Search

Objectives: During and after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donation, donors may experience adverse events. This situation can increase anxiety of candidate donors. Time to return to daily life routine and work, presentation of comorbid diseases in follow-up, and donor opinions are topics of interest., Materials and Methods: We conducted a 14-question survey among related stem cell donors between January 2010 and March 2019 by telephone interview., Results: Of 257 related donors, 175 (68.1%) were interviewed; 87 (49.7%) were female and 88 (50.3%) were male. Among donors interviewed, 144 (82.3%) donated from only peripheral blood. After harvesting of stem cells, adverse events included hip pain (38.7%), bone pain (57.2%) during mobilization, and paresthesia (28.9%) during apheresis. After apheresis, 2 serious adverse events were reported in 2 (1.3%) female donors (1 salpingo-oophorectomy and 1 nephrectomy). Splenomegaly was observed in 1 male donor (0.7%). Among donors interviewed, 77 (44%) reported being able to perform daily activities on the same day. The shortest time to daily activity was in the peripheral blood group, and the longest was in the bone marrow group (P = .001). Among working donors, 23 (27.4%) returned to work on the same day; all were peripheral blood donors. Among donors interviewed, 114 (65.1%) wanted to volunteer to donate again. One donor (0.6%) expressed guilt after donation, and 162 (92.6%) recommended other people to be stem cell donors. During the follow-up period, musculoskeletal-joint diseases increased after donation (P = .012)., Conclusions: It is important to raise awareness in society about stem cell donation and to reduce the concerns among donor candidates. Although most of the adverse events after donation are temporary and mild, a few serious adverse events in donors have been observed. Stem cell donation does not cause loss of daily activity or inability to return to the work force.

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a well-established approach for patients diagnosed with primary myelofibrosis and remains the only potentially curative treatment., Aims: To present the overall outcome of patients with myelofibrosis treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation., Study Design: A retrospective cross-sectional study., Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of 26 consecutive patients with primary myelofibrosis who underwent transplantation at our center between January 2002 and January 2022. Disease and transplant variables contributing to outcomes were analyzed., Results: The median age at the time of transplantation was 52.5 (range, 32-63) years and the median time from diagnosis to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was 25 (range, 3.1-156.8) months. Myeloablative conditioning and reduced-intensity conditioning regimens were used in 8 (30.8%) and 18 (69.2%) transplantations, respectively. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was achieved in 23 patients at a median follow-up of 21.2 months (range, 12 days to 234.8 months). Primary graft failure occurred in 1 of 23 patients (4.3%). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred at a median of 16 (range, 12-39) days and 20 (range, 11-78) days, respectively. Acute graft-versus-host disease was seen in 11 of 22 patients engrafted allografts, of which 7 (31.8%) were grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease. Eight patients (36.4%) developed chronic graft-versus-host disease, and three cases were extensive. Four patients (19%) relapsed after a median of 5.5 months, and three patients received donor lymphocyte infusion. The 3-year overall survival rate of the entire study population was 46.2%. The median overall survival was not reached in the myeloablative conditioning group; however, it was 11.9 months in the reduced-intensity conditioning group (p =0.3). According to the donor graft source, the median overall survival was 0.73 months in mismatched unrelated graft recipients, 12 months in matched sibling donors, and not reached in matched unrelated graft recipients (p = 0.03). The 3-year progression-free survival rate of patients who survived > 100 days was 74.7%. The effect of JAK-2 status, graft source, conditioning regimen or dynamic international prognostic scoring system on progression-free survival was not statistically significant., Conclusion: Given the poor prognosis of non-transplant recipients and the lack of non-transplant curative approaches, our results support the consideration of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for eligible patients with primary myelofibrosis.

The AETHERA trial reported an increased progression-free survival (PFS) when brentuximab vedotin (BV) was used as maintenance therapy in high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Thus, we aimed to determine the impact and safety of BV as maintenance after ASCT in real-world patients. Seventy-five patients with relapsed/refractory HL started on BV consolidation therapy after ASCT due to high risk of relapse, between January 2016 and July 2019, from 25 institutions, were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 26 months. The most common high-risk features were primary refractory or relapsed disease <12 months (n = 61), lack of complete response (CR) to the last salvage regimen (n = 51), and having had at least two salvage regimens (n = 29). At the time of analysis, 42 patients completed consolidation courses, and BV was discontinued in 33 patients. Fifty patients had an ongoing response (CR in 41, PR in 6, and SD in 3 patients), 25 had progressed. Ten died in the follow-up, eight with progressive disease and two due to infection while in CR. The 2-year PFS and OS rates were 67.75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.77) and 87.61% (95% CI: 0.76-0.94), respectively. Seventeen patients (23%) received BV in the pre-ASCT treatment lines, and there was no survival difference between the BV-naïve and BV-exposed groups. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (27%) and peripheral neuropathy (21%). Sixteen patients (21.3%) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity. BV was discontinued due to adverse event in 12 patients. Consolidation with BV after ASCT can achieve a 2-year PFS of 67.75% (95% CI: 0.55-0.75) with an acceptable toxicity profile., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and poor prognostic hematological malignancy. There is still no standard treatment established for BPDCN patients. We aim to summarize the main clinical, biological features and treatment of 9 BPDCN patients., Methods: Nine patients with BPDCN who had been diagnosed between July 2008 and December 2018 in Ankara University School of Medicine, were retrospectively evaluated., Results: All patients (n = 9) were male, median age was 64 (21-80). Five patients (55.6%) had bone marrow infiltration, 5 patients (55.6%) cutaneous lesions, 6 patients (66.7%) lymph node involvement, 2 patients (22.2%) central nervous system involvement and 2 patients (22.2%) spleen involvement at time of diagnosis. Complex karyotype was observed in 2 patients. CHOP was given to 5 patients (55.6%), hyper-CVAD to 2 patients (22.2%), fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone to 1 patient (11.1%) and cyclophosphamide, etoposide, methylprednisolone to 1 patient (11.1%) as first line chemotherapy. Four patients (44.4%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in complete remission (CR) 1. Venetoclax was given to a transplant ineligible patient who had skin and lymph node involvement, with the off-label use. The median follow-up time was 15.9 months (3-48.6 months). Estimated median overall survival was 15.9 + 1.6 (95% CI 12.7-19.1) months., Conclusion: Intensive induction therapies followed by AHSCT in CR seems to be best approaches for patients with BPDCN. Thus, more effective treatment strategies particularly targeted therapies should be warranted to improve the survival of patients with this rare disease., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestOn behalf of all authors, there was no conflict of interest., (© Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 2020.)

Introduction: Thyroid dysfunction (TD) is one of the major endocrinopathies shown after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation over the long term. The incidence and the risk factors for TD have varied widely., Patients and Methods: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients with pre-transplant normal thyroid function tests who survived at least 1 year after allo-HSCT between 2006-2016 were included in the study., Results: Sixty-four patients (25%) developed TD at median of 34 months (range, 1-112 months). Hypothyroidism was detected in 32 patients (12%): 5 patients had primary hypothyroidism, and subclinical hypothyroidism occurred in 27 patients. 18 patients (7%) were diagnosed with hyperthyroidism: 2 patients (0.07%) were treated for primary hyperthyroidism, and 16 patients (6%) were followed for subclinical hyperthyroidism. Euthyroid sick syndrome occurred in 14 cases. None of the patients with thyroid dysfunction developed secondary thyroid malignancy. Receiving high-dose TBI (P = .001) was found to be significant risk for hypothyroidism; older age than median (P = .01) and pre-transplant active disease (P < .0001) were related to hyperthyroidism., Conclusions: Thyroid dysfunction, mostly hypothyroidism, is a long-term complication after allo-HSCT in 25% of patients. Older age, pre-transplant active disease, and receiving TBI are among the risk factors. Sustained long-term monitoring of thyroid function test should be considered post allo-HSCT., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)