Search

PurposeTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) often metastasizes to the central nervous system (CNS) and has the highest propensity among breast cancer subtypes to develop leptomeningeal disease (LMD). LMD is a spread of cancer into leptomeningeal space that speeds up the disease progression and severely aggravates the prognosis. LMD has limited treatment options. We sought to test whether the common anti-helminthic drug mebendazole (MBZ) may be effective against murine TNBC LMD.MethodsA small-molecule screen involving TNBC cell lines identified benzimidazoles as potential therapeutic agents for further study. In vitro migration assays were used to evaluate cell migration capacity and the effect of MBZ. For in vivo testing, CNS metastasis was introduced into BALB/c athymic nude mice through internal carotid artery injections of brain-tropic MDA-MB-231-BR or MCF7-BR cells. Tumor growth and spread was monitored by bioluminescence imaging and immunohistochemistry. MBZ was given orally at 50 and 100 mg/kg doses. MBZ bioavailability was assayed by mass spectrometry.ResultsBioinformatic analysis and migration assays revealed higher migratory capacity of TNBC compared to other breast cancer subtypes. MBZ effectively slowed down migration of TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231 and its brain tropic derivative MDA-MB-231-BR. In animal studies, MBZ reduced leptomeningeal spread, and extended survival in brain metastasis model produced by MDA-MB-231-BR cells. MBZ did not have an effect in the non-migratory MCF7-BR model.ConclusionsWe demonstrated that MBZ is a safe and effective oral agent in an animal model of TNBC CNS metastasis. Our findings are concordant with previous efforts involving MBZ and CNS pathology and support the drug's potential utility to slow down leptomeningeal spread.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between brain metastasis resection and risk of nodular leptomeningeal disease (nLMD) is unclear. This study examined genomic alterations found in brain metastases with the aim of identifying alterations associated with postoperative nLMD in the context of clinical and treatment factors. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted on patients who underwent resection of brain metastases between 2014 and 2022 and had clinical and genomic data available. Postoperative nLMD was the primary endpoint of interest. Targeted next-generation sequencing of > 500 oncogenes was performed in brain metastases. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to identify clinical features and genomic alterations associated with nLMD. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 101 patients with tumors originating from multiple cancer types. There were 15 patients with nLMD (14.9% of the cohort) with a median time from surgery to nLMD diagnosis of 8.2 months. Two supervised machine learning algorithms consistently identified CDKN2A/B codeletion and ERBB2 amplification as the top predictors associated with postoperative nLMD across all cancer types. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis including clinical factors and genomic alterations observed in the cohort, tumor volume (× 10 cm3; HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.5; p = 0.04), CDKN2A/B codeletion (HR 5.3, 95% CI 1.7-16.9; p = 0.004), and ERBB2 amplification (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1-14.4; p = 0.04) were associated with a decreased time to postoperative nLMD. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to increased resected tumor volume, ERBB2 amplification and CDKN2A/B deletion were independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative nLMD across multiple cancer types. Additional work is needed to determine if targeted therapy decreases this risk in the postoperative setting.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of melanoma with a dismal prognosis. We present the case of a young man with stage IV BRAF V600E mutant melanoma with lung, lymph node, and brain metastases initially treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab, who subsequently developed LMD. Upon change to BRAF/MEK targeted therapy with nivolumab, a durable complete response was achieved and remains ongoing, off treatment, 7 years from diagnosis. Management of symptomatic LMD remains a critical unmet clinical challenge, with limited clinical trial data. This exceptional case is instructive, as the first published case of the use of the triplet, and the first durable response with therapy discontinuation, in melanoma LMD. The triple‐drug regimen may be considered a viable option in fit patients. This case highlights the potential for long‐term disease control and the critical and urgent need to develop clinical trials inclusive of patients with LMD to define the best treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cytology cell blocks (CBs) are not routinely made for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens. The goal of this study was to identify when CSF CB preparation improves diagnostic performance. Materials and Methods: Under institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of CSF cytology cases was conducted at a tertiary university‐based hospital and an affiliated county hospital. Patient history, CSF volume, final diagnosis, use of stains, and whether the CB was contributory was determined from the cytopathology report. CSF nucleated cell count data was obtained from the medical record. Results: A total of 69 CSF specimens with CBs from January 2006 to March 2023 were identified from 61 patients. The median CSF volume was 8 mL (interquartile range, 4–13 mL; range, 1–800 mL), with immunohistochemical stains performed on 29 (42%) cases. Per cytology report, CB was contributory in 23 cases (33%), not contributory in 34 cases (49%), and not discussed in 12 cases (17%). The median volume was 8 mL for cases in which CB was contributory, not contributory, or not discussed. There was no difference in average nucleated cell counts between cases in which CB was contributory versus not contributory (73.9 vs. 40.0, p =.175). Conclusions: CBs for CSF samples were contributory in a subset (33%) of cases. The authors were unable to identify any specific pre‐analytic factors, including specimen volume and average nucleated cell counts, for cases in which CB was contributory. Further evaluation is needed to identify if there are scenarios in which CSF CBs should be routinely prepared. Cytology cell blocks (CBs) are not routinely made for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens. In a retrospective review of CSF cytology cases at a tertiary university‐based hospital and an affiliated county hospital, CBs for CSF samples were contributory in a subset (33%) of cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Epithelioid glioblastoma (eGB), a very aggressive and rare brain tumour, is associated with a dismal median overall survival. Effective therapies for patients with eGB, particularly with leptomeningeal dissemination, are still lacking. Here, we describe a case of a 25-year-old male diagnosed with an intramedullary cervical tumour with subsequent leptomeningeal disease. Histopathology identified a highly necrotising, epithelioid-type tumour with high cell density, most compatible with the diagnosis of an eGB. DNA analysis revealed an unprecedented B-Raf protooncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) gene variant in exon 15 (ENST00000288602.6, c.1799_1810delinsATG, p.(V600_W604delinsDG)), triggering activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Consequently, we initiated MAPK inhibitor (MAPKi) therapy, utilizing a combination of BRAF and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis confirmed the drugs’ presence in the patient’s cerebrospinal fluid, indicating their capacity to cross the blood-brain barrier. Remarkably, the patient responded very well to therapy and transitioned from a near-comatose state to significantly improved health, sustained for over three months. This study highlights that MAPKi, particularly targeted towards novel BRAFV600 mutations, might offer promising advancements in eGB treatment strategies.

Background Melanoma leptomeningeal disease (LMD) has a poor prognosis. However, the management of patients with advanced melanoma has evolved with time, including those with LMD. We reviewed a large cohort of melanoma LMD patients to assess factors associated with survival. Methods Retrospective clinical data was collected on patients diagnosed with LMD at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2015 to 2020. Overall survival (OS) was determined from LMD diagnosis to date of death or last follow-up. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate OS and to assess univariate group differences, respectively. Multivariable associations of survival with variables of interest were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results A total of 172 patients were identified. The median age at LMD diagnosis was 53 (range 20–79) years, and all patients had radiographic evidence of LMD on magnetic resonance imaging of either brain or spine. In total 143 patients previously received systemic therapy (83%), with a median of 2 prior treatments (range 0–5). 81 patients (47%) had concurrent uncontrolled systemic disease and 80 patients (53%) had elevated serum LDH at the time of diagnosis. With a median follow-up of 4.0 months (range 0.1–65.3 months), median OS for all patients from LMD diagnosis was 4.9 months. Patients (n  = 45) who received intrathecal therapy or systemic immunotherapy for LMD had a median OS of 8.0 months and 10.2 months, respectively. On multivariable analysis, decreased performance status, positive CSF cytology, elevated LDH, and whole brain radiation were associated with worse OS. Conclusions Despite many advances in therapeutic options, the outcomes of melanoma patients with LMD remains poor. However, a subset of patients appears to derive benefit from LMD-directed treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating sequelae of metastatic spread that affects approximately 5% of cancer patients. The incidence of LMD is increasing due to advancements in systemic therapy and enhanced detection methods. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the evidence in the detection, prognostication, and treatment of LMD. A comprehensive literature search of PUBMED was conducted to identify articles reporting on LMD including existing data and ongoing clinical trials. We found a wide array of treatment options available for LMD including chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy as well as several choices for radiotherapy including whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Despite treatment, the prognosis for patients with LMD is dismal, typically 2–4 months on average. Novel therapies and combination approaches are actively under investigation with the aim of improving outcomes and quality of life for patients with LMD. Recent prospective data on the use of proton CSI for patients with LMD have demonstrated its potential survival benefit with follow-up investigations underway. There is a need for validated metrics to predict prognosis and improve patient selection for patients with LMD in order to optimize treatment approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It is critical to better understand the risk factors, natural history, and treatment outcomes, including patients in a modern cohort. Methods: In this single center retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with MBC and LMD who received care from 2000 to 2024 and abstracted key clinical, treatment, and survival data. Results: We identified 111 patients with MBC and LMD, including patients with the following subtypes: HR+/HER2− (n = 53, 47.7%), HER2+ (n = 30, 27.0%), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC; n = 28, 25.2%). Median time from the diagnosis of MBC to LMD was 16.4 months (range 0–101.3 months). After the diagnosis of LMD, most patients received systemic therapy (n = 66, 59.5%) and/or central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy (n = 94, 84.7%) including intrathecal therapy (n = 42, 37.8%) and/or CNS-directed radiation therapy (n = 70, 63.1%). In all patients, median overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis of LMD to death was 4.1 months (range 0.1–78.1 months) and varied by subtype, with HR+/HER2− or HER2+ MBC patients living longer than those with TNBC (4.2 and 6.8 months respectively vs. 2.0 months, p < 0.01, HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.36–3.39). Patients who received CNS-directed therapy lived longer than those who did not (4.2 vs. 1.3, p = 0.02 HR 0.54, 0.32–0.91). Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 (6.4 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.04, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46–0.99). On multivariable analysis, having TNBC was associated with shorter OS from time of LMD to death (p = 0.004, HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.25–3.30). Conclusion: This is one of the largest case series of patients with MBC and LMD. Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014, although median OS was short overall. Patients with TNBC and LMD had particularly short OS. Novel therapeutic strategies for LMD remain an area of unmet clinical need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating sequela of many cancers, with an extremely poor prognosis. Barriers to improving outcomes are related to the inability of many traditional therapies to effectively reach the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space within the central nervous system. Liquorpheresis is an emerging treatment modality specific to CSF diseases, the primary mechanism of action of which is direct targeted filtration of CSF content by neurosurgical access. In this review, we highlight the principles of liquorpheresis and detail how LMD can be amenable to this treatment. Further, we summarize the current in vitro and in vivo evidence supporting liquorpheresis as a feasible method to treat LMD and other central nervous system diseases as well as describe its conceivable limitations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Resection of brain metastases (BMs) may be associated with increased risk of leptomeningeal disease (LMD). This study examined rates and predictors of LMD, including imaging subtypes, in patients who underwent resection of a BM followed by postoperative radiation. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted examining overall LMD, classic LMD (cLMD), and nodular LMD (nLMD) risk. Logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards, and random forest analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with LMD. RESULTS: Of the 217 patients in the cohort, 47 (21.7%) developed postoperative LMD, with 19 cases (8.8%) of cLMD and 28 cases (12.9%) of nLMD. Six-, 12-, and 24-month LMD-free survival rates were 92.3%, 85.6%, and 71.4%, respectively. Patients with cLMD had worse survival outcomes from the date of LMD diagnosis compared with nLMD (median 2.4 vs 6.9 months, p = 0.02, log-rank test). Cox proportional hazards analysis identified cerebellar/insular/occipital location (hazard ratio [HR] 3.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-6.11, p = 0.0003), absence of extracranial disease (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.27-4.88, p = 0.008), and ventricle contact (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.5-5.3, p = 0.001) to be associated with postoperative LMD. A predictive model using random forest analysis with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 in a test cohort identified tumor location, systemic disease status, and tumor volume as the most important factors associated with LMD. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location, absence of extracranial disease at the time of surgery, ventricle contact, and increased tumor volume were associated with LMD. Further work is needed to determine whether escalating therapies in patients at risk of LMD prevents disease dissemination.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) refers to the infiltration of cancer cells into the leptomeningeal compartment. Leptomeninges are the two membranous layers, called the arachnoid membrane and pia mater. The diffuse nature of LMD poses a challenge to its effective diagnosis and successful management. Furthermore, the predominant phenotype; solid masses or freely floating cells, has altering implications on the effectiveness of drug delivery systems. The standard of care is the intrathecal delivery of chemotherapy drugs but it is associated with increased instances of treatment-related complications, low patient compliance, and suboptimal drug distribution. An alternative involves administering the drugs systemically, after which they must traverse fluid barriers to arrive at their destination within the leptomeningeal space. However, this route is known to cause off-target effects as well as produce subtherapeutic drug concentrations at the target site within the central nervous system. The development of new drug delivery systems such as liposomal cytarabine has improved drug delivery in leptomeningeal metastatic disease, but much still needs to be done to effectively target this challenging condition. In this review, we discuss about the anatomy of leptomeninges relevant for drug penetration, the conventional and advanced drug delivery methods for LMD. We also discuss the future directions being set by different clinical trials.

Leptomeningeal disease, also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, occurs when cancer metastasizes to the meninges. This rare complication is associated with a poor prognosis. It is most commonly seen in patients with metastatic breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma. However, it is extremely rare in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. A 64-year-old female with poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma metastatic to the peritoneum developed new neurological symptoms twelve months after initiating palliative chemotherapy. Her uptrending tumor markers, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and lumbar puncture results were consistent with leptomeningeal disease. The patient was started on treatment with intrathecal methotrexate (IT MTX), which resulted in significant improvement in her neurological symptoms. Leptomeningeal disease in gastric cancer has limited treatment options due to poor blood-brain barrier penetration. IT MTX is a potentially effective treatment for patients with leptomeningeal disease from gastric cancer.

Introduction: CNSide is a platform that detects and characterizes tumor cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD). The platform was validated per College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Clinical Laboratories Improvement Amendment (CLIA) guidelines and run as a commercial Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) at Biocept in San Diego, CA. The platform allows CSF tumor cell (CSF-TC) enumeration and biomarker characterization by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective chart review of HER2 FISH CNSide test results that were commercially ordered on 26 patients by physicians for LMD breast cancer patients between April 2020 and October 2022. Results: We show that HER2 is amplified on CSF tumor cells in 62% (16/26) of LMD breast cancer patients. 10/26 (38%) patients had discordant HER2-positivity between the primary tumor tissue and CSF-TC; of these, 35% (9/26) of the patients displayed HER2 amplification on the CSF-TCs, however were categorized as HER2 negative on the primary tumor. Of the 27% (7/26) patients with a HER2 positive primary tumor, one patient showed a HER2 negative LMD tumor. Two patients, 8% (2/26) had a HER2 equivocal primary tumor; of these, one demonstrated a HER2 negative, and one a HER2 positive LMD tumor. Serial analysis (at least 4 longitudinal tests) of HER2 status of the CSF-TC throughout therapy was available for 14 patients and demonstrated that HER2 status of the LMD changed in 29% (4/14) during their treatment course and impacted care decisions. Conclusions: Our data suggests that CSF-TC HER2 FISH analysis in LMD breast cancer patients may be discordant to the primary tumor sample and the discovery of HER2 positivity in the CSF may open doors to anti-HER2 targeted therapy options for LMD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The CNS is a common site for distant metastasis and treatment failure in melanoma patients. This study aimed to evaluate the inclusion rate of patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) in prospective clinical trials. 69.3% of trials excluded MBM patients based on their CNS disease. In univariate analysis, trials not employing immunotherapy (p = 0.0174), inclusion of leptomeningeal disease (p < 0.0001) and non-pharmaceutical sponsor trials (p = 0.0461) were more likely to enroll patients with MBM. Thoughtful reconsideration of clinical trial designs is needed to give patients with MBMs access to promising investigational agents and improve outcomes for patients with MBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a serious cancer complication associated with poor prognosis. Approximately 5%–25% of patients with melanoma develop LMD. Currently, no standard treatment protocol exists and very few cases have been reported. Despite ongoing advances in new therapies, treatment options for LMD remain limited. Herein, we report a case of intrathecal pembrolizumab administration in a patient with melanoma and LMD. Intrathecal pembrolizumab administration was feasible and safe at the doses tested. Drawing from this case, along with our expertise and the existing evidence on systemic immunotherapy, we propose that an immunotherapy approach involving intrathecal administration for patients with LMD from melanoma warrants additional exploration in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) secondary to high grade glioma (HGG), such as glioblastoma (GBM), are characterized by the spread of tumor cells to the leptomeninges which further complicates treatment approaches. Intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy has surfaced as a potential strategy to bypass the blood-brain barrier and address the challenges posed by disseminated disease. Here, we present a review of the safety and efficacy of IT chemotherapy in the treatment of LMD secondary to HGG. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted searching PubMed and Embase from January 1995 to September 2022 using specified terms related to IT chemotherapy for LMD. Included articles involved patients diagnosed with LMD from HGG, treated with intrathecal chemotherapy, and provided survival data. Data, including demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival information, were collected and independently extracted. Results: A total of 68 patients across 10 clinical studies were diagnosed with LMD from HGG and included in the review. Among these patients, the average age at diagnosis was 44.2 years. GBM was the most common tumor type (n = 58, 85.3%). A majority of the patients presented with recurrent disease (n = 29, 60.4%). The review encompassed various IT chemotherapy regimens, including mafosfamide, thio-TEPA, 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd), methotrexate (MTX), and cytarabine; however, dosages and frequencies were inconsistently reported. The mean progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for this cohort were 7.5 months and 11.7 months, respectively. Common side effects of IT chemotherapy included headaches, nausea, and vomiting, with more severe complications such as myelotoxicity, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, meningitis, and gastrointestinal toxicity reported in some cases. Conclusion: LMD continues to be an uncommon complication associated with HGG with a poor prognosis. This article provides an overview of the presently available literature on IT chemotherapy for LMD secondary to HGG, and their respective treatment protocols with overall survival attributes. Additional research is warranted to ascertain how to maximize the potential efficacy of IT chemotherapy as a treatment option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The "International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer" was initiated more than 10 years ago. The rationale was to standardize treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) based on available evidence and to ensure that all ABC patients worldwide receive adequate treatment and access to new therapies. Topics of ABC7: The 7th International Consensus Conference for ABC (ABC7) took place from November 9 to 11, 2023 – as in previous years in Lisbon/Portugal. ABC7 focused not only on metastatic disease but also on locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. Special topics were the management of oligometastatic disease, leptomeningeal disease, brain metastases, and pregnant women with ABC. Due to the current situation worldwide, there was a special interest to patients living in conflict zones. As in previous years, patient advocates from around the world were integrated into the ABC conference and had a major input to the consensus. Rationale for the Manuscript: A German breast cancer expert panel comments on the voting results of the ABC7 panelists regarding their relevance for routine clinical practice in Germany. As with previous meetings, the ABC7 votes focused on modified or new statements. Regarding the statements not modified for the ABC7 consensus, they are discussed in the published manuscript from 2021 in which the German experts commented on the ABC6 consensus. The German comments are always based on the current recommendations of the "Breast Committee" of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGO Mamma). Box 1. ABC7 Panelists: 1-Fatima Cardoso, PT (chair) 2-Eric P. Winer, US (honorary chair) 3-Larry Norton, US (honorary chair) 4-Alberto Costa, CH/IT (honorary chair, not in presence) 5-Eva Schumacher-Wulf, DE (co-chair, patient advocate) 6-Sandra Ximena Franco Millan, CO (scientific committee) 7-Karen Gelmon, CA (scientific committee) 8-JosephGligorov, FR (scientific committee) 9-Volkmar Mueller, DE (scientific committee) 10-Birgitte V. Offersen, DK (scientific committee) 11-Sandra Swain, US (scientific committee) 12-Matti S. Aapro, CH 13-Jyoti Bajpai, IN 14-Carlos H. Barrios, BR 15-Laura Biganzoli, IT 16-Maria João Cardoso, PT 17-Lisa A Carey, US 18-Mariana Chavez MacGregor, US 19-Runcie CW Chidebe, NG (patient advocate) 20-Javier Cortés, ES 21-Rebecca Dent, SG 22-Nagi S. El Saghir, LB 23-Alexandru Eniu, CH 24-Lesley Fallowfield, UK (psycho-oncologist) 25-Prudence A. Francis, AU 26-Jenny Gilchrist, AU 27-William Gradishar, US 28-Nadia Harbeck, DE 29-Xichun Hu, CN 30-Ranjit Kaur, MY (patient advocate) 31-Belinda Kiely, AU 32-Sung-Bae Kim, KR 33-Marion Kuper-Hommel, NZ 34-Frédéric E. Lecouvet, BE 35-Ginny Mason, US (patient advocate) 36-Claire Myerson, UK (patient advocate) 37-Silvia Neciosup, PE 38-Shinji Ohno, JP 39-Shani Paluch-Shimon, IL 40-Ann Partridge, US 41-Frédérique Penault-Llorca, FR 42-Hope S. Rugo, US 43-Elzbieta Senkus, PL 44-Peter Vuylsteke, BW 45-Theresa Wiseman, UK (nurse) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is a treatment option for leptomeningeal disease (LMD), which permits whole neuroaxis treatment while minimizing toxicity. Despite this, patients inevitably experience progression. Adding systemic therapy to pCSI may improve outcomes. Methods In this single-institution retrospective case series, we present the feasibility of treatment with pCSI (30Gy, 10 fractions) and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in two sequential patients with LMD from melanoma. Results The first patient developed LMD related to BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma after prior ICI and BRAF-targeted therapy. After pCSI with concurrent nivolumab, the addition of relatlimab, and BRAF-targeted therapy, he remained alive 7 months after LMD diagnosis despite central nervous system progression. The second patient developed LMD related to BRAF-wildtype melanoma after up-front ICI. He received pCSI with concurrent ipilimumab and nivolumab, then nivolumab maintenance. Though therapy was held for ICI hepatitis, the patient remained progression-free 5 months after LMD diagnosis. Conclusion Adding an ICI to pCSI is feasible for patients with LMD and demonstrates a tolerable toxicity profile. While prospective evaluation is ultimately warranted, pCSI with ICI may confer survival benefits, even after prior ICI.

Introduction: Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is a treatment option for leptomeningeal disease (LMD), which permits whole neuroaxis treatment while minimizing toxicity. Despite this, patients inevitably experience progression. Adding systemic therapy to pCSI may improve outcomes. Methods: In this single-institution retrospective case series, we present the feasibility of treatment with pCSI (30Gy, 10 fractions) and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in two sequential patients with LMD from melanoma. Results: The first patient developed LMD related to BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma after prior ICI and BRAF-targeted therapy. After pCSI with concurrent nivolumab, the addition of relatlimab, and BRAF-targeted therapy, he remained alive 7 months after LMD diagnosis despite central nervous system progression. The second patient developed LMD related to BRAF-wildtype melanoma after up-front ICI. He received pCSI with concurrent ipilimumab and nivolumab, then nivolumab maintenance. Though therapy was held for ICI hepatitis, the patient remained progression-free 5 months after LMD diagnosis. Conclusion: Adding an ICI to pCSI is feasible for patients with LMD and demonstrates a tolerable toxicity profile. While prospective evaluation is ultimately warranted, pCSI with ICI may confer survival benefits, even after prior ICI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) remains a major challenge in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma patients. Outcomes for patient remain poor, and patients with LMD continue to be excluded from almost all clinical trials. However, recent trials have demonstrated the feasibility of conducting prospective clinical trials in these patients. Further, new insights into the pathophysiology of LMD are identifying rational new therapeutic strategies. Here we present recent advances in the understanding of, and treatment options for, LMD from metastatic melanoma. We also annotate key areas of future focus to accelerate progress for this challenging but emerging field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is characterized by the infiltration of tumor cells into the meninges, and poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Breast cancer is a common cause of NM among solid tumors, further highlighting the urgent need to explore effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of NM therapy in breast cancer by collating existing research, evaluating current treatments, and identifying potential emerging therapeutic options. This review explores the clinical features, therapeutic strategies, recent advances, and challenges of managing NM in patients with breast cancer. Its management includes multimodal strategies, including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. This review also emphasizes targeted drug options and optimal drug concentrations, and discusses emerging therapies. Additionally, it highlights the variability in treatment outcomes and the potential of combination regimens to effectively manage NM in breast cancer. Challenges in treating NM include debates over clinical trial end points and the management of adverse effects. Drug resistance and low response rates are significant hurdles, particularly inHER2-negative breast cancer. The development of more precise and cost-effective medications with improved selectivity is crucial. Additionally, global efforts are needed for infrastructure development and cancer control considering the diverse nature of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Metastasis from cancers of the cervix to the central nervous system is relatively uncommon. Smallcell neuroendocrine cancer of the cervix is a very rare tumor with a high tendency to spread early. Case Description: A 33-year-old-woman was diagnosed with a small-cell neuroendocrine cancer of the cervix after complaining about a long time of post-coital bleeding. The patient was treated with eight cycles of chemotherapy and whole pelvis consolidation radiotherapy. One year later, the patient experienced local recurrence with metastases to the liver, left adrenal, and brain. Brain metastases were treated with radiosurgery. The patient started immunotherapy. Two months later, the patient was presented to the emergency department with urinary incontinence, neck pain, and difficulty walking. She was then diagnosed with craniospinal leptomeningeal disease (LMD). The patient received craniospinal palliative radiation therapy. The disease activity was severely progressive, and the patient passed out within 10 days after being diagnosed with cranial LMD. Conclusion: A high index of suspicion for LMD is essential in patients diagnosed with cervix cancer who present with unexplained neurologic symptoms, especially with the high-grade neuroendocrine cancer type. Implementing robust research to uncover the biology of these aggressive tumors is important due to the rarity of this pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leptomeningeal metastases/diseases (LMDs) are a late-stage complication of solid tumor or hematologic malignancies. LMD is spread of cancer cells to the layers of the leptomeninges (pia and arachnoid maters) and subarachnoid space seen in 3 to 5% of cancer patients. It is a disseminated disease which carries with it significant neurologic morbidity and mortality. Our understanding of disease pathophysiology is currently lacking; however, advances are being made. As our knowledge of disease pathogenesis has improved, treatment strategies have evolved. Mainstays of treatment such as radiotherapy have changed from involved-field radiotherapy strategies to proton craniospinal irradiation which has demonstrated promising results in recent clinical trials. Systemic treatment strategies have also improved from more traditional chemotherapeutics with limited central nervous system (CNS) penetration to more targeted therapies with better CNS tumor response. Many challenges remain from earlier clinical detection of disease through improvement of active treatment options, but we are getting closer to meaningful treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Breast cancer with brain metastasis (BCBM) and leptomeningeal disease (LMD) are important clinical problems. Traditionally, patients with metastases to the brain and meninges were excluded from clinical trials; hence, robust, evidence-based treatment recommendations are lacking. In this review, we outline the systemic treatment options and ongoing clinical trials. Recent Findings: Several recent studies have added to the systemic treatment options available. Antibody-drug conjugates have changed the therapeutic landscape. Combination treatment modalities that target multiple mechanisms including disruption of the blood brain barrier are increasingly being studied. Summary: Breast cancer with brain metastases and LMD is a heterogenous disease. While the prognosis remains grim, with more systemic treatment options, patients with BCBM are now living longer. Many ongoing clinical trials hold promise to further improve outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionCNSide is a platform that detects and characterizes tumor cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD). The platform was validated per College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Clinical Laboratories Improvement Amendment (CLIA) guidelines and run as a commercial Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) at Biocept in San Diego, CA. The platform allows CSF tumor cell (CSF-TC) enumeration and biomarker characterization by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). MethodsWe performed a multicenter retrospective chart review of HER2 FISH CNSide test results that were commercially ordered on 26 patients by physicians for LMD breast cancer patients between April 2020 and October 2022.ResultsWe show that HER2 is amplified on CSF tumor cells in 62% (16/26) of LMD breast cancer patients. 10/26 (38%) patients had discordant HER2-positivity between the primary tumor tissue and CSF-TC; of these, 35% (9/26) of the patients displayed HER2 amplification on the CSF-TCs, however were categorized as HER2 negative on the primary tumor. Of the 27% (7/26) patients with a HER2 positive primary tumor, one patient showed a HER2 negative LMD tumor. Two patients, 8% (2/26) had a HER2 equivocal primary tumor; of these, one demonstrated a HER2 negative, and one a HER2 positive LMD tumor. Serial analysis (at least 4 longitudinal tests) of HER2 status of the CSF-TC throughout therapy was available for 14 patients and demonstrated that HER2 status of the LMD changed in 29% (4/14) during their treatment course and impacted care decisions. ConclusionsOur data suggests that CSF-TC HER2 FISH analysis in LMD breast cancer patients may be discordant to the primary tumor sample and the discovery of HER2 positivity in the CSF may open doors to anti-HER2 targeted therapy options for LMD patients.

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has supplanted whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) as standard-of-care adjuvant treatment following surgery for brain metastasis (BrM). Concomitant with the adoption of adjuvant SRS, a new pattern of failure termed “Pachymeningeal failure” (PMF) has emerged. Methods: We reviewed a prospective registry of 264 BrM patients; 145 and 119 were treated adjuvantly with WBRT and SRS, respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify variables correlating to outcomes. Outcomes were calculated using the cumulative incidence (CI) method. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were done to identify factors associated with PMF. Results: CI of PMF was 2 % and 18 % at 12 months, and 2 % and 23 % at 24 months for WRBT and SRS, respectively (p

Nervous system metastases (CNSm) are late events associated with poor outcomes in endocrine-sensitive HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) patients, especially in the presence of leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Effective treatments are extremely limited in this setting. The antibody-drug conjugate, trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), which combines the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab with a topoisomerase type 1 inhibitor, showed high efficacy not only against HER2-positive but also HER2-low metastatic BCs, expressing HER2 at a lower level. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with metastatic endocrine-sensitive HER2-low BC suffering from BMs associated with LMD and sustained disease control when treated with T-DXd. Several recent case series have reported the activity of T-DXd in patients with HER2-positive disease and brain metastases or LMD, but none in HER2-low patients. This case is particularly relevant since more than 50% of BCs are HER2-low.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating sequelae of metastatic spread that affects approximately 5% of cancer patients. The incidence of LMD is increasing due to advancements in systemic therapy and enhanced detection methods. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the evidence in the detection, prognostication, and treatment of LMD. A comprehensive literature search of PUBMED was conducted to identify articles reporting on LMD including existing data and ongoing clinical trials. We found a wide array of treatment options available for LMD including chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy as well as several choices for radiotherapy including whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Despite treatment, the prognosis for patients with LMD is dismal, typically 2–4 months on average. Novel therapies and combination approaches are actively under investigation with the aim of improving outcomes and quality of life for patients with LMD. Recent prospective data on the use of proton CSI for patients with LMD have demonstrated its potential survival benefit with follow-up investigations underway. There is a need for validated metrics to predict prognosis and improve patient selection for patients with LMD in order to optimize treatment approaches.

The present review aimed to establish an understanding of the pathophysiology of leptomeningeal disease as it relates to late-stage development among different cancer types. For our purposes, the focused metastatic malignancies include breast cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, primary central nervous system tumors, and hematologic cancers (lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma). Of note, our discussion was limited to cancer-specific leptomeningeal metastases secondary to the aforementioned primary cancers. LMD mechanisms secondary to non-cancerous pathologies, such as infection or inflammation of the leptomeningeal layer, were excluded from our scope of review. Furthermore, we intended to characterize general leptomeningeal disease, including the specific anatomical infiltration process/area, CSF dissemination, manifesting clinical symptoms in patients afflicted with the disease, detection mechanisms, imaging modalities, and treatment therapies (both preclinical and clinical). Of these parameters, leptomeningeal disease across different primary cancers shares several features. Pathophysiology regarding the development of CNS involvement within the mentioned cancer subtypes is similar in nature and progression of disease. Consequently, detection of leptomeningeal disease, regardless of cancer type, employs several of the same techniques. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in combination with varied imaging (CT, MRI, and PET-CT) has been noted in the current literature as the gold standard in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis. Treatment options for the disease are both varied and currently in development, given the rarity of these cases. Our review details the differences in leptomeningeal disease as they pertain through the lens of several different cancer subtypes in an effort to highlight the current state of targeted therapy, the potential shortcomings in treatment, and the direction of preclinical and clinical treatments in the future. As there is a lack of comprehensive reviews that seek to characterize leptomeningeal metastasis from various solid and hematologic cancers altogether, the authors intended to highlight not only the overlapping mechanisms but also the distinct patterning of disease detection and progression as a means to uniquely treat each metastasis type. The scarcity of LMD cases poses a barrier to more robust evaluations of this pathology. However, as treatments for primary cancers have improved over time, so has the incidence of LMD. The increase in diagnosed cases only represents a small fraction of LMD-afflicted patients. More often than not, LMD is determined upon autopsy. The motivation behind this review stems from the increased capacity to study LMD in spite of scarcity or poor patient prognosis. In vitro analysis of leptomeningeal cancer cells has allowed researchers to approach this disease at the level of cancer subtypes and markers. We ultimately hope to facilitate the clinical translation of LMD research through our discourse.

Selpercatinib and pralsetinib are RET inhibitors with substantial activity in advanced RET-rearranged NSCLC. We present a case of pralsetinib-related pneumonitis and leptomeningeal and brain metastases progression during treatment suspension for pneumonitis. During recovery, selpercatinib administration led to rapid neurologic response and complete intracranial response and allowed pneumonitis resolution. This case supports the safety of selpercatinib in patients with pneumonitis on pralsetinib and highlights its marked efficacy in leptomeningeal disease.

Background: Pachymeningeal disease (PMD) is a newly recognized pattern of brain metastasis (BrM) failure that specifically occurs following surgery with adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and has unique prognostic implications relative to leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Here, we report its prevalence, prognostic implications, and associated risk factors. Methods: A literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on PUBMED and Cochrane from January 2000 to June 2023. Results: We identified 12 studies that included a total of 3992 BrM patients, 659 (16.5%) of whom developed meningeal disease (MD) following surgery plus adjuvant SRS, including either PMD or LMD. The mean prevalence of MD across studies was 20.9% (7.9–38.0%), with PMD accounting for 54.6% of this prevalence and LMD comprising the remaining 45.4%. Mean of the median overall survivals following diagnosis of PMD and LMD was 10.6 months and 3.7 months p = 0.007, respectively, a significant difference. Only 2 risk factors for PMD were reported in ≥ 2 studies and also identified as statistically significant per our meta-analysis: infratentorial location and controlled systemic disease status. Conclusion: While PMD has a superior prognosis to LMD, it is nevertheless a critical oncologic event associated with significant mortality and remains poorly recognized. PMD is predominantly observed in patients with controlled systemic disease status and infratentorial location. Future treatment strategies should focus on reducing surgical seeding and sterilizing surgical cavities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC represent a unique subset of lung cancer patients with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. Previous studies have shown a higher incidence of brain metastases (BM) in this subgroup of patients, and neurologic death has been reported to be as high as 40% and correlates with leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Methods: Between 2012 and 2021, a retrospective review of our prospective registry identified 606 patients with BM from NSCLC, with 170 patients having an EGFR mutation. Demographic, clinical, radiographic, and treatment characteristics were correlated to the incidence of LMD and survival. Results: LMD was identified in 22.3% of patients (n = 38) at a median follow-up of 19 (2–98) months from initial SRS. Multivariate regression analysis showed targeted therapy and a cumulative number of metastases as significant predictors of LMD (p = 0.034, HR = 0.44), (p =.04, HR = 1.02). The median survival time after SRS of the 170 patients was 24 months (CI 95% 19.1–28.1). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, RPA, exon 19 deletion, and osimertinib treatment were significant predictors of overall survival. The cumulative incidence of neurological death at 2 and 4 years post initial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was 8% and 11%, respectively, and correlated with LMD. Conclusion: The study shows that current-generation targeted therapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients may prevent the development and progression of LMD, leading to improved survival outcomes. Nevertheless, LMD is associated with poor outcomes and neurologic death, making innovative strategies to treat LMD essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant pediatric brain tumor arising in the cerebellum. Although abnormal GABAergic receptor activation has been described in MB, studies have not yet elucidated the contribution of receptor-independent GABA metabolism to MB pathogenesis. We find primary MB tumors globally display decreased expression of GABA transaminase (ABAT), the protein responsible for GABA metabolism, compared with normal cerebellum. However, less aggressive WNT and SHH subtypes express higher ABAT levels compared with metastatic G3 and G4 tumors. We show that elevated ABAT expression results in increased GABA catabolism, decreased tumor cell proliferation, and induction of metabolic and histone characteristics mirroring GABAergic neurons. Our studies suggest ABAT expression fluctuates depending on metabolite changes in the tumor microenvironment, with nutrient-poor conditions upregulating ABAT expression. We find metastatic MB cells require ABAT to maintain viability in the metabolite-scarce cerebrospinal fluid by using GABA as an energy source substitute, thereby facilitating leptomeningeal metastasis formation.

Abstract Background Hemangioblastoma of the central nervous system is an uncommon benign neoplasm, with about 25% of cases in patients with von Hippel–Lindau disease. The incidence of metastasis is rare, particularly in patients without von Hippel–Lindau disease. We report a case of hemangioblastoma with leptomeningeal dissemination as a late recurrence. Case presentation A 65-year-old Caucasian man with a history of World Health Organization grade I hemangioblastoma of the cerebellar vermis underwent gross total resection in 1997. In early 2018, he developed intracranial recurrences with diffuse leptomeningeal disease of the entire spine. The patient underwent resection of intracranial recurrence, followed by palliative craniospinal irradiation. The disease progressed quickly, and he died 8 months after recurrence. Conclusions Despite a benign pathology, hemangioblastoma has a low risk of metastasis. The outcome for hemangioblastoma patients with metastasis is poor. Multidisciplinary care for patients with metastatic hemangioblastoma warrants further investigation, and an effective systemic option is urgently needed. Regular lifelong follow-up of at-risk patients is recommended.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) remains a challenging condition with a dismal prognosis. In this case study, we report partial response of LMD in a patient with metastatic large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma following treatment with proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI), bevacizumab, and pembrolizumab. Two years after the initial diagnosis, he presented with LMD. He underwent proton CSI with bevacizumab followed by combination therapy with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab. He had a partial disease response with progression-free survival after LMD diagnosis of 4.6 months. He unfortunately developed pembrolizumab induced hypophysitis, after which he experienced rapid neurologic clinical progression. Overall, this novel combination led to a durable partial response which warrants prospective evaluation.

Pancreatic cancer remains an inauspicious malignancy with poor long-term outcomes. The majority of patients present with advanced disease; many suffer from consequences of local progression of disease, and survival rates remain unacceptably poor. Central nervous system (CNS) metastatic spread is uncommon, with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis or leptomeningeal disease (LMD) having seldom been described in the literature. Herein we report the case of a patient with metastatic PALB2-mutated pancreatic cancer who developed progressive neurologic symptoms from LMD after five years of treatment. This case and others suggest a possible link between pancreatic cancer with absent double-strand break DNA homologous recombination repair mechanisms and the development of leptomeningeal disease.

Purpose of Review: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of advanced metastatic cancer associated with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study reviews the current understanding of the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of LMD. We highlight opportunities for advances in this disease. Recent Findings: In recent years, the use of soluble CSF biomarkers has expanded, suggesting improved sensitivity over traditional cytology, identification of targetable mutations, and potential utility for monitoring disease burden. Recent studies of targeted small molecules and intrathecal based therapies have demonstrated an increase in overall and progression-free survival. In addition, there are several ongoing trials evaluating immunotherapy in LMD. Summary: Though overall prognosis of LMD remains poor, studies suggest a potential role for soluble CSF biomarkers in diagnosis and management and demonstrate promising findings in patient outcomes with targeted therapies for specific solid tumors. Despite these advances, there continues to be a gap of knowledge in this disease, emphasizing the importance of inclusion of LMD patients in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of cancer with a particularly poor prognosis. Among solid tumours, malignant melanoma (MM) has one of the highest rates of metastasis to the leptomeninges, with approximately 10–15% of patients with advanced disease developing LMD. Tumour cells that metastasise to the brain have unique properties that allow them to cross the blood–brain barrier, evade the immune system, and survive in the brain microenvironment. Metastatic colonisation is achieved through dynamic communication between metastatic cells and the tumour microenvironment, resulting in a tumour-permissive milieu. Despite advances in treatment options, the incidence of LMD appears to be increasing and current treatment modalities have a limited impact on survival. This review provides an overview of the biology of LMD, diagnosis and current treatment approaches for MM patients with LMD, and an overview of ongoing clinical trials. Despite the still limited efficacy of current therapies, there is hope that emerging treatments will improve the outcomes for patients with LMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present review aimed to establish an understanding of the pathophysiology of leptomeningeal disease as it relates to late-stage development among different cancer types. For our purposes, the focused metastatic malignancies include breast cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, primary central nervous system tumors, and hematologic cancers (lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma). Of note, our discussion was limited to cancer-specific leptomeningeal metastases secondary to the aforementioned primary cancers. LMD mechanisms secondary to non-cancerous pathologies, such as infection or inflammation of the leptomeningeal layer, were excluded from our scope of review. Furthermore, we intended to characterize general leptomeningeal disease, including the specific anatomical infiltration process/area, CSF dissemination, manifesting clinical symptoms in patients afflicted with the disease, detection mechanisms, imaging modalities, and treatment therapies (both preclinical and clinical). Of these parameters, leptomeningeal disease across different primary cancers shares several features. Pathophysiology regarding the development of CNS involvement within the mentioned cancer subtypes is similar in nature and progression of disease. Consequently, detection of leptomeningeal disease, regardless of cancer type, employs several of the same techniques. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in combination with varied imaging (CT, MRI, and PET-CT) has been noted in the current literature as the gold standard in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis. Treatment options for the disease are both varied and currently in development, given the rarity of these cases. Our review details the differences in leptomeningeal disease as they pertain through the lens of several different cancer subtypes in an effort to highlight the current state of targeted therapy, the potential shortcomings in treatment, and the direction of preclinical and clinical treatments in the future. As there is a lack of comprehensive reviews that seek to characterize leptomeningeal metastasis from various solid and hematologic cancers altogether, the authors intended to highlight not only the overlapping mechanisms but also the distinct patterning of disease detection and progression as a means to uniquely treat each metastasis type. The scarcity of LMD cases poses a barrier to more robust evaluations of this pathology. However, as treatments for primary cancers have improved over time, so has the incidence of LMD. The increase in diagnosed cases only represents a small fraction of LMD-afflicted patients. More often than not, LMD is determined upon autopsy. The motivation behind this review stems from the increased capacity to study LMD in spite of scarcity or poor patient prognosis. In vitro analysis of leptomeningeal cancer cells has allowed researchers to approach this disease at the level of cancer subtypes and markers. We ultimately hope to facilitate the clinical translation of LMD research through our discourse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The standard treatment for patients with large brain metastases and limited intracranial disease is surgical resection and post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, post-operative SRS still has elevated rates of local failure (LF) and is complicated by radiation necrosis (RN), and meningeal disease (MD). Pre-operative SRS may reduce the risk of RN and MD, while fractionated therapy may improve local control through delivering a higher biological effective dose. We hypothesize that pre-operative fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) will have less toxicity compared to patients who receive post-operative SRS or FSRT. Methods: A multi-institutional analysis was conducted and included patients who had surgical resection and stereotactic radiation therapy to treat at least one brain metastasis. Pertinent demographic, clinical, radiation, surgical, and follow up data were collected for each patient. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint defined as patients with one of the following adverse events: 1) LF, 2) MD, and/or 3) Grade 2 or higher (symptomatic) RN. Results: 279 patients were eligible for analysis. The median follow-up time was 9 months. 87 % of patients received fractionated treatment. 29 % of patients received pre-operative treatment. The composite endpoint incidences for post-operative SRS (n = 10), post-operative FSRT (n = 189), pre-operative SRS (n = 27), and pre-operative FSRT (n = 53) were 0 %, 17 %, 15 %, and 7.5 %, respectively. Conclusions: In our study, the composite endpoint of 7.5% for pre-operative FSRT compares favorably to our post-operative FSRT rate of 17%. Pre-operative FSRT was observed to have low rates of LF, MD, and RN. Prospective validation is needed.

Purpose: Neurosurgery (NS) is an essential modality for large brain metastases (BM). Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the standard of care adjuvant treatment. Pachymeningeal failure (PMF) is a newly described entity, distinct from classical leptomeningeal failure (LMF), that is uniquely observed in postoperative patients treated with adjuvant SRS. We sought to identify risk factors for PMF in patients treated with NS + SRS. Methods: From a prospective registry (2009 to 2021), we identified all patients treated with NS + SRS. Clinical, imaging, pathological, and treatment factors were analyzed. PMF incidence was evaluated using a competing risks model. Results: 144 Patients were identified. The median age was 62 (23–90). PMF occurred in 21.5% (31/144). Female gender [Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.65, p = 0.013], higher Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) index (HR 2.4, p < 0.001), absence of prior radiation therapy (HR N/A, p = 0.018), controlled extracranial disease (CED) (HR 3.46, p = 0.0038), and pia/dura contact (PDC) (HR 3.30, p = 0.0053) were associated with increased risk for PMF on univariate analysis. In patients with PDC, wider target volumes correlated with reduced risk of PMF. Multivariate analysis indicated PDC (HR 3.51, p = 0.0053), piecemeal resection (HR 2.38, p = 0.027), and CED (HR 3.97, p = 0.0016) independently correlated with PMF risk. PMF correlated with reduced OS (HR 2.90, p < 0.001) at a lower rate compared to LMF (HR 10.15, p < 0.001). Conclusion: PMF correlates with tumor PDC and piecemeal resection in patients treated with NS + SRS. For unclear reasons, it is also associated with CED. In tumors with PDC, wider dural radiotherapy coverage was associated with a lower risk of PMF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN) is a rare group of malignant placental-related tumours requiring systemic anti-cancer treatment. Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) related to GTN is not well reported with no consensus in optimal treatment. We offer recommendations for management of these patients. We discuss five patients with GTN who presented with features of LMD and were diagnosed with gadolinium-enhanced MRI brain, all of whom received low dose induction etoposide-cisplatin (EP) followed by either EP-etoposide, methotrexate (CNS) and actinomycin-D (EMA) or EMA(CNS)-cyclophosphamide and vincristine (CO). Four out of the five patients additionally received intrathecal methotrexate. Four patients had complete hCG response to first line multi-agent chemotherapy, one patient required second line paclitaxel, cisplatin alternating with paclitaxel, etoposide (TP/TE), where paclitaxel was substituted with nab-paclitaxel due to anaphylaxis, followed by hysterectomy. One of the four initial complete hCG responders relapsed in the lung requiring further systemic treatment with subsequent lobectomy. Patient reported outcomes indicate persistent neurological symptoms are mild and do not affect functionality and quality of life. With a follow-up range of 2–6 years, all five patients remain cured demonstrating excellent survival outcomes with the avoidance of whole-brain radiotherapy in all cases. • Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) due to GTN is rarely reported, and consequently there is no consensus for optimal management. • Diagnostic workup should include gadolinium-enhanced MRI brain +/− completion MRI spine. • We recommend low-dose induction EP followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and intrathecal MTX. • Whole brain radiotherapy can be avoided and should not be recommended. • We report a 100% cure rate of all five of our patients with GTN with LMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leptomeningeal disease occurs when cancer cells migrate into the ventricles of the brain and spinal cord and then colonize the meninges of the central nervous system. The triple-negative subtype of breast cancer often progresses toward leptomeningeal disease and has a poor prognosis because of limited treatment options. This is due, in part, to a lack of animal models with which to study leptomeningeal disease. Here, we developed a translucent zebrafish casper (roy-/-; nacre-/-) xenograft model of leptomeningeal disease in which fluorescent labeled MDA-MB-231 human triple-negative breast cancer cells are microinjected into the ventricles of zebrafish embryos and then tracked and measured using fluorescent microscopy and multimodal plate reader technology. We then used these techniques to measure tumor area, cell proliferation, and cell death in samples treated with the breast cancer drug doxorubicin and a vehicle control. We monitored MDA-MB-231 cell localization and tumor area, and showed that samples treated with doxorubicin exhibited decreased tumor area and proliferation and increased apoptosis compared to control samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hemangioblastoma of the central nervous system is an uncommon benign neoplasm, with about 25% of cases in patients with von Hippel–Lindau disease. The incidence of metastasis is rare, particularly in patients without von Hippel–Lindau disease. We report a case of hemangioblastoma with leptomeningeal dissemination as a late recurrence. Case presentation: A 65-year-old Caucasian man with a history of World Health Organization grade I hemangioblastoma of the cerebellar vermis underwent gross total resection in 1997. In early 2018, he developed intracranial recurrences with diffuse leptomeningeal disease of the entire spine. The patient underwent resection of intracranial recurrence, followed by palliative craniospinal irradiation. The disease progressed quickly, and he died 8 months after recurrence. Conclusions: Despite a benign pathology, hemangioblastoma has a low risk of metastasis. The outcome for hemangioblastoma patients with metastasis is poor. Multidisciplinary care for patients with metastatic hemangioblastoma warrants further investigation, and an effective systemic option is urgently needed. Regular lifelong follow-up of at-risk patients is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Leptomeningeal disease in melanoma (LMM) patients is characterized by aggressiveness and dismal outcomes. Clinical studies and case reports demonstrate the potential of immune and targeted therapies (especially in combinatorial or multi-modal settings) in improving survival for some patients; however, LMM still progresses rapidly in most patients regardless of treatment. Several recent studies have characterized the melanoma microenvironment within the CSF compartment and improved the basic understanding of the biology of LMM. Additional laboratory and clinical studies are necessary to substantiate the relevance of different therapies and their impact on melanoma within the leptomeningeal microenvironment. Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication caused by seeding malignant cells to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the leptomeningeal membrane. LMD is diagnosed in 5–15% of patients with systemic malignancy. Management of LMD is challenging due to the biological and metabolic tumor microenvironment of LMD being largely unknown. Patients with LMD can present with a wide variety of signs and/or symptoms that could be multifocal and include headache, nausea, vomiting, diplopia, and weakness, among others. The median survival time for patients with LMD is measured in weeks and up to 3–6 months with aggressive management, and death usually occurs due to progressive neurologic dysfunction. In melanoma, LMD is associated with a suppressive immune microenvironment characterized by a high number of apoptotic and exhausted CD4+ T-cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and a low number of CD8+ T-cells. Proteomics analysis revealed enrichment of complement cascade, which may disrupt the blood–CSF barrier. Clinical management of melanoma LMD consists primarily of radiation therapy, BRAF/MEK inhibitors as targeted therapy, and immunotherapy with anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4, and anti-LAG-3 immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review summarizes the biology and anatomic features of melanoma LMD, as well as the current therapeutic approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]