Search

The introduction of bowel cancer population screening programs has had a profound impact on gastrointestinal pathology. While the focus is mainly on quality assurance of diagnoses relevant for the outcome of these programs (colorectal cancer and its precursors), incidental findings are increasingly diagnosed. The incidence of such findings is largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the incidence of incidental findings within the national screening program of the Netherlands. From the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (PALGA), we retrieved all histological diagnoses of patients participating in the national bowel cancer screening program from the start in 2014 until 1/ 1/2021. Descriptive statistics were used. During these 7 years, in total 9407 other polyps and malignancies (262 per 10,000 colonoscopies) were diagnosed. The majority (65%) were classified as inflammatory polyps. The most common malignancies were neuroendocrine tumours (n = 198, 6 per 10,000 colonoscopies); less common were lymphomas (n = 64) and metastases (n = 33). Mesenchymal polyps, such as leiomyomas and lipomas, were relatively common (27 and 16 per 10,000 colonoscopies, respectively), in comparison with neural polyps such as perineuriomas, ganglioneuromas, and neurofibromas (respectively 3, 2, and 1 per 10,000 colonoscopies). This is the largest study into the incidence of nonconventional colorectal polyps and malignancies in a homogeneous cohort of asymptomatic patients. Several of these diagnoses may have consequences for treatment and followup, in particular the malignancies and detection of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate, consistent and reproducible grading by pathologists is of key‐importance for identification of individual patients with invasive breast cancer (IBC) that will or will not benefit from adjuvant systemic treatment. We studied the laboratory‐specific grading variation using nationwide real‐life data to create insight and awareness in grading variation. Synoptic pathology reports of all IBC resection‐specimens, obtained between 2013 and 2016, were retrieved from the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Absolute differences in laboratory‐proportions of Grades I–III were compared to the national reference. Multivariable logistic regression provided laboratory‐specific odds ratios (ORs) for high‐ vs. low‐grade IBC. 33,792 IBC pathology reports of 33,043 patients from 39 laboratories were included, of which 28.1% were reported as Grade I (range between laboratories 16.3–43.3%), 47.6% as Grade II (38.4–57.8%), and 24.3% as Grade III (15.5–34.3%). Based on national guidelines, the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy was dependent on histologic grade in 29.9% of patients. After case‐mix correction, 20 laboratories (51.3%) showed a significantly deviant OR. Significant grading differences were also observed among pathologists within laboratories. In this cohort of 33,043 breast cancer patients, we observed substantial inter‐ and intra‐laboratory variation in histologic grading. It can be anticipated that this has influenced outcome including exposure to unnecessary toxicity, since choice of adjuvant chemotherapy was dependent on grade in nearly a third of patients. Better standardization and training seems warranted. What's new? Histologic grade serves a critical prognostic role in invasive breast cancer (IBC) and is used to guide therapeutic decisions. Evidence indicates, however, that IBC grading varies considerably. Here, grading variation in clinical practice was evaluated using real‐life data from laboratories in the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry. Laboratories varied in IBC grade I, II, and III reporting. Among grading components, nuclear polymorphism showed the greatest difference between laboratories. Within laboratories, one‐third of pathologists deviated significantly from national proportions for IBC grade I. Despite deployment of uniform guidelines across laboratories, IBC histologic grading is not necessarily performed in a consistent manner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The recent accelerated FDA approval of sotorasib, a highly selective KRAS G12C inhibitor, offers new opportunities for the treatment of KRAS p.(G12C)-mutated non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of the current study was to the determine the prevalence of KRAS mutations in stage IV non-squamous NSCLC in The Netherlands to reveal the potential impact of upcoming KRAS targeted therapy., Materials and Methods: All patients diagnosed with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC in 2013, 2015 and 2017 in the Netherlands were selected by linking the nation-wide Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Demographic and pathological variables were retrieved from the pathology reports including sex, age, KRAS mutation status, molecular test method used, and the mutation status of other genes., Results: Prevalence for any KRAS mutations in codon 12/13/61/146 was 39.1%. KRAS p.(G12C) was detected in 15.5% of all non-squamous NSCLC cases representing 39.6% of all KRAS-mutant cases. National testing rate for KRAS mutations increased from 70% in 2013 to 82% in 2017. Testing techniques changed significantly over time with next generation sequencing as the main used method in 2017 (71.6%) but did not affect prevalence of KRAS mutations over time. When KRAS was tested as part of a larger panel, the KRAS p.(G12C) mutation was frequently reported with a concurrent mutation in TP53 (47.7%) or STK11 (10.3%)., Conclusion: The high prevalence for KRAS p.(G12C) offers a promising new specific treatment option for 15% of all stage IV non-squamous NSCLC patients., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Immunohistochemical expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is used as a predictive biomarker for prescription of immunotherapy to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Accurate assessment of PD-L1 expression is therefore crucial. In this study, the extent of interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity in the Netherlands was assessed, using real-world clinical pathology data., Materials and Methods: Data on all NSCLC patients in the Netherlands with a mention of PD-L1 testing in their pathology report from July 2017 to December 2018 were extracted from PALGA, the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands. PD-L1 positivity rates were determined for each laboratory that performed PD-L1 testing, with separate analyses for histological and cytological material. Two cutoffs (1% and 50%) were used to determine PD-L1 positivity. Differences between laboratories were assessed using funnel plots with 95% confidence limits around the overall mean., Results: 6,354 patients from 30 laboratories were included in the analysis of histology data. At the 1% cutoff, maximum interlaboratory variation was 39.1% (32.7%-71.8%) and ten laboratories (33.3%) differed significantly from the mean. Using the 50% cutoff, four laboratories (13.3%) differed significantly from the mean and maximum variation was 23.1% (17.2%-40.3%). In the analysis of cytology data, 1,868 patients from 23 laboratories were included. Eight laboratories (34.8%) differed significantly from the mean in the analyses of both cutoffs. Maximum variation was 41.2% (32.2%-73.4%) and 29.2% (14.7%-43.9%) using the 1% and 50% cutoffs, respectively., Conclusion: Considerable interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity was observed. Variation was largest using the 1% cutoff. At the 50% cutoff, analysis of cytology data demonstrated a higher degree of variation than the analysis of histology data., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Accurate, consistent and reproducible grading by pathologists is of key-importance for identification of individual patients with invasive breast cancer (IBC) that will or will not benefit from adjuvant systemic treatment. We studied the laboratory-specific grading variation using nationwide real-life data to create insight and awareness in grading variation. Synoptic pathology reports of all IBC resection-specimens, obtained between 2013 and 2016, were retrieved from the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Absolute differences in laboratory-proportions of Grades I-III were compared to the national reference. Multivariable logistic regression provided laboratory-specific odds ratios (ORs) for high- vs. low-grade IBC. 33,792 IBC pathology reports of 33,043 patients from 39 laboratories were included, of which 28.1% were reported as Grade I (range between laboratories 16.3-43.3%), 47.6% as Grade II (38.4-57.8%), and 24.3% as Grade III (15.5-34.3%). Based on national guidelines, the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy was dependent on histologic grade in 29.9% of patients. After case-mix correction, 20 laboratories (51.3%) showed a significantly deviant OR. Significant grading differences were also observed among pathologists within laboratories. In this cohort of 33,043 breast cancer patients, we observed substantial inter- and intra-laboratory variation in histologic grading. It can be anticipated that this has influenced outcome including exposure to unnecessary toxicity, since choice of adjuvant chemotherapy was dependent on grade in nearly a third of patients. Better standardization and training seems warranted., (© 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine at a national level whether patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are adequately tested for EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangement, because targeted therapy is tailored to the results of molecular diagnostics., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Method: Data from all patients with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC diagnosed in 2013 or 2015 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and coupled with data from the Netherlands national pathology registry (PALGA). Using information extracted from PALGA we determined what percentage of the tumours were tested for EGFR or KRAS mutations and ALK rearrangement, identified the variables that were associated with the performance of molecular diagnostics and investigated the differences between 48 laboratories., Results: A total of 6,619 patients were included (2013: n = 3,195; 2015: n = 3,424). In 2013, EGFR or KRAS testing was performed on 73.1% of the tumours (variation between laboratories 30.6-91.7%); in 2015 this was 78.9% (variation 40.0-91.0%). In 2013 49.5% of the tumours without EGFR or KRAS mutations underwent ALK testing (variation between laboratories 6.3-100%) and in 2015 ALK testing was performed on 77.4% (32.5-100%). In 2015, 6 and 7 laboratories tested significantly fewer EGFR and ALK tests, respectively, than the national average., Conclusion: In 2013, molecular testing for EGFR and KRAS mutations and, in particular, for ALK rearrangement was suboptimal. EGFR and ALK testing was performed significantly more often in 2015. Despite this increase, there is room for improvement in a number of laboratories and hospitals, considering that some patients were possibly wrongly not eligible for targeted therapy.