Search

Abstract Background Simulation is a useful education tool for high-stakes clinical skills and decision-making. Recommending whether to accept or reject an organ for transplantation based on infection risk is a critical core competency in Transplant Infectious Disease (ID), however there are no published data that learners have opportunities to practice this during training. We created a novel simulation to expose learners to this real-life clinical scenario and evaluated their clinical decision-making in these situations. Methods We created 6 simulations with common ID consult questions about whether to accept or reject an organ for transplant based on infection risk (Table 1). During learners’ Transplant ID rotations, faculty periodically texted or paged them with the simulation cases as though they were the transplant coordinator. Learners had 15 minutes to ask follow up questions before deciding to accept or reject the organ and explain their decision-making process in a survey. Learners completed a survey 1 month after the simulation experience to evaluate its effectiveness. Results Between October 2021 and April 2022, 16 learners from 7 medical centers participated in the simulation (Table 2) and 94% (15/16) completed the follow up survey. Eighty-seven percent (13/15) of ID learners reported that the simulation was effective in teaching them when to accept or reject organs and 80% (12/15) felt more prepared to make these decisions in practice. Most learners correctly identified acceptable organs for transplant during the simulations (Figure 1). Of the 100 clinical reasoning decisions made during the activity, 19% were discordant, where the learner correctly decided to accept or decline the organ but with incorrect or incomplete reasoning for this decision (Figure 2). Conclusion ID learners perceived our transplant ID simulation as an effective educational tool to learn when to accept or reject an organ for transplant. By evaluating the clinical reasoning behind these decisions our simulation provides ID educators with nuanced insight into their learners' thought process and allows for targeted coaching to correct deficits in reasoning. Disclosures Rebecca Kumar, MD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support Jonathan Hand, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Roderick Go, DO, Aptose Biosciences: Stocks/Bonds|Bristol Meyers Squibb: Stocks/Bonds|Cytodyn Inc.: Stocks/Bonds|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support Erica J. Stohs, MD, MPH, bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support.

Transplant infectious disease (TID) clinicians are integral to the pre‐transplantation evaluation. Pre‐transplant evaluations allow clinicians to assess risk factors for latent infections and relevant exposures to potential pathogens, address immunizations, and optimize patients' health and understanding of life after transplant. However, there is not a standardized approach to the pre‐transplant evaluation. This article reviews the details of performing successful pre‐transplant evaluations, including updated recommendations on available vaccines and contemporary opinions on marijuana use. This resource can be used for teaching with trainees or for early career TID clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transplant infectious diseases is an engaging subspecialty within the field of infectious diseases and poses unique considerations when searching for a job. Here, we present essential considerations for those early in their career when applying for and selecting their employment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Limited evidence is available to inform the duration of antibiotic treatment in kidney transplant recipients with bacterial acute graft pyelonephritis. Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation suggest a 14–21 day duration. Methods: A four‐question survey was constructed to determine the current standard of practice for the duration of treatment for acute graft pyelonephritis. The survey was distributed among members of the Infectious Diseases and the Kidney Pancreas Communities of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation. Results: Among 144 survey respondents, 87 (60%) were infectious disease physicians, and 36 (25%) were transplant nephrologists. Although most (55%) respondents preferred a 14‐day duration, a spread between 7 and 28 days was observed. Goals of treatment and drivers for longer duration differed between infectious disease physicians and transplant nephrologists. Conclusions: Although most respondents prefer a 14‐day duration of treatment for acute graft pyelonephritis, a wide range of responses was seen between 7 and 28 days. More evidence is needed to inform optimal treatment duration in this common infectious complication after transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has strained healthcare systems with patient hospitalizations and deaths. Anti-spike monoclonal antibodies, including bamlanivimab, have demonstrated reduction in hospitalization rates in clinical trials, yet real-world evidence is lacking. Methods We conducted a retrospective case-control study across a single healthcare system of nonhospitalized patients, age 18 years or older, with documented positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing, risk factors for severe COVID-19, and referrals for bamlanivimab via emergency use authorization. Cases were defined as patients who received bamlanivimab; contemporary controls had a referral order placed but did not receive bamlanivimab. The primary outcome was 30-day hospitalization rate from initial positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Descriptive statistics, including χ 2 and Mann-Whitney U test, were performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used for adjusted analysis to evaluate independent associations with 30-day hospitalization. Results Between 30 November 2020 and 19 January 2021, 218 patients received bamlanivimab (cases), and 185 were referred but did not receive drug (controls). Thirty-day hospitalization rate was significantly lower among patients who received bamlanivimab (7.3% vs 20.0%, risk ratio [RR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]:.21–.64, P <.001), and the number needed to treat was 8. On logistic regression, odds of hospitalization were increased in patients not receiving bamlanivimab and with a higher number of pre-specified comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] 4.19 ,95% CI: 1.31–2.16, P <.001; OR 1.68, 95% CI: 2.12–8.30, P <.001, respectively). Conclusions Ambulatory patients with COVID-19 who received bamlanivimab had a lower 30-day hospitalization than control patients in real-world experience. We identified receipt of bamlanivimab and fewer comorbidities as protective factors against hospitalization. Bamlanivimab's role in preventing hospitalization associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. In a real-world, retrospective study of 403 high-risk, ambulatory patients with COVID-19, receipt of bamlanivimab compared to no monoclonal antibody therapy was associated with lower 30-day hospitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]