Search

In this paper we will develop a comparative study of labor models that we will categorize as coherent, incoherent and mixed, based on their interpenetration with the postulates of the right to freedom of association derived from ILO Conventions 87 and 98, and the realization of two objects of analysis: the freedom of constitution, size and structural organization of the union and the union interaction based on the solidarity strike. For this purpose, a descriptive and explanatory research is carried out, using a dogmatic methodology -classical of the legal sciences- and the systematic, analytical and factual sub-methods. To this extent, we will conclude which are the main errors of the labor models in the search for the principles and ideals of unionization and some comments on the reasons why certain legal instruments that remain anchored in the nineteenth century survive, at a time when the recognition and protection of the collective subject of labor should be at its peak. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article will study the control of conventionality and the margin of appreciation as legal-political models for the protection of human rights derived from the particular visions, needs and institutional resources of the OAS States and the Council of Europe respectively, establishing, notwithstanding the disparate methods of integration of international law, that human dignity is the universal objective for the effective exercise of justice apparatus. For this objective, since a research descriptive and explicative, and used a dogmatic methodologist, and sub methods systematic, analytic and judgment facts, we will conclude that first, the effects of national sovereignty should be diminished, because this limit the guarantee harmonization of the legal system, and then, secondly, build a minimum international standard through a constitutional space common to provide a balance of rights universally protected by multilevel judges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the most conflictive scenarios for criminal law and its punitive and preventive responses is found at the confluence of armed conflicts, being these an inexhaustible engine of production of regulated criminal acts, both nationally and internationally. The present work will focus its study on those crimes related to internal armed conflicts and on how we can reach a more comprehensive legal logic from a dogmatic criminal perspective derived from the theory of crime --more than a political response in amnesty--, specifically through assumptions of need, when providing a definitive resolution to a context of armed conflict, which requires unrestricted criminal solutions to the dialectical borders of each government in office. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]