Search

Resumen Objetivo El objetivo del presente articulo fue identificar el valor pronostico del indice nutricional pronostico (INP) basal en pacientes con cancer de prostata resistente a la castracion metastasico (CPRCm) tratados con acetato de abiraterona o enzalutamida. Metodos Se incluyeron 101 pacientes de CPRCm. El INP se calculo mediante la formula 10 × valor de albumina serica (g/dl) + 0,005 × recuento total de linfocitos (mm 3 ). Se utilizo el analisis ROC para determinar el valor pronostico del INP. Resultados El valor de corte estadisticamente significativo para el INP fue 46,62. La respuesta inicial del PSA y la cinetica del PSA (respuesta precoz por PSA y respuesta por PSA del 30-50-90% en cualquier momento) fueron mucho mejores en el grupo INP > 46,62 que en el grupo INP ≤ 46,62 (p 46,62 fue un predictor independiente de la SLP por PSA (HR: 0,42; p Conclusion El INP es un marcador pronostico util e independiente para los pacientes con CPRCm tratados con acetato de abiraterona o enzalutamida. El uso del INP previo al tratamiento puede ayudar a los medicos en la prediccion de la supervivencia y en la eleccion de acetato de abiraterona o enzalutamida.

Transverse colon cancer (TCC) is a rare condition that accounts for 10% of all colon cancers. TCC was accepted more likely right-sided colon cancers. We aimed to investigate whether TCC differs from other colon tumors by using clinical, pathological, and molecular prognostic factors known to be important in colon cancer and if it differs in its own anatomical structure. We evaluated local and locally advanced TCC patients between 2007 and 2020 years for demographics data, symptoms, treatment status, and histopathological and molecular features. Overall, 107 TCC patients were included in this study. According to the molecular data analysis of 44, 35, and 23 patients for MSI, RAS, and BRAF status, respectively, 7 (15.9%) were MSI-H, 13 (37.1%) were RAS mutant, and 11 (47.8%) had BRAF V600E mutation. The median follow-up time was 31.5 months. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5.19 months, and median OS was 88.3 months for the whole study population. The tumor stage was the most significant prognostic factor for DFS and OS. Although BRAF mutation was not a significant marker for DFS, it was an independent prognostic marker for OS (HR 3.90 95% CI 1.42–10.7). There were no statistically significant differences between proximal two-thirds and distal one-third tumor location. TCC has molecular features and prognostic factors more likely RCC and no differences between proximal and distal sub-parts. BRAF V600E mutation status is an independent predictor of survival even in the early stages of TCC.

Purpose: We aimed to identify the prognostic and predictive values of post-treatment prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and PNI dynamics in nasopharyngeal cancer patients (NPC) in this study.Methods: 107 non-metastatic NPC patients were included. PNI was calculated by using the following formula: [10 x serum albumin value (gr/dL)] + [0.005 x total lymphocyte count (per mm3)]. ROC analysis was used for determining prognostic PNI values and univariate and multivariate statistical analyses for prognostic characterization of PNI. Results: The statistically significant cut-off values for pre-and post-treatment PNI were 50.65 and 44.75, respectively. Of the pre-treatment PNI analysis, PNI≤50.65 group had shorter loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, for post-treatment PNI analysis, PNI≤44.75 group had shorter LRRFS and OS. In univariate analysis, only pre-treatment PNI was associated with LRRFS and DMFS, while pre-and post-treatment PNI were both associated with OS. In multivariate analysis, both PNI were independent prognostic markers for OS. In the combined analysis, pre-and post-treatment PNI, differences between the groups were statistically significant, and the PNI dynamics was an independent prognostic indicator for OS. Conclusion: PNI is a useful, independent prognostic marker for non-metastatic NPC patients. It is used for either pre-or post-treatment patients. Furthermore, changes in pre-treatment PNI value after curative treatment is a significant indicator for OS.

Aim: In this study, we aimed to analyze the effect of prognostic nutritional index and neutrophile lymphocyte ratio on the overall survival (OS) in patients treated with regorafenib. Materials and Methods: Metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who treated with regorafenib between 2016 and 2020 in a single center were evaluated retrospectively. ROC analysis was used for neutrophile lymphocyte ratio (NLR’s) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI’s) optimum cut‑off value. The relationship between OS with PNI and NLR was investigated. Results: Fifty‑two patient’s data were analyzed. The median age was 57 years, 22 (41.5%) of the patients were female. The optimal cut‑off value of PNI for OS was 45.7 according to ROC curve analysis. The median NLR value was accepted as 2.7. Median OS was 8.3 months. Patients who have high PNI value than 45.7 had longer OS (12.09 months vs. 6.31 months hazard ratio [HR]: 0.37 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19–0.73 P = 0.003) and there was a tendency for longer OS with low NLR value then median (12.05 months vs. 6.14 months HR: 0.54 95% CI: 0.29–1.23 P = 0.057). Primary tumor resected patients had longer OS than nonresected patients (12.05 months vs. 6.30 months HR: 0.34 95% CI: 0.17–0.66 P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, high PNI value more than 45.7 (HR: 0.40 95% CI: 0.18–0.88 P = 0.02) and resection of the primary tumor (HR: 0.40 95% CI: 0.21–0.80 P = 0.01) were the only independent factors for longer OS. Conclusion: Metastatic CRC patients with high pretreatment PNI and primary tumor resected are more likely to have longer OS with regorafenib. PNI is more reliable index than NLR to predict OS in metastatic CRC patients treated with regorafenib.

Purpose: The study evaluated the distributions and prognostic significance of ABO and rhesus (D) groups in MBC patients.Patients and methods: The data of 137 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, histopathological data and ABO/Rh blood groups of the patients were recorded. The ABO/Rh blood group distributions were compared to the healthy men control group (n:120,160) by the chi-square test. Results: Overall distributions of ABO blood groups were different between the patients (17.5% AB, 38% A, 19% B, 25.5% O) and control group (7.88% AB, 42.06% A, 15.22% B, 34.84% O) (pConclusions: The frequency of the AB blood group in MBC patients is increased than in the healthy control group. AB blood group may be a risk factor for MBC, whereas O blood group may be a protective factor.

Objective: To evaluate clinical and demographic characteristics and the results of cytotoxic treatments of KRASG12C, KRASother, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel negative patients. Methods: NGS data of 1264 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Among these patients, the mutation distributions of 1081 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma were analyzed. A total of 150 patients with negative NGS panel or mutant KRAS followed up in our clinic were included. Clinical features, overall survival, first-line chemotherapy responses, and progression-free survival of NGS panel negative, KRASG12C, and KRASother groups were compared. Results: In 1081 patients who underwent NGS from tumor tissue with the diagnosis of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, 296 (27%) NGS panel negative and 276 (26%) KRAS mutant patients were detected. Among these patients, 150 patients whose data were available were 71 (47.3%) NGS panel negative, 54 (36%) KRASother, and 25 (16.7%) KRASG12C. Clinical features, brain metastasis, and first-line chemotherapy response were similar among groups. Bone metastases were detected more often in the NGS panel negative group ( p = 0.03). The median follow-up was 8.4 months. Overall, 107 deaths had occurred at the time of analysis. There was no difference in overall survival ( p = 0.56) or progression-free survival ( p = 0.71) among NGS panel negative, KRASother, and KRASG12C patients. Conclusion: There is no difference in overall survival, first-line chemotherapy response, or progression-free survival among patients with NGS panel negative, KRASG12C, or KRASother metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Bone metastases were observed more frequently in the NGS panel negative group.

Contrast nephropathy risk has been increasing in cancer patients. Nephrotoxic side effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/receptor (anti-VEGF/R) drugs used in oncologic treatment are also prominent. The purpose of this study was to identify the possible association among anti-VEGF/R drugs use and development of the contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with cancers. A total of 92 patients were included in this prospective cross-sectional study. Patients whose glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of

To demonstrate whether early changes in systemic inflammatory markers are related with pazopanib treatment response in soft tissue sarcoma and renal cell carcinoma.Forty-one patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC) (n=22) and advanced stage soft tissue sarcoma (STS) (n=19) were assessed. Systemic inflammatory markers such as neutrophils, lymphocytes, c-reactive protein (CRP), mean platelet volume (MPV), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at both baseline and 1-month of pazopanib treatment were obtained and their relation with the first radiological response about 3-months later after pazopanib treatment was evaluated.Disease control rate (DCR) at the first initial radiological evaluation was 58.5 % for all, it was 77.3% for the RCC group and 36.8% in the STS group. Serum neutrophil, NLR and CRP levels were significantly decreased from baseline in RCC patients who had DCR with pazopanib treatment. Also, serum CRP levels after pazopanib treatment was significantly lower in RCC patients who had DCR (+) rather than those who progressed.Early decline in serum CRP, neutrophil and NLR levels in RCC patients who received pazopanib at the first month was significantly associated with disease control, assuming a predictive role for the first radiological assessment. However, there was no significant association between change in serum inflammatory marker levels and disease control in STS patients.

In this study, we aimed to determine the factors which affect post-progression survival (PPS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.87 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer had been followed up with palliative care due to disease progression or ECOG performance status after receiving at least two cycles of chemotherapy. PPS was estimated as the time between the last progression date and last control or death date in patients who were followed up with palliative care.87 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were included in the study. Evaluation with multivariate analysis of factors affecting PPS revealed a significantly longer PPS (10.8 weeks) in patients with ECOG score 0 or 1 than the PPS of patients with ECOG score 2-5 (3 weeks) (p=0.01). It was also found that PPS was 14.4 weeks in patients with CEA levels5ng/ml,while it was 6.7 weeks in patients with CEA levels ≥5 ng/ml (p=0.001) and PPS was 13.7 weeks in patients with controlled disease after first-line chemotherapy while it was 8 weeks in patients with progression (p=0.03); both were statistically significant. No significant association was found between PPS and age, gender, tumor location, sites of metastasis, and RAS status.ECOG performance status score of 0-1, CEA levels below 5 ng/ml, and disease control with first-line chemotherapy are related to longer PPS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Aim: The authors present real-world data on the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: The Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC) database includes patients with mRCC from 13 cancer centers in Turkey. Patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the second line and beyond were extracted from the TKCC database. Results: A total of 173 patients were included. The rates of patients treated with nivolumab in the second, third, fourth and fifth lines were 47.4%, 32.4%, 14.5% and 5.7%, respectively. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 24.2 months and 9.6 months, respectively. Nivolumab was discontinued owing to adverse events in 11 (6.4%) patients. Conclusion: Nivolumab was effective in patients with mRCC and no new safety signal was observed. WOS:000713725100001 34726480 Q3

Background To describe the prognostic value of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio and its effect on survival in in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 331 patients. The cut-off value of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio was specified as “3” which is mostly close—and also clinically easily applicable—to the median neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio level of our study group. High group is identified as neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio >3 (n = 160) and low group is identified as neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio ≤3 (n = 163). Results A total of 331 (with 211 male and 120 female) patients were enrolled to study. The median age of the patients was 58. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk score is calculated for the 72.8% (n = 241) of the study group and among these patients, favorable, intermediate, and poor risk rates were 22, 45.2, and 32.8%. The total usage of tyrosine kinase inhibitors reached 78% of the patients. The median overall survival was 32 months versus 11 months in the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio low and high groups, respectively (HR: 0.49 (95% CI 0.37–0.65), p Conclusion In conclusion, the pre-treatment value of elevated neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio might be a predictor of poor overall survival in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients.

In this study, we aimed to compare the data of sunitinib and pazopanib used in the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases and to evaluate the effective factors in terms of survival.The records of 125 patients with metastatic RCC admitted between January 2005 and February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed and 63 patients who received pazopanib or sunitinib were included in the study while 62 patients were excluded due to insufficient data. Clinical and histological characteristics, treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of the patients were compared.Patients with metastatic RCC who received pazopanib or sunitinib as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in first-line treatment were analyzed; 45 (71.4%) were male while 18 (28.6%) were female, and the median age was 60. 43 (68.3%) patients were treated with sunitinib and 20 (31.7%) with pazopanib. PFS ​​of pazopanib and sunitinib were 10.6 and 7.2 months, respectively. Median OS was 14.5 months in patients receiving pazopanib and 13.6 months in those receiving sunitinib. There was no statistical difference in PFS and OS between both treatments. The median OS of clear-cell RCC was 15.2 months, while of non-clear-cell RCC was 7.7months.High ECOG score, non-clear-cell histology, presence of liver metastasis in metastatic RCC patients were found to be associated with shorter OS and PFS. Sunitinib and pazopanib produced similar OS and PFS rates in first-line treatment of metastatic RCC.

Introduction: Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody–drug conjugate and its survival advantage has been shown in advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer. However, clinical trials underrepresent patients ⩾65 years of age, leading to a lack of information in this population. We analyzed the real-world outcomes of older women who were treated with T-DM1 therapy. Methods: We performed a multicenter, observational, retrospective analysis of patients aged ⩾65 years treated with T-DM1. A total of 93 patients from 10 cancer centers were involved in the study. Our goal was to determine the survival, response rates, and toxicity profile in T-DM1–treated patients, as well as the factors that influence survival. Results: Median follow-up was 12.2 months. Objective response rate was 29%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.47 and 15.0 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score 2 was found to be an independent prognostic factor for worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.81, p = 0.032) and OS (HR 2.33, p = 0.006). Any adverse event (AE) was seen in 92.5% of patients; grade 3 or 4 AEs were seen in 30.1%. Dose reduction or treatment discontinuation rates were 11.8% and 6.5%, respectively. Conclusion: The efficacy of T-DM1 was acceptable and it was generally well-tolerated among older patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.

This study aimed to reveal the relationship between the level of galectin-3 expression and the depth of response to neoadjuvant therapy in bladder tumor tissue with muscle invasion revealed by transurethral biopsy.The percentage of galectin-3 staining in transurethral biopsy tissue with muscle invasion was determined by immunohistochemistry. The patients were divided into two groups: the down-staging (+) group consisting of patients with pathological complete response or non-invasive bladder cancer, and the down-staging (-) group consisting of patients with stage 2 and above.There were 11 patients in the down-staging (+) group and 12 patients in the down-staging (-) group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of median age, gender, smoking, clinical stage at the time of diagnosis, distribution of carboplatin or cisplatin used as a platinum agent. Galectin-3 was positive in 2 patients (18.2%) in the group where down-staging was achieved with neoadjuvant therapy, while it was positive in 9 patients (75%) in the other group (p = 0.01). The median follow-up period of the patients was 31.6 months (95% CI 25.1-39.3). Overall survival was 43.4 months in the down-staging (+) group (95% CI 25.1-61.6) and 31.6 months in the down-staging (-) group (95% CI 12.7-50.6). Although there was a numerical difference, it did not reach statistical significance (p=0.37).The rate of down-staging after platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy is significantly higher in patients with low galectin-3 staining in transurethral bladder biopsy tissue.

We aimed to assess whether skeletal muscle loss during EGFR thyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy of advance non-small cell lung cancer patients is an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overal survival (OS).A total of 45 patients who had computed tomography images were retrospectively evaluated at the diagnosis and during the treatment period before progression occurs.During treatment 19 patients (42.2%) had skeletal muscle loss. Objective response rates in muscle loss group and muscle stable group were 36.8% and 73.0%, respectively (p0.01). Median follow-up time was 18.9 months (14.8-32.1). Median PFS was 14.7 months (95% CI 12.1-17.3) in muscle stable group and 7.6 months (95% CI 6.7-8.5) in muscle loss group (p0.01). Median OS was 18.3 months (95% CI 16.5-20.2) in muscle loss group while it was 30.1 months (95% CI 22.1-38.2) in muscle stable group (p0.01). In multivariate analysis for both PFS and OS, skeletal muscle loss was an independent prognostic factor. Hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS were 12.2 (95% CI 4.3-34.4) and 3.51 (95% CI 1.41-8.73) respectively.On CT imaging skeletal muscle loss before progression is an independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS in advance non-small cell lung cancer patients who received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Background: We present two cases of secondary pneumothorax after immunotherapy in two different clinics. Case summary: A 25-year old female patient with metastatic osteosarcoma, treated with atezolizumab. Grade 2 pneumonitis developed twice in the first year. Treatment was continued after recovery and areas of pneumonitis and pneumothorax were observed on computed tomography. No other reason could be found to cause pneumothorax. Pneumothorax resorbed spontaneously during follow-up. A 36-year old female patient treated with nivolumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), areas of pneumonitis and pneumothorax were only found as the cause of dyspnea. After treatment, remission was achieved on computed tomography findings. Pneumothorax was detected for the second time during continued therapy, and immunotherapy stopped permanently. Conclusion: These cases, indicate that immunotherapy can cause secondary immune-related pneumothorax based on immune pneumonitis.

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment outcomes, and survival of MCC cases in Turkey. Materials and Methods: The patients diagnosed with MCC between 1999 and 2018 at twenty different centers in Turkey were included in the study. Patient and tumor characteristics and adjuvant and metastatis treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median age of totally 89 patients was 70 (26-93). The most common primary location was lower limbs (n = 29, 32.5%). Immunohistochemically, CK20 positivity was present in 59 patients (66.3%). Only two patients had secondary malignancy. The majority of the patients (n = 76, 85.4%) were diagnosed at the localized stage. Surgery was performed for all patients in the early stage, and adjuvant radiotherapy or/and chemotherapy was applied to 52.6% (n = 40) of nonmetastatic patients. The median follow-up was 29 months. Recurrence developed in 21 (27.6%) of the 76 patients who presented with local or regional disease. Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 68.1% and 5-year DFS was 62.0% for localized stage. The 5-year DFS was similar for patients receiving adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or sequential chemoradiotherapy) and without adjuvant therapy (P > 0.05). Two-year overall survival in patients who presented with localized disease was 71.3% and 18.5% in metastatic patients (P < 0.001). In the metastatic stage, platinum/etoposide combination was the most preferred combination regimen. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line chemotherapy was 7 months (95% confidence interval: 3.5-10.5 months; standart error: 1.78). Conclusions: Although MCC is rare in Turkey, the incidence is increasing. Gender, CK20 status, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and adjuvant treatment were not associated with recurrence. © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment outcomes, and survival of MCC cases in Turkey. Materials and methods: The patients diagnosed with MCC between 1999 and 2018 at twenty different centers in Turkey were included in the study. Patient and tumor characteristics and adjuvant and metastatis treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median age of totally 89 patients was 70 (26-93). The most common primary location was lower limbs (n = 29, 32.5%). Immunohistochemically, CK20 positivity was present in 59 patients (66.3%). Only two patients had secondary malignancy. The majority of the patients (n = 76, 85.4%) were diagnosed at the localized stage. Surgery was performed for all patients in the early stage, and adjuvant radiotherapy or/and chemotherapy was applied to 52.6% (n = 40) of nonmetastatic patients. The median follow-up was 29 months. Recurrence developed in 21 (27.6%) of the 76 patients who presented with local or regional disease. Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 68.1% and 5-year DFS was 62.0% for localized stage. The 5-year DFS was similar for patients receiving adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or sequential chemoradiotherapy) and without adjuvant therapy (P > 0.05). Two-year overall survival in patients who presented with localized disease was 71.3% and 18.5% in metastatic patients (P < 0.001). In the metastatic stage, platinum/etoposide combination was the most preferred combination regimen. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line chemotherapy was 7 months (95% confidence interval: 3.5-10.5 months; standart error: 1.78). Conclusions: Although MCC is rare in Turkey, the incidence is increasing. Gender, CK20 status, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and adjuvant treatment were not associated with recurrence.

Sinonasal type hemangiopericytoma is a rare soft tissue tumor. Oncogenic osteomalacia (tumor-induced osteomalacia) is a rare syndrome that develops especially due to benign mesenchymal tumors. Nonspecific general bone pain and weakness delay the diagnosis and treatment of oncogenic osteomalacia, and it is difficult to determine the localization of the primary tumor causing oncogenic osteomalacia. A 43-year-old male patient with nasal hemangiopericytoma with symptoms of oncogenic osteomalacia is presented. The patient had musculoskeletal complaints at first and was diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation and surgery was performed. When his complaints recurred 1 year later, he was re-evaluated and diagnosed with hypophosphatemic osteomalacia. Despite the various treatments he received, his complaints did not decrease but increased, so a detailed examination was decided. When the positive PHEX mutation and very high fibroblast growth factor 23 level were detected, PET-CT imaging was performed with a pre-diagnosis of possible oncogenic osteomalacia, but no finding was found. Then he was evaluated with Ga-68 DOTATATE, and the soft tissue mass filling the right ethmoidal sinus was detected. Due to the relation of the mass with surrounding structures, it was considered unsuitable for total excision and incomplete surgical excision was performed. Pathologic evaluation revealed sinonasal type hemangiopericytoma (glomangiopericytoma). A significant remission in the patient's complaints was observed after the operation. Young patients with osteomalacia with unknown causes should be evaluated for malignancy, and screening and further examinations should be performed.

We aimed to assess whether anti-EGFR combined chemotherapy regimens are related with loss of skeletal muscle mass and to compare cetuximab and panitumumab therapies in the aspect of skeletal muscle area change as well as to assess whether skeletal muscle mass loss has prognostic significance in the RAS wild mCRC patients. A total of 56 patients (30 patients in cetuximab arm and 26 patients in panitumumab) who had computed tomography images were retrospectively evaluated at the diagnosis and follow up during the treatment period before progression. During treatment period 24 patients (42.8%) had muscle loss. Of these, 7 (29.2%) patients were treated at first-line and 17 (70.8%) patients were treated at second-line setting. There was no significant difference in the aspect of skeletal muscle loss among cetuximab and panitumumab combined treatment regimens. Median PFS was 9.1 (8.6–9.6) months in muscle loss group and 13.9 (7.2–20.6) months in muscle stable group (p = 0.001). Median OS was 23.4 (95% CI 15.8–31.0) months in muscle stable group and 19.1 (95% CI 17.0–21.3) months in muscle loss group (p = 0.57) at first-line setting. For second-line, median OS was 21.2 (14.7–27.7) months in muscle stable group and 14.4 (6.0-22.4) months in muscle loss group (p = 0.003). Decrease in skeletal muscle mass before progression on CT imaging is an independent indicator for shorter PFS value in RAS WT mCRC patients who received anti-EGFR combined chemotherapy regimens at both the first and second-line settings. Beside that shorter overall survival values also were significantly seen in patients who had muscle loss during anti-EGFR therapy in the second-line setting.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether primary tumor localization may be a risk factor for relapse and survival in seminomatous germ cell tumors (GCT) patients.In our study, 612 seminomatous GCT patients diagnosed in 22 centers between 01.01.1989 and 03.02.2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient interview information, patient files and electronic system data were used for the study.The primary tumor was localized in the right testis in 305 (49.9%) patients and in 307 (50.1%) in the left testis. Mean age of the patients was 36 years (range 16-85±10.4). The median follow-up period was 47 months (1-298). Recurrence was observed in 78 (12.7%) patients and 29 (4.7%) died during the follow-up period. Four-year overall survival (OS) was 95.4% and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 84.5%. The relationship between localization and relapse was significant in 197 patients with stage 2 and stage 3 (p=0.003). In this patient group, 41 (20.8%) relapses were observed. Thirty (73.2%) of the relapses were in the right testis and 11 (26.8%) in the left testis. Four-year OS was 92.1% in patients with right tumor; and 98.7% in patients with left tumor (p=0.007). When 612 patients were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 4 years, there was a 6.6% survival advantage in patients with left testicular tumor and this difference was significant (p=0.007).Survival rates of patients with primary right testicular localization were worse compared with left testicular localization, and relapse rates were higher in stage 2 and 3 patients with right testicular localization.

Aims: The addition of aflibercept to the fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with oxaliplatin. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI and aflibercept combination in patients with metastatic CRC in real-life experience. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and thirty-three patients who treated with FOLFIRI and aflibercept in the second-line were included in the study. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were recorded retrospectively. Survival (overall and progression-free survival [PFS]), response rates, and safety data were analyzed. Results: The median age was 61. Majority of patients (87.5%) received first-line bevacizumab and 10.1% of patients received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. About 80% of patients had KRAS, 18.6% of patients had NRAS, and 6.4% of patients had BRAF mutations. The median OS was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-12.6) and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5.5-6.5). About 4.6% of patients had complete response and 30.6% of patients had partial response as best tumor response. Grade 1-2 toxicities were seen in 33.4% of patients, while grade 3-4 toxicities were recorded in 27% of patients. Eight patients (2%) died due to treatment toxicity. Conclusions: Overall and PFS were similar in routine clinical practice compared to phase III pivotal VELOUR trial. However, response rates were found to be higher. It was observed that there were fewer adverse events compared to the VELOUR trial. © 2022 Authors. All rights reserved.

BackgroundSarcopenia is related to poor prognosis and drug toxicities in solid tumors. The aim of our study is to investigate the predisposition of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma who started regorafenib treatment to sarcopenia and prolonged survival.MethodsPatients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma who receives regorafenib were search retrospectively. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as dose reduction or toxicity requiring drug withdrawal. Sarcopenia evaluation was made with computed tomography performed within a month before treatment. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated.ResultsThirty-six patients were found as suitable for the study. 63.9% of patients were found as basally sarcopenic. Dose-limiting toxicity occured 13 of 23 patients (56.5%) with basal sarcopenia, whereas only 1 of 13 patients (7.6%) with no sarcopenia exhibited dose-limiting toxicity (p=0.005). Three patients suffered from grade 3-4 toxicity. Hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, and mucosal rash were the most seen side effects. Mean regorafenib treatment duration was 3.36 months. There was no significant difference in the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) between sarcopenic patients and patients with no sarcopenia. Durations were as OS 24.2 weeks in patients with sarcopenia (95% CI 16.7-31.7), 28.1 weeks in patients with no sarcopenia (95% CI 20.5-35.7) (p=0.36), and as PFS 14.2 weeks in patients with sarcopenia (95% CI 12.1-16.4), 14.8 weeks in patients with no sarcopenia (95% CI 9.7-20.1) (p=0.65).ConclusionDose-limiting toxicity was significantly higher in basally sarcopenic patients who were started regorafenib as treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. There was no significant relationship between overall survival and progression-free survival with sarcopenia.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether primary tumor localization may be a risk factor for relapse and survival in seminomatous germ cell tumors (GCT) patients. Methods: In our study, 612 seminomatous GCT patients diagnosed in 22 centers between 01.01.1989 and 03.02.2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient interview information, patient files and electronic system data were used for the study. Results: The primary tumor was localized in the right testis in 305 (49.9%) patients and in 307 (50.1%) in the left testis. Mean age of the patients was 36 years (range 16-85±10.4). The median follow-up period was 47 months (1-298). Recurrence was observed in 78 (12.7%) patients and 29 (4.7%) died during the follow-up period. Four-year overall survival (OS) was 95.4% and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 84.5%. The relationship between localization and relapse was significant in 197 patients with stage 2 and stage 3 (p=0.003). In this patient group, 41 (20.8%) relapses were observed. Thirty (73.2%) of the relapses were in the right testis and 11 (26.8%) in the left testis. Four-year OS was 92.1% in patients with right tumor; and 98.7% in patients with left tumor (p=0.007). When 612 patients were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 4 years, there was a 6.6% survival advantage in patients with left testicular tumor and this difference was significant (p=0.007). Conclusion: Survival rates of patients with primary right testicular localization were worse compared with left testicular localization, and relapse rates were higher in stage 2 and 3 patients with right testicular localization. © 2020 Zerbinis Publications. All rights reserved.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether primary tumor localization may be a risk factor for relapse and survival in seminomatous germ cell tumors (GCT) patients. Methods: In our study, 612 seminomatous GCT patients diagnosed in 22 centers between 01.01.1989 and 03.02.2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient interview information, patient files and electronic system data were used for the study. Results: The primary tumor was localized in the right testis in 305 (49.9%) patients and in 307 (50.1%) in the left testis. Mean age of the patients was 36 years (range 16-85 +/- 10.4). The median follow-up period was 47 months (1-298). Recurrence was observed in 78 (127%) patients and 29 (4.7%) died during the follow-up period. Four-year overall survival (OS) was 95.4% and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 84.5%. The relationship between localization and relapse was significant in 197 patients with stage 2 and stage 3 (p=0.003). In this patient group, 41 (20.8%) relapses were observed. Thirty (73.2%) of the relapses were in the right testis and 11 (26.8%) in the left testis. Four-year OS was 92.1% in patients with right tumor; and 98.7% in patients with left tumor (p=0.007). When 612 patients were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 4 years, there was a 6.6% survival advantage in patients with left testicular tumor and this difference was significant (p=0.007). Conclusion: Survival rates of patients with primary right testicular localization were worse compared with left testicular localization, and relapse rates were higher in stage 2 and 3 patients with right testicular localization. C1 [Yildiz, Birol; Erturk, Ismail; Acar, Ramazan; Karadurmus, Nuri] Hlth Sci Univ, Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Ankara, Turkey. [Kucukarda, Ahmet; Gokyer, Ali] Trakya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Edirne, Turkey. [Demiray, Atike Gokcen] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Denizli, Turkey. [Paydas, Semra] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Adana, Turkey. [Aral, Ipek Pinar] Nevsehir State Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Nevsehir, Turkey. [Gumusay, Ozge] Gazi Osman Pasa Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Tokat, Turkey. [Bilici, Ahmet] Medipol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey. [Akdeniz, Nadiye] Dicle Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Diyarbakir, Turkey. [Bahceci, Aykut] Gaziantep Dr Ersin ARSLAN Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Gaziantep, Turkey. [Demir, Hacer] Afyon Kocatepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Afyon, Turkey. [Esin, Ece] Bayindir Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Ankara, Turkey. [Uyeturk, Ummugul] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Bolu, Turkey. [Okten, Ilker Nihat] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Gortepe Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey. [Turk, H. Mehmet] BezmiAlem Vakif Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey. [Topaloglu, Ulas Serkan] Kayseri City Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kayseri, Turkey. [Basoglu, Tugba] Marmara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey. [Turhal, Nazim Serdar] Anadolu Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Kocaeli, Turkey. [Cinkir, Havva Yesil] Gaziantep Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Fac Med, Gaziantep, Turkey. [Menekse, Serkan; Kut, Engin] Manisa City Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Manisa, Turkey. [Cakmak, Yagmur] Kocaeli Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Kocaeli, Turkey. [Urun, Yuksel] Ankara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Ankara, Turkey. [Dal, Pinar] Eskisehir City Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Eskisehir, Turkey. [Sakalar, Teoman] Kahramanmaras City Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Kahramanmaras, Turkey. [Aktepe, Oktay Halit] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Ankara, Turkey.

Amac: Kolorektal kanser en sik gorulen kanserlerden biridir ve hastalik surecinde karaciger metastazi sik olarak gelismektedir. Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) skoru/gradinin hepatoseluler kanserde sagkalimi predikte ettigi gosterilmistir. Bu calismada ALBI skoru/gradinin karaciger metastatik kolon kanserindeki prognostik degerinin arastirilmasi amaclanmistir. Yontemler: Kolorektal kanser tanili ve senkron ya da metakron karaciger metastazi olan hastalarin tibbi kayitlari incelenmistir. Karaciger metastazinin saptandigi andaki serum albumin, total bilirubin, laktat dehidrojenaz, karsinoembryonik antijen and notrofil-lenfosit orani belirlenmistir. Albumin ve bilirubin kullanilarak ALBI skoru hesaplanmis ve derecelendirilmistir. Prognostik faktorler cok degiskenli regresyon modelleri ile degerlendirilmistir. Bulgular: Calismaya 223 hasta dahil edildi. Medyan genel sagkalim ALBI grad 1, 2 ve 3 icin sirasiyla 23.9, 16.0 ve 4.0 ay olarak saptandi (P

To assess whether regorafenib and TAS-102 treatments are associated with a change in Skeletal Muscle Area (SMA) as well as to compare Skeletal Muscle Mass (SMM) loss levels between regorafenib and TAS-102 treatments and prognostic significance in the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).A total of 36 mCRC patients, who received regorafenib or TAS-102 in the third-line and subsequent settings were assessed in the analysis. SMM changes were assessed with CT scans findings, and they were categorized into two groups as SMM-loss (SMM decrease ≥2%) and SMM-stable (SMM change2%).The SMM change after regorafenib therapy was significantly worse compared with TAS-102 therapy (p=0.001). The median overall survival (OS) was longer in SMM-stable group than in SMM-loss group (12.8 months; 95%CI:9.8-15.7) vs. 6.4 months; 95%CI:5.2-7.7, respectively;p=0.04). Cox regression analysis showed that SMM loss was independent prognostic indicator for OS (HR, 2.87; 95%CI: 1.07-7.42, p=0.03).Although patients who received regorafenib had more SMM loss than those who received TAS-102, there was no difference in OS between drugs.

Introduction and aim To investigate the effect of the prognostic nutritional index on treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the treatment modalities; the demographic, clinical and pathological features of 396 patients with RCC and prognostic nutritional index. Based on the median value, patients were grouped as having low and high prognostic nutritional index values. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and Cox-regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Results The median overall survival was 39 months (95% CI 26.1–51.8), 28 months (95% CI 17.9–38) and 7 months (95% CI 4.7–9.2) in patients with favorable, intermediate and poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk group, respectively. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p 38.5) group (p Conclusion In patients with renal cell cancer, prognostic nutritional index is closely related to survival and has prognostic significance.

321 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) started a new era in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). CheckMate-025 and CheckMate-214 trials established the effect of ICIs in the second-line and upfront therapy of mRCC, respectively. This study aimed to share a real-life experience regarding nivolumab in the second-line treatment and beyond in mRCC Methods: We retrospectively searched the Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC) database, which is the multicenter registry system, and extracted patients treated with nivolumab in the second line and beyond. The patients treated with nivolumab plus targeted therapy or ipilimumab were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were response rates and safety. Results: A total of 134 patients were included in this study. The median age at the starting of nivolumab treatment was 61 years (Inter Quartile Range (IQR):55-67). Three out of four patients were male. One hundred four patients (78%) had previous nephrectomy. The majority of patients had clear-cell pathology (83%). Thirteen patients (10%) had sarcomatoid features. According to International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, seventy patients (52%) were in the intermediate and poor prognostic group. The previous drugs administered in each line before nivolumab are shown in the table below. The number of patients treated with nivolumab was 63(47%), 45(33%), 17(13%), and 9(7%) in the second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-line setting, respectively. The median OS was 34 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 24.1-43.8)) with the 15 months (IQR:5-26) median follow-up. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 33% and 57%, respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were pneumonitis (%1.4) and colitis (

Introduction Colovesical fistulas are one of the most frequent complications in fistulizing Crohn's disease. Fistulizing Crohn's disease and tumor coexistence may lead to tumor spread through the fistula. Case report In this study, a 62-year-old male patient with colon cancer spreading to bladder mucosa through the colovesical fistula due to Crohn's disease is presented. He was treated and followed up for Crohn's disease and in the routine follow-up colonoscopy, a mass was observed in sigmoid colon. Computed tomography demonstrated the mass as a local disease. The patient underwent both left hemicolectomy and due to intraoperative colovesical fistula, subsequently, fistulectomy. Pathologic evaluation revealed stage 1 adenocarcinoma of the colon. Transurethral resection was performed for postoperative evaluation and a mass was detected and resected in the bladder. Pathologic findings of resected specimens were consistent with metastasis of adenocarcinoma of the colon. The clinical features, diagnosis and treatment data were analyzed retrospectively and it was thought that the existing tumor spreads to the bladder through the colovesical fistula due to no invasion into the muscularis propria layer of the bladder. Management and outcome Since muscle invasion was not detected in the bladder after TUR-T, cystectomy was not planned. 8 cycles of systemic adjuvant chemotherapy (Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine) were planned for 6 months. Gastroenterology consultation was requested for Crohn's disease treatment. It was recommended to discontinue azathioprine and continue with adalimumab therapy. Discussion Colovesical fistula may develop in Crohn's disease that is not in remission and the fistulae can lead the metastasis of tumors.

Purpose: To assess whether regorafenib and TAS-102 treatments are associated with a change in Skeletal Muscle Area (SMA) as well as to compare Skeletal Muscle Mass (SMM) loss levels between regorafenib and TAS-102 treatments and prognostic significance in the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: A total of 36 mCRC patients, who received regorafenib or TAS-102 in the third-line and subsequent settings were assessed in the analysis. SMM changes were assessed with CT scans findings, and they were categorized into two groups as SMM-loss (SMM decrease ≥2%) and SMM-stable (SMM change