Search

OBJECTIVES To examine the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy for the prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) about the elbow. DESIGN Retrospective chart review. SETTING Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS Two hundred and twenty-nine patients who received prophylactic radiotherapy (XRT) over a 15 year period were identified. Patients were included if they received XRT to the elbow joint and had at least 12 weeks of follow up after XRT. Fifty-four patients were ultimately included. INTERVENTION All patients were treated with a single dose of 7 Gy. 98% of patients received XRT within 24 hours after surgery, and all patients received XRT within 72 hours after surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS The primary study measures evaluated were the presence or absence of clinically symptomatic HO and the presence of radiographic HO after XRT to the elbow joint. RESULTS Eighteen patients were treated with XRT after a traumatic injury requiring surgery (primary prophylaxis), and 36 were treated with XRT after excision surgery to remove HO which had already formed (secondary prophylaxis). In the primary cohort, 16.7% developed symptomatic HO after XRT, and 11.1% required surgery to resect heterotopic bone. In the secondary cohort, 11.1% developed symptomatic HO after surgery and XRT, and 5.5% required resection surgery. No secondary malignancies were identified. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that XRT for elbow HO may be safe and effective for both primary and secondary HO. XRT for HO was not shown to be associated with radiation-induced sarcoma in this series, at least in the short term. Further study in a large patient population with extended follow up is required to better characterize populations at high risk for development of HO and secondary malignancy. [ZERO WIDTH SPACE]. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background It is difficult to evaluate the results of surgical techniques as there is inherent variability between surgeons in regard to experience, skill level, and knowledge. Tang suggested a classification system in 2009 in an attempt to standardize surgeon level of expertise, with categories ranging from nonspecialist (Level I) to expert (Level V). This epidemiological analysis of all articles citing Tang's original paper examines if a surgeon's self-reported level of expertise correlates with outcomes and evaluates whether the current definition of Tang level is sufficient to account for expertise bias. Methods In May 2021, all articles citing Tang level of expertise were identified (N = 222). Articles were included if they described a novel technique and provided author(s)' levels (n = 205). Statistical analysis was conducted, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results The most common specialties reporting Tang level of expertise were orthopaedic surgery (82.9%) and plastic surgery (15.5%). The most common subspecialty was hand surgery. 2020 was the year with the most studies reporting level of expertise (31.7%), followed by 2021 (20.0%) and 2019 (17.1%). The majority of studies (80.5%) reported positive results with their technique, and of these, 63.3% were statistically significant. Level of expertise was not significantly associated with a doctoral degree, type of residency completed, fellowship completion, hand fellowship, author sex, study type, or result significance. Discussion The current Tang classification is both underreported and incomplete in its present state. To account for expertise bias, we recommend all authors report Tang level when describing surgical techniques. Studies with multiple authors should explicitly state the level of each author, as well as a weighted average accounting for the total contribution of each individual.

Introduction Recent efforts to standardize reporting of surgeon experience in novel technique publications have recommended reporting of Tang level of expertise (LOE). Question/Purpose The aim of this study was to document trends in LOE reporting for novel technique articles published in the Journal of Wrist Surgery and evaluate whether author experience affects novel research outcomes. Methods A total of 261 articles published from 2018 to 2020 were reviewed. Articles describing novel surgical techniques were included and examined for Tang LOE. Author variables were collected online. Results Eight percent (21/261) of articles discussed novel surgical techniques and one reported LOE. Nearly half (47.6%) of articles did not conduct statistical analysis. Four (19.0%) reported insignificant statistical results and 7 (33.3%) reported significant findings. All significant statistical findings were positive. Number of prior related publications by the senior author did not affect new technique result significance (p = 0.34). Discussion From 2018 to 2020, only one article documented LOE. Authors' variables, including number of prior related publications, were not correlated with significant results in their new publications. This may suggest that an author's established experience in a novel technique, quantified by prior publications on the topic, does not make one more likely to achieve significantly better or worse outcomes in their reviewed Journal of Wrist Surgery study. Conclusions Tang LOE is an important way for readers to classify expertise and should be reported, and potentially modified to better define contributing variables.

Prophylactic radiotherapy (XRT) is a commonly used treatment to decrease heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients with traumatic hip injuries. We conducted a retrospective review of patients at risk for HO who underwent XRT. Of the patients reviewed, 27.3% developed radiographic HO, 11.2% developed symptoms, and 2.0% required resection surgery. Patients were divided into primary (n = 71) and secondary prophylaxis (n = 27) cohorts. In the primary group, 25.0% developed radiographic HO, 5.6% developed symptoms, and 0 required surgery. In the secondary cohort, 33.3% of patients developed new radiographic HO, and 25.9% were symptomatic: four had a Brooker score of 3, and three had a score of 4 (p = 0.03), and 7.4% required surgical resection. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):113-118, 2022).

The purpose of this study was (1) to determine how much emphasis is placed on the Personal Statement (PS) by program directors (PDs) and (2) to gain a better understanding of what factors within the PS are considered most important to PDs. An anonymous survey was distributed to PDs at allopathic orthopaedic residency programs in the United States using Survey Monkey (San Mateo, CA). Survey responses were received from 51 of 152 (34%) PDs. Forty-five (88.2%) identified as male, five (9.8%) identified as female, and one (1.9%) chose not to disclose. PDs reported the PS was of average importance, with an average score of 2.82 (range,1-4). Although the PS is still given consideration as part of the overall orthopaedic surgery residency application process, it does not play a major role in determining which applicants will be invited for an interview or how they will be ranked. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):090-095, 2022).

OBJECTIVES Electric scooter (e-scooter) use and resulting injuries have grown exponentially since expansion into ridesharing in 2017. No study has described pediatric e-scooter injuries and focused on their impact in an adolescent cohort. Our primary purpose was to describe the epidemiology of admitted pediatric e-scooter injuries and compare them with existing literature on adults. METHODS We queried the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System for e-scooter injuries between 2015 and 2019 in patients 0-18 years old. Injuries caused by an e-scooter to a nonrider were removed. Patients admitted to the hospital were analyzed and weighted national estimates were calculated. A P value of

BACKGROUND Pediatric orthopaedic fellowship directors (FDs) have a valuable impact on the education of trainees and future leaders in the field. There is currently no research on the characteristics of pediatric orthopaedic FDs. METHODS Programs were identified using the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America fellowship directory. Operative, nonoperative, and specialty programs were included. Data was collected through Qualtrics survey, e-mail, telephone, and online searches. Variables included demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), Hirsch index (h-index) as a measure of research productivity, graduate education, residency and fellowship training, years of hire at current institution and as FD, and leadership roles. RESULTS Fifty-five FDs were identified. The majority (49/55, 89%) were male and 77% (27/35) were Caucasian. The mean age at survey was 51.1±8.2 years. The mean h-index was 17.2. Older age correlated with higher h-index (r=0.48, P=0.0002). The average duration from fellowship graduation to FD appointment was 9.6±6.7 and 6.9±6.1 years from institutional hire. Sixteen FDs (29%) had additional graduate level degrees. Almost all (52/55, 95%) FDs completed orthopaedic surgery residencies and all graduated fellowship training. Twenty-nine percent (16/55) completed more than 1 fellowship. Most FDs (51/55, 93%) completed a fellowship in pediatric orthopaedic surgery. Ten FDs (18%) completed pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellowships that included spine-specific training. One-third of all current FDs were fellowship-trained at either Boston Children's Hospital (9/55, 16%) or Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children (9/55, 16%). CONCLUSIONS Pediatric orthopaedic FDs are typically early-career to mid-career when appointed, with a strong research background. Nearly a third completed additional graduate degrees or multiple fellowships. Although male dominated, there are more female FDs leading pediatric orthopaedic programs compared with adult reconstruction, trauma, and spine fellowships. As fellowships continue to grow and diversify, this research will provide a baseline to determine changes in FD leadership.

Children with medical complexity are at increased risk of low bone mineral density (BMD) and complications after spinal fusion compared with idiopathic scoliosis patients. Our aim was to compare treatments and outcomes of children with medical complexity undergoing spinal fusion in those who had dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans versus those who did not in an effort to standardize the workup of these patients before undergoing spinal surgery.We conducted a retrospective review of patients with low BMD who underwent spinal fusion at a tertiary care pediatric hospital between 2004 and 2016. We consulted with a pediatric endocrinologist to create standard definitions for low BMD to classify each subject. Regardless of DXA status, all patients were given a clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis [at least 2 long bone or 1 vertebral pathologic fracture(s)], osteopenia (stated on radiograph or by the physician), or clinically low bone density belonging to neither category. The last classification was used for patients whose clinicians had documented low bone density not meeting the criteria for osteoporosis or osteopenia. Fifty-nine patients met the criteria, and 314 were excluded for insufficient follow-up and/or not meeting a diagnosis definition. BMD Z -scores compare bone density ascertained by DXA to an age-matched and sex-matched average. Patients who had a DXA scan were also given a DXA diagnosis of low bone density (≤-2 SD), slightly low bone density (-1.0 to -1.9 SD), or neither (-1.0 SD) based on the lowest BMD Z -score recorded.Fifty-nine patients were analyzed. Fifty-four percent had at least 1 DXA scan preoperatively. Eighty-one percent of DXA patients received some form of treatment compared with 52% of non-DXA patients ( P =0.03).Patients referred for DXA scans were more likely to be treated for low BMD, although there is no standardized system in place to determine which patients should get scans. Our research highlights the need to implement clinical protocols to optimize bone health preoperatively.Level II-retrospective prognostic study.

Orthopaedic surgery is one of the most competitive specialties in the residency match. The personal statement (PS) is one component of the application. The significance of the PS to orthopaedic surgery residency applicants is unknown. This study evaluates applicant perceptions of the PS. Applicants to two separate United States orthopaedic residency programs for the 2019-2020 cycle were invited to participate. Survey was distributed via email. Twenty-one percent (204/978) of applicants completed the survey. Most were men (157/204, 77%), and most (125/204, 61%) spent up to 15 hours writing their PS. Many [79.4% (162/204)] believed the PS should continue to be included in the application. Women always edited their PS, while 7.0% (11/ 157) of men did not use any editors. Applicants believe the PS is valuable. The PS is time consuming but allows applicants to communicate details that otherwise may not be included in their application. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(1):034-041, 2022).

Retrospective case series. To describe how pediatric patients with spinal and pelvic osteomyelitis are diagnosed and treated and assess the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), needle aspiration biopsy (NAB), and blood cultures in this population. Spinal and pelvic osteomyelitis de novo are uncommon in children and minimal literature exists on the subject. Research has shown that NAB and blood cultures have variable diagnostic yield in adult native osteomyelitis. At our institution, there is no standard protocol for diagnosing and treating pediatric spinal and pelvic osteomyelitis de novo. All diagnoses of spinal and pelvic osteomyelitis at a pediatric tertiary care center from 2003 to 2017 were reviewed. Patients aged 0–21 at diagnosis were included. Patients with osteomyelitis resulting from prior spinal operations, wounds, or infections and those with chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis were eliminated. All eligible patients’ diagnoses were confirmed by MRI. 29 patients (18 men, 11 women) met the inclusion criteria. The median age at diagnosis was 11 years old (range 1–18). More than half of all cases (17/29, 59%) affected the lumbar spine. The most common symptoms were back pain (20/29, 69%), fever (18/29, 62%), hip pain (11/29, 38%), and leg pain (8/29, 28%). The majority of NABs and blood cultures performed were negative, but of the positive tests Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent bacteria. 86% (25/29) had an MRI before a diagnosis was made and 72% (13/18) had an NAB performed post-diagnosis. MRI is a popular and helpful tool in diagnosing spinal osteomyelitis de novo. NAB cultures are often negative but can be useful in determining antibiotic treatment. Level IV.

Research has demonstrated similar efficacy of drill epiphysiodesis and percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws for the management of adolescent leg length discrepancy. A cost analysis was performed to determine which procedure is more cost-effective. Patients seen for epiphysiodesis of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia and fibula between 2004 and 2017 were reviewed. A decision analysis model was used to compare costs. Two hundred thirty-five patients who underwent either drill (155/235, 66%) or screw (80/235, 34%) epiphysiodesis were analyzed with an average age at initial procedure of 13 years (range, 8.4 to 16.7 years). There was no significant difference in average initial procedure cost or total cost of all procedures across treatment groups (n = 184). The cost difference between drill and screw epiphysiodesis is minimal. In order for screw epiphysiodesis to be cost-favored, there would need to be a significant decrease in its cost or complication rate. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(3):181-184, 2021).

Background There is a paucity of literature about return to play (RTP) for golf protocols following cervical and lumbar fusions. The timing of return to this sport is a common question among patients. The aim of this review was to analyze and report the current protocols for RTP following cervical and lumbar spinal fusion. Methods A systematic search was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. A 3-step, multiauthor screening process was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed and published prospective, case-control, cohort, case series, or review articles. Studies had to pertain to RTP for golf following instrumented cervical or lumbar spinal fusion to be included. Results Three articles met inclusion criteria: 2 retrospective survey-based cohort studies and 1 survey-based case series study. All studies included a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Of patients, 71.6% (n = 51) were able to RTP following surgery; 54.3%–80% were able to RTP at a similar or improved level of play as preoperatively. Postoperative pain reduction was noted in 2 articles. Conclusions Most golfers are able to RTP within 12 months following cervical or lumbar spinal fusion. Patients generally reported decreased lower back pain and leg pain postoperatively. Following cervical or lumbar fusion, many golfers are able to RTP at the same or an increased frequency compared with preoperatively.

Design Retrospective comparative study. Objective The purpose of this study is to measure SSI outcomes before and after implementation of our center’s multidisciplinary clinical pathway protocol for high-risk spinal surgery. Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spinal fusion harm patients and are associated with significant health care costs. Given the high rate of SSI in neuromuscular populations, there is a rationale to develop infection prevention strategies. Methods An institutional clinical pathway was created in 2012 and based on nationally published Best Practice Guidelines as well as hospital practices with a goal of reducing the rate of deep SSI in high-risk patients. Patient and procedure characteristics were compared prior to (2008-2011) and after (2012-2016) implementation of the pathway. Logistic regression using penalized maximum likelihood was used to assess differences in rate of infection before and after implementation. Results Cohorts of 132 and 115 high-risk patients were analyzed before and after pathway implementation. Rate of deep infections decreased from 8% to 1% of patients (p = .005). Preoperative antibiotics were dosed within 1 hour in 90% of the postpathway cohort. Redosing was successful in 94% of patients for first redose and 79% for second redose. Betadine irrigation was used in 76% of cases and vancomycin administered in 86%. Multivariable analysis determined that instances of compliant antibiotics dosing had 63% lower odds of infection compared with instances of noncompliance (p = .04). Conclusions Implementation of a multidisciplinary pathway aimed to reduce infection in patients at high risk for SSI after spinal fusion led to a significant reduction in deep SSI rate. It is impossible to attribute the drop in the deep SSI rate to any one factor. Our results demonstrate that adherence to a protocol using multiple strategies to reduce infection results in a lower SSI rate, lower care costs, and improved patient-related outcomes. Level of Evidence Level III.

Introduction Recent efforts to standardize reporting of surgeon experience in novel technique publications have recommended reporting of Tang level of expertise (LOE). Question/Purpose The aim of this study was to document trends in LOE reporting for novel technique articles published in the Journal of Wrist Surgery and evaluate whether author experience affects novel research outcomes. Methods A total of 261 articles published from 2018 to 2020 were reviewed. Articles describing novel surgical techniques were included and examined for Tang LOE. Author variables were collected online. Results Eight percent (21/261) of articles discussed novel surgical techniques and one reported LOE. Nearly half (47.6%) of articles did not conduct statistical analysis. Four (19.0%) reported insignificant statistical results and 7 (33.3%) reported significant findings. All significant statistical findings were positive. Number of prior related publications by the senior author did not affect new technique result significance ( p = 0.34). Discussion From 2018 to 2020, only one article documented LOE. Authors' variables, including number of prior related publications, were not correlated with significant results in their new publications. This may suggest that an author's established experience in a novel technique, quantified by prior publications on the topic, does not make one more likely to achieve significantly better or worse outcomes in their reviewed Journal of Wrist Surgery study. Conclusions Tang LOE is an important way for readers to classify expertise and should be reported, and potentially modified to better define contributing variables.

Study design Case series. Objective In this study we focus on this group, and describe the largest cohort to date of single ventricle patients undergoing surgical correction of scoliosis at a single institution. Summary of background data Outcomes of spinal surgery for patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) have evolved and most affected patients have uncomplicated procedures. The risk of perioperative complications remains highest in patients with single ventricle ("Fontan") physiology. Methods We reviewed patients with single ventricle CHD and operative scoliosis repair over a 25-year span. Patients who had undergone a Fontan, bidirectional Glenn, and/or Kawashima procedure before operative scoliosis repair were included. Patients were excluded if they lacked preoperative cardiac care and/or sufficient medical history at our institution. Results Twenty-three patients were included. The average age at surgery was 13.6 years (range, 5-23). Seventy percent of the cohort was female (16/23). The majority of patients underwent a Fontan before scoliosis surgery (20/23, 87%). Patients without intraoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) had a 67% complication rate (8/12) versus 36% (4/11) in those with intraoperative TXA (P = 0.29). There was a significant difference in estimated blood loss by weight (cc/kg) between non-TXA and TXA patients (P = 0.016). Twelve patients experienced complications (52%), all of which occurred postoperatively. There were no deaths, cerebrovascular events, adverse perioperative cardiac or hemodynamic complications, or wound infections. Using the Clavien-Dindo-Sink classification for postoperative complications, four patients had serious adverse events, including one permanent neurologic deficit. Conclusion Spinal surgery for scoliosis has been performed in selected patients with single ventricle physiology at a single institution without mortality for 25 years. Operative blood loss may be reduced by routine use of TXA. Complications occur most commonly in the postoperative period, and can include pleural effusion.Level of Evidence: 4.

Background The risk of surgical site infection in pediatric posterior spine fusion (PSF) is up to 4.3% in idiopathic populations and 24% in patients with neuromuscular disease. Twenty-three percent of pediatric PSF tissue cultures are positive before closure, with a higher rate in neuromuscular patients. Our primary aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a complete randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of surgical site irrigation with povidone-iodine (PVP-I) compared with sterile saline (SS) to reduce the bacterial contamination rate before closure in children undergoing PSF. Methods One hundred seventy-five subjects undergoing PSF were enrolled in a multicenter, single-blind, pilot randomized controlled trial. We recruited patients at low-risk (LR) and high-risk (HR) for infection 3:1, respectively. Before closure, a wound culture was collected. Nonviable tissues were debrided and the wound was soaked with 0.35% PVP-I or SS for 3 minutes. The wound was then irrigated with 2 L of saline and a second sample was collected. Results One hundred fifty-three subjects completed the protocol. Seventy-seven subjects were allocated to PVP-I (18 HR, 59 LR) and 76 to SS (19 HR, 57 LR). Cultures were positive in 18% (14/77) of PVP-I samples (2 HR, 12 LR) and in 17% (13/76) of SS samples (3 HR, 10 LR) preirrigation and in 16% (12/77) of PVP-I samples (5 HR, 7 LR) and in 18% (14/76) of SS samples (4 HR, 10 LR) postirrigation. Eight percent (3/37) HR subjects (1 PVP-I, 2 SS) experienced infection at 30 days postoperative. No LR subjects experienced infection. Conclusions Positive cultures were similar across treatment and risk groups. The bacterial contamination of wounds before closure remains high regardless of irrigation type. A complete randomized controlled trial would be challenging to adequately power given the similarity of tissue positivity across groups. Level of evidence Level II-pilot randomized controlled trial.

A 2012 publication regarding the surgical management of pediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures (PLHCF) found that leaving pins exposed produced an average savings of $3442 per patient compared to burying pins, with fewer complications. The primary objective of this present study was to determine the impact of this cost analysis on surgeons' treatment preferences at the same hospital. The secondary aim was to verify that leaving pins exposed continued to be a cost-effective and safe treatment strategy. We reviewed all PLHCF treated with open reduction and internal fixation at our institution between 2004 and 2017. The Clavien-Dindo Classification was used to grade complications. Variations in treatment course were evaluated using a chi-squared test to compare the proportions of buried and exposed pins, pre- and postcost analysis report publication. Two hundred forty-eight patients were included. The mean age was 5.9 years (range 1-12 years). In 174 (70%) cases, the pins were buried and in the remaining 30% the pins were exposed. Between 2004 and 2012, the majority of pins were buried (90%) compared to between 2013 and 2017, when the majority of pins were exposed (62%) (P < 0.001). There was no difference detected in complication rate (P = 0.75) or complication severity (P = 0.61) across groups. The demonstrated cost-effectiveness of exposing the pins in the treatment of PLHCF has had a statistically significant impact on surgeon behavior at our institution. Publishing cost analysis research can change physician practice to improve quality, safety and value of care delivery.

Background Occipital plate fixation has been shown to improve outcomes in cervical spine fusion. There is a paucity of literature describing occipital plate fixation, especially in the pediatric population. The authors reviewed a case series of 34 patients at a pediatric hospital who underwent cervical spine fusion with occipital plate fixation between 2003 and 2016. This study describes how occipital plates aid the cervical spine union in a case series of diverse, complex pediatric patients. Methods Our orthopaedic database at our institution was queried for patients undergoing an instrumented cervical spine procedure between 2003 and 2016. Medical records were used to collect diagnoses, fusion levels, surgical technique, and length of hospitalization, neurophysiological monitoring, complications, and revision procedures. Results Thirty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 10.9 years (range, 3-21 y). Indications for surgery included cervical instability, basilar invagination, and os odontoideum. These indications were often secondary to a variety of diagnoses, including trisomy 21, Klippel-Feil syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis. The mean length of hospitalization was 10 days (range, 2 to 80 d). There were no cases of intraoperative dural leak, venous sinus bleeding from occipital screw placement, or implant-related complications. Postoperative complications included 2 cases of nonunion. Eight patients (24%) had follow-up surgery, only 3 (9%) of which were instrumentation revisions. Both patients with nonunion had repeat occipitocervical fixation procedures and achieved union with revision. Conclusions Occipital plate fixation was successful for pediatric cervical spine fusion in this diverse cohort. The only procedure-related complication demonstrated was delayed union or nonunion and implant loosening (4/34, 12%) and there were no plate-related complications. This novel case series shows that occipital plate fixation is safe and effective for pediatric patients with complex diagnoses. Level of evidence Level IV-case series.

OBJECTIVEPatients with trisomy 21 (Down syndrome; DS) often have atlantoaxial instability (AAI), which, if severe, causes myelopathy and neurological deterioration. Children with DS and AAI who undergo cervical spine fusion have a high rate of nonunion requiring revision surgery. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein–2 (rhBMP-2) is a TGF-β growth factor that is used to induce bone formation in spine fusion. Although previous studies in the adult population have reported no reduction in pseudarthrosis rates with the use of rhBMP-2, there is a lack of literature in the pediatric DS population. This study describes the use of rhBMP-2 in children with DS and AAI during revision to treat nonunion.METHODSA retrospective review of a cervical spine fusion database (n = 175) was conducted. This database included all cervical spine fusions using modern instrumentation at the authors’ institution from 2002 to 2019. Patients with DS who underwent a revision utilizing rhBMP-2 were included in the study. The number of prior fusions, use of rhBMP-2 in fusions, length of stay, halo use, and surgical data were collected. Postoperative complications and length of follow-up were also recorded.RESULTSEight patients (75% female) met the inclusion criteria. The average age at revision with rhBMP-2 was 11 years (range 3–19 years). All patients were diagnosed with nonunion after an initial cervical fusion. All revisions were posterior fusions of C1–2 (n = 2) or occiput to cervical (n = 6). All revisions included implant revisions, iliac crest bone grafting, and rhBMP-2 use. One patient required irrigation and debridement of an rhBMP-induced seroma. Another patient required return to the operating room to repair a dural tear. There were no neurological, infectious, airway, or implant-related complications. Revision utilizing rhBMP-2 achieved fusion in 100% (n = 8) of patients. The average length of follow-up was 42.6 months. All patients demonstrated solid fusion mass on the last radiograph.CONCLUSIONSThis is the first case series reporting the successful use of rhBMP-2 to facilitate cervical spine fusion in patients with DS after previous nonunion. In addition, few rhBMP-2–related postoperative complications occurred.

Background Valid patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for the shoulder and elbow do not exist for children. We assessed children's comprehension of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) standardized shoulder assessment form, identified response errors, and modified items to create a new pediatric shoulder and elbow PRO. Methods We recruited 50 children (aged 10-18 years) with shoulder or elbow disorders from a children's hospital–based orthopedic clinic for this qualitative study. A trained researcher conducted cognitive interviews to identify children's comprehension of PROs. In phase 1, 40 children were purposefully sampled on the basis of age and gender, interviewed, and audiotaped. A behavioral scientist analyzed transcripts, modified items, and created the Pediatric and Adolescent Shoulder and Elbow Survey (Pedi-ASES). In phase 2, 10 children were interviewed to gather feedback on and to refine the Pedi-ASES. Results The average interview time was 25 minutes (range, 17-44 minutes). There were 242 comments generated about the QuickDASH; 51% of children struggled with complex terminology, and 35% did not understand “tingling.” Children generated 309 comments about the ASES, primarily associated with narcotic medications (65%) and shoulder instability (42%). Time frame and format issues were noted. In phase 2, children found the new PRO easier to comprehend and answer. Conclusions Modifications were needed in general instruction, language, format, and response mapping in the original PROs. Children had few difficulties with the Pedi-ASES. Designing PROs that are specific to children will enable researchers and clinicians to more accurately assess health status and clinical outcomes.

Objectives: To assess the comprehensibility of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, the Shoulder and Hand Score (Quick DASH) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) in children, identify sources of response errors, and modify items, in order to develop an original, age-appropriate, validated pediatric shoulder and elbow patient-reported outcome (PRO) survey. Methods: 49 children with shoulder and/or elbow disorders were recruited from a children’s hospital-based orthopedic outpatient clinic. A researcher, who was trained by a behavioral scientist in cognitive interviewing techniques, used a standardized protocol and conducted cognitive interviews to identify children’s comprehension of the QuickDASH and ASES surveys. In Phase One of the study, 39 children (46% female, mean age=15 years; range 10-18) were purposefully sampled based on age and gender, interviewed, and audiotaped. The questionnaires were given in varying sequential order. Interview probes focused on directions, formatting, item content and matching of responses and items. A behavioral scientist analyzed transcripts, modified items accordingly, and created an original pediatric shoulder and elbow PRO. In Phase Two, 10 children (40% female, mean age=15 years) were interviewed to gather feedback specifically on the original pediatric PRO. Results: The average interview time was 26 minutes (range=16 - 44 minutes). 255 comments were generated about the Quick DASH, identifying 60 issues related to item comprehension and 191 issues related to item response format. 51% of children struggled with complex terminology used to describe activities and 41% did not understand symptom-related items such as “tingling”. 294 comments were generated about the ASES, primarily associated with medications (76%) and shoulder instability (47%). Timeframe and format issues were also noted. The resulting original PRO was easy to comprehend, although 40% of children could not interpret a “loose shoulder or elbow”. Conclusion: Item comprehension issues were noted in approximately half of the children completing the Quick DASH and ASES. Specific areas of difficulty included items addressing medication use, activity level and symptoms such as shoulder instability and tingling. Modifications were also needed in general instruction, language, survey and item format, layout, and item response mapping. Based on the results of the cognitive interviews, children had minimal difficulty comprehending items and directions of the newly developed pediatric shoulder and elbow PRO. A subsequent study will assess this original PRO’s psychometric properties in an effort to continue its development and provide more comprehensive, methodologically rigorous validation of its use in this population.