Search

Introduction: Early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) manifests prior to the age of 65, and affects 4%-8% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The current analyses sought to examine longitudinal cognitive trajectories of participants with early-onset dementia., Methods: Data from 307 cognitively normal (CN) volunteer participants and those with amyloid-positive EOAD or amyloid-negative cognitive impairment (EOnonAD) were compared. Cognitive trajectories across a comprehensive cognitive battery spanning 42 months were examined using mixed-effects modeling., Results: The EOAD group displayed worse cognition at baseline relative to EOnonAD and CN groups, and more aggressive declines in cognition over time. The largest effects were observed on measures of executive functioning domains, while memory declines were blunted in EOAD., Discussion: EOAD declined 2-4× faster than EOnonAD, and EOAD pathology is not restricted to memory networks. Early identification of deficits is critical to ensure that individuals with sporadic EOAD can be considered for treatment using disease-modifying medications., Highlights: Represents the most comprehensive longitudinal characterization of sporadic EOAD to date. The trajectory of cognitive declines was steep for EOAD participants and worse than for other groups. Executive functioning measures exhibited the greatest declines over time in EOAD., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: Early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) share similar amyloid etiology, but evidence from smaller-scale studies suggests that they manifest differently clinically. Current analyses sought to contrast the cognitive profiles of EOAD and LOAD., Methods: Z-score cognitive-domain composites for 311 amyloid-positive sporadic EOAD and 314 amyloid-positive LOAD participants were calculated from baseline data from age-appropriate control cohorts. Z-score composites were compared between AD groups for each domain., Results: After controlling for cognitive status, EOAD displayed worse visuospatial, executive functioning, and processing speed/attention skills relative to LOAD, and LOAD displayed worse language, episodic immediate memory, and episodic delayed memory., Discussion: Sporadic EOAD possesses distinct cognitive profiles relative to LOAD. Clinicians should be alert for non-amnestic impairments in younger patients to ensure proper identification and intervention using disease-modifying treatments., Highlights: Both early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) participants displayed widespread cognitive impairments relative to their same-aged peers. Cognitive impairments were more severe for EOAD than for LOAD participants in visuospatial and executive domains. Memory and language impairments were more severe for LOAD than for EOAD participants Results were comparable after removing clinical phenotypes of posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), primary progressive aphasia (lv-PPA), and frontal-variant AD., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Amyloid-PET quantification through the tracer-independent Centiloid (CL) scale has emerged as an essential tool for the accurate measurement of amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. The AMYPAD consortium set out to integrate existing literature and recent work from the consortium to provide clinical context-of-use recommendations for the CL scale. Compared to histopathology, visual reads, and cerebrospinal fluid, CL quantification accurately reflects the amount of AD pathology. With high certainty, a CL value below 10 excludes the presence of Aβ pathology, while a value above 30 corresponds well with pathological amounts. Values falling in between these two cutoffs ("intermediate range") are related to an increased risk of disease progression. Together, CL quantification is a valuable adjunct to visual assessments of amyloid-PET images. An abnormal amyloid biomarker assessment is a key criterion to determine eligibility for anti-amyloid disease-modifying therapies, and amyloid-PET quantification can add further value by precisely monitoring amyloid clearance, and hence guiding patient management decisions. HIGHLIGHTS: Centiloid (CL) quantification robustly reflects of the amount of Aβ pathology. CL < 10/CL > 30 reflects Aβ-negativity/positivity thresholds with high certainty. CL quantification is a valuable adjunct to visual assessments of amyloid-PET. CL quantification can support trial design and treatment management. CL quantification could support the identification of early or emerging Aβ pathology., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) are common even in cognitively normal older adults who lack objectively-detectable deficits on standard neuropsychological evaluation. The clinical relevance of these concerns, particularly considering the nature of concerns (e.g., memory versus non-memory), remains unclear. Thus, we examined whether baseline memory and non-memory SCC relate to longitudinal change in brain volume and neuropsychological test performance in 476 functionally-intact, objectively unimpaired older adults (M age = 72y, 56 % female, follow-up time = 1 - 9 years). Mixed-effects models revealed that both higher baseline memory and non-memory SCC predicted greater atrophy in total gray matter and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex atrophy over time, while only memory SCC predicted steeper medial temporal lobe atrophy. Regarding neuropsychological performance, higher non-memory SCC predicted decline in processing speed performance, while memory SCC did not predict neuropsychological trajectories. SCC are a risk factor for more adverse brain and cognitive aging trajectories, even in functionally-intact, seemingly cognitively normal older adults., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Inquiries into properties of brain structure and function have progressed due to developments in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To sustain progress in investigating and quantifying neuroanatomical details in vivo, the reliability and validity of brain measurements are paramount. Quality control (QC) is a set of procedures for mitigating errors and ensuring the validity and reliability of brain measurements. Despite its importance, there is little guidance on best QC practices and reporting procedures. The study of hippocampal subfields in vivo is a critical case for QC because of their small size, inter-dependent boundary definitions, and common artifacts in the MRI data used for subfield measurements. We addressed this gap by surveying the broader scientific community studying hippocampal subfields on their views and approaches to QC. We received responses from 37 investigators spanning 10 countries, covering different career stages, and studying both healthy and pathological development and aging. In this sample, 81% of researchers considered QC to be very important or important, and 19% viewed it as fairly important. Despite this, only 46% of researchers reported on their QC processes in prior publications. In many instances, lack of reporting appeared due to ambiguous guidance on relevant details and guidance for reporting, rather than absence of QC. Here, we provide recommendations for correcting errors to maximize reliability and minimize bias. We also summarize threats to segmentation accuracy, review common QC methods, and make recommendations for best practices and reporting in publications. Implementing the recommended QC practices will collectively improve inferences to the larger population, as well as have implications for clinical practice and public health., (© 2024 The Author(s). Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: We compared the accuracy of amyloid and [ 18 F]Flortaucipir (FTP) tau positron emission tomography (PET) visual reads for distinguishing patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia with fluid biomarker support of Alzheimer's disease (AD)., Methods: Participants with FTP-PET, amyloid-PET, and diagnosis of dementia-AD (n = 102), MCI-AD (n = 41), non-AD diseases (n = 76), and controls (n = 20) were included. AD status was determined independent of PET by cerebrospinal fluid or plasma biomarkers. The mean age was 66.9 years, and 44.8% were women. Three readers interpreted scans blindly and independently. Amyloid-PET was classified as positive/negative using tracer-specific criteria. FTP-PET was classified as positive with medial temporal lobe (MTL) binding as the minimum uptake indicating AD tau (tau-MTL+), positive with posterolateral temporal or extratemporal cortical binding in an AD-like pattern (tau-CTX+), or negative. The majority of scan interpretations were used to calculate diagnostic accuracy of visual reads in detecting MCI/dementia with fluid biomarker support for AD (MCI/dementia-AD)., Results: Sensitivity of amyloid-PET for MCI/dementia-AD was 95.8% (95% confidence interval 91.1-98.4%), which was comparable to tau-CTX+ 92.3% (86.7-96.1%, p = 0.67) and tau-MTL+ 97.2% (93.0-99.2%, p = 0.27). Specificity of amyloid-PET for biomarker-negative healthy and disease controls was 84.4% (75.5-91.0%), which was like tau-CTX+ 88.5% (80.4-94.1%, p = 0.34), and trended toward being higher than tau-MTL+ 75.0% (65.1-83.3%, p = 0.08). Tau-CTX+ had higher specificity than tau-MTL+ (p = 0.0002), but sensitivity was lower (p = 0.02), driven by decreased sensitivity for MCI-AD (80.5% [65.1-91.2] vs. 95.1% [83.5-99.4], p = 0.03)., Interpretation: Amyloid- and tau-PET visual reads have similar sensitivity/specificity for detecting AD in cognitively impaired patients. Visual tau-PET interpretations requiring cortical binding outside MTL increase specificity, but lower sensitivity for MCI-AD. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:476-487., (© 2024 American Neurological Association.)

Importance: An accurate prognosis is especially pertinent in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), when individuals experience considerable uncertainty about future progression., Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of tau positron emission tomography (PET) to predict clinical progression from MCI to dementia., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter cohort study with external validation and a mean (SD) follow-up of 2.0 (1.1) years. Data were collected from centers in South Korea, Sweden, the US, and Switzerland from June 2014 to January 2024. Participant data were retrospectively collected and inclusion criteria were a baseline clinical diagnosis of MCI; longitudinal clinical follow-up; a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 22; and available tau PET, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan less than 1 year from diagnosis. A total of 448 eligible individuals with MCI were included (331 in the discovery cohort and 117 in the validation cohort). None of these participants were excluded over the course of the study., Exposures: Tau PET, Aβ PET, and MRI., Main Outcomes and Measures: Positive results on tau PET (temporal meta-region of interest), Aβ PET (global; expressed in the standardized metric Centiloids), and MRI (Alzheimer disease [AD] signature region) was assessed using quantitative thresholds and visual reads. Clinical progression from MCI to all-cause dementia (regardless of suspected etiology) or to AD dementia (AD as suspected etiology) served as the primary outcomes. The primary analyses were receiver operating characteristics., Results: In the discovery cohort, the mean (SD) age was 70.9 (8.5) years, 191 (58%) were male, the mean (SD) MMSE score was 27.1 (1.9), and 110 individuals with MCI (33%) converted to dementia (71 to AD dementia). Only the model with tau PET predicted all-cause dementia (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80) better than a base model including age, sex, education, and MMSE score (AUC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.77; P = .02), while the models assessing the other neuroimaging markers did not improve prediction. In the validation cohort, tau PET replicated in predicting all-cause dementia. Compared to the base model (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82), prediction of AD dementia in the discovery cohort was significantly improved by including tau PET (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.89; P < .001), tau PET visual read (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88; P = .001), and Aβ PET Centiloids (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88; P = .03). In the validation cohort, only the tau PET and the tau PET visual reads replicated in predicting AD dementia., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, tau-PET showed the best performance as a stand-alone marker to predict progression to dementia among individuals with MCI. This suggests that, for prognostic purposes in MCI, a tau PET scan may be the best currently available neuroimaging marker.

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathological changes present with amnestic and nonamnestic (atypical) syndromes. The contribution of comorbid neuropathology as a substratum of atypical expression of AD remains under investigated., Methods: We examined whether atypical AD exhibited increased comorbid neuropathology compared to typical AD and if such neuropathologies contributed to the accelerated clinical decline in atypical AD., Results: We examined 60 atypical and 101 typical AD clinicopathological cases. The number of comorbid pathologies was similar between the groups ( p  = 0.09). Argyrophilic grain disease was associated with atypical presentation ( p  = 0.008) after accounting for sex, age of onset, and disease duration. Vascular brain injury was more common in typical AD ( p  = 0.022). Atypical cases had a steeper Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) decline over time ( p  = 0.033)., Discussion: Comorbid neuropathological changes are unlikely to contribute to atypical AD presentation and the steeper cognitive decline seen in this cohort., Highlights: Autopsy cohort of 60 atypical and 101 typical AD; does comorbid pathology explain atypical presentation?Atypical versus Typical AD: No significant differences in comorbid neuropathologies were found ( p  = 0.09).Argyrophilic Grain Disease Association: significantly correlates with atypical AD presentations, suggesting a unique neuropathological pattern ( p  = 0.008).Vascular Brain Injury Prevalence: Vascular brain injury is more common in typical AD than in atypical AD ( p  = 0.022).Cognitive Decline in Atypical AD: Atypical AD patients experience a steeper cognitive decline measured by MMSE than those with typical AD despite lacking more comorbid neuropathology, highlighting the severity of atypical AD pathogenesis ( p  = 0.033)., Competing Interests: L.T.G. receives research support from NIH, Tau Consortium, Genentech Inc. S.P.E., R.L.J., S.S., E.J.H., A.B., M.L.G.T., H.R., J.H.K., B.L.M., W.W.S. receive research support from Tau Consortium. GDR receives research support from NIH, Alzheimer's Association, American College of Radiology, Rainwater Charitable Foundation, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, GE Healthcare, Life Molecular Imaging, and Genentech. He has served as a paid consultant to Eli Lilly, Genentech, Roche, Merck, and Johnson & Johnson. He is an Associate Editor for JAMA Neurology. R.L.J., S.S., E.J.H., M.L.G.T., H.R., J.H.K., B.L.M., W.W.S. receive support from the NIH. R.L.J. receives support from the Alzheimer's Association. A.B. has served as a consultant to AGTC, Alector, Alzprotect, Amylyx, Arrowhead, Arvinas, Aviado, Boehringer Ingelheim, Denali, Eli Lilly, GSK, Humana, Life Edit, Arkuda, Merck, Modalis, Oligomerix, Oscotec, Roche, Transposon and Wave. He has received research support from Biogen and Eisai for serving as a site investigator for clinical trials, as well as from Regeneron. He has received research support from the NIH Tau Consortium, Bluefield Project to Cure FTD, GHR Foundation, Alzheimer Association, Association for FTD, Gates Ventures, and ADDF. H.G., N.S.M., Z.M., and J.H.H. report no competing interests. Author disclosures are available in the supporting information., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Approximately 5% of Alzheimer's disease patients develop symptoms before age 65 (early-onset Alzheimer's disease), with either sporadic (sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease) or dominantly inherited (dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease) presentations. Both sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease and dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease are characterized by brain amyloid-β accumulation, tau tangles, hypometabolism and neurodegeneration, but differences in topography and magnitude of these pathological changes are not fully elucidated. In this study, we directly compared patterns of amyloid-β plaque deposition and glucose hypometabolism in sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease and dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease individuals. Our analysis included 134 symptomatic sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease amyloid-Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-positive cases from the University of California, San Francisco, Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (mean ± SD age 59.7 ± 5.6 years), 89 symptomatic dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease cases (age 45.8 ± 9.3 years) and 102 cognitively unimpaired non-mutation carriers from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network study (age 44.9 ± 9.2). Each group underwent clinical and cognitive examinations, 11 C-labelled Pittsburgh Compound B-PET and structural MRI. 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET was also available for most participants. Positron Emission Tomography scans from both studies were uniformly processed to obtain a standardized uptake value ratio (PIB 50-70 cerebellar grey reference and FDG 30-60 pons reference) images. Statistical analyses included pairwise global and voxelwise group comparisons and group-independent component analyses. Analyses were performed also adjusting for covariates including age, sex, Mini-Mental State Examination, apolipoprotein ε4 status and average composite cortical of standardized uptake value ratio. Compared with dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease, sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease participants were older at age of onset (mean ± SD, 54.8 ± 8.2 versus 41.9 ± 8.2, Cohen's d = 1.91), with more years of education (16.4 ± 2.8 versus 13.5 ± 3.2, d = 1) and more likely to be apolipoprotein ε4 carriers (54.6% ε4 versus 28.1%, Cramer's V = 0.26), but similar Mini-Mental State Examination (20.6 ± 6.1 versus 21.2 ± 7.4, d = 0.08). Sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease had higher global cortical Pittsburgh Compound B-PET binding (mean ± SD standardized uptake value ratio, 1.92 ± 0.29 versus 1.58 ± 0.44, d = 0.96) and greater global cortical 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET hypometabolism (mean ± SD standardized uptake value ratio, 1.32 ± 0.1 versus 1.39 ± 0.19, d = 0.48) compared with dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. Fully adjusted comparisons demonstrated relatively higher Pittsburgh Compound B-PET standardized uptake value ratio in the medial occipital, thalami, basal ganglia and medial/dorsal frontal regions in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease versus sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease showed relatively greater 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET hypometabolism in Alzheimer's disease signature temporoparietal regions and caudate nuclei, whereas dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease showed relatively greater hypometabolism in frontal white matter and pericentral regions. Independent component analyses largely replicated these findings by highlighting common and unique Pittsburgh Compound B-PET and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET binding patterns. In summary, our findings suggest both common and distinct patterns of amyloid and glucose hypometabolism in sporadic and dominantly inherited early-onset Alzheimer's disease., Competing Interests: Y.L., E.T., B.G., and G.W. report no conflict of interest relevant to this manuscript. J.J.L.-G.’s research is supported by NIH-NIA (K01AG073526), the Alzheimer’s Association (AARFD-21-851415, SG-20-690363), the Michael J. Fox Foundation (MJFF-020770), the Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the McDonnell Academy. T.L.S.B., MD, PhD, has investigator-initiated research funding from the NIH, the Alzheimer’s Association, the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals. T.L.S.B. participates as a site investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, Biogen, Eisai, Janssen and F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. She serves as an unpaid consultant to Eisai and Siemens. She is on the Speaker’s Bureau for Biogen. J.C.M., MD, is the Friedman Distinguished Professor of Neurology, Director, Knight ADRC; Associate Director of DIAN and Founding Principal Investigator of DIAN. He is funded by NIH grants # P30 AG066444, P01AG003991, P01AG026276, U19 AG032438 and U19 AG024904. Neither J.C.M. nor his family owns stock or has equity interest (outside of mutual funds or other externally directed accounts) in any pharmaceutical or biotechnology company. Carlos Cruchaga, PhD, receives research support from Biogen, EISAI, Alector and Parabon. The funders of the study had no role in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. Dr. Cruchaga is a member of the advisory board of Vivid Genetics, Halia Therapeutics and Adx Healthcare. G.S.D.’s research is supported by NIH (K23AG064029, U01AG057195 and U19AG032438), the Alzheimer’s Association and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. He serves as a consultant for Parabon NanoLabs, Inc., as a Topic Editor (Dementia) for DynaMed (EBSCO), and as the clinical director of the Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis Foundation, Inc. (Canada; uncompensated). He is the co-project PI for a clinical trial in anti-NMDAR encephalitis, which receives support from Horizon Pharmaceuticals. He has developed educational materials for PeerView Media, Inc., and Continuing Education, Inc. He owns stock in ANI Pharmaceuticals. R.J.B., MD, is the director and principal investigator of the DIAN and DIAN-TU-001. He receives research support from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health, DIAN-TU Trial Pharmaceutical Partners (Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd. and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals), Alzheimer’s Association, GHR Foundation, Anonymous Organization, DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium (Active: Biogen, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd./Genentech, United Neuroscience. Previous: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Forum, Mithridion, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi). He has been an invited speaker and consultant for AC Immune, F. Hoffman La Roche, Ltd. and Janssen and a consultant for Amgen and Eisai. J.L., MD, reports speaker fees from Bayer Vital, Biogen and Roche, consulting fees from Axon Neuroscience and Biogen and author fees from Thieme Medical Publishers and W. Kohlhammer GmbH Medical Publishers. In addition, he reports compensation for serving as chief medical officer for MODAG GmbH, is a beneficiary of the phantom share program of MODAG GmbH and is an inventor in a patent ‘Pharmaceutical Composition and Methods of Use’ (EP 22 159 408.8) filed by MODAG GmbH, all activities outside the submitted work. L.I. is currently a full-time employee of Eli Lilly and Company/Avid Radiopharmaceuticals and a minor shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. His contribution to the work presented in this manuscript was performed while he was affiliated with the University of California San Francisco. G.D.R., MD, receives research support from NIA P30-AG062422, U01 AG057195, R35 AG072362, R56-AG075744, NINDS R21-NS120629, Alzheimer’s Association ZEN-21-848216, American College of Radiology, Rainwater Charitable Foundation, Shenandoah Foundation, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Life Molecular Imaging, GE HealthCare and Genentech. He has served as a consultant for Alector, Eli Lilly, Genentech, GE HealthCare, Roche, Johnson & Johnson and Merck. He serves as an associate editor for JAMA Neurology., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

The medial temporal lobe (MTL) cortex, located adjacent to the hippocampus, is crucial for memory and prone to the accumulation of certain neuropathologies such as Alzheimer's disease neurofibrillary tau tangles. The MTL cortex is composed of several subregions which differ in their functional and cytoarchitectonic features. As neuroanatomical schools rely on different cytoarchitectonic definitions of these subregions, it is unclear to what extent their delineations of MTL cortex subregions overlap. Here, we provide an overview of cytoarchitectonic definitions of the entorhinal and parahippocampal cortices as well as Brodmann areas (BA) 35 and 36, as provided by four neuroanatomists from different laboratories, aiming to identify the rationale for overlapping and diverging delineations. Nissl-stained series were acquired from the temporal lobes of three human specimens (two right and one left hemisphere). Slices (50 μm thick) were prepared perpendicular to the long axis of the hippocampus spanning the entire longitudinal extent of the MTL cortex. Four neuroanatomists annotated MTL cortex subregions on digitized slices spaced 5 mm apart (pixel size 0.4 μm at 20× magnification). Parcellations, terminology, and border placement were compared among neuroanatomists. Cytoarchitectonic features of each subregion are described in detail. Qualitative analysis of the annotations showed higher agreement in the definitions of the entorhinal cortex and BA35, while the definitions of BA36 and the parahippocampal cortex exhibited less overlap among neuroanatomists. The degree of overlap of cytoarchitectonic definitions was partially reflected in the neuroanatomists' agreement on the respective delineations. Lower agreement in annotations was observed in transitional zones between structures where seminal cytoarchitectonic features are expressed less saliently. The results highlight that definitions and parcellations of the MTL cortex differ among neuroanatomical schools and thereby increase understanding of why these differences may arise. This work sets a crucial foundation to further advance anatomically-informed neuroimaging research on the human MTL cortex., (© 2024 The Authors. Hippocampus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background and Objectives: Cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) is a common but nonspecific MRI finding in individuals with prior head trauma. The type and extent of head trauma related to CSP, CSP features specific to head trauma, and the impact of brain atrophy on CSP are unknown. We evaluated CSP cross-sectionally and longitudinally in healthy and clinically impaired older adults who underwent detailed lifetime head trauma characterization., Methods: This is an observational cohort study of University of California, San Francisco Memory and Aging Center participants (healthy controls [HCs], those with Alzheimer disease or related dementias [ADRDs], subset with traumatic encephalopathy syndrome [TES]). We characterized traumatic brain injury (TBI) and repetitive head impacts (RHI) through contact/collision sports. Study groups were no RHI/TBI, prior TBI only, prior RHI only, and prior RHI + TBI. We additionally looked within TBI (1, 2, or 3+) and RHI (1-4, 5-10, and 11+ years). All underwent baseline MRI, and 67% completed a second MRI (median follow-up = 5.4 years). CSP measures included grade (0-4) and length (millimeters). Groups were compared on likelihood of CSP (logistic regression, odds ratios [ORs]) and whether CSP length discriminated groups (area under the curve [AUC])., Results: Our sample included 266 participants (N = 160 HCs, N = 106 with ADRD or TES; age 66.8 ± 8.2 years, 45.3% female). Overall, 123 (49.8%) participants had no RHI/TBI, 52 (21.1%) had TBI only, 41 (16.6%) had RHI only, 31 (12.6%) had RHI + TBI, and 20 were classified as those with TES (7.5%). Compared with no RHI/TBI, RHI + TBI (OR 3.11 [1.23-7.88]) and TES (OR 11.6 [2.46-54.8]) had greater odds of CSP. Approximately 5-10 years (OR 2.96 [1.13-7.77]) and 11+ years of RHI (OR 3.14 [1.06-9.31]) had higher odds of CSP. CSP length modestly discriminated participants with 5-10 years (AUC 0.63 [0.51-0.75]) and 11+ years of prior RHI (AUC 0.69 [0.55-0.84]) from no RHI/TBI (cut point = 6 mm). Strongest effects were noted in analyses of American football participation. Longitudinally, CSP grade was unchanged in 165 (91.7%), and length was unchanged in 171 (95.5%) participants., Discussion: Among older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease, risk of CSP is driven more by duration (years) of RHI, especially American football, than number of TBI. CSP length (≥6 mm) is relatively specific to individuals who have had substantial prior RHI. Neurodegenerative disease and progressive atrophy do not clearly influence development or worsening of CSP.

Disease staging, whereby the spatial extent and load of brain pathology are used to estimate the severity of Alzheimer disease (AD), is pivotal to the gold-standard neuropathological diagnosis of AD. Current in vivo diagnostic frameworks for AD are based on abnormal concentrations of amyloid-β and tau in the cerebrospinal fluid or on PET scans, and breakthroughs in molecular imaging have opened up the possibility of in vivo staging of AD. Focusing on the key principles of disease staging shared across several areas of medicine, this Review highlights the potential for in vivo staging of AD to transform our understanding of preclinical AD, refine enrolment criteria for trials of disease-modifying therapies and aid clinical decision-making in the era of anti-amyloid therapeutics. We provide a state-of-the-art review of recent biomarker-based AD staging systems and highlight their contributions to the understanding of the natural history of AD. Furthermore, we outline hypothetical frameworks to stage AD severity using more accessible fluid biomarkers. In addition, by applying amyloid PET-based staging to recently published anti-amyloid therapeutic trials, we highlight how biomarker-based disease staging frameworks could illustrate the numerous pathological changes that have already taken place in individuals with mildly symptomatic AD. Finally, we discuss challenges related to the validation and standardization of disease staging and provide a forward-looking perspective on potential clinical applications., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

With the emergence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) disease-modifying therapies, identifying patients who could benefit from these treatments becomes critical. In this study, we evaluated whether a precise blood test could perform as well as established cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests in detecting amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles. Plasma %p-tau217 (ratio of phosporylated-tau217 to non-phosphorylated tau) was analyzed by mass spectrometry in the Swedish BioFINDER-2 cohort (n = 1,422) and the US Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight ADRC) cohort (n = 337). Matched CSF samples were analyzed with clinically used and FDA-approved automated immunoassays for Aβ42/40 and p-tau181/Aβ42. The primary and secondary outcomes were detection of brain Aβ or tau pathology, respectively, using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging as the reference standard. Main analyses were focused on individuals with cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia), which is the target population for available disease-modifying treatments. Plasma %p-tau217 was clinically equivalent to FDA-approved CSF tests in classifying Aβ PET status, with an area under the curve (AUC) for both between 0.95 and 0.97. Plasma %p-tau217 was generally superior to CSF tests in classification of tau-PET with AUCs of 0.95-0.98. In cognitively impaired subcohorts (BioFINDER-2: n = 720; Knight ADRC: n = 50), plasma %p-tau217 had an accuracy, a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value of 89-90% for Aβ PET and 87-88% for tau PET status, which was clinically equivalent to CSF tests, further improving to 95% using a two-cutoffs approach. Blood plasma %p-tau217 demonstrated performance that was clinically equivalent or superior to clinically used FDA-approved CSF tests in the detection of AD pathology. Use of high-performance blood tests in clinical practice can improve access to accurate AD diagnosis and AD-specific treatments., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Most neuroimaging studies linking regional brain volumes with cognition correct for total intracranial volume (ICV), but methods used for this correction differ across studies. It is unknown whether different ICV correction methods yield consistent results. Using a brain-wide association approach in the MRI substudy of UK Biobank (N = 41,964; mean age = 64.5 years), we used regression models to estimate the associations of 58 regional brain volumetric measures with eight cognitive outcomes, comparing no correction and four ICV correction approaches. Approaches evaluated included: no correction; dividing regional volumes by ICV (proportional approach); including ICV as a covariate in the regression (adjustment approach); and regressing the regional volumes against ICV in different normative samples and using calculated residuals to determine associations (residual approach). We used Spearman-rank correlations and two consistency measures to quantify the extent to which associations were inconsistent across ICV correction approaches for each possible brain region and cognitive outcome pair across 2320 regression models. When the association between brain volume and cognitive performance was close to null, all approaches produced similar estimates close to the null. When associations between a regional volume and cognitive test were not null, the adjustment and residual approaches typically produced similar estimates, but these estimates were inconsistent with results from the crude and proportional approaches. For example, when using the crude approach, an increase of 0.114 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.103-0.125) in fluid intelligence was associated with each unit increase in hippocampal volume. However, when using the adjustment approach, the increase was 0.055 (95% CI: 0.043-0.068), while the proportional approach showed a decrease of -0.025 (95% CI: -0.035 to -0.014). Different commonly used methods to correct for ICV yielded inconsistent results. The proportional method diverges notably from other methods and results were sometimes biologically implausible. A simple regression adjustment for ICV produced biologically plausible associations., (© 2024 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: With emergence of disease-modifying therapies, efficient diagnostic pathways are critically needed to identify treatment candidates, evaluate disease severity, and support prognosis. A combination of plasma biomarkers and brief digital cognitive assessments could provide a scalable alternative to current diagnostic work-up., Methods: We examined the accuracy of plasma biomarkers and a 10-minute supervised tablet-based cognitive assessment (Tablet-based Cognitive Assessment Tool Brain Health Assessment [TabCAT-BHA]) in predicting amyloid β positive (Aβ+) status on positron emission tomography (PET), concurrent disease severity, and functional decline in 309 older adults with subjective cognitive impairment (n = 49), mild cognitive impairment (n = 159), and dementia (n = 101)., Results: Combination of plasma pTau181, Aβ42/40, neurofilament light (NfL), and TabCAT-BHA was optimal for predicting Aβ-PET positivity (AUC = 0.962). Whereas NfL and TabCAT-BHA optimally predicted concurrent disease severity, combining these with pTau181 and glial fibrillary acidic protein was most accurate in predicting functional decline., Discussion: Combinations of plasma and digital cognitive markers show promise for scalable diagnosis and prognosis of ADRD., Highlights: The need for cost-efficient diagnostic and prognostic markers of AD is urgent. Plasma and digital cognitive markers provide complementary diagnostic contributions. Combination of these markers holds promise for scalable diagnosis and prognosis. Future validation in community cohorts is needed to inform clinical implementation., (© 2024 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: We estimated the ages when associations between Alzheimer's disease (AD) genes and brain volumes begin among middle-aged and older adults., Methods: Among 45,616 dementia-free participants aged 45-80, linear regressions tested whether genetic risk score for AD (AD-GRS) had age-dependent associations with 38 regional brain magnetic resonance imaging volumes. Models were adjusted for sex, assessment center, genetic ancestry, and intracranial volume., Results: AD-GRS modified the estimated effect of age (per decade) on the amygdala (-0.41 mm 3 [-0.42, -0.40]); hippocampus (-0.45 mm 3 [-0.45, -0.44]), nucleus accumbens (-0.55 mm 3 [-0.56, -0.54]), thalamus (-0.38 mm 3 [-0.39, -0.37]), and medial orbitofrontal cortex (-0.23 mm 3 [-0.24, -0.22]). Trends began by age 45 for the nucleus accumbens and thalamus, 48 for the hippocampus, 51 for the amygdala, and 53 for the medial orbitofrontal cortex. An AD-GRS excluding apolipoprotein E (APOE) was additionally associated with entorhinal and middle temporal cortices., Discussion: APOE and other genes that increase AD risk predict lower hippocampal and other brain volumes by middle age., (© 2024 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: The pace of innovation has accelerated in virtually every area of tau research in just the past few years., Methods: In February 2022, leading international tau experts convened to share selected highlights of this work during Tau 2022, the second international tau conference co-organized and co-sponsored by the Alzheimer's Association, CurePSP, and the Rainwater Charitable Foundation., Results: Representing academia, industry, and the philanthropic sector, presenters joined more than 1700 registered attendees from 59 countries, spanning six continents, to share recent advances and exciting new directions in tau research., Discussion: The virtual meeting provided an opportunity to foster cross-sector collaboration and partnerships as well as a forum for updating colleagues on research-advancing tools and programs that are steadily moving the field forward., (© 2024 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Dementia represents a growing public health burden with large social, racial, and ethnic disparities. The etiology of dementia is poorly understood, and the lack of robust biomarkers in diverse, population-representative samples is a barrier to moving dementia research forward. Existing biomarkers and other measures of pathology-derived from neuropathology, neuroimaging, and cerebrospinal fluid samples-are commonly collected from predominantly White and highly educated samples drawn from academic medical centers in urban settings. Blood-based biomarkers are noninvasive and less expensive, offering promise to expand our understanding of the pathophysiology of dementia, including in participants from historically excluded groups. Although largely not yet approved by the Food and Drug Administration or used in clinical settings, blood-based biomarkers are increasingly included in epidemiologic studies on dementia. Blood-based biomarkers in epidemiologic research may allow the field to more accurately understand the multifactorial etiology and sequence of events that characterize dementia-related pathophysiological changes. As blood-based dementia biomarkers continue to be developed and incorporated into research and practice, we outline considerations for using them in dementia epidemiology, and illustrate key concepts with Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (2003-present) data. We focus on measurement, including both validity and reliability, and on the use of dementia blood-based biomarkers to promote equity in dementia research and cognitive aging. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Posterior cortical atrophy is a rare syndrome characterised by early, prominent, and progressive impairment in visuoperceptual and visuospatial processing. The disorder has been associated with underlying neuropathological features of Alzheimer's disease, but large-scale biomarker and neuropathological studies are scarce. We aimed to describe demographic, clinical, biomarker, and neuropathological correlates of posterior cortical atrophy in a large international cohort., Methods: We searched PubMed between database inception and Aug 1, 2021, for all published research studies on posterior cortical atrophy and related terms. We identified research centres from these studies and requested deidentified, individual participant data (published and unpublished) that had been obtained at the first diagnostic visit from the corresponding authors of the studies or heads of the research centres. Inclusion criteria were a clinical diagnosis of posterior cortical atrophy as defined by the local centre and availability of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers (PET or CSF), or a diagnosis made at autopsy. Not all individuals with posterior cortical atrophy fulfilled consensus criteria, being diagnosed using centre-specific procedures or before development of consensus criteria. We obtained demographic, clinical, biofluid, neuroimaging, and neuropathological data. Mean values for continuous variables were combined using the inverse variance meta-analysis method; only research centres with more than one participant for a variable were included. Pooled proportions were calculated for binary variables using a restricted maximum likelihood model. Heterogeneity was quantified using I 2 ., Findings: We identified 55 research centres from 1353 papers, with 29 centres responding to our request. An additional seven centres were recruited by advertising via the Alzheimer's Association. We obtained data for 1092 individuals who were evaluated at 36 research centres in 16 countries, the other sites having not responded to our initial invitation to participate to the study. Mean age at symptom onset was 59·4 years (95% CI 58·9-59·8; I 2 =77%), 60% (56-64; I 2 =35%) were women, and 80% (72-89; I 2 =98%) presented with posterior cortical atrophy pure syndrome. Amyloid β in CSF (536 participants from 28 centres) was positive in 81% (95% CI 75-87; I 2 =78%), whereas phosphorylated tau in CSF (503 participants from 29 centres) was positive in 65% (56-75; I 2 =87%). Amyloid-PET (299 participants from 24 centres) was positive in 94% (95% CI 90-97; I 2 =15%), whereas tau-PET (170 participants from 13 centres) was positive in 97% (93-100; I 2 =12%). At autopsy (145 participants from 13 centres), the most frequent neuropathological diagnosis was Alzheimer's disease (94%, 95% CI 90-97; I 2 =0%), with common co-pathologies of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (71%, 54-88; I 2 =89%), Lewy body disease (44%, 25-62; I 2 =77%), and cerebrovascular injury (42%, 24-60; I 2 =88%)., Interpretation: These data indicate that posterior cortical atrophy typically presents as a pure, young-onset dementia syndrome that is highly specific for underlying Alzheimer's disease pathology. Further work is needed to understand what drives cognitive vulnerability and progression rates by investigating the contribution of sex, genetics, premorbid cognitive strengths and weaknesses, and brain network integrity., Funding: None., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MC received research support from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec–Santé (FRQS). MF, FA, EC, FC, and GM receive research support from the Foundation Research on Alzheimer Disease and Italian Ministry of Healthy (#GR-2010-2303035). MEM receives research support from the NIH (R01 AG054449, R01 AG075802, U01-AG057195 and P30 AG062677). Data from Mayo Clinic (Jacksonville) was supported by the State of Florida Alzheimer's Disease Initiative and the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. BD receives research funding from NIA R21-AG051987, P50-AG005134, and R01-DC014296 and philanthropic funding to the MGH FTD Unit including the Mooney Family Fund. KY is an Etherington posterior cortical atrophy Senior Research Fellow and is funded by the Alzheimer's Society, grant number 453 (AS-JF-18-003). The work was also supported by an Alzheimer's Research UK Senior Research Fellowship and ESRC/NIHR (ES/L001810/1) grant to SC. JMS acknowledges the support of the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, ARUK (ARUK-PG2017–1946), Weston Brain Institute (UB170045), Medical Research Council, and British Heart Foundation. TL is supported by an Alzheimer's Research UK senior fellowship. The Queen Square Brain Bank is supported by the Reta Lila Weston Institute for Neurological Studies and the Medical Research Council. The Dementia Research Centre is supported by Alzheimer's Research UK, Brain Research Trust, and The Wolfson Foundation. This work was also supported by the NIHR Queen Square Dementia Biomedical Research Unit, and the NIHR UCL/H Biomedical Research Centre. This work was supported by the MRC Dementia Platform UK and the UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, which receives its funding from UK DRI, funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Alzheimer's Society and Alzheimer's Research UK. DG, AH, and GL receive research support from Shiley-Marcos ADRC P30 AG062429. KJ, JW, and JGR receive research funding from the NIH (R01-AG50603). BDCB receives funding from Alzheimer Nederland (#WE.15-2019-13, WE.03-2021-15, and #WE.06-2023-01). MM, JR, and KA were supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre including the Cambridge Brain Bank (BRC-1215-20014. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care) and the Race Against Dementia. M.F.M. receives research support from the NIA (1RF1AG050967). RM is supported by France Alzheimer, Fondation Recherche Alzheimer, Philippe Chatrier Foundation and by Rosita Gomez Association. OH has acquired research support (for the institution) from ADx, AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Fujirebio, GE Healthcare, Pfizer, and Roche and has received consultancy or speaker fees from AC Immune, Amylyx, Alzpath, BioArctic, Biogen, Cerveau, Fujirebio, Genentech, Novartis, Roche, and Siemens. Work at the Lund University was supported by the Swedish Research Council (2016-00906), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation (2017-0383), the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg foundation (2015·0125), the Strategic Research Area MultiPark (Multidisciplinary Research in Parkinson's disease) at Lund University, the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (AF-939932), the Swedish Brain Foundation (FO2021-0293), The Parkinson foundation of Sweden (1280/20), the Konung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias Frimurarestiftelse, the Skåne University Hospital Foundation (2020-O000028), Regionalt Forskningsstöd (2020-0314), and the Swedish federal Government under the ALF agreement (2018-Projekt0279). PN is supported by The Mater Foundation. DP, SPC, and GT are supported by The Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata Progetto Reti Nazionale AD NET-2011-02346784). OP, NC, JB, JH, and DF were supported by funding to ForeFront, a collaborative research group dedicated to the study of frontotemporal dementia and motor neuron disease, from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (GNT1037746) and the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders Memory Program (CE11000102). OP is supported by an NHMRC Leadership Fellowship (GNT2008020). LA receives research support from Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (P30 AG010133 and LEADS (U01AG6057195). ER, SW, and MM received research support from the NIH (P30AG13854 and P30AG072977). BDCB receives funding from Alzheimer Nederland (#WE.15-2019-13, WE.03-2021-15, and #WE.06-2023-01). Data from Geneva was supported by Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) grants (NIA P50 AG005138 and P30 AG066514). Data from Xuanwu Hospital was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971011) and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Committee (7202060). Research of Alzheimer Center Amsterdam has been funded by ZonMW, NWO, EU-FP7, EU-JPND, Alzheimer Nederland, Hersenstichting CardioVascular Onderzoek Nederland, Health Holland, Topsector Life Sciences & Health, stichting Dioraphte, Gieskes-Strijbis fonds, stichting Equilibrio, Edwin Bouw fonds, Pasman stichting, stichting Alzheimer & Neuropsychiatrie Foundation, Philips, Biogen MA, Novartis-NL, Life-MI, AVID, Roche BV, Fujifilm, and Combinostics. Data from Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center was funded by NIH grants (R01-AG054519 and K01-AG061277). Data from MASS's group comes from The Sant Pau Initiative on Neurodegeneration cohort. LTG receives research support from the NIH (K24053435) and R01AG075802. GDR receives research support from the NIH/NIA (R35 AG072362, P30-AG062422, U01-AG057195, and P01-AG019724). Other support to GDR includes National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Alzheimer's Association, American College of Radiology, Rainwater Charitable Foundation, Shanendoah Foundation, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, GE Healthcare, Life Molecular Imaging, and Genentech. LA has received personal compensation for serving as a consultant for Biogen, Two Labs, FL Dept Health, Genentech, NIH Biobank, Eli Lilly, GE Healthcare, Eisai, and Roche Diagnostics and for serving on a Data Safety and Monitoring Board for IQVIA. LA receives research support from the National Institute on Aging, the Alzheimer's Association, Roche Diagnostics, AVID radiopharmaceuticals, Life Molecular Imaging, and Eli Lilly. MFM is the section editor for Behavioral Neurology for UpToDate. JGR serves on the Drug Safety Monitoring Board for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke StrokeNET. KAJ is an Associate Editor for Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology and is on the editorial boards of Journal of Neurology, Acta Neuropathologica, and Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. JLW is an Associate Editor for Brain Connectivity and Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. RO has received research support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, has given lectures in symposia sponsored by GE Healthcare and is an editorial board member of Alzheimer's Research & Therapy and the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. FA is Associate Editor of NeuroImage: Clinical, has received speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec, Italfarmaco, Roche and Zambon, and receives or has received research supports from the Italian Ministry of Health, the Italian Ministry of University and Research, AriSLA (Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA), and the European Research Council and Foundation Research on Alzheimer Disease. MF is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology, Associate Editor of Human Brain Mapping, Neurological Sciences, and Radiology; received compensation for consulting services from Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; speaking activities from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Chiesi Italia SpA, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Neopharmed Gentili, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and TEVA; participation in Advisory Boards for Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Takeda; scientific direction of educational events for Biogen, Merck, Roche, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme; and receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Italian Ministry of Health, and Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla. GDR has served on Scientific Advisory Boards for Alector, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Merck, and Roche. He serves on a Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Johnson & Johnson. He is an Associate Editor for JAMA Neurology. The other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We comprehensively evaluated how self- and informant-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) were differentially associated with cerebral amyloid-beta (Aβ) PET levels in older adults without dementia., Methods: Two hundred and twenty-one participants (48% female, age = 73.4 years ± 8.4, Clinical Dementia Rating = 0 [n = 184] or 0.5 [n = 37]) underwent an Aβ-PET scan (florbetapir or PIB), comprehensive neuropsychological testing, and self-reported (Geriatric Depression Scale - 30 item [GDS-30]) and informant-reported interview (Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire [NPI-Q]) of NPS. Cerebral Aβ burden was quantified using centiloids (CL). NPI-Q and GDS-30 queried the presence of NPS within 4 subdomains and 6 subscales, respectively. Regression models examined the relationship between NPS and Aβ-PET CL., Results: Both higher self- and informant-reported NPS were associated with higher Aβ burden. Among specific NPI-Q subdomains, informant-reported changes in depression, anxiety, and irritability were all associated with higher Aβ-PET. Similarly, self-reported (GDS-30) subscales of depression, apathy, anxiety, and cognitive concern were associated with higher Aβ-PET. When simultaneously entered, only self-reported cognitive concern was associated with Aβ-PET in the GDS-30 model, while both informant-reported anxiety and depression were associated with Aβ-PET in the NPI-Q model. Clinical status moderated the association between self-reported NPS and Aβ-PET such that the positive relationship between self-perceived NPS and Aβ burden strengthened with increasing functional difficulties., Conclusions: In a cohort of older adults without dementia, both self- and informant-reported measures of global NPS, particularly patient-reported cognitive concerns and informant-reported anxiety and depression, corresponded with cerebral Aβ burden. NPS may appear early in the prodromal disease state and relate to initial AD proteinopathy burden, a relationship further exaggerated in those with greater clinical severity., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Tau PET has enabled the visualization of paired helical filaments of 3 or 4 C-terminal repeat tau in Alzheimer disease (AD), but its ability to detect aggregated tau in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) spectrum disorders is uncertain. We investigated 2-(2-([ 18 F]fluoro)pyridin-4-yl)-9 H -pyrrolo[2,3-b:4,5c']dipyridine ([ 18 F]PI-2620), a newer tracer with ex vivo evidence for binding to FTLD tau, in a convenience sample of patients with suspected FTLD and AD using a static acquisition protocol and parametric SUV ratio (SUVr) images. Methods: We analyzed [ 18 F]PI-2620 PET data from 65 patients with clinical diagnoses associated with AD or FTLD neuropathology; most (60/65) also had amyloid-β (Aβ) PET. Scans were acquired 30-60 min after injection; SUVr maps (reference, inferior cerebellar cortex) were created for the full acquisition and for 10-min truncated sliding windows (30-40, 35-45,…50-60 min). Age- and sex-adjusted z score maps were computed for each patient, relative to 23 Aβ-negative cognitively healthy controls (HC). Mean SUVr in the globus pallidus, substantia nigra, subthalamic nuclei, dentate nuclei, white matter, and temporal gray matter was extracted for the full and truncated windows. Results: Patients with suspected AD neuropathology (Aβ-positive patients with mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia) showed high-intensity temporoparietal cortex-predominant [ 18 F]PI-2620 binding. At the group level, patients with clinical diagnoses associated with FTLD (progressive supranuclear palsy with Richardson syndrome [PSP Richardson syndrome], corticobasal syndrome, and nonfluent-variant primary progressive aphasia) exhibited higher globus pallidus SUVr than did HCs; pallidal retention was highest in the PSP Richardson syndrome group, in whom SUVr was correlated with symptom severity (ρ = 0.53, P = 0.05). At the individual level, only half of PSP Richardson syndrome, corticobasal syndrome, and nonfluent-variant primary progressive aphasia patients had a pallidal SUVr above that of HCs. Temporal SUVr discriminated AD patients from HCs with high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.83-1.00]) for all time windows, whereas discrimination between patients with PSP Richardson syndrome and HCs using pallidal SUVr was fair regardless of time window (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61-0.92] at 30-40 min vs. 0.81 [95% CI, 0.66-0.96] at 50-60 min; P = 0.67). Conclusion: [ 18 F]PI-2620 SUVr shows an intense and consistent signal in AD but lower-intensity, heterogeneous, and rapidly decreasing binding in patients with suspected FTLD. Further work is needed to delineate the substrate of [ 18 F]PI-2620 binding and the usefulness of [ 18 F]PI2620 SUVr quantification outside the AD continuum., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Introduction: One goal of the Longitudinal Early Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) is to define the fluid biomarker characteristics of early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD)., Methods: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, total tau (tTau), pTau181, VILIP-1, SNAP-25, neurogranin (Ng), neurofilament light chain (NfL), and YKL-40 were measured by immunoassay in 165 LEADS participants. The associations of biomarker concentrations with diagnostic group and standard cognitive tests were evaluated., Results: Biomarkers were correlated with one another. Levels of CSF Aβ42/40, pTau181, tTau, SNAP-25, and Ng in EOAD differed significantly from cognitively normal and early-onset non-AD dementia; NfL, YKL-40, and VILIP-1 did not. Across groups, all biomarkers except SNAP-25 were correlated with cognition. Within the EOAD group, Aβ42/40, NfL, Ng, and SNAP-25 were correlated with at least one cognitive measure., Discussion: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of CSF biomarkers in sporadic EOAD that can inform EOAD clinical trial design., (© 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: We examined neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and psychotropic medication use in a large sample of individuals with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD; onset 40-64 years) at the midway point of data collection for the Longitudinal Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS)., Methods: Baseline NPS (Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Questionnaire; Geriatric Depression Scale) and psychotropic medication use from 282 participants enrolled in LEADS were compared across diagnostic groups - amyloid-positive EOAD (n = 212) and amyloid negative early-onset non-Alzheimer's disease (EOnonAD; n = 70)., Results: Affective behaviors were the most common NPS in EOAD at similar frequencies to EOnonAD. Tension and impulse control behaviors were more common in EOnonAD. A minority of participants were using psychotropic medications, and use was higher in EOnonAD., Discussion: Overall NPS burden and psychotropic medication use were higher in EOnonAD than EOAD participants. Future research will investigate moderators and etiological drivers of NPS, and NPS differences in EOAD versus late-onset AD., (© 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Objective: The Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) seeks to provide comprehensive understanding of early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD; onset <65 years), with the current study profiling baseline clinical, cognitive, biomarker, and genetic characteristics of the cohort nearing the data-collection mid-point., Methods: Data from 371 LEADS participants were compared based on diagnostic group classification (cognitively normal [n = 89], amyloid-positive EOAD [n = 212], and amyloid-negative early-onset non-Alzheimer's disease [EOnonAD; n = 70])., Results: Cognitive performance was worse for EOAD than other groups, and EOAD participants were apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 homozygotes at higher rates. An amnestic presentation was common among impaired participants (81%), with several clinical phenotypes present. LEADS participants generally consented at high rates to optional trial procedures., Conclusions: We present the most comprehensive baseline characterization of sporadic EOAD in the United States to date. EOAD presents with widespread cognitive impairment within and across clinical phenotypes, with differences in APOE ε4 allele carrier status appearing to be relevant., Highlights: Findings represent the most comprehensive baseline characterization of sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) to date. Cognitive impairment was widespread for EOAD participants and more severe than other groups. EOAD participants were homozygous apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 carriers at higher rates than the EOnonAD group. Amnestic presentation predominated in EOAD and EOnonAD participants, but other clinical phenotypes were present., (© 2023 the Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: We used sex and apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) carrier status as predictors of pathologic burden in early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD)., Methods: We included baseline data from 77 cognitively normal (CN), 230 EOAD, and 70 EO non-Alzheimer's disease (EOnonAD) participants from the Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS). We stratified each diagnostic group by males and females, then further subdivided each sex by APOE ε4 carrier status and compared imaging biomarkers in each stratification. Voxel-wise multiple linear regressions yielded statistical brain maps of gray matter density, amyloid, and tau PET burden., Results: EOAD females had greater amyloid and tau PET burdens than males. EOAD female APOE ε4 non-carriers had greater amyloid PET burdens and greater gray matter atrophy than female ε4 carriers. EOnonAD female ε4 non-carriers also had greater gray matter atrophy than female ε4 carriers., Discussion: The effects of sex and APOE ε4 must be considered when studying these populations., Highlights: Novel analysis examining the effects of biological sex and apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) carrier status on neuroimaging biomarkers among early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD), early-onset non-AD (EOnonAD), and cognitively normal (CN) participants. Female sex is associated with greater pathology burden in the EOAD cohort compared to male sex. The effect of APOE ε4 carrier status on pathology burden was the most impactful in females across all cohorts., (© 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: We compared white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) with cognitively normal (CN) and early-onset amyloid-negative cognitively impaired (EOnonAD) groups in the Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study., Methods: We investigated the role of increased WMH in cognition and amyloid and tau burden. We compared WMH burden of 205 EOAD, 68 EOnonAD, and 89 CN participants in lobar regions using t-tests and analyses of covariance. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate the association between WMH and cognitive impairment and that between amyloid and tau burden., Results: EOAD showed greater WMHs compared with CN and EOnonAD participants across all regions with no significant differences between CN and EOnonAD groups. Greater WMHs were associated with worse cognition. Tau burden was positively associated with WMH burden in the EOAD group., Discussion: EOAD consistently showed higher WMH volumes. Overall, greater WMHs were associated with worse cognition and higher tau burden in EOAD., Highlights: This study represents a comprehensive characterization of WMHs in sporadic EOAD. WMH volumes are associated with tau burden from positron emission tomography (PET) in EOAD, suggesting WMHs are correlated with increasing burden of AD. Greater WMH volumes are associated with worse performance on global cognitive tests. EOAD participants have higher WMH volumes compared with CN and early-onset amyloid-negative cognitively impaired (EOnonAD) groups across all brain regions., (© 2023 the Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) is a useful neuropsychological test for describing episodic memory impairment in dementia. However, there is limited research on its utility in early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD). We assess the influence of amyloid and diagnostic syndrome on several memory scores in EOAD., Methods: We transcribed RAVLT recordings from 303 subjects in the Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study. Subjects were grouped by amyloid status and syndrome. Primacy, recency, J-curve, duration, stopping time, and speed score were calculated and entered into linear mixed effects models as dependent variables., Results: Compared with amyloid negative subjects, positive subjects exhibited effects on raw score, primacy, recency, and stopping time. Inter-syndromic differences were noted with raw score, primacy, recency, J-curve, and stopping time., Discussion: RAVLT measures are sensitive to the effects of amyloid and syndrome in EOAD. Future work is needed to quantify the predictive value of these scores., Highlights: RAVLT patterns characterize various presentations of EOAD and EOnonAD Amyloid impacts raw score, primacy, recency, and stopping time Timing-based scores add value over traditional count-based scores., (© 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: We aimed to describe baseline amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau-positron emission tomograrphy (PET) from Longitudinal Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS), a prospective multi-site observational study of sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD)., Methods: We analyzed baseline [18F]Florbetaben (Aβ) and [18F]Flortaucipir (tau)-PET from cognitively impaired participants with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD dementia aged < 65 years. Florbetaben scans were used to distinguish cognitively impaired participants with EOAD (Aβ+) from EOnonAD (Aβ-) based on the combination of visual read by expert reader and image quantification., Results: 243/321 (75.7%) of participants were assigned to the EOAD group based on amyloid-PET; 231 (95.1%) of them were tau-PET positive (A+T+). Tau-PET signal was elevated across cortical regions with a parietal-predominant pattern, and higher burden was observed in younger and female EOAD participants., Discussion: LEADS data emphasizes the importance of biomarkers to enhance diagnostic accuracy in EOAD. The advanced tau-PET binding at baseline might have implications for therapeutic strategies in patients with EOAD., Highlights: 72% of patients with clinical EOAD were positive on both amyloid- and tau-PET. Amyloid-positive patients with EOAD had high tau-PET signal across cortical regions. In EOAD, tau-PET mediated the relationship between amyloid-PET and MMSE. Among EOAD patients, younger onset and female sex were associated with higher tau-PET., (© 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Approximately 5% of Alzheimer's disease cases have an early age at onset (<65 years), with 5-10% of these cases attributed to dominantly inherited mutations and the remainder considered as sporadic. The extent to which dominantly inherited and sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease overlap is unknown. In this study, we explored the clinical, cognitive and biomarker profiles of early-onset Alzheimer's disease, focusing on commonalities and distinctions between dominantly inherited and sporadic cases. Our analysis included 117 participants with dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease enrolled in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network and 118 individuals with sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease enrolled at the University of California San Francisco Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. Baseline differences in clinical and biomarker profiles between both groups were compared using t -tests. Differences in the rates of decline were compared using linear mixed-effects models. Individuals with dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease exhibited an earlier age-at-symptom onset compared with the sporadic group [43.4 (SD ± 8.5) years versus 54.8 (SD ± 5.0) years, respectively, P < 0.001]. Sporadic cases showed a higher frequency of atypical clinical presentations relative to dominantly inherited (56.8% versus 8.5%, respectively) and a higher frequency of APOE-ε4 (50.0% versus 28.2%, P = 0.001). Compared with sporadic early onset, motor manifestations were higher in the dominantly inherited cohort [32.5% versus 16.9% at baseline ( P = 0.006) and 46.1% versus 25.4% at last visit ( P = 0.001)]. At baseline, the sporadic early-onset group performed worse on category fluency ( P < 0.001), Trail Making Test Part B ( P < 0.001) and digit span ( P < 0.001). Longitudinally, both groups demonstrated similar rates of cognitive and functional decline in the early stages. After 10 years from symptom onset, dominantly inherited participants experienced a greater decline as measured by Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes [3.63 versus 1.82 points ( P = 0.035)]. CSF amyloid beta-42 levels were comparable [244 (SD ± 39.3) pg/ml dominantly inherited versus 296 (SD ± 24.8) pg/ml sporadic early onset, P = 0.06]. CSF phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 levels were higher in the dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease cohort (87.3 versus 59.7 pg/ml, P = 0.005), but no significant differences were found for t-tau levels ( P = 0.35). In summary, sporadic and inherited Alzheimer's disease differed in baseline profiles; sporadic early onset is best distinguished from dominantly inherited by later age at onset, high frequency of atypical clinical presentations and worse executive performance at baseline. Despite these differences, shared pathways in longitudinal clinical decline and CSF biomarkers suggest potential common therapeutic targets for both populations, offering valuable insights for future research and clinical trial design., Competing Interests: J.J.L.-G.’s research is supported by NIH-NIA (K01AG073526), the Alzheimer’s Association (AARFD-21-851415 and SG-20-690363), the Michael J. Fox Foundation (MJFF-020770), the Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the McDonnell Academy. A.M.F., PhD, is the Biomarker Core Leader of the DIAN-TU. She is a member of the scientific advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics, Genentech and AbbVie and also consults for Araclon/Grifols, DiademRes, DiamiR and Otsuka Pharmaceuticals. T.L.S.B., MD, PhD, has investigator-initiated research funding from the NIH, the Alzheimer’s Association, the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals. T.L.S.B. participates as a site investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, Biogen, Eisai, Jaansen and F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. She serves as an unpaid consultant to Eisai and Siemens. She is on the Speaker’s Bureau for Biogen. J.C.M., MD, is the Friedman Distinguished Professor of Neurology, Director, Knight ADRC, Associate Director of DIAN and Founding Principal Investigator of DIAN. He is funded by NIH grants # P30 AG066444, P01AG003991, P01AG026276, U19 AG032438 and U19 AG024904. Neither J.C.M. nor his family owns stock or has equity interest (outside of mutual funds or other externally directed accounts) in any pharmaceutical or biotechnology company. A.J.A., PhD, has served as a consultant for Biogen Inc and H. Lundbeck HS. J.H., PhD, is a paid consultant for F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Takeda, and Lundbeck and is on the Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Eisai. J.L., MD, reports speaker fees from Bayer Vital, Biogen and Roche, consulting fees from Axon Neuroscience and Biogen and author fees from Thieme Medical Publishers and W. Kohlhammer GmbH Medical Publishers. In addition, he reports compensation for serving as chief medical officer for MODAG GmbH, is a beneficiary of the phantom share program of MODAG GmbH and is an inventor in a patent ‘Pharmaceutical Composition and Methods of Use’ (EP 22 159 408.8) filed by MODAG GmbH, all activities outside the submitted work. L.I. is currently a full-time employee of Eli Lilly and Company/Avid Radiopharmaceuticals and a minor shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. His contribution to the work presented in this manuscript was performed while he was affiliated with the University of California San Francisco. G.D.R., MD, receives research support from NIA P30-AG062422, U01-AG057195, R35 AG072362, R56-AG075744, NINDS R21-NS120629, Alzheimer’s Association ZEN-21-848216, American College of Radiology, Rainwater Charitable Foundation, Shenandoah Foundation, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Life Molecular Imaging, GE Healthcare and Genentech. He has served as a consultant for Alector, Eli Lilly, Genentech, GE Healthcare, Roche, Johnson & Johnson and Merck. He serves as associate editor for JAMA Neurology. All other authors report no conflict of interest relevant to this manuscript., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Stress and depression are increasingly recognized as cerebrovascular risk factors, including among high stress populations such as people living with HIV infection (PLWH). Stress may contribute to stroke risk through activation of neural inflammatory pathways. In this cross-sectional study, we examined the relationships between stress, systemic and arterial inflammation, and metabolic activity in stress-related brain regions on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET in PLWH. Participants were recruited from a parent trial evaluating the impact of alirocumab on radiologic markers of cardiovascular risk in people with treated HIV infection. We administered a stress battery to assess different forms of psychological stress, specifying the Perceived Stress Scale as the primary stress measure, and quantified plasma markers of inflammation and immune activation. Participants underwent FDG-PET of the brain, neck, and chest. Age- and sex-matched control participants without HIV infection were selected for brain FDG-PET comparisons. Among PLWH, we used nonparametric pairwise correlations, partial correlations, and linear regression to investigate the association between stress and 1) systemic inflammation; 2) atherosclerotic inflammation on FDG-PET; and metabolic activity in 3) brain regions in which glucose metabolism differed significantly by HIV serostatus; and 4) in a priori defined stress-responsive regions of interest (ROI) and stress-related neural network activity (i.e., ratio of amygdala to ventromedial prefrontal cortex or temporal lobe activity). We studied 37 PLWH (mean age 60 years, 97% men) and 29 control participants without HIV (mean age 62 years, 97% men). Among PLWH, stress was significantly correlated with systemic inflammation (r = 0.33, p = 0.041) and arterial inflammation in the carotid (r = 0.41, p = 0.023) independent of age, race/ethnicity, traditional vascular risk factors and health-related behaviors. In voxel-wise analyses, metabolic activity in a cluster corresponding to the anterior medial temporal lobes, including the bilateral amygdalae, was significantly lower in PLWH compared with controls. However, we did not find a significant positive relationship between stress and this cluster of decreased metabolic activity in PLWH, a priori defined stress-responsive ROI, or stress-related neural network activity. In conclusion, psychological stress was associated with systemic and carotid arterial inflammation in this group of PLWH with treated infection. These data provide preliminary evidence for a link between psychological stress, inflammation, and atherosclerosis as potential drivers of excess cerebrovascular risk among PLWH., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) has emerged as a promising biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Studies have reported strong associations between p-tau and tau-PET that are mainly driven by differences between amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative patients. However, the relationship between p-tau and tau-PET is less characterized within cognitively impaired patients with a biomarker-supported diagnosis of AD. We conducted a head-to-head comparison between plasma p-tau217 and tau-PET in patients at the clinical stage of AD and further assessed their relationships with demographic, clinical, and biomarker variables., Methods: We retrospectively included 87 amyloid-positive patients diagnosed with MCI or dementia due to AD who underwent structural MRI, amyloid-PET ( 11 C-PIB), tau-PET ( 18 F-flortaucipir, FTP), and blood draw assessments within 1 year (age = 66 ± 10, 48% female). Amyloid-PET was quantified in Centiloids (CL) while cortical tau-PET binding was measured using standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) referenced against inferior cerebellar cortex. Plasma p-tau217 concentrations were measured using an electrochemiluminescence-based assay on the Meso Scale Discovery platform. MRI-derived cortical volume was quantified with FreeSurfer. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were available at baseline (n = 85) and follow-up visits (n = 28; 1.5 ± 0.7 years)., Results: Plasma p-tau217 and cortical FTP-SUVR were correlated (r = 0.61, p < .001), especially in temporo-parietal and dorsolateral frontal cortices. Both higher p-tau217 and FTP-SUVR values were associated with younger age, female sex, and lower cortical volume, but not with APOE-ε4 carriership. PIB-PET Centiloids were weakly correlated with FTP-SUVR (r = 0.26, p = 0.02), but not with p-tau217 (r = 0.10, p = 0.36). Regional PET-plasma associations varied with amyloid burden, with p-tau217 being more strongly associated with tau-PET in temporal cortex among patients with moderate amyloid-PET burden, and with tau-PET in primary cortices among patients with high amyloid-PET burden. Higher p-tau217 and FTP-SUVR values were independently associated with lower MMSE scores cross-sectionally, while only baseline FTP-SUVR predicted longitudinal MMSE decline when both biomarkers were included in the same model., Conclusion: Plasma p-tau217 and tau-PET are strongly correlated in amyloid-PET-positive patients with MCI or dementia due to AD, and they exhibited comparable patterns of associations with demographic variables and with markers of downstream neurodegeneration., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Mechanisms of resilience against tau pathology in individuals across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum are insufficiently understood. Longitudinal data are necessary to reveal which factors relate to preserved cognition (i.e. cognitive resilience) and brain structure (i.e. brain resilience) despite abundant tau pathology, and to clarify whether these associations are cross-sectional or longitudinal. We used a longitudinal study design to investigate the role of several demographic, biological and brain structural factors in yielding cognitive and brain resilience to tau pathology as measured with PET. In this multicentre study, we included 366 amyloid-β-positive individuals with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease dementia with baseline 18F-flortaucipir-PET and longitudinal cognitive assessments. A subset (n = 200) additionally underwent longitudinal structural MRI. We used linear mixed-effects models with global cognition and cortical thickness as dependent variables to investigate determinants of cognitive resilience and brain resilience, respectively. Models assessed whether age, sex, years of education, APOE-ε4 status, intracranial volume (and cortical thickness for cognitive resilience models) modified the association of tau pathology with cognitive decline or cortical thinning. We found that the association between higher baseline tau-PET levels (quantified in a temporal meta-region of interest) and rate of cognitive decline (measured with repeated Mini-Mental State Examination) was adversely modified by older age (Stβinteraction = -0.062, P = 0.032), higher education level (Stβinteraction = -0.072, P = 0.011) and higher intracranial volume (Stβinteraction = -0.07, P = 0.016). Younger age, higher education and greater cortical thickness were associated with better cognitive performance at baseline. Greater cortical thickness was furthermore associated with slower cognitive decline independent of tau burden. Higher education also modified the negative impact of tau-PET on cortical thinning, while older age was associated with higher baseline cortical thickness and slower rate of cortical thinning independent of tau. Our analyses revealed no (cross-sectional or longitudinal) associations for sex and APOE-ε4 status on cognition and cortical thickness. In this longitudinal study of clinically impaired individuals with underlying Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes, we identified education as the most robust determinant of both cognitive and brain resilience against tau pathology. The observed interaction with tau burden on cognitive decline suggests that education may be protective against cognitive decline and brain atrophy at lower levels of tau pathology, with a potential depletion of resilience resources with advancing pathology. Finally, we did not find major contributions of sex to brain nor cognitive resilience, suggesting that previous links between sex and resilience might be mainly driven by cross-sectional differences., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) is a neurodegenerative syndrome characterized linguistically by gradual loss of repetition and naming skills resulting from left posterior temporal and inferior parietal atrophy. Here, we sought to identify which specific cortical loci are initially targeted by the disease (epicenters) and investigate whether atrophy spreads through predetermined networks. First, we used cross-sectional structural MRI data from individuals with lvPPA to define putative disease epicenters using a surface-based approach paired with an anatomically fine-grained parcellation of the cortical surface (i.e., HCP-MMP1.0 atlas). Second, we combined cross-sectional functional MRI data from healthy controls and longitudinal structural MRI data from individuals with lvPPA to derive the epicenter-seeded resting-state networks most relevant to lvPPA symptomatology and ascertain whether functional connectivity in these networks predicts longitudinal atrophy spread in lvPPA. Our results show that two partially distinct brain networks anchored to the left anterior angular and posterior superior temporal gyri epicenters were preferentially associated with sentence repetition and naming skills in lvPPA. Critically, the strength of connectivity within these two networks in the neurologically-intact brain significantly predicted longitudinal atrophy progression in lvPPA. Taken together, our findings indicate that atrophy progression in lvPPA, starting from inferior parietal and temporoparietal junction regions, predominantly follows at least two partially nonoverlapping pathways, which may influence the heterogeneity in clinical presentation and prognosis., (© 2023 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) is a clinical phenotype sensitive but non-specific to underlying chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) neuropathology. However, cognitive symptoms of TES overlap with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and features of AD pathology like beta-amyloid (Aβ) plaques often co-occur with CTE, making clinical-to-pathological conclusions of TES diagnoses challenging. We investigated how Alzheimer's neuropathological changes associated with cognition, brain volume, and plasma biomarkers in patients with repetitive head impacts (RHI)/TES, clinical AD, or typically aging controls., Methods: We studied 154 participants including 33 with RHI/TES (age 61.5 ± 11.5, 100% male, 11/33 Aβ[ +]), 62 with AD and no known prior RHI (age 67.1 ± 10.2, 48% male, 62/62 Aβ[ +]), and 59 healthy controls without RHI (HC; age 73.0 ± 6.2, 40% male, 0/59 Aβ[ +]). Patients completed neuropsychological testing (memory, executive functioning, language, visuospatial) and structural MRI (voxel-based morphometry analysis), and provided plasma samples analyzed for GFAP, NfL, IL-6, IFN-γ, and YKL-40. For cognition and plasma biomarkers, patients with RHI/TES were stratified as Aβ[ +] or Aβ[ -] and compared to each other plus the AD and HC groups (ANCOVA adjusting for age and sex). Differences with at least a medium effect size (Cohen's d > 0.50) were interpreted as potentially meaningful., Results: Cognitively, within the TES group, Aβ[ +] RHI/TES performed worse than Aβ[-] RHI/TES on visuospatial (p = .04, d = 0.86) and memory testing (p = .07, d = 0.74). Comparing voxel-wise brain volume, both Aβ[ +] and Aβ[ -] RHI/TES had lower medial and anterior temporal lobe volume than HC and did not significantly differ from AD. Comparing plasma biomarkers, Aβ[ +] RHI/TES had higher plasma GFAP than HC (p = .01, d = 0.88) and did not significantly differ from AD. Conversely, Aβ[ -] RHI/TES had higher NfL than HC (p = .004, d = 0.93) and higher IL-6 than all other groups (p's ≤ .004, d's > 1.0)., Conclusions: Presence of Alzheimer's pathology in patients with RHI/TES is associated with altered cognitive and biomarker profiles. Patients with RHI/TES and positive Aβ-PET have cognitive and plasma biomarker changes that are more like patients with AD than patients with Aβ[ -] RHI/TES. Measuring well-validated Alzheimer's biomarkers in patients with RHI/TES could improve interpretation of research findings and heighten precision in clinical management., (© 2023. The Author(s).)