Search

Mario Cazzola,1 Paola Rogliani,1 Rossella Laitano,1 Luigino Calzetta,2 Maria Gabriella Matera3 1Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 2Unit of Respiratory Diseases and Lung Function, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; 3Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, ItalyCorrespondence: Mario Cazzola Email mario.cazzola@uniroma2.itAbstract: Although pharmacological treatment of COPD is codified in different guidelines and strategy documents, there is abundant evidence of discrepancy between what they suggest and what health professionals prescribe, especially in low-risk groups where there is widespread overprescription of triple therapy. It is therefore necessary to clarify when the use of triple therapy is indicated in COPD patients and when it is preferable to maintain treatment with dual bronchodilation. In this article, we discuss our views based on our experience and what is reported in the literature and try to give answers to these two questions. The evidence generated by pivotal RCTs supports the use of triple therapy in patients who present for the first time and have severe airway obstruction, are symptomatic, have had frequent moderate or severe exacerbations in the previous year, and have peripheral eosinophilia. However, it is difficult to determine whether step-up is useful in all other cases because the available data are quite conflicting. It is likely that the inconsistency in the information generated by the various available studies may explain the prescribing behaviour of many physicians who do not adhere to recommendations of guidelines and strategies. However, it is necessary to establish whether and when the addition of an ICS to the LAMA/LABA combination is effective, to determine whether triple therapy can induce an additional clinical benefit over dual bronchodilation, irrespective of a preventive effect on COPD exacerbations, to establish its value, and to examine whether cost differences can support the use of triple therapy over combined LAMA/LABA therapy in real life.Keywords: dual bronchodilation, triple therapy, ICSs, LABs, LAMAs

The increasing global elderly population, projected to reach 20 % of individuals aged 65 and over by 2030, faces significant pulmonary challenges, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Aging is associated with a natural decline in lung function and structural changes that exacerbate respiratory issues. COPD, characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms and airflow obstruction, presents a unique challenge in older patients due to the accelerated decline in lung function. Acetylcholine plays a pivotal role in airway dynamics through muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, particularly M 3 subtype, which mediates bronchoconstriction. The efficacy of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) may differ in older adults, with evidence suggesting that these patients can respond favorably to LAMA treatment. This study utilized meta-analysis and meta-regression to explore the efficacy and safety of LAMA in treating COPD, while considering aging as a potential modifier. A meta-analysis of Phase III randomized controlled trials highlighted significant improvements in trough forced expiratory volume in the 1st second when LAMA were compared to placebo (PCB). Furthermore, the meta-regression revealed a trend suggesting older adults may experience enhanced benefits from LAMA therapy, particularly with once-daily regimens. Safety outcomes, including serious adverse events (SAE), cardiovascular SAE, and mortality, were not modulated by age when comparing LABA to PCB. Overall, these findings support the use of LAMA in elderly COPD patients and underscore the need for tailored treatment strategies to improve clinical outcomes in this vulnerable population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, characterized by chronic mucus hypersecretion (CMH) that exacerbates airway obstruction and accelerates disease progression. Effective airway clearance techniques are essential to improve respiratory function and reduce exacerbations. Temporary Positive Expiratory Pressure (T-PEP) is a novel airway clearance device that has shown promise in managing COPD. Objectives : This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of T-PEP in a standard pulmonary rehabilitation program. Methods : Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in the MEDLINE and PEDro databases. Data from 162 subjects, including those with severe COPD and bronchiectasis, were analyzed. Key outcomes assessed were changes in lung function (FVC, FEV1, TLC), inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP, MEP), gas exchange (PaO 2 , PaCO 2 ), exercise capacity (6MWT), symptom severity (mMRC, CAT, BCSS), and exacerbation rates. Results : T-PEP significantly improved FVC, FEV1, TLC, MIP, MEP, and DLCO compared to baseline, with heterogeneity noted across studies. Improvements in gas exchange and physical capacity were observed, with PaO 2 increasing and PaCO 2 decreasing. T-PEP also reduced symptoms of cough and dyspnea, improving quality-of-life scores. Additionally, a notable reduction in acute exacerbations of COPD was seen after one month and three months of treatment. Conclusions : T-PEP therapy shows substantial benefits in improving lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life while reducing exacerbation rates in COPD patients. Although promising, these findings require further confirmation through randomized clinical trials to establish the optimal application of T-PEP in various clinical settings and patient phenotypes.

Background : Severe asthma is a challenging condition that often resists traditional treatments and requires high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and other controllers to manage uncontrolled symptoms. Recent advances include the use of biologic agents targeting specific inflammation pathways, which have improved symptom control and quality of life, although their effects on small airways remain less understood. Methods : This prospective observational study, conducted at Tor Vergata University Hospital in Rome from July 2021 to March 2024, aims to evaluate the efficacy of treatments in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. It involves baseline assessments and follow-ups at 1 and 3 months post-biological therapy initiation, focusing on both spirometric and non-spirometric (oscillometry) measurements of the small airways to provide a comprehensive evaluation of respiratory function. Results : This study, conducted from July 2021 to March 2024, enrolled 40 patients with severe asthma, ultimately analyzing data from 31 participants who underwent biological therapy. The results showed significant improvements in asthma symptoms, the ACT scores increased significantly from visit 1 to visit 2 ( p = 0.00008) and from visit 1 to visit 3 ( p = 0.00047), and pulmonary function tests, with notable increases in FEV1 (from visit 1 (74.97 ± 23.43%) to visit 2 (82.96 ± 26.57%, p = 0.041) and to visit 3 (88.89 ± 31.41%, p = 0.003)) and quality of life scores, and substantial reductions in specific airway resistance and small airway dysfunction markers (the PEF, %pr post-BD showed significant improvement from visit 1 to visit 3 ( p = 0.012)). However, oscillometric measurements showed no significant changes post-therapy. Conclusions : The study concluded that there was an improvement in the small airways measured by non-oscillometric values, without significant improvements in oscillometric parameters. Additionally, a significant improvement in symptoms was observed after the first month of therapy. There was also a significant increase in respiratory function after one to three months of therapy.

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are chronic respiratory disorders characterized by airways obstruction and chronic inflammation. Exacerbations lead to worsening of symptoms and increased airflow obstruction in both airways diseases, and they are associated with increase in local and systemic inflammation. Exosomes are cell-derived membrane vesicles containing proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids that reflect their cellular origin. Through the transfer of these molecules, exosomes act as mediators of intercellular communication. Via selective delivery of their contents to target cells, exosomes have been proved to be involved in regulation of immunity and inflammation. Although, exosomes have been extensively investigated in different diseases, little is currently known about their role in asthma and COPD pathogenesis, and particularly in exacerbations. This review aims to systemically assess the potential role of exosomes in asthma and COPD exacerbations., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Laitano, Calzetta, Motta, Puxeddu and Rogliani.)

Introduction: According to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) should be considered as add-on therapy in patients with asthma that remains uncontrolled, despite treatment with medium-dose (MD) or high-dose (HD) inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting β 2 -agonist (LABA) combinations. In patients ≥ 18 years, LAMA may be added in triple combination with an ICS and a LABA. To date, the precise efficacy of triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination remains uncertain concerning the impact on exacerbation risk in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Therefore, an umbrella review was performed to systematically summarize available data on the effect of triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination on the risk of asthma exacerbation., Methods: An umbrella review has been performed according to the PRIOR statement., Results: The overall results obtained from 5 systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination reduces the risk of asthma exacerbation. HD-ICS showed a greater effect particularly in reducing severe asthma exacerbation, especially in patients with evidence of type 2 inflammation biomarkers., Conclusions: The findings of this umbrella review suggest an optimization of ICS dose in triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination, based on the severity of exacerbation and type 2 biomarkers expression.

Objective: Among animals defined as "pests", cockroaches and rodents (mouse and rat) represent the most common cause of airway allergic sensitization and bronchial asthma worldwide. Their frequency of sensitization has been widely assessed in US and other countries but poorly in Western Europe. This narrative review aims to provide a synthesis of data resulting in MEDLINE concerning allergic sensitization/asthma to pests as well as their related environmental/social risk factors, specifically in the European area., Data Sources: We performed a literature research in MEDLINE for clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses., Study Selections: We selected studies to the following key words: allergic sensitization, allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma, cockroach, hypersensitivity, integrated pest management, material hardship, medication compliance, mouse, pest, poverty, rat, rodents., Results: Current evidence indicates that residence in poor and urban areas, exposure to outdoor/indoor pollutants and tobacco smoke, poverty, material hardship, poor-quality housing, differences in health care quality, medication compliance, health care access contribute to increased pest-related allergic sensitization and asthma morbidity., Conclusion: Further research should be done on many aspects of pest allergy such as a better characterization of allergens and epidemiological aspects. Relevant social actions should be carried out against poverty, healthcare disparities, psycho-social stress, poor compliance to therapy, with economic contributions to improve private and public living environments. Allergic sensitization to pests and pest-allergic respiratory diseases like asthma are "paradoxical" conditions, as they typically affect the poorest communities but can only be corrected by high-cost (diagnostic and preventive) interventions. We hope that progress can be made in this direction in the future.

Introduction: Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) led to investigation of biologic drugs targeting specific inflammatory pathways. No biologics are licensed for COPD while all the approved monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for severe asthma treatment are systemically administered. Systemic administration is associated with low target tissue exposure and risk of systemic adverse events. Thus, delivering mAbs via inhalation may be an attractive approach for asthma and COPD treatment due to direct targeting of the airways., Areas Covered: This systematic review of randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluated the potential role of delivering mAbs via inhalation in asthma and COPD treatment. Five RCTs were deemed eligible for a qualitative analysis., Expert Opinion: Compared to systemic administration, delivering mAbs via inhalation is associated with rapid onset of action, greater efficacy at lower doses, minimal systemic exposure, and lower risk of adverse events. Although some of the inhaled mAbs included in this study showed a certain level of efficacy and safety in asthmatic patients, delivering mAbs via inhalation is still challenging and controversial. Further adequately powered and well-designed RCTs are needed to assess the potential role of inhaled mAbs in the treatment of asthma and COPD.

Background: The strength of association between comorbidities and asthma has never been ranked in relation to the prevalence of the comorbidity in the nonasthma population. We investigated the strength of association between comorbidities and asthma., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed for observational studies reporting data on comorbidities in asthma and nonasthma populations. A pairwise meta-analysis was performed and the strength of association calculated by anchoring odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals with the rate of comorbidities in nonasthma populations via Cohen's d method. Cohen's d= 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 were cut-off values for small, medium and large effect sizes, respectively; very large effect size resulted for Cohen's d  >0.8. The review was registered in the PROSPERO database; identifier number CRD42022295657., Results: Data from 5 493 776 subjects were analysed. Allergic rhinitis (OR 4.24, 95% CI 3.82-4.71), allergic conjunctivitis (OR 2.63, 95% CI 2.22-3.11), bronchiectasis (OR 4.89, 95% CI 4.48-5.34), hypertensive cardiomyopathy (OR 4.24, 95% CI 2.06-8.90) and nasal congestion (OR 3.30, 95% CI 2.96-3.67) were strongly associated with asthma (Cohen's d >0.5 and ≤0.8); COPD (OR 6.23, 95% CI 4.43-8.77) and other chronic respiratory diseases (OR 12.85, 95% CI 10.14-16.29) were very strongly associated with asthma (Cohen's d >0.8). Stronger associations were detected between comorbidities and severe asthma. No bias resulted according to funnel plots and Egger's test., Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the relevance of individualised strategies for disease management that look beyond asthma. A multidimensional approach should be used to assess whether poor symptom control is related to uncontrolled asthma or to uncontrolled underlying comorbidities., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P. Rogliani participated as a lecturer and advisor in scientific meetings and courses under the sponsorship of Almirall, AstraZeneca, Biofutura, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini Group, Mundipharma, and Novartis, and her department was funded by Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici Novartis, and Zambon, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Laitano has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Ora has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Beasley reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Genentech, personal fees from Avillion and Theravance, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L. Calzetta has participated as advisor in scientific meetings under the sponsorship of Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis; received nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca; a research grant partially funded by Chiesi Farmaceutici, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Almirall; is or has been a consultant to ABC Farmaceutici, Edmond Pharma, Zambon, Verona Pharma, and Ockham Biotech; and his department was funded by Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Novartis, and Zambon, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Purpose: Calcium ions are involved in the regulation of several cellular processes and may also influence viral replication. Hypocalcemia has been frequently reported during infectious diseases and in critically ill patients, including also COVID-19 patients, significantly related with the pro-inflammatory state and mortality. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of hypocalcemia at admission in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) and to evaluate association of hypocalcemia with in-hospital COVID-19 outcomes., Methods: Retrospective analysis on 118 consecutive patients, hospitalized for COVID-19 between March and May 2020. Clinical characteristics, inflammation markers, biochemical routine and mineral metabolism parameters at admission were collected. Hypocalcemia was defined as total serum calcium <2.2 mmol/L. Population was stratified by tertiles of total serum calcium. Primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death or admission to intensive care unit (ICU). Secondary outcomes included in-hospital death, admission to ICU and need for non-invasive ventilation as separate events. Associations were tested by logistic regression and Cox-regression analysis with survival curves., Results: Overall prevalence of hypocalcemia was 76.6%, with just 6.7% of patients reporting levels of 25-(OH)-vitamin D > 30 ng/ml. Total serum calcium was inversely related with selected inflammatory biomarkers (p < 0.05) and poorer outcome of COVID-19 during hospitalization. Lower tertile of total calcium (≤2.02 mmol/L) had increased risk of in-hospital mortality (HR 2.77; 1.28-6.03, p = 0.01) compared with other groups., Conclusion: Total serum calcium detected on admission is inversely related with proinflammatory biomarkers of severe COVID-19 and is useful to better define risk stratification for adverse in-hospital outcome., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents a serious global health issue that is commonly associated with cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD). The close relationship between COPD and CVD could be explained by different factors, first and foremost a chronic low-grade systemic inflammation implicated in the pathogenesis of both diseases and several stimuli enhancing the inflammatory processes and causing a mixed condition with worse outcomes than either disorder alone., Areas Covered: The present narrative review considers the mechanisms underlying the increased CV risk in COPD, and it provides insights on biomarkers and predictive models to predict CVD in COPD patients., Expert Opinion: COPD patients often remain asymptomatic of CVD, with respiratory symptoms generally attributed to the preexisting pulmonary disease. It is fundamental to understand the mechanistic pathways that underpin the intimate relationship between the two disorders. However, it is still not clear what is the origin of the common background of low-grade systemic inflammation, it could be a 'spillover' or a general inflammatory state. Primary prevention, cross-collaboration between specialists and early detection via predictive biomarkers and validated models are fundamental to stratify COPD patients according to CV risk.

Asthma is a heterogeneous chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that affects approximately 300 million people worldwide. About 5-10% of all asthmatics suffer from severe or uncontrolled asthma, associated with increased mortality and hospitalization, reduced quality of life, and increased health care costs. In recent years, new treatments have become available, and different asthma phenotypes characterized by specific biomarkers have been identified. Biological drugs are currently indicated for patients with severe asthma that is not controlled with recommended treatments. They are mostly directed against inflammatory molecules of the type 2 inflammatory pathway and are effective at reducing exacerbations, maintaining control over asthma symptoms, and reducing systemic steroid use, which is associated with well-known adverse events. Although biological drugs for severe asthma have had a major impact on the management of the disease, there is still a need for head-to-head comparison studies of biologics and to identify new biomarkers for asthma diagnosis, prognosis, and response to treatment. Identifying novel biomarkers could facilitate the development of therapeutic strategies that are precisely tailored to each patient's requirements.

A comparison was made between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Ente per le Nuove Tecnologie l'Energia e l'Ambiente (ENEA) air kerma standards for medium energy x rays and 60 Co gamma rays. The comparison took place at ENEA in June 1994. Two different transfer chambers from NIST were used for the comparison. The measurements were made at radiation qualities similar to those used at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) (generating voltages of 100 kV, 135 kV, 180 kV and 250 kV, respectively) and with 60 Co gamma radiation. The transfer chamber calibration factors obtained at the NIST and at the ENEA agreed with one another to 0.03 % for 60 Co gamma radiation and between 0.1 % to 0.8 % for the medium energy x-ray beam codes.

A programme for the Quality Assurance of the Italian network for surveillance of radioactivity in foodstuff and environmental samples was started by the ENEA in 1983. The main purpose of this programme is to establish uniform levels of accuracy and reproducibility in measurement procedures routinely used by the laboratories belonging to the network. This paper describes the technical aspects relevant to the calibration and intercomparison campaigns carried out, in Italy, in the period 1986-1989. The relevant measurements include gamma spectrometry and beta-ray counting in liquid aqueous samples.

A national intercomparison was organized by ENEA for activity measurements of 90Sr and 137Cs in spiked solutions of milk. The participants in the intercomparison were the laboratories belonging to the Italian network for control of radioactivity in the environment. The purpose of these measurements was to check the reliability of measurement procedures and experimental means as routinely used by each participant. This first intercomparison showed appreciable discrepancies among the participants and this was due both to improper procedures and non correct calibrated spectrometers. Soon after a second intercomparison was carried out to check to what extent the previous results were reproducible among the various participants. Methods and results are discussed.