, Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J, Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A, Lonsdorf, Tina B, Lim, Michele C, Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B, Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F, Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L K, Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J, Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R, Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A, Wolska, Julia K, Henderson, Emma L, Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G, Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M, Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L, Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K, Baum, Myriam A, Williams, Emily A, Assaneea, Asma A, Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G, Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M J, Melia, Claire R, Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H, Pickering, Jade S, Evans, Thomas R, Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A, Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G, Rinke, Eike M, Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E, Blake, Ashley R, Cockcroft, Jamie P, Micheli, Leticia, Bret, Brice Beffara, Flack, Zoe M, Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X, Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J, Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T, Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E, Iley, Bethan J, Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J, Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F, Millager, Ryan A, Fox, Kerry J, AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R, Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A, Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H, and Aczel, Balazs

Abstract

Open scholarship has transformed research, and introduced a host of new terms in the lexicon of researchers. The ‘Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Teaching’ (FORRT) community presents a crowdsourced glossary of open scholarship terms to facilitate education and effective communication between experts and newcomers.

31. Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Author

Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas Rhys, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M. F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lüke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Tromp, Myrthe Vel, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan J., Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, Sadhwani, Shanu, Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas Rhys, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M. F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lüke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Tromp, Myrthe Vel, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan J., Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, and Sadhwani, Shanu

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students’ scientific literacies (i.e. students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students’ attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

32. A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

Author

Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M, Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N, Govaart, Gisela H, Norris, Emma, O'Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J, Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R, Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L, Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J, Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A, Lonsdorf, Tina B, Lim, Michele C, Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B, Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F, Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L K, Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J, Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R, Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A, Wolska, Julia K, Henderson, Emma L, Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G, Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M, Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L, Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K, Baum, Myriam A, Williams, Emily A, Assaneea, Asma A, Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G, Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M J, Melia, Claire R, Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H, Pickering, Jade S, Evans, Thomas R, Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A, Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G, Rinke, Eike M, Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E, Blake, Ashley R, Cockcroft, Jamie P, Micheli, Leticia, Bret, Brice Beffara, Flack, Zoe M, Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X, Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J, Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T, Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E, Iley, Bethan J, Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J, Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F, Millager, Ryan A, Fox, Kerry J, AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R, Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A, Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H, Aczel, Balazs, Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M, Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N, Govaart, Gisela H, Norris, Emma, O'Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J, Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R, Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L, Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J, Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A, Lonsdorf, Tina B, Lim, Michele C, Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B, Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F, Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L K, Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J, Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R, Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A, Wolska, Julia K, Henderson, Emma L, Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G, Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M, Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L, Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K, Baum, Myriam A, Williams, Emily A, Assaneea, Asma A, Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G, Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M J, Melia, Claire R, Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H, Pickering, Jade S, Evans, Thomas R, Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A, Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G, Rinke, Eike M, Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E, Blake, Ashley R, Cockcroft, Jamie P, Micheli, Leticia, Bret, Brice Beffara, Flack, Zoe M, Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X, Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J, Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T, Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E, Iley, Bethan J, Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J, Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F, Millager, Ryan A, Fox, Kerry J, AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R, Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A, Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H, and Aczel, Balazs

Abstract

Open scholarship has transformed research, and introduced a host of new terms in the lexicon of researchers. The ‘Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Teaching’ (FORRT) community presents a crowdsourced glossary of open scholarship terms to facilitate education and effective communication between experts and newcomers.

33. Mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral strategies for psychological detachment: Comparing effectiveness and mechanisms of change.

Author

Reis D, Hart A, Krautter K, Prestele E, Lehr D, and Friese M

Subjects
Humans, Female, Male, Adult, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Bayes Theorem, Occupational Stress psychology, Longitudinal Studies, Mindfulness, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy methods
Abstract

Recovering from work is essential for maintaining occupational well-being, health, motivation, and performance, but recovery is often difficult to achieve. In this study, we evaluated and compared the effectiveness of two (parallel) interventions aimed at promoting recovery: one based on mindfulness and one involving applying cognitive-behavioral strategies. Both interventions were embedded in a measurement burst design, which allowed us to examine the mechanisms underlying change or intervention success. To explore mechanisms of change, we used the stressor-detachment model as a theoretical framework. We operationalized the interventions' effects in three ways: as changes from pretest to posttest, as changes in daily states, and as changes in daily associations. To this end, we used intensive longitudinal data to examine the roles that daily negative activation plays in detachment and strain. In a randomized controlled trial (N = 393), we administered three assessments of traits: pretest, posttest (8 weeks later), and follow-up (3 months after the posttest). We also administered 2 work weeks of experience sampling questionnaires (preintervention and postintervention). Latent change models and Bayes factor equivalence tests revealed that both interventions substantially-and to a similar extent-increased detachment. Bayesian multilevel path models showed improvements in all state variables, including improvements in negative activation, and provided some evidence that mindfulness-based and cognitive-behavioral approaches might tackle different processes at the daily level. We discuss theoretical implications for the literature on recovery from work and specifically for the stressor-detachment model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

34. Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes.

Author

Pownall M, Azevedo F, König LM, Slack HR, Evans TR, Flack Z, Grinschgl S, Elsherif MM, Gilligan-Lee KA, de Oliveira CMF, Gjoneska B, Kalandadze T, Button K, Ashcroft-Jones S, Terry J, Albayrak-Aydemir N, Děchtěrenko F, Alzahawi S, Baker BJ, Pittelkow MM, Riedl L, Schmidt K, Pennington CR, Shaw JJ, Lüke T, Makel MC, Hartmann H, Zaneva M, Walker D, Verheyen S, Cox D, Mattschey J, Gallagher-Mitchell T, Branney P, Weisberg Y, Izydorczak K, Al-Hoorie AH, Creaven AM, Stewart SLK, Krautter K, Matvienko-Sikar K, Westwood SJ, Arriaga P, Liu M, Baum MA, Wingen T, Ross RM, O'Mahony A, Bochynska A, Jamieson M, Tromp MV, Yeung SK, Vasilev MR, Gourdon-Kanhukamwe A, Micheli L, Konkol M, Moreau D, Bartlett JE, Clark K, Brekelmans G, Gkinopoulos T, Tyler SL, Röer JP, Ilchovska ZG, Madan CR, Robertson O, Iley BJ, Guay S, Sladekova M, and Sadhwani S

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' scientific literacies (i.e. students' understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship., Competing Interests: We declare we have no competing interests., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results