Search

Firefighters can be exposed to complex mixtures of airborne substances, including hazardous substances released during structural fires. This study employed silicone wristbands (SWBs) as passive samplers to investigate potential exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and flame retardants (FRs). SWBs were deployed at different areas of four fire stations, in four truck cabins, and at an office control location; they were also donned outside the jackets of 18 firefighters who responded to fire calls. Overall, office areas had significantly lower PAHs than fire station areas. Vehicle bays and truck cabins had significantly higher concentrations of low molecular weight (LMW) PAHs than sleeping and living room areas. For organophosphate ester flame retardants (OPFRs), tri-n-butyl phosphate (TnBP) and tris(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCPP) were detected in all the samples; 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate (EHDPP) was more frequently detected in the fire station areas. Triphenyl phosphate (TPP) concentrations were highest in the truck cabin and office areas, and tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl)phosphate (TDCPP) was highest in truck cabins. Thirteen of 16 PAHs and nine of 36 OPFRs were detected in all the SWBs worn by firefighters, and tris (2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBEP) was the predominant OPFR. Levels of LMW PAHs were significantly lower when firefighters did not enter the fire. LMW PAHs, HMW (high molecular weight) PAHs, and EHDPP were significantly elevated when heavy smoke was reported. This work highlights the potential for occupational exposure to PAHs and flame retardants in some fire station areas; moreover, factors that may influence exposure during fire suppression. Whilst firefighters' occupational exposure to PAHs is likely related to fire suppression and exposure to contaminated gear and trucks, exposure to OPFRs may be more related to their presence in truck interiors and electronics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tris(2‐ethylhexyl) phosphate (TEHP, CAS no. 78‐42‐2) is a plasticizer and a flame retardant, while di(2‐ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid (DEHPA, CAS no. 298‐07‐7) is an oil additive and extraction solvent. Publicly‐available information on repeated exposure to these two related organophosphate compounds is fragmentary. Hence, adult male and female Fischer rats were exposed to TEHP (300, 1000 and 3000 mg/kg body weight [BW]/day) or DEHPA (20, 60 and 180 mg/kg BW/day) by gavage for 28 consecutive days, to assess and compare their toxicities. Although significantly impaired BW gains and evidence of TEHP enzymatic hydrolysis to DEHPA were observed only in males, exposures to the highest TEHP and DEHPA doses often resulted in similar alterations of hematology, serum clinical chemistry and liver enzymatic activities in both males and females. The squamous epithelial hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis observed in the non‐glandular forestomach of rats exposed to the middle and high DEHPA doses were most likely caused by the slightly corrosive nature of this chemical. Although tubular degeneration and spermatid retention were observed only in the testes of males exposed to the highest TEHP dose, numerous periodic acid‐Schiff stained crystalline inclusions were observed in testis interstitial cells at all TEHP dose levels. No‐observed‐adverse‐effect levels for TEHP and DEHPA are proposed, but the lower serum pituitary hormone levels resulting from TEHP and DEHPA exposures and the perturbations of testicular histology observed in TEHP‐treated males deserve further investigation. Improved characterization of the toxicity of flame retardants will contribute to better informed substitution choices for legacy flame retardants phased‐out over health concerns. Tris(2‐ethylhexyl) phosphate (TEHP) is a plasticizer and a flame retardant, while the related di(2‐ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid (DEHPA) is an oil additive and extraction solvent. TEHP and DEHPA toxicities were compared in a rat 28‐day oral exposure study. Although TEHP hydrolysis to DEHPA was detected only in males, TEHP and DEHPA often had similar effects on the endpoints assessed in both males and females. The observed alterations of serum pituitary hormone levels and testis histological features in males warrant further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ingestion of house dust has been demonstrated to be an important exposure pathway to several contaminants in young children. These compounds include bisphenol A (BPA), alkylphenols (APs), and alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEOs). Analysis of these compounds in house dust is challenging because of the complex composition of the sample matrix. Objective: The objective was to develop a simple and sensitive method to measure BPA, APs, and APEOs in indoor house dust. Methods: An integrated method that involved solvent extraction using sonication, sample cleanup by solid-phase extraction, derivatization by 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-methyl- N-(trimethylsilyl)acetamide, and analysis by GC coupled with tandem MS was developed for the simultaneous determination of BPA, APs, and APEOs in NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2585 (Organic contaminants in house dust) and in settled house dust samples. Results: Target analytes included BPA, 4-tert-octylphenol (OP), OP monoethoxylate, OP diethoxylate, 4-n-nonylphenol (4nNP), 4nNP monoethoxylate (4nNP1EO), branched nonylphenol (NP), NP monoethoxylate, NP diethoxylate, NP triethoxylate, and NP tetraethoxylate. The method was sensitive, with method detection limits ranging from 0.05 to 5.1 µg/g, and average recoveries between 82 and 115%. All target analytes were detected in SRM 2585 and house dust except 4nNP and 4nNP1EO. Conclusions: The method is simple and fast, with high sensitivity and good reproducibility. It is applicable to the analysis of target analytes in similar matrixes, such as sediments, soil, an [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]