Search

Despite documented evidence that ovarian cancer cells express immune-checkpoint molecules, such as PD-1 and PD-L1, and of a positive correlation between the presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and favourable overall survival outcomes in patients with this tumour type, the results of trials testing immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in these patients thus far have been disappointing. The lack of response to ICIs can be attributed to tumour heterogeneity as well as inherent or acquired resistance associated with the tumour microenvironment (TME). Understanding tumour immunobiology, discovering biomarkers for patient selection and establishing optimal treatment combinations remains the hope but also a key challenge for the future application of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. In this Review, we summarize results from trials testing ICIs in patients with ovarian cancer. We propose the implementation of a systematic CD8 + T cell-based immunophenotypic classification of this malignancy, followed by discussions of the preclinical data providing the basis to treat such immunophenotypes with combination immunotherapies. We posit that the integration of an accurate TME immunophenotype characterization with genetic data can enable the design of tailored therapeutic approaches and improve patient recruitment in clinical trials. Lastly, we propose a roadmap incorporating tissue-based profiling to guide future trials testing adoptive cell therapy approaches and assess novel immunotherapy combinations while promoting collaborative research., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

The accurate identification and prioritization of antigenic peptides is crucial for the development of personalized cancer immunotherapies. Publicly available pipelines to predict clinical neoantigens do not allow direct integration of mass spectrometry immunopeptidomics data, which can uncover antigenic peptides derived from various canonical and noncanonical sources. To address this, we present an end-to-end clinical proteogenomic pipeline, called NeoDisc, that combines state-of-the-art publicly available and in-house software for immunopeptidomics, genomics and transcriptomics with in silico tools for the identification, prediction and prioritization of tumor-specific and immunogenic antigens from multiple sources, including neoantigens, viral antigens, high-confidence tumor-specific antigens and tumor-specific noncanonical antigens. We demonstrate the superiority of NeoDisc in accurately prioritizing immunogenic neoantigens over recent prioritization pipelines. We showcase the various features offered by NeoDisc that enable both rule-based and machine-learning approaches for personalized antigen discovery and neoantigen cancer vaccine design. Additionally, we demonstrate how NeoDisc's multiomics integration identifies defects in the cellular antigen presentation machinery, which influence the heterogeneous tumor antigenic landscape., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Cryoablation is a minimally invasive procedure implemented to destroy solid tumors. It also results in the release of tumor antigens into the systemic circulation. Preclinical studies using immunogenic tumor models have shown that cryoablation evokes antitumor immune responses. The mechanisms by which cryoablation impacts immune responses in poorly immunogenic tumors have not been sufficiently explored., Experimental Design: We used a bilateral B16F10 melanoma model devoid of strong immunogenic antigens. Cryoablation-induced effector immune responses were investigated, also in combination with a peritumoral STING agonist and systemic anti-PD-1. Selective immune cell depletion, T-cell migration arrest, in vivo T-cell transplantation, and cryoablation versus surgical removal techniques were used to determine the contribution of cryoablation and immunotherapies to systemic antitumor effector immune responses., Results: Treatment of a tumor with cryoablation + STING agonist + anti-PD-1 resulted in the rejection of unablated, contralateral tumors. Depletion studies demonstrated that tumor rejection is essentially dependent on CD8+ T cells. T-cell arrest in the lymph nodes had no effect on the rejection process. Splenic CD8+ T cells isolated from cryoablation-treated mice with B16F10 melanoma, upon transplantation into melanoma-bearing recipients, did not impact the recipient's tumor growth. Finally, comparison of cryoablation + STING agonist + anti-PD-1 versus surgery + STING agonist + anti-PD-1 in the bilateral tumor model showed no difference in the rejection of contralateral tumors., Conclusions: Cryoablation does not significantly contribute to systemic antitumor effector immune responses in a B16F10 melanoma model. Cryoablation primarily performs tumor debulking, and immunotherapy functions independently of cryoablation in eliciting antitumor effector immune responses., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtype, with dismal prognosis and limited option in advanced settings, yet stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in this subtype has a predictive role., Patients and Methods: The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial 22-00 is a randomized phase III clinical trial testing the efficacy of low-dose metronomic oral Cyclophosphamide-Methotrexate (CM) maintenance following standard adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for early-stage hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients. A case-cohort sampling was used. We characterized immune cells infiltrates in patients with TNBC by 6 plex immunofluorescence (IF) staining for CD4, FOXP3, CD3, cytokeratine and CD8 RESULTS: We confirmed that high immune CD3 + T cells as well as stromal and intra-epithelial Tregs (CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells) infiltrates were associated with a better Distant Recurrence-Free Interval (DRFI), especially in LN+ patient, regardless of the treatment. More importantly, we showed that the spatial distribution of immune cells at baseline is crucial, as CM maintenance was detrimental for T cells excluded LN+ TNBC patients., Conclusions: immune spatial classification on immune cells infiltrates seems crucial and could help patients' selection in clinical trial and greatly improve responses to specific therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Rusakiewicz S, Tyekucheva S, Tissot-Renaud S, Chaba K, Imbimbo M, Benedetti F, Kammler R, Hornfeld J, Munzone E, Gianni L, Thurlimann B, Láng, I, Pruneri G, Gray KP, Regan MR, Loi, S, Colleoni M, Viale G, Kandalaft L, Coukos G reported no conflict of interest. Giuseppe Curigliano reports consultation fees from Roche, Seagen, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Daichii Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Exact Sciences, Menarini., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Tumor microenvironments (TMEs) influence cancer progression but are complex and often differ between patients. Considering that microenvironment variations may reveal rules governing intratumoral cellular programs and disease outcome, we focused on tumor-to-tumor variation to examine 52 head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. We found that macrophage polarity-defined by CXCL9 and SPP1 (CS) expression but not by conventional M1 and M2 markers-had a noticeably strong prognostic association. CS macrophage polarity also identified a highly coordinated network of either pro- or antitumor variables, which involved each tumor-associated cell type and was spatially organized. We extended these findings to other cancer indications. Overall, these results suggest that, despite their complexity, TMEs coordinate coherent responses that control human cancers and for which CS macrophage polarity is a relevant yet simple variable.

Background: The SAKK 17/16 study showed promising efficacy data with lurbinectedin as second- or third-line palliative therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Here, we evaluated long-term outcome and analyzed the impact of lurbinectedin monotherapy on the tumor microenvironment at the cellular and molecular level to predict outcomes., Material and Methods: Forty-two patients were treated with lurbinectedin in this single-arm study. Twenty-nine samples were available at baseline, and seven additional matched samples at day one of cycle two of treatment. Survival curves and rates between groups were compared using the log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical significance was set at P value <0.05., Results: Updated median overall survival (OS) was slightly increased to 11.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.8-13.8 months]. Thirty-six patients (85%) had died. The OS rate at 12 and 18 months was 47% (95% CI 32.1% to 61.6%) and 31% (95% CI 17.8% to 45.0%), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.6-5.5 months). No new safety signals were observed. Patients with lower frequencies of regulatory T cells, as well as lower tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) at baseline, had a better OS. Comparing matched biopsies, a decrease of M2 macrophages was observed in five out of seven patients after exposure to lurbinectedin, and two out of four patients showed increased CD8+ T-cell infiltrates in tumor., Discussion: Lurbinectedin continues to be active in patients with progressing malignant pleural mesothelioma. According to our very small sample size, we hypothesize that baseline TAMs and regulatory T cells are associated with survival. Lurbinectedin seems to inhibit conversion of TAMs to M2 phenotype in humans., Competing Interests: Disclosure MF declared unrestricted grants from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) and AstraZeneca paid to his institution, advisory board roles for AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); Roche, BMS; Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Takeda, payment for expert testimony from Takeda and Roche, meeting support from Merck, and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Roche. FG declared outside the submitted work personal fees for advisory role, speaker engagements and travel and accommodation expenses from MSD, Novocure, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pharmamar, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work personal fees for advisory role, speaker engagements, and travel, and accommodation expenses from MSD, Novocure, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pharmamar, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work personal fees for advisory role, speaker engagements and travel and accommodation expenses from MSD, Novocure, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pharmamar, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre. MP declared consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Esei, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Merck, speakers fee from Janssen, payment for expert testimony from Takeda and Novartis, support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Vifor, and Takeda. PZ declared payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from MSD, Astellas, Janssen, Sanofi, Ipsen, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Bayer, support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Astellas, Janssen, Sanofi, Ipsen, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Bayer, participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for MSD, Astellas, Janssen, Sanofi, Ipsen, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Bayer. GLC declared payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Novocure, Zai Lab, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, BMS, and Bayer, participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Novocure. RvM declared advisory boards fees from AstraZeneca, MSD; Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pfizer, Pharmamar, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Gillead, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Vifor. SS declared grants from AstraZeneca, BMS paid to her institution, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, MSD, and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for MSD, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim paid to her institution. YM declared consulting fees from Merck-Serono, BMS, Roche, Novartis, support for attending meetings and/or travel from PharmaMar, Merck, and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Merck-Serono, BMS, Roche, Novartis, all paid to his institution. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Cryoablation is a hypothermic modality exercised as a focal therapy for annihilating cancer lesions. Its application leaves the ablated tumor in situ, allowing multifarious tumor antigens to be available to the host's immune system. This ensues the activation of innate and adaptive immunity against the tumor antigens. Therefore, cryoablation can be employed as an in vivo vaccination tool to fortify the impact of immunotherapies. Application of checkpoint inhibitors, toll-like receptor agonists, adoptive cell therapies and epigenetic modulators has been shown to galvanize the immune system against tumors. Preliminary data demonstrate an excellent synergy between cryoablation and immunotherapies. Future endeavors should focus on tailoring cryo-immunotherapies based on the tumor's immune signature and testing alternative approaches to circumvent treatment-associated toxicities and maximize efficacy., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is a promising experimental immunotherapy that has shown high objective responses in patients with melanoma. Current protocols use a lymphodepletive chemotherapy before infusion of ex vivo expanded TILs, followed by high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2). Treatment-related toxicities are mainly attributable to the chemotherapy regimen and to the high-dose IL-2 and are generally reversible. Neurological side effects have rarely been described. Nevertheless, due to improvements in cell production techniques and due to combinations with other immunomodulating molecules, side effects not previously described may be encountered., Case Presentation: We report the case of a 53-year-old heavily pretreated patient with melanoma who developed Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) 19 days after ACT using autologous TILs, given in the context of a phase I trial. He presented with dorsal back pain, unsteady gait and numbness in hands and feet. Lumbar puncture showed albuminocytological dissociation, and nerve conduction studies revealed prolonged distal motor latencies in median, ulnar, tibial and peroneal nerves, compatible with a GBS. The patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulins and intensive neurological rehabilitation, with progressive and full recovery at 21 months post-TIL-ACT. Concomitant to the onset of GBS, a cytomegalovirus reactivation on immunosuppression was detected and considered as the most plausible cause of this neurological side effect., Conclusion: We describe for the first time a case of GBS occurring shortly after TIL-ACT for melanoma, even though we could not identify with certainty the triggering agent. The report of such rare cases is of extreme importance to build on the knowledge of immune cellular therapies and their specific spectrum of toxicities., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GC has received grants or research support from or is coinvestigator in clinical trials by BMS, Celgene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Iovance and Kite, and has received honoraria for consultations or presentations by Roche, Genentech, BMS, AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, Nextcure and GeneosTx. SZ reports travel grants by AstraZeneca in the last 12 months., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Several mechanisms are present in the tumor microenvironment (TME) to impair cytotoxic T cell responses potentially able to control tumor growth. Among these, the accumulation of adenosine (Ado) contributes to tumor progression and represents a promising immunotherapeutic target. Ado has been shown to impair T cell effector function, but the role and mechanisms employed by Ado/Ado receptors (AdoRs) in modulating human peripheral and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) function are still puzzling., Methods: CD8 + T cell cytokine production following stimulation was quantified by intracellular staining and flow cytometry. The cytotoxic capacity of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was quantified by the chromium release assay following co-culture with autologous or anti-CD3-loaded tumor cell lines. The CD8 + T cell metabolic fitness was evaluated by the seahorse assay and by the quantification of 2-NBDG uptake and CD71/CD98 upregulation upon stimulation. The expression of AdoRs was assessed by RNA flow cytometry, a recently developed technology that we validated by semiquantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), while the impact on T cell function was evaluated by the use of selective antagonists and agonists. The influence of Ado/AdoR on the PKA and mTOR pathways was evaluated by phosphoflow staining of p-CREB and p-S6, respectively, and validated by western blot., Results: Here, we demonstrate that Ado signaling through the A2A receptor (A2AR) in human peripheral CD8 + T cells and TILs is responsible for the higher sensitivity to Ado-mediated suppression of T central memory cells. We confirmed that Ado is able to impair peripheral and tumor-expanded T cell effector functions, and we show for the first time its impact on metabolic fitness. The Ado-mediated immunosuppressive effects are mediated by increased PKA activation that results in impairment of the mTORC1 pathway., Conclusions: Our findings unveil A2AR/PKA/mTORC1 as the main Ado signaling pathway impairing the immune competence of peripheral T cells and TILs. Thus, p-CREB and p-S6 may represent useful pharmacodynamic and efficacy biomarkers of immunotherapies targeting Ado. The effect of Ado on T cell metabolic fitness reinforces the importance of the adenosinergic pathway as a target for next-generation immunotherapy.

Treatment of solid tumors by ablation techniques has gained momentum in the recent years due to their technical simplicity and reduced morbidity as juxtaposed to surgery. Cryoablation is one of such techniques, known for its uniqueness to destroy the tumors by freezing to lethal temperatures. Freezing the tumor locally and allowing it to remain in situ unleashes an array of tumor antigens to be exposed to the immune system, paving the way for the generation of anti-tumor immune responses. However, the immune responses triggered in most cases are insufficient to eradicate the tumors with systemic spread. Therefore, combination of cryoablation and immunotherapy is a new treatment strategy currently being evaluated for its efficacy, notably in patients with metastatic disease. This article examines the mechanistic fabric of cryoablation for the generation of an effective immune response against the tumors, and various possibilities of its combination with different immunotherapies that are capable of inducing exceptional therapeutic responses. The combinatorial treatment avenues discussed in this article if explored in sufficient profundity, could reach the pinnacle of future cancer medicine., (Copyright © 2019 Yakkala, Chiang, Kandalaft, Denys and Duran.)

Purpose: Although localized prostate cancer (PCa) is multifocal, the dominant intraprostatic nodule (DIN) is responsible for disease progression after radiation therapy. PCa expresses antigens that could be recognized by the immune system. We therefore hypothesized that stereotactic dose escalation to the DIN is safe, may increase local control, and may initiate tumor-specific immune responses., Patients and Methods: Patients with localized PCa were treated with stereotactic extreme hypofractionated doses of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions to the whole prostate while simultaneously escalating doses to the magnetic resonance image-visible DIN (45 Gy, 47.5 Gy, and 50 Gy in 5 fractions). The phase 1a part was designed to determine the recommended phase 1b dose in a "3 + 3" cohort-based, dose-escalation design. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicities defined as ≥grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity (or both) by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4) up to 90 days after the first radiation fraction. The secondary endpoints were prostate-specific antigen kinetics, quality of life (QoL), and blood immunologic responses., Results: Nine patients were treated in phase 1a. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at either level, and therefore the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Further characterization of tolerability, efficacy, and immunologic outcomes was conducted in the subsequent 11 patients irradiated at the highest dose level (50 Gy) in the phase 1b expansion cohort. Toxicity was 45% and 25% for grades 1 and 2 GU, and 20% and 5% for grades 1 and 2 GI, respectively. No grade 3 or worse toxicity was reported. The average (±standard error of the mean) of the QoL assessments at baseline and at 3-month posttreatment were 0.8 (±0.8) and 3.5 (±1.5) for the bowel (mean difference, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-5), and 6.4 (±0.8) and 7.27 (±0.9) for the International Prostate Symptom Score (mean difference, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.9), respectively. A subset of patients developed antigen-specific immune responses against prostate-specific membrane antigen (n = 2), prostatic acid phosphatase (n = 1), prostate stem cell antigen (n = 4), and prostate-specific antigen (n = 2)., Conclusions: Irradiation of the whole prostate with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and dose escalation to 50 Gy to the DIN was tolerable and determined as the recommended phase 1b dose. This treatment has promising antitumor activity, which will be confirmed by the ongoing phase 2 part. Preliminary QoL analysis showed minimal impact in GU, GI, and sexual domains. Stereotactic irradiation induced antigen-specific immune responses in a subset of patients., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Fighting leukemia using the immune system (antibodies, lymphocytes) is an old idea, which has already been fulfilled in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Indeed, the effectiveness of the transplant depends on the action of the donor lymphocytes. To limit the adverse effects on bystander organs (graft-versus-host disease), autologous T cells can be engineered to express synthetic chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) with artificially redirected antigen specificity. Autologous T cells engineered to express a CAR targeting CD19 have shown unprecedented efficacy in clinical trials for relapsed/refractory B-cell leukemias and lymphomas. In this review article, we describe the therapeutic strategies, clinical trial results, side effects and future direction of CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and other pediatric cancers and its future role in the Swiss setting., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

The association of radiotherapy and immunotherapy has recently emerged as an exciting combination that might improve outcomes in many solid tumor settings. In the context of breast cancer, this opportunity is promising and under investigation. Given the heterogeneity of breast cancer, it might be meaningful to study the association of radiotherapy and immunotherapy distinctly among the various breast cancer subtypes. The use of biomarkers, such as tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, which are also associated to breast cancer heterogeneity, might provide an opportunity for tailored studies. This review highlights current knowledge of the association of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in the setting of breast cancer and attempts to highlight the therapeutic opportunities among breast cancer heterogeneity.

Colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) is a key regulator of monocyte/macrophage differentiation that sustains the protumorigenic functions of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). We show that CSF1 is expressed in human melanoma, and patients with metastatic melanoma have increased CSF1 in blood compared to healthy subjects. In tumors, CSF1 expression correlated with the abundance of CD8 + T cells and CD163 + TAMs. Human melanoma cell lines consistently produced CSF1 after exposure to melanoma-specific CD8 + T cells or T cell-derived cytokines in vitro, reflecting a broadly conserved mechanism of CSF1 induction by activated CD8 + T cells. Mining of publicly available transcriptomic data sets suggested co-enrichment of CD8 + T cells with CSF1 or various TAM-specific markers in human melanoma, which was associated with nonresponsiveness to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) checkpoint blockade in a smaller patient cohort. Combination of anti-PD1 and anti-CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) antibodies induced the regression of BRAF V600E -driven, transplant mouse melanomas, a result that was dependent on the effective elimination of TAMs. Collectively, these data implicate CSF1 induction as a CD8 + T cell-dependent adaptive resistance mechanism and show that simultaneous CSF1R targeting may be beneficial in melanomas refractory to immune checkpoint blockade and, possibly, other T cell-based therapies., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.)

Introduction: Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynecologic cancers. Relapses after remission are common, hence novel strategies are urgently needed. Our group has previously developed a vaccination approach based on dendritic cells pulsed with HOCl-oxidized tumor lysates. Here we investigate the improvement of this vaccine strategy using squaric acid treatment of cancer cells during tumor lysate preparation and by differentiating dendritic cells in the presence of GM-CSF and IFNα. Methods: Induction of cell death by squaric acid treatment was assessed with propidium iodide (PI) and Annexin V in ID8 tumor cells. High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) immunogenic status was analyzed using a western blot-based method, as previously described. For immunological tests, ID8 cells expressing ovalbumin (ova-ID8) were treated with squaric acid before cell lysis. DCs prepared with the canonical GM-CSF and IL-4 differentiation cocktail or IFNα and GM-CSF were pulsed with tumor cell lysates and further matured in the presence of IFNγ and LPS (4-DCs and α-DCs respectively). DCs were then used in co-culture assays with ova-specific T cells and IFNγ and IL-4 secretion measured by ELISA. DC phenotypes were characterized by FACS. Finally, DCs were tested in an ovarian cancer mouse model measuring body weight and animal survival. Results: Squaric acid treatment of mouse ovarian cancer cells induced tumor cell death as well as preserve HMGB1, a crucial Damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) signal, in its active reduced form. Squaric acid treatment of ID8-ova cells increased IFNγ and decreased IL-4 production from ova-specific T cells in co-culture experiments, promoting a more immunogenic cytokine secretion pattern. DCs differentiated in the presence of IFNα induced a considerable decrease in IL-4 production compared to canonical 4-DCs, without affecting IFNγ release. DC phenotyping demonstrated a more mature and immunogenic phenotype for IFNα-differentiated DCs. Vaccination in tumor-bearing mice showed that IFNα-differentiated DCs pulsed with squaric acid-treated lysates were the most potent at delaying tumor growth, improving animal survival. Conclusion: We identified squaric acid as a novel immunogenic treatment of tumor cells for cancer vaccines particularly efficient in prolonging animal survival when used in combination with IFNα-differentiated DCs. These promising results support future efforts for the clinical translation of this approach.

Background: Immunotherapy consists of activating the patient's immune system to fight cancer and has the great potential of preventing future relapses thanks to immunological memory. A great variety of strategies have emerged to harness the immune system against tumors, from the administration of immunomodulatory agents that activate immune cells, to therapeutic vaccines or infusion of previously activated cancer-specific T cells. However, despite great recent progress many difficulties still remain, which prevent the widespread use of immunotherapy. Some of these limitations include: systemic toxicity, weak immune cellular responses or persistence over time and most ultimately costly and time-consuming procedures., Main Body: Synthetic and natural biomaterials hold great potential to address these hurdles providing biocompatible systems capable of targeted local delivery, co-delivery, and controlled and/or sustained release. In this review we discuss some of the bioengineered solutions and approaches developed so far and how biomaterials can be further implemented to help and shape the future of cancer immunotherapy., Conclusion: The bioengineering strategies here presented constitute a powerful toolkit to develop safe and successful novel cancer immunotherapies.

* Coffea arabica (Arabica) and Coffea canephora (Robusta) are the two main cultivated species used for coffee bean production. Arabica genotypes generally produce a higher coffee quality than Robusta genotypes. Understanding the genetic basis for sucrose accumulation during coffee grain maturation is an important goal because sucrose is an important coffee flavor precursor. * Nine new Coffea genes encoding sucrose metabolism enzymes have been identified: sucrose phosphate synthase (CcSPS1, CcSPS2), sucrose phosphate phosphatase (CcSP1), cytoplasmic (CaInv3) and cell wall (CcInv4) invertases and four invertase inhibitors (CcInvI1, 2, 3, 4). * Activities and mRNA abundance of the sucrose metabolism enzymes were compared at different developmental stages in Arabica and Robusta grains, characterized by different sucrose contents in mature grain. * It is concluded that Robusta accumulates less sucrose than Arabica for two reasons: Robusta has higher sucrose synthase and acid invertase activities early in grain development - the expression of CcSS1 and CcInv2 appears to be crucial at this stage and Robusta has a lower SPS activity and low CcSPS1 expression at the final stages of grain development and hence has less capacity for sucrose re-synthesis. Regulation of vacuolar invertase CcInv2 activity by invertase inhibitors CcInvI2 and/or CcInvI3 during Arabica grain development is considered.