Search

Purpose: To determine if women with breast cancer that undergo fertility preservation (FP), with or without hormonal stimulation, present with an increased risk of breast cancer recurrence.Methods: A matched cohort study on women with breast cancer attempting to ensure FP in Stockholm from 1999 to 2013 [exposed women (n = 188), age-matched unexposed controls (n = 378)] was designed using the Stockholm regional data from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Quality Register. Breast cancer relapse rates [incidence rate ratio (IRR)] and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using Cox regression and adjusted for potential confounding factors. Completeness of the registry at the time of the study was close to 99%.Results: Most women attempted FP by hormonal stimulation treatment (n = 148, 79%) with the objective of freezing their eggs or embryos. A smaller group elected FP methods without hormone stimulation (n = 40, 21%). Women who received hormone stimulation did not present with a higher relapse rate than unexposed control women in a model adjusted for age and calendar period of diagnosis (IRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.34–1.04). The results remained virtually unchanged after adjustment for tumor size, estrogen receptor status, affected lymph nodes, and chemotherapy treatment (IRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.37–1.17).Conclusion: Evidence was not found that fertility preservation, with or without hormonal stimulation, was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer recurrence. The high coverage rate of this population-based study supports the safe practice of fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. HER2 amplification has been reported to occur in 19--30% of breast cancers in women from Western countries. Little is known about the HER2 status in breast cancers from Vietnamese women. The aim of this study was to assess the HER2 status in Vietnamese women with operable breast cancer using immunohistochemistry and silver in situ hybridization techniques. Material and method. Tissue blocks from 242 Vietnamese women with invasive primary breast carcinoma were stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and a dual silver in situ hybridization (SISH) for assessing HER2 status. The analysis followed international recommendations with a semi-quantitative grading of the reaction in four levels, ''0'', ''1++'', ''2++'' and ''3++''. The HER2 gene amplification was assessed by calculating the ratio of HER2/chromosome 17 in 20 tumor cell nuclei. A ratio of <1.8 was classified as non-amplification and a ratio >2.2 indicated tumors with gene amplification. A ratio between 1.8 and 2.2 was equivocal. Results. Using IHC, 39% of the tumors strongly expressed ''3++'' the HER2 protein. An intermediate level ''2++'' of the protein was found in 11% while 50% showed no or low ''0/1++'' levels of protein expression. Gene amplification was found in 95% and 46% of the tumors with high ''3++'' and intermediate ''2++'' levels of protein expression, respectively. Thus, 41% of the patients had tumors with HER2 amplification. The concordance between IHC and SISH was 87%. Gene amplification was more frequent in ER negative than in ER positive tumors, 57% versus 33%, respectively. Additionally, tumors from postmenopausal women were amplified in 55% as compared to 36% in premenopausal women. Conclusions. HER2 gene amplification was found in 41% of Vietnamese breast cancers; this level is considerably higher than that previously found in a series of Swedish breast cancer women. The HER2-positive tumors were more often found in post-menopausal women than in ER negative tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical management of primary cutaneous melanomas is based on histopathological staging of the tumour. The aim of this study was to investigate, in a non-selected population in clinical practice, the agreement rate between general pathologists and pathologists experienced in melanoma in terms of the evaluation of histopathological prognostic parameters in cutaneous malignant melanomas, and to what extent the putative variability affected clinical management. A total of 234 cases of invasive cutaneous malignant melanoma were included in the study from the Stockholm-Gotland Healthcare Region in Sweden. Overall interobserver variability between a general pathologist and an expert review was 68.8-84.8%. Approximately 15.5% of melanomas ≤1 mm were re-classified either as melanoma in situ or melanomas >1 mm after review. In conclusion, review by a pathologist experienced in melanoma resulted in a change in recommendations about surgical excision margins and/or sentinel node biopsy in subgroups of T1 melanomas.