Search

The Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, v2.0 (the CAP/CTM assay), was used to quantify cell-associated HIV-1 (CAH) nucleic acid in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from well-characterized clinical specimens from HIV-1-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Chronically infected individuals on ART with no detectable plasma HIV-1 RNA demonstrated average CAH burdens of 3.2 HIV-1 log 10 copies/million cells. Assay sensitivity and specificity were 98.9% and 100%, respectively, with the positive and negative predictive values being 100% and 98.6%, respectively. The CAH burden was also measured at weeks 0, 1, 2, 8, and 60 in 37 participants (RV254/SEARCH010, Bangkok, Thailand) stratified by Fiebig stage (Fiebig stage I [FI] to FVI) at ART initiation. Prior to ART initiation, the average CAH burden was 1.4, 4.1, and 3.6 log 10 copies/million PBMCs for individuals who initiated ART at FI, FII, and FIII to FVI, respectively. Initiation of ART resulted in a rapid decline of CAH in all individuals, with the greatest decrease being observed in individuals who initiated ART at FI to FIII. By week 60, 100% (FI), 71.8% (FII/FIII), and 20.5% (FIV to FVI) of samples from individuals initiating treatment were at or near the limit of quantitation. Residual CAH was detectable at 60 weeks in most individuals who initiated ART at later stages (FIV to FVI) and averaged 1.9 ± 0.7 log 10 copies/million PBMCs. The modified Roche CAP/CTM assay provides a convenient, standardized approach to measure residual HIV in blood and may be useful for monitoring patients under therapy or those participating in HIV remission studies.

Background: Third- and fourth-generation immunoassays (IAs) are widely used in the diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) during acute HIV infection (AHI) may impact HIV-specific antibodies, with failure to develop antibody or seroreversion. We report on the ability of diagnostic tests to detect HIV-specific antibodies in Thai participants initiating ART during AHI., Methods: Participants with detectable plasma HIV RNA but nonreactive HIV-specific immunoglobulin G, enrolled in an AHI study, were offered immediate initiation of ART. Participants were tested at initiation and at 12 and 24 weeks following treatment using standard second-, third-, and fourth-generation IAs and Western blot (WB)., Results: Participants (N = 234) initiating ART at a median of 19 days (range, 1-62 days) from HIV exposure demonstrated different frequencies of reactivity prior to and following 24 weeks of ART depending on the IA. Third-generation IA nonreactivity prior to ART was 48%, which decreased to 4% following ART (P < .001). Fourth-generation IA nonreactivity was 18% prior to ART and 17% following ART (P = .720). Negative WB results were observed in 89% and 12% of participants prior to and following 24 weeks of ART, respectively (P < .001). Seroreversion to nonreactivity during ART was observed to at least one of the tests in 20% of participants, with fourth-generation IA demonstrating the highest frequency (11%) of seroreversion., Conclusions: HIV-specific antibodies may fail to develop and, when detected, may decline when ART is initiated during AHI. Although fourth-generation IA was the most sensitive at detecting AHI prior to ART, third-generation IA was the most sensitive during treatment., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00796146 and NCT00796263., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To compare central nervous system (CNS) outcomes in participants treated during acute HIV infection with standard combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) vs. cART plus integrase inhibitor and CCR5 antagonist (cART+)., Design: 24-week randomized open-label prospective evaluation., Method: Participants were evaluated then randomized to initiate cART (efavirenz, tenofovir, and either emtricitabine or lamivudine) vs. cART+ (cART plus raltegravir and maraviroc) during acute HIV and re-evaluated at 4, 12 and 24 weeks. We examined plasma and CSF cytokines, HIV RNA levels, neurological and neuropsychological findings, and brain MRS across groups and compared to healthy controls., Results: At baseline, 62 participants were in Fiebig stages I-V. Randomized groups were similar for mean age (27 vs. 25, p = 0.137), gender (each 94% male), plasma log10 HIV RNA (5.4 vs. 5.6, p = 0.382), CSF log10 HIV RNA (2.35 vs. 3.31, p = 0.561), and estimated duration of HIV (18 vs. 17 days, p = 0.546). Randomized arms did not differ at 24 weeks by any CNS outcome. Combining arms, all measures concurrent with antiretroviral treatment improved, for example, neuropsychological testing (mean NPZ-4 of -0.408 vs. 0.245, p<0.001) and inflammatory markers by MRS (e.g. mean frontal white matter (FWM) choline of 2.92 vs. 2.84, p = 0.045) at baseline and week 24, respectively. Plasma neopterin (p<0.001) and interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10) (p = 0.007) remained elevated in participants compared to controls but no statistically significant differences were seen in CSF cytokines compared to controls, despite individual variability among the HIV-infected group., Conclusions: A 24-week course of cART+ improved CNS related outcomes, but was not associated with measurable differences compared to standard cART.

Objective: To assess the addition of HIV nucleic acid testing (NAT) to fourth-generation (4thG) HIV antigen/antibody combination immunoassay in improving detection of acute HIV infection (AHI)., Methods: Participants attending a major voluntary counseling and testing site in Thailand were screened for AHI using 4thG HIV antigen/antibody immunoassay and sequential less sensitive HIV antibody immunoassay. Samples nonreactive by 4thG antigen/antibody immunoassay were further screened using pooled NAT to identify additional AHI. HIV infection status was verified following enrollment into an AHI study with follow-up visits and additional diagnostic tests., Results: Among 74 334 clients screened for HIV infection, HIV prevalence was 10.9% and the overall incidence of AHI (N = 112) was 2.2 per 100 person-years. The inclusion of pooled NAT in the testing algorithm increased the number of acutely infected patients detected, from 81 to 112 (38%), relative to 4thG HIV antigen/antibody immunoassay. Follow-up testing within 5 days of screening marginally improved the 4thG immunoassay detection rate (26%). The median CD4 T-cell count at the enrollment visit was 353 cells/μl and HIV plasma viral load was 598 289 copies/ml., Conclusion: The incorporation of pooled NAT into the HIV testing algorithm in high-risk populations may be beneficial in the long term. The addition of pooled NAT testing resulted in an increase in screening costs of 22% to identify AHI: from $8.33 per screened patient to $10.16. Risk factors of the testing population should be considered prior to NAT implementation given the additional testing complexity and costs.

We compared the long-term immunologic and virologic efficacy of the dual- and triple-nucleoside therapy for HIV infection. This was a retrospective analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials in antiretroviral-naive patients. In the dual-nucleoside group, 15 started with didanosine (ddI) monotherapy and then added stavudine (d4T) after 24 weeks, 63 started with various doses of d4T and ddI, and 53 started with zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC). In the triple-nucleoside group, 53 started with ZDV, 3TC, and ddI. After 48 weeks, patients who were not failing were randomized to immediate (before treatment failure) versus delayed (at the time of virologic failure) switching from ddI and d4T to ZDV and 3TC or vice versa and from ZDV, 3TC, and ddI to d4T, 3TC, and abacavir (ABC). Failure was defined as a plasma HIV-1 RNA level>or=1 log10 above nadir or >or=10,000 copies/mL when nadir was <500 copies/mL. Patients failing therapy before week 48 received the new treatment as in the immediate switching group. Hydroxyurea was added to the last treatment regimen if patients failed after week 96. CD4 count and plasma HIV-1 RNA level (branched DNA assay with a cutoff point of 50 copies/mL) at week 144 were analyzed by intention to treat. Compared with the dual-nucleoside group, the triple-nucleoside group had a higher proportion of patients with <50 copies/mL at 144 weeks (60% vs. 18%; P<0.001), higher median CD4 count (388 cells/microL vs. 346 cells/microL; P=0.018), and longer duration of response, defined as the time from onset of viral suppression (<500 copies/mL) to the time of treatment failure (the first of 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements >500 copies/mL never followed by 2 consecutive visits showing suppressible viremia to <500 copies/mL) or discontinuation from the study (144 weeks vs. 104 weeks; P=0.002). Multivariate regression analyses showed that significant predictors for treatment success, defined as a plasma viral load <50 copies/mL at week 144, were asymptomatic clinical status at enrollment, a baseline plasma viral load

The authors describe the development of a population pharmacokinetic model using NONMEM for itraconazole and its active metabolite hydroxyitraconazole in a Thai cohort of HIV-infected patients who were using itraconazole as an addition to their antiretroviral therapy. The data were best described with an open two-compartment model for both itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole. The model adequately described the data and provided population pharmacokinetic parameters which were not different from those described for other populations. The authors found that concomitant use of co-trimoxazole leads to a reduced formation rate (-51%) of hydroxyitraconazole.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of a triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor combination of zidovudine, lamivudine, and didanosine therapy., Design: A randomized open-label trial., Patients: Antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients with CD4+ cell counts of 100 to 500 cells/microl., Methods: A total of 106 patients were randomly assigned to 300 mg of zidovudine (200 mg for body weight <60 kg) twice daily plus 150 mg of lamivudine twice daily plus 200 mg of didanosine (125 mg for body weight <60 kg) twice daily (n = 53) or to zidovudine plus lamivudine (n = 53) for 48 weeks., Main Outcome Measures: Degree and duration of reduction of HIV-1 RNA load and increase in CD4+ cell counts from baseline and development of drug-related toxicities., Results: At 48 weeks, triple drug therapy showed greater declines in plasma HIV-RNA levels from the beginning of treatment than double drug therapy (1.86 vs. 1.15 log10 copies/ml, respectively; p <.001). The proportions of patients with HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml in an intention-to-treat analysis were 54.7% (29 of 53 patients) and 11.3% (6 of 53 patients) in the triple and double drug therapy, respectively (p =.001). There was no significant difference in increase of CD4 count., Conclusion: Triple drug therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and didanosine was significantly more effective in inducing sustained immunologic and virologic responses than the double combination of zidovudine and lamivudine.

Background: Triple combination antiretroviral therapy, recommended as standard of care, is unaffordable for much of the developing world., Objectives: To establish whether half doses of zidovudine (AZT) and zalcitabine (ddC) are as effective as standard doses in a Thai population with lower body weight than Western populations and predominantly infected with HIV-1 subtype E., Methods: A group of 116 antiretroviral naive patients, with CD4 cell counts 100-500 x 10(6) cells/l, were randomized to: AZT 200 mg three times daily plus ddC 0.75 mg three times daily versus AZT 100 mg three times daily plus ddC 0.375 mg three times daily and followed-up regularly for 48 weeks., Results: The study enrolled 111 patients: 59 men and 52 women, body weight (mean +/- standard deviation) 56.4 +/- 12.3 kg, mean CD4 cell count 324 x 10(6) cells/l, mean HIV RNA 4.7 log10 copies/ml. There were no significant differences between the two groups. Twelve patients discontinued, including two deaths that were unrelated to study medication. No significant differences in adverse events were seen. Week 48 data for the standard dose and half dose arms, respectively, were mean CD4 cell count increases of 52 and 78 x 10(6) cells/l (P = 0.34), mean plasma HIV-1 RNA reduction of 1.4 and 1.1 log10 copies/ml (P = 0.10), HIV RNA of < 400 copies/ml in 52 and 20%[ (P = 0.001). Participants with higher than mean baseline CD8 cell counts (mean 1062 x 10(6) cells/l) showed greater decline in CD8 cells on standard doses. Further analysis showed improved reduction in HIV RNA (P < 0.0001) and in the percentage with undetectable HIV RNA (P = 0.0137) in the standard dose arm, corrected for baseline HIV RNA, which if < 4.75 log10 copies/ml significantly correlated with HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml at week 48., Conclusion: At week 48, the proportion with HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml was significantly higher in the standard dose arm; lower baseline HIV RNA correlated with better HIV RNA outcome at 48 weeks. The arms did not differ in CD4 cell response but standard doses correlated with greater CD8 cell decline.

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of four different regimens of didanosine (ddI) + stavudine (d4T) in HIV-infected Thais., Design: Prospective, open-label, randomized study., Methods: Patients were randomized to four regimens of high and low doses of ddI and d4T or to ddI alone. D4T was added to the ddI-alone arm after week 24. The duration of study was 48 weeks., Results: Seventy-eight patients were randomized (mean CD4 cell count, 255 x 10(6)/l; mean plasma HIV-1 RNA; 4.3 log10 copies/ml). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 78% of patients in the pooled combination arms and 20% of the patients in the ddI alone arm (to which d4T was added after 24 weeks) showed plasma HIV-1 RNA < 500 copies/ml at week 24 (P < 0.001), and 59% versus 53% at week 48, respectively. In addition, the proportion of patients with < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml was 13% versus 7% at week 24 (P = 0.5) and 17% versus 20% at week 48 respectively. At week 24, median CD4 cell count increases from baseline were 101 x 10(6)/l in the pooled combination versus 76 x 10(6)/l in the ddI alone arm (P = 0.78). Logistic regression modeling suggested a correlation between receiving high dose ddI and achieving HIV-1 RNA < 500 copies/ml at week 48 (P = 0.07)., Conclusions: The d4T/ddI combination was superior to ddI alone in producing HIV-1 viral suppression. At week 48, > 60% of patients treated with this combination reached HIV-1 RNA levels < 500 copies/ml. Receiving high dose ddI but not d4T may correlate with a better viral suppression.

Background: Current antiretroviral treatment can induce significant and sustained virological and immunological responses in HIV-1-infected persons over at least the short- to mid-term., Objectives: In this study, long-term immune reconstitution was investigated during highly active antiretroviral therapy., Methods: Patients enrolled in the INCAS study in The Netherlands were treated for 102 weeks (range 52-144 weeks) with nevirapine (NVP) + zidovudine (ZDV) (n = 9), didanosine (ddl) + ZDV (n = 10), or NVP + ddl + ZDV (n = 10). Memory and naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were measured using CD45RA and CD27 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), T-cell function was assayed by CD3 + CD28 mAb stimulation, and plasma HIV-1 RNA load was measured by ultra-direct assay (cut-off < 20 copies/ml)., Results: Compared to both double combination regimens the triple combination regimen resulted in the most sustained increase in CD4+ T cells (change in CD4+, + 253 x 10(6) cells/l; standard error, 79 x 10(6) cells/l) and reduction of plasma HIV-1 RNA. In nine patients (31%) (ddl + ZDV, n = 2; NVP + ddl + ZDV, n = 7) plasma HIV-1 RNA levels remained below cut-off for at least 2 years. On average, these long-term virological responders demonstrated a significantly higher increase of naïve and memory CD4+ T cells (P = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively) as compared with patients with a virological failure, and showed improved T-cell function and normalization of the naïve; memory CD8+ T-cell ratio. However, individual virological success or failure did not predict the degree of immunological response. T-cell patterns were independent of baseline CD4+ T-cell count, T-cell function, HIV-1 RNA load or age. Low numbers of naïve CD4+ T cells at baseline resulted in modest long-term naïve T-cell recovery., Conclusions: Patients with prolonged undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA levels during antiretroviral therapy do not invariably show immune restoration. Naïve T-cell recovery in the setting of complete viral suppression is a gradual process, similar to that reported for immune recovery in adults after chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.

Ultraviolet A (UVA, 315-400 nm) radiation is known to be a complete carcinogen, but in contrast to UVB (280-315 nm) radiation, much of the cell damage is oxygen dependent (mediated through reactive oxygen species), and the dominant premutational DNA lesion(s) remains to be identified. To investigate further the basic differences in UVA and UVB carcinogenesis, we compared in vivo cellular responses, viz. cell cycle progression and transient p53 expression in the epidermis, after UVA1 (340-400 nm) exposure with those after broadband UVB exposure of hairless mice. Using flow cytometry we found a temporary suppression of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) uptake in S-phase cells both after UVB and UVA1 irradiation, which only in the case of UVB is followed by an increase to well over control levels. With equally erythemogenic doses (1-2 MED), the modulation of BrdU uptake was more profound after UVB than after UVA1 irradiation. Also, a marked transient increase in the percentage of S-phase cells occurred both after UVB and after UVA1 irradiation, but this increase evolved more rapidly after UVA1 irradiation. Further, p53 expression increased both after UVB and UVA1 irradiations, with peak expression already occurring from 12 to 24 h after UVA1 exposure and around 24 h after UVB exposure. Overall, UVA1 radiation appears to have less of an impact on the cell cycle than UVB radiation, as measured by the magnitude and duration of changes in DNA synthesis and cells in S phase. These differences are likely to reflect basic differences between UVB and UVA1 in genotoxicity and carcinogenic action.