Search

Brian W Labadie,1 David S Morris,2 Alan H Bryce,3 Robert Given,4,5 Jingsong Zhang,6 Wassim Abida,7 Simon Chowdhury,8,9 Akash Patnaik1 1Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; 2Urology Associates, P.C., Nashville, TN, USA; 3Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 4Department of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA; 5Urology of Virginia, Virginia Beach, VA, USA; 6Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; 7Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; 8Medical Oncology, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK; 9Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UKCorrespondence: Akash Patnaik Knapp Center for Biomedical Discovery, Room 7152, University of Chicago, 900 E. 57th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637 Tel +773-834-3519 Fax +773-834-0778 Email apatnaik@medicine.bsd.uchicago.eduPurpose: The US Food and Drug Administration has recently granted accelerated approval of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib as treatment for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) associated with a deleterious germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alteration. As the safety profile of this new addition to the mCRPC treatment landscape may be unfamiliar to clinicians and patients, we summarize the data from the literature and provide practical guidelines for the management of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that may occur during rucaparib treatment.Materials and Methods: Safety data were identified from PubMed and congress publications of trials involving men with mCRPC treated with oral rucaparib monotherapy (600 mg twice daily). Management guidelines for TEAEs were developed based on trial protocols, prescribing information, oncology association guidance, and the authors’ clinical experience.Results: In clinical trials of men with mCRPC who received rucaparib (n = 193), TEAEs observed were consistent with that of other PARP inhibitors. The most frequent any-grade TEAEs included gastrointestinal events, asthenia/fatigue, anemia, increased alanine/aspartate aminotransferase, rash, and thrombocytopenia; the most frequent grade ≥ 3 TEAE was anemia. The majority of TEAEs were self-limiting and did not require treatment modification or interruption. Here, we provide recommendations on management of the most common TEAEs reported with rucaparib as well as other TEAEs of interest.Conclusion: Rucaparib’s recent approval for treatment of BRCA-mutant mCRPC is practice changing. Proper management of TEAEs will allow maximum treatment benefit for patients receiving rucaparib.Keywords: poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, rucaparib, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, adverse drug reaction

Purpose: Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss-of-function/PI3K pathway hyperactivation is associated with poor therapeutic outcomes and immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance across multiple malignancies. Our prior studies in Pb-Cre;PTENfl/flTrp53fl/fl genetically engineered mice (GEM) with aggressive-variant prostate cancer (AVPC) demonstrated tumor growth control in 60% mice following androgen deprivation therapy/PI3K inhibitor (PI3Ki)/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody combination, via abrogating lactate cross-talk between cancer cells and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), and suppression of histone lactylation (H3K18lac)/phagocytic activation within TAM. Here, we targeted immunometabolic mechanism(s) of PI3Ki resistance, with the goal of durable tumor control in AVPC., Experimental Design: Pb-Cre;PTENfl/flTrp53fl/fl GEM were treated with PI3Ki (copanlisib), MEK inhibitor (trametinib) or Porcupine inhibitor (LGK'974) singly or their combinations. MRI was used to monitor tumor kinetics and immune/proteomic profiling/ex vivo coculture mechanistic studies were performed on GEM tumors or corresponding tumor-derived cell lines., Results: Given our proteomic profiling showing persistent MEK signaling within tumors of PI3Ki-resistant GEM, we tested whether addition of trametinib to copanlisib enhances tumor control in GEM, and we observed 80% overall response rate via additive suppression of lactate within TME and H3K18lac within TAM, relative to copanlisib (37.5%) monotherapy. The 20% resistant mice demonstrated feedback Wnt/β-catenin activation, resulting in restoration of lactate secretion by tumor cells and H3K18lac within TAM. Cotargeting Wnt/β-catenin signaling with LGK'974 in combination with PI3Ki/MEKi, demonstrated durable tumor control in 100% mice via H3K18lac suppression and complete TAM activation., Conclusions: Abrogation of lactate-mediated cross-talk between cancer cells and TAM results in durable ADT-independent tumor control in PTEN/p53-deficient AVPC, and warrants further investigation in clinical trials., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss of function occurs in approximately 50% of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and is associated with poor prognosis and responsiveness to standard-of-care therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. While PTEN loss of function hyperactivates PI3K signaling, combinatorial PI3K/AKT pathway and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has demonstrated limited anticancer efficacy in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to elucidate mechanism(s) of resistance to ADT/PI3K-AKT axis blockade, and to develop rational combinatorial strategies to effectively treat this molecular subset of mCRPC., Experimental Design: Prostate-specific PTEN/p53-deficient genetically engineered mice (GEM) with established 150-200 mm3 tumors, as assessed by ultrasound, were treated with either ADT (degarelix), PI3K inhibitor (copanlisib), or anti-PD-1 antibody (aPD-1), as single agents or their combinations, and tumors were monitored by MRI and harvested for immune, transcriptomic, and proteomic profiling, or ex vivo co-culture studies. Single-cell RNA sequencing on human mCRPC samples was performed using 10X Genomics platform., Results: Coclinical trials in PTEN/p53-deficient GEM revealed that recruitment of PD-1-expressing tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) thwarts ADT/PI3Ki combination-induced tumor control. The addition of aPD-1 to ADT/PI3Ki combination led to TAM-dependent approximately 3-fold increase in anticancer responses. Mechanistically, decreased lactate production from PI3Ki-treated tumor cells suppressed histone lactylation within TAM, resulting in their anticancer phagocytic activation, which was augmented by ADT/aPD-1 treatment and abrogated by feedback activation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis in mCRPC patient biopsy samples revealed a direct correlation between high glycolytic activity and TAM phagocytosis suppression., Conclusions: Immunometabolic strategies that reverse lactate and PD-1-mediated TAM immunosuppression, in combination with ADT, warrant further investigation in patients with PTEN-deficient mCRPC., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Combination of antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) plus anti-cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (anti-CTLA-4) immunotherapy shows greater response rates (RRs) than anti-PD-1 antibody alone in melanoma, but RR after initial anti-PD-1 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody progression awaits robust investigation. Anti-CTLA-4 antibody alone after anti-PD-1/L1 antibody progression has a historical RR of 13%. We report the results of the first prospective clinical trial evaluating ipilimumab 1 mg/kg plus pembrolizumab following progression on anti-PD-1 immunotherapy., Methods: Patients with advanced melanoma who had progressed on anti-PD-1/L1 antibody as immediate prior therapy (including non-anti-CTLA-4 antibody combinations) were eligible. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by pembrolizumab monotherapy. The primary end point was RR by irRECIST. After 35 patients, the trial met the primary end point and was expanded to enroll a total of 70 patients to better estimate the RR., Results: Prior treatments included 60 on anti-PD-1 antibody alone and 10 on anti-PD-1/L1 antibody-based combinations. Thirteen patients had progressed in the adjuvant setting. The median length of prior treatment with anti-PD-1/L1 antibody was 4.8 months. Response assessments included five complete and 15 partial responses, making the irRECIST RR 29% among the entire trial population. The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months, and the median overall survival was 24.7 months. The median duration of response was 16.6 months. There was no difference in median time on prior anti-PD1/L1 or time to PD1 + CTLA4 initiation between responders and nonresponders. Grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events occurred in 27% of patients. Responses occurred in PD-L1-negative, non-T-cell-inflamed, and intermediate tumor phenotypes., Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study in melanoma of pembrolizumab plus low-dose ipilimumab after anti-PD-1/L1 immunotherapy failure, demonstrating significant antitumor activity and tolerability., Competing Interests: Zeynep ErogluConsulting or Advisory Role: Regeneron, Sun Pharma, Genentech/Roche, Novartis, OncoSec, Natera, ElsevierResearch Funding: Novartis, Pfizer Bruce BrocksteinConsulting or Advisory Role: Exelixis/IpsenResearch Funding: AstraZenecaPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: UpToDate. Author and Editorial duties Andrew S. PoklepovicConsulting or Advisory Role: NovartisSpeakers' Bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb Sunil BabuEmployment: Fort Wayne Medical Oncology & HematologyStock and Other Ownership Interests: Fort Wayne Medical Oncology & Hematology, Lutheran HospitalHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Bayer, AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, argenx, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Kite, a Gilead company, Janssen Oncology, AmgenSpeakers' Bureau: Alexion PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Janssen Oncology, Amgen, TG Therapeutics, Abbvie, Lilly, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novartis, Syndax, Nektar, Sanofi, argenxTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Janssen Oncology, Genentech/Roche Sigrun HallmeyerLeadership: Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC)Honoraria: Cardinal HealthConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, Array PharamceuticalSpeakers' Bureau: Bristol Myers SquibbTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Cardinal Health, Bristol Myers SquibbUncompensated Relationships: Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Mario VelascoEmployment: Cancer Care Specialists of IL Jose LutzkyConsulting or Advisory Role: Castle Biosciences, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Replimune, RegeneronResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Immunocore, Regeneron, Replimune, Vyriad Emily HiggsEmployment: LillyStock and Other Ownership Interests: LillyResearch Funding: LillyPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Jeffrey D. Helterbrand, Richard E. Higgs, Phillip W. Iversen, Automatic Contextual Segmentation for Imaging Bones for Osteoporosis Therapies (Granted February 1, 2000, US Patent 6,021,213). Raymond E. Kaiser, Richard E. Higgs, Randall K. Julian Jr, System and Methods for Quantitatively Comparing Complex Mixtures Using Single Ion Chromatograms Derived From Spectroscopic Analysis of Such Admixtures (Granted March 23, 1999, US Patent 5,885,841)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Lilly Vernon K. SondakConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck/Schering Plough, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Regeneron, Replimune, EisaiTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Polynoma, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Replimune Thomas F. GajewskiStock and Other Ownership Interests: Jounce Therapeutics, Evelo Therapeutics, Five Prime Therapeutics, PyxisConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, Jounce Therapeutics, Adaptimmune, FOGPharma, Allogene Therapeutics, Pyxis, Trillium Therapeutics, Janssen Oncology, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Ono Pharmaceutical, Aduro Biotech, Pyxis, BayerPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Licensing to Evelo, Licensing to Aduro, Licensing to BMS, Licensing to Pyxis Nikhil I. KhushalaniStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Mazor Robotics, Amarin Corporation, Asensus SurgicalHonoraria: SanofiConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, Array BioPharma, Immunocore, Merck, Incyte, Jounce Therapeutics, Iovance Biotherapeutics, NCCN/PfizerResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, HUYA Bioscience International, Amgen, Regeneron, Celgene, Replimune Jason J. LukeStock and Other Ownership Interests: Actym Therapeutics, Mavu Pharmaceutical, Pyxis, Alphamab, Tempest Therapeutics, Kanaph Therapeutics, Onc.AI, Arch OncologyConsulting or Advisory Role: Array BioPharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, EMD Serono, Novartis, 7 Hills Pharma, Janssen, Reflexion Medical, Tempest Therapeutics, TTC Oncology, Alphamab, Compugen, Spring Bank, Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Incyte, Mersana, Partner Therapeutics, Synlogic, Eisai, Werewolf Therapeutics, Ribon Therapeutics, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Nektar, Regeneron, Rubius Therapeutics, Tesaro, Xilio Therapeutics, XencorResearch Funding: Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Macrogenics, Xencor, Array BioPharma, Agios, Astellas Pharma, EMD Serono, Immatics, Kadmon, Moderna Therapeutics, Nektar, Spring Bank, Trishula TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Serial #15/612,657 (Cancer Immunotherapy), Serial #PCT/US18/36052 (Microbiome Biomarkers for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Responsiveness: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Uses Thereof)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, Array BioPharma, EMD Serono, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Reflexion Medical, Mersana, Pyxis, Xilio TherapeuticsNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Melanoma is an aggressive cutaneous malignancy with rapidly rising incidence. Diagnosis of controversial melanocytic lesions, correct prognostication of patients, selection of appropriate adjuvant and systemic therapies, and prediction of response to a given therapy remain very real challenges. Despite these challenges, multiple high throughput, nucleic-acid based biomarkers have been developed that can be assayed from histologic tissue specimens. FISH, CGH, Decision-Dx, and other multi-marker assays have been combined to improve overall predictability. This review discusses some of the most promising nucleic acid based assays that can be obtained from tissue specimens to assist with diagnosis, prognostication, and prediction of treatment response.

Hypothesis: The majority of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy develop either innate or acquired resistance. Across tumor types, the "T cell-inflamed" tumor microenvironment correlates with clinical response to immunotherapy. We hypothesize that clinical characteristics may be predictive of resistance and that "T cell-inflamed" NSCLC tumors can be identified by gene expression profiling., Results: Of 93 patients, 36 (38.7%) had innate resistance and 57 (61.3%) had initial benefit to immunotherapy. Innate resistance was associated with non-smokers ( p = 0.013), more involved disease sites ( p = 0.011), more prior therapy ( p = 0.001), and a lower albumin level ( p = 0.014). Among patients with initial benefit, factors associated with subsequent progression-free survival included higher Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ( p = 0.004) and lower depth of response to anti-PD-1 therapy ( p = 0.003). A "T cell-inflamed" microenvironment was identified in 42% of TCGA adenocarcinoma samples versus 21.0% of squamous cell., Discussion: Specific clinical characteristics appear to be predictive of either innate or acquired resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. A "T cell-inflamed" tumor was more common in adenocarcinoma than squamous histology., Methods: A retrospective review of NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Patients with innate resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (defined as progression at first CT evaluation) were compared to patients with initial clinical benefit. Among those with initial clinical benefit, we identified prognostic factors for time to progression (acquired resistance) or death. To further corroborate our findings on limited numbers, immune gene expression profiling of all NSCLC samples from the TCGA database was also pursued., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Objective: The summer surgery program (SSP) was founded in 2012 as an educational program for students at the critical juncture between high school and college to engender interest in medicine, science, and innovation. This program has a distinct emphasis on innovation and problem solving based on real-life operative challenges identified by students during surgical observation in the operating room. The effect of the SSP regarding postsecondary education and career goals was evaluated by participants using a follow-up questionnaire., Design: Retrospective cohort study using web-based survey administered to students at least 1 year after participation in the SSP. Associations between demographics and survey responses were made using Fisher's exact test and a Bonferonni correction was used to account for multiple comparisons., Participants: Between July 2012 and August 2015, 119 students enrolled in the SSP. We sent a web-based questionnaire link to all participants who completed the program. The questionnaire contained 80 questions assessing the participant's interest in studying medicine or science in college, knowledge of health care, and their appreciation and understanding of innovation., Setting: UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Institutional tertiary care center., Results: In total, 77 (64.7%) of 119 students who matriculated in the SSP completed the follow-up survey; the mean number of years after the program was 2.09 years. Nearly all students reported the program increased their interest in studying medicine or science in college (97.4%), led them to a better understanding of their own career goals (93.5%) and made them more confident in their ability to succeed in a career in health care (88.3%). The majority indicated the program led them to better understand the training and schooling required of doctors and surgeons (94.8%), and led them to better appreciate the roles of different medical specialties (96.1%). Overall 96% of students reported that the program led them to better understand the importance of innovation and 86% of the respondents noted they better understood the process of innovation. Participants in the SSP were confident they would be able to become a health professional (p < 0.0001). Of note, there was no drop off in the ratings for the program when comparing classes that were 1, 2, 3, or 4 years after their SSP experience., Conclusions: The follow-up survey revealed that the 2 week SSP had a markedly, long lasting positive effect on participants in areas of academic, career, and innovation-related variables., (Copyright © 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are dysplastic lesions of the epidermis that have the potential to progress to non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Traditional photodynamic therapy (PDT) requires a pre-illumination incubation time, which adds to overall in-office time and has been linked to pain. Our group has found a novel protocol to effectively treat AKs with PDT that eliminates the pre-illumination incubation period and uses 2 back-to-back cycles of 16 minute 40 seconds.

METHODS: The patient was prepped with soapy water and isopropyl alcohol, and thick AKs were descaled with a curette. Next, 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) was applied to the treatment areas and the patient was immediately placed under the blue light for 33 minutes and 20 seconds (two cycles of 16m/40s).

RESULTS: During therapy, the patient reported no pain. At one week, treated areas revealed a good reaction. The procedure was repeated at one month to treat residual AKs. At a 4-month follow-up, the patient's face and scalp showed near clearance of any AKs.

CONCLUSION: During PDT, the photosensitizer aminolevulinic acid (ALA), or in Europe methyl aminolevulinate (MAL), is utilized as a synthetic precursor that preferentially accumulates in dysplastic cells. The precursor then converts to PpIX via the heme pathway and causes apoptosis of the cells when excited, most commonly by either blue-violet (400-430 nm) or red (630-635 nm) light. Shorter incubation times are associated with reduced pain because less PpIX will have accumulated in the treated tissue by the start of the exposure to the light. The doubling of the light exposure time allows comparable levels of the photosensitizing molecule to accumulate and be activated so as to produce an equivalent reaction. The associated reduction in pain along with a more convenient treatment schedule makes this PDT protocol more tolerable and convenient to some patients.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(3):275-278.