Search

* Context.--Granular cell change in melanocytic nevus is underrepresented in the literature with only 4 well-documented cases, 1 described in the conjunctiva. Unfamiliarity with the clinical and pathologic features of these lesions contributes to the diagnostic difficulty. Objective.--To delineate the clinical and histopathologic features of conjunctival nevi with granular cell change. Design.--In a retrospective observational case series, the medical records of all patients with conjunctival nevi and granular cell change diagnosed between December 2016 and October 2018 were reviewed. Data collected included age, sex, clinical presentation, pathologic findings, and follow-up. Results.--Twelve patients, 6 males and 6 females, with a median age of 14 years (range, 8-82 years) were identified. The nevus manifested as a pigmented, well-circumscribed nodule (7 of 9; 78%) or patch (2 of 9; 22%) in the bulbar and limbal conjunctiva (7 of 9; 78%) or in the plica semilunaris/caruncle (2 of 9; 22%). Cysts were noted in 7 of 9 lesions (78%). Features prompting surgical excision included atypical pigmentation (8 of 9; 89%), growth (7 of 9; 78%), and atypical vascularity (4 of 9; 44%). Microscopically, all lesions comprised a conventional melanocytic nevus with focal granular cell change and immunoreactivity for Melan-A, SOX10, and HMB-45, with Ki-67 proliferative index of less than 2%. Of the 9 lesions with follow-up information, there were no recurrences over mean follow-up of 11.2 months (range, 1-23 months). Conclusions.--Granular cell change in melanocytic nevi is an underrecognized finding that can simulate melanoma clinically and histopathologically. Young age at diagnosis, lack of associated conjunctival melanosis, bulbar location, cysts, and the absence of mitotic figures with a low Ki-67 proliferative index are helpful clinical and pathologic diagnostic clues. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144:457-465; doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0053-OA), Granular cell nevus is a rare benign variant of melanocytic nevus, which can be mistaken for malignant melanoma because of the morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap between the 2 lesions. (1-3) [...]

Background/aims To evaluate the likelihood of germline mutation in patients presenting with solitary retinoblastoma based on tumour location at first examination. Methods Retrospective analysis of solitary unilateral retinoblastoma for likelihood of germline mutation (family history of retinoblastoma and/or genetic testing indicating germline RB1 mutation and/or development of additional new or bilateral tumours) based on tumur location at presentation (macular vs extramacular). Results Of 480 consecutive patients with solitary retinoblastoma, 85 were in the macula (18%) and 395 were extramacular (82%). By comparison (macular vs extramacular tumours), macular tumours had smaller basal diameter (12.7 mm vs 18.9 mm, p<0.001) and smaller tumour thickness (6.1 mm vs 10.7 mm, p<0.001). Patients with macular tumours demonstrated greater likelihood for germline mutation (23% vs 12%, OR=2.18, p=0.011), specifically based on family history of retinoblastoma (13% vs 2%, OR=4.64, p=0.004), genetic testing showing germline RB1 mutation (27% vs 15%, OR=2.04 (95% CI 1.04 to 4.01), p=0.039), development of new tumours (13% vs 3%, OR=5.16 (95% CI 2.06 to 12.87), p=0.001) and/or development of bilateral disease (9% vs 2%, OR=4.98 (95% CI 1.70 to 14.65), p=0.004). Conclusions Among patients with solitary unilateral retinoblastoma, those presenting with macular tumour (compared with extramacular tumour) show 2.18 times greater likelihood for germline mutation and an even higher likelihood of development of subsequent tumours. Solitary macular retinoblastoma should raise an index of suspicion for likely germline mutation and multifocal disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: To understand conditional prognostic value of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for uveal melanoma metastasis based on event-free survival at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. METHODS: A retrospective study of eyes with uveal melanoma categorized according to TCGA and studied for nonconditional and conditional risks for metastasis at 5 and 10 years. RESULTS: Of 1001 eyes with uveal melanoma, the nonconditional (standard, at presentation) 5-year/10-year metastatic rate was 18%/25%. The conditional 5-year/10-year metastatic rate (for those without metastasis at 2 years) revealed 10%/18% and the conditional 10-year metastatic rate (for those without metastasis at 5 years) revealed 9%. The TCGA categories included Group A (n = 486, 49%), B (n = 141, 14%), C (n = 260, 26%), and D (n = 114, 11%). The non-conditional 5-year/10-year metastatic rate revealed Group A (4%/6%), Group B (12%/20%), Group C (23%/49%), and Group D (60%/68%). The conditional 5-year/10-year metastatic rate (for those without metastasis at 2 years) revealed Group A (2%/5%), Group B (8%/18%), Group C (21%/40%), and Group D (38%/50%). The conditional 10-year metastatic rate (for those without metastasis at 5 years) revealed Group A (2%), Group B (10%), Group C (33%), and Group D (20%). The peak incidence of metastasis for Groups A and B occurred during years 5-6, C during years 4-6, and D during years 1-2. CONCLUSION: Survival outcomes for uveal melanoma as non-conditional (at presentation) and conditional (event-free survival during follow-up) reveal reduction in metastatic rate over time. For those with 5-year metastasis-free survival, the 10-year conditional risk for metastasis was 9%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]